War criminal Canadian Defence Minister Peter MacKay leaves the Canadian HQ in Kandahar with sacked Brig.-Gen. Daniel Ménard

Canada’s top soldier in Afghanistan, Brigadier-General Daniel Ménard, has been dismissed from command following allegations he had an intimate relationship with a member of his staff, violating the military’s rules on personal relationships in the field. This had “caused Commander CEFCOM (Canadian Expeditionary Forces Command) to lose confidence in Brig.-Gen Menard’s capacity to command,”

Canadian soldiers in Afghanistan and civilian employees, including journalists embedded alongside them, must follow very strict rules governing behaviour with each other. No intimate personal relationships are allowed in theatre, including those involving married couples deployed at the same time.

“Sexual activity or any other form of intimate contact in any context with another individual is prohibited anywhere in the Joint Task Force Afghanistan Area of Operations,” according to theatre standing orders governing personal relationships.

Lieutenant-General Marc Lessard, commander of Canadian forces overseas, made the announcement Saturday, a few days after Brig.-Gen. Ménard returned to Kandahar from a three-week leave.

Brigadier-General Daniel Ménard was involved in another incident on March 25, 2010 whereby his assault rifle unexpectedly went off at Kandahar Airfield.

The commander of Canadian troops in Afghanistan was being investigated after his assault rifle unexpectedly went off at Kandahar Airfield. Ménard said he was loading his C8 carbine at Kandahar Airfield on March 25, something he said he has done thousands of times, when it went off. No one was injured and nothing was damaged, but the National Defence Act makes it an offence to accidentally discharge a weapon. The general routinely travels outside of the wire, visiting troops at forward bases. If it’s found to be an accidental discharge, Menard would face an automatic court martial.

Brig.-Gen. Menard has in the past strongly objected to the US policy of taking an area and then leaving. He has said that he will not take an area without holding it. Canada’s top general in Afghanistan predicted that the Taliban will be marginalized from most of Kandahar’s population by the time the Canadian military mission ends in 2011.

Brig.-Gen. Daniel Menard said that with more than 5,000 Canadian and U.S. soldiers under his command, coalition forces will be able to hold areas in the violent province far more effectively than in recent years.

“What I can do is marginalize the insurgency in our area and they can become irrelevant to 85% of the population of Kandahar province,” Brig.-Gen. Menard said when asked what he could achieve before Canadian troops are scheduled to leave Afghanistan in the summer of 2011.

“This is what I think I can certainly achieve.”

In some parts of Kandahar, Canadian soldiers have secured terrain only to see the areas slip back under Taliban influence. Brig.-Gen. Menard had vowed to reverse this trend now that the number of forces in the region has grown.

Beyond the rhetoric and rules on personal relationships smoke screen

The personal relationship reason for sacking Brig.-Gen. Daniel Menard seems to be the standard, over used protocol applied to anyone the US or Canadian government wants to get rid of - for political reasons. Governments use it every time they don’t want the public to know what really happened or what’s really going on. This time around it may have been used to prevent any investigation of the March 25, 2010 incident at the Kandahar Airfield. Was it an accidental discharge? Could it be another reason? I think it would be prudent for us to look deeper. Look at what has been happening recently in Afghanistan. Look at what is suppose to happen in 2011 - the withdrawal of Canadian troops in Afghanistan. Is this the first step the US government is taking to make the Canadian government change their minds and stay beyond 2011 in Afghanistan? Is Brigadier-General Daniel Ménard to be replaced by someone that will support the US war of aggression in Afghanistan and make false claims to the Canadian public about the illegal war in Afghanistan? I would look very closely at the ongoing investigation concerning the torturing of detainees at the Kandahar Airfield. By sacking Brigadier-General Daniel Ménard during an ongoing investigation the Canadian government will be obstructing justice once again by removing from command and from judicial and parliamentary oversight the one person who knows exactly happens, or has happened to Afghan detainees.

Once Canadian troops detain an Afghan suspect, largely on suspicion they are involved in insurgent activity, they look at any supporting evidence. If that isn’t sufficient, they have no choice but to quickly release him or her, Brig.-Gen. Menard claimed.

“The sole authority for this, the only authority, is me. Nobody in Canada can direct me to release anybody. Nobody. The task force commander is the authority for releasing, transferring or to keep them.”

If kept, a detainee is then subject to Canadian and NATO policy. If they are still held and not transferred after 96 hours, Brig.-Gen. Menard must contact his military superiors in Canada. If the person must be held longer, perhaps for medical reasons, the general must explain why. After that, every 24 hours, he must again justify why he is still holding a specific detainee instead of transferring him or her to Afghan authorities.

“We don’t keep people just because. It’s not a prison,” Brig.-Gen. Menard said.

Once detainees are transferred to Afghan officials, they go through the legal system. Though the evidence is supplied by Canadians, the legal system is Afghan.

“After the transfer has taken place, we have a very robust monitoring system,” said Jess Dutton, civilian director of Canada’s Provincial Reconstruction Team in Kandahar City. “A Department of Foreign Affairs officer will interview detainees.”

What is a civilian doing in a war zone interviewing detainees? Let me explain by using the now infamous example of the Stephen Harper Conservative government involvement in committing war crimes - specifically the torturing of prisoners of war (POW). Officials from Canada’s Department of Foreign Affairs and International Trade (DFAIT) were sent by the Canadian government to interrogate Omar Khadr at Guantanamo Bay and they gave their interrogation records to Khadr’s U.S. captors, after being told that U.S. officials had tortured Khadr (by severe sleep deprivation) for three weeks to “make him more amenable and willing to talk” to the Canadians and that he would be placed in isolation after the interrogation. The Supreme Court of Canada confirmed that the government of Canada violated Omar Khadr’s Charter rights, that those violations continue and that those violations contribute to his ongoing detention. But the Supreme Court of Canada went on to rule it appropriate to leave “it to the government to decide how best to respond…”. The Supreme Court of Canada set aside the 23 April 2009 order of the Federal Court of Canada–confirmed by the Federal Court of Appeal on 14 August 2009 - compelling the Prime Minister, the Minister of Foreign Affairs, the Commissioner of the RCMP and the Director of CSIS to “…request that the United States return Mr. Khadr to Canada as soon as practicable.”

Another Canadian cover-up to appease the US

Saturday, January 19, 2008 - An internal training manual developed by the Canadian foreign affairs department lists the United States as a country where foreigners risk torture and abuse, alongside countries such as Afghanistan, China, Iran, Israel, Mexico, Saudi Arabia, and Syria. Both Israel and the United States are officially allies of Canada.

The manual is a 93-page PowerPoint presentation by the Foreign Affairs Department for Canadian diplomats and was accidentally given to lawyers for the human rights group, Amnesty International.

The leak was protested by the United States ambassador. “We find it to be offensive for us to be on the same list with countries like Iran and China. Quite frankly it’s absurd,” U.S. Ambassador David Wilkins to Canada said. “For us to be on a list like that is just ridiculous.”

Canadian officials disclaimed its significance. “The document is a training manual. It is not a policy document or a statement of policy. As such it does not convey the government’s views or positions,” said Marina Wilson, spokeswoman for the Department of Foreign Affairs in Ottawa.

Canadian Foreign Affairs Minister Maxime Bernier said the manual “contains a list that wrongly includes some of our closest allies”, and that he “regret[s] the embarrassment caused by the public disclosure of the manual used in the department’s torture awareness training”.

Canadian Conservative Government’s Torture Cover-Up

A former Canadian Armed Forces’ interpreter has charged that Canada’s military handed over Afghan detainees whom it deemed uncooperative to the Afghan secret police so that information could be beaten out of them through torture.

Testifying before a House of Commons committee in April 2010, Ahmadshah Malgarai said he “saw Canadian military intelligence sending detainees to the NDS (Afghanistan’s National Directorate of Security) when the detainees did not tell them what they expected to hear.”

“If the [Canadian] interrogator thought a detainee was lying, the military sent him to NDS for more questions, Afghan style. Translation: abuse and torture.”

Canada’s military, declared Malgarai, “used the NDS as subcontractors for abuse and torture.”

Malgarai served as a Canadian Armed Forces (CAF) interpreter from June 2007 through June 2008. He worked for its counter-intelligence unit and for Brigadier General Guy Laroche, the then overall commander of the Canadian military in Afghanistan. In this position, Malgarai witnessed CAF interrogations and interaction between CAF and Canadian Department of Foreign Affairs officials and NDS officers.

There is already a mountain of evidence to show that the Canadian Conservative government and CAF ignored and suppressed warnings that prisoners transferred to Afghan security forces would be abused and tortured, making both guilty of war crimes. (Under the Geneva Conventions, it is illegal to transfer prisoners if there to is reason to suspect those to whom they are being transferred will abuse and torture them.)

Malgarai is the first participant in the Canadian military intervention in Afghanistan to charge the Canadian Conservative Government and the Canadian Armed Forces with subcontracting torture—with transferring prisoners to the NDS with the express aim of having Afghan security forces subject them to torture and abuse.

The former Canadian Armed Forces translator testified that he personally translated more than 40 documents into Pashto authorizing the transfer of Afghan detainees from the Canadian Armed Forces to the NDS. He told the Commons committee that when he asked his Canadian Armed Forces bosses, “Should I translate this as transfer for questioning or transfer for torture? They would just laugh. They were subcontracting torture.”

Malgarai insisted that “all along the chain of command” everyone “involved in any way, or at any level, with the detainee transfer” knew “what was going on and what the NDS does to the detainees.”

The day after Malgarai made his charge that the Canadian Armed Forces subcontracted torture, Paul Dewar, the foreign affairs critic for the New Democratic Party (NDP), announced that he had evidence suggesting the Canadian Armed Forces did transfer prisoners to the NDS because it judged Afghan’s secret police better able to wring information from suspects.

Dewar said he had a copy of a confidential Canadian Armed Forces report, likely from late October 2007, that recommended a batch of prisoners be transferred to the NDS because all “were deceptive and have a better knowledge on TB (Taliban) activity” than they had admitted.

Dewar declined to provide a copy of the document to the press for fear of running afoul of Canada’s national security laws.

In its campaign to disrupt and derail any investigation of the Canadian Armed Forces’ treatment of Afghan detainees, the Stephen Harper’s Conservative government has repeatedly claimed national security is at risk. This has served both to justify its refusal to provide parliament and a Military Police Complaints Commission (MPCC) inquiry uncensored documents concerning the Afghan detainee issue and to intimidate, with the threat of criminal prosecution, those who might come forward to challenge the “official story.”

Defence Minister Peter MacKay responded to Malgarai’s testimony with the now customary torrent of abuse that the Stephen Harper’s Conservative government heaps on critics of the Canadian intervention in Afghanistan, even if they are, as in the case of the opposition parties, supporters of Canada’s leading role in the Afghan war. “Our troops,” declared MacKay, “certainly deserve better than drive-by smears and unsubstantiated allegations.”

Malgarai, in his opening statement to the Commons committee, also accused the Canadian Armed Forces of having shot an unarmed 17 year-old in the head during an operation in a village north of Kandahar in June or July 2007.

Later under questioning Malgarai explained that he had not witnessed the event, but had translated the interrogations of persons detained during the same operation, read a Canadian Armed Forces intelligence report about it, and overheard the author of the report say to the head of the Canadian Armed Forces counter-intelligence unit “this is murder and we’re trying to cover it up.”

Spokesman for the Stephen Harper’s Conservative government quickly seized on the fact that Malgarai had not witnessed the shooting to claim his charge was mere hearsay.

But Malgarai’s testimony on the operation was not limited to the accusation that the Canadian Armed Forces had murdered a teenage youth. He told the Commons committee, “After the Canadian Forces wrongly killed a man, they panicked. They swept through the neighborhood, arresting people for no reason.” Those arrested, he said, included a 10 year-old boy and a crippled man of ninety.

None of the detained, said Malgarai, were Taliban, but all were nevertheless transferred to the NDS: “None did anything wrong except to be at home when the Canadian Forces murdered their neighbour. Yet Canada transferred all these innocent men to the NDS.”

Stephen Harper’s Conservative government has gone to extreme lengths to prevent parliament and the MPCC from examining the Afghan detainee issue. This has included defaming and threatening to prosecute “whistleblowers” for imperiling national security, defying a parliamentary motion that it hand all over relevant documents, and shutting down parliament for two months at the end of last year. At the same time, the Stephen Harper’s Conservatives have aggressively courted the support of military and extreme right by portraying the opposition parties as disloyal, if not quasi-treasonous, for questioning the Canadian Armed Forces’ conduct in war time.

Torture is specifically forbidden in war time Mr Harper. Article 12 of the First Geneva Convention, mandates that wounded and sick soldiers who are out of the battle should be humanely treated, and in particular should not be killed, injured, tortured, or subjected to biological experimentation. This article is the keystone of the treaty, and defines the principles from which most of the rest the treaty is derived.

Article 15 mandates that wounded and sick soldiers should be collected, cared for, and protected, though they may also become prisoners of war.

Article 3 of Third Geneva Convention has been called a “Convention in miniature.” It is the only article of the Geneva Conventions that applies in non-international conflicts. It describes minimal protections which must be adhered to by all individuals within a signatory’s territory during an armed conflict not of an international character (regardless of citizenship or lack thereof): Noncombatants, combatants who have laid down their arms, and combatants who are hors de combat (out of the fight) due to wounds, detention, or any other cause shall in all circumstances be treated humanely, including prohibition of outrages upon personal dignity, in particular humiliating and degrading treatment. The passing of sentences must also be pronounced by a regularly constituted court, affording all the judicial guarantees which are recognized as indispensable by civilized peoples. Article 3’s protections exist even if one is not classified as a prisoner of war. Article 3 also states that parties to the internal conflict should endeavour to bring into force, by means of special agreements, all or part of the other provisions of GCIII.

By providing damning new evidence of the Stephen Harper’s government’s and state’s complicity in torture, Malgarai’s testimony sheds further light on the motivations behind the government’s lying, stonewalling and ever-widening attack on parliamentary norms and democratic rights.

Is the BP Gulf of Mexico oil spill the greatest environmental disaster ever? No! A much larger oil spill can be found in Alberta Canada. The BP Gulf of Mexico oil spill was accidental. The oil spill in Alberta Canada is not accidental, it is deliberately man made. The BP oil spill can be cleaned up. The Alberta Canada oil spill will never be cleaned up. The BP oil spill is temporary. The Alberta Canada oil spill has been ongoing since 1967 and will continue for an estimated 170 years. The entire World media has been covering the BP oil spill, and showing the World the impact the spill is having on the environment. No one is covering the greatest environmental threat to Canada and the World - the Alberta’s oil sands.

On April 20, 2010, a semi-submersible exploratory offshore drilling rig in the Gulf of Mexico exploded after a blowout and sank two days later, killing eleven people and causing a massive oil spill threatening the coast of Louisiana, Mississippi, Alabama, Texas, and Florida. The rig is owned and operated by Transocean Ltd on behalf of BP, which is the majority owner of the oil field. The company originally estimated the size of the leak at about 1,000 barrels a day but later accepted government estimates of a leak of at least 5,000 barrels per day. Huge no matter which figure you choose to believe but the BP Gulf of Mexico oil spill is nothing compared to the catastrophic environmental disaster that occurs daily in Alberta Canada. BP is also apart of this catastrophic environmental disaster. BP is one of numerous firms who are extracting oil from Canadian oil sands, a process that produces four times as much CO2 as conventional drilling. The Cree aboriginal group describe BP as being complicit in ‘the biggest environmental crime on the planet’.

The Alberta Tar Sands (Saudi Arabia of the North) as it is proudly referred to in the oil industry, has proven to be a financial boom to the Canadian economy. It has also proven to be an environmental nightmare. Most of the oil that is being pumped out - or actually mined out to be fried; sprayed clean and then dried; pressed and squeezed so the dirt can ultimately be liquifying - has come at an extremely high cost to the environment.

Massive dead lakes are being intentionally created to store all the oily water residue from the oil extraction process and natives are worried that it’s only a matter of time before that toxic sludge finds its way into the local drinking water.

The Oil Sands in 2007 produced 40 million tons of ‘greenhouse gas emissions’ which equals to about 10 million cars on the Canadian roads. This could grow to 142 million by 2020 if left unchecked. It is also estimated that within a couple of years, 50% of Canada’s greenhouse gas emissions will be attributable to the Athabascan Oil Sands. The province of Alberta, with 10% of Canada’s population is now responsible for 50% of Canada’s pollution!

The environmental disaster that is playing out in the Alberta’s Oil Sands, - all in the name of Canadian Prosperity and US insatiable demand for oil, has made Canada one of the worlds worst contributors of ‘carbon gas emissions’.

Demand for the sticky, dirty-to-extract crude of the tar sands (called bitumen) has soared. The sector has exploded. The pressure to develop keeps mounting, with no political will to curb it, despite the serious climate and financial risks involved.

The US demand has triggered the need/greed for more capacity out of the tar sands. It’s a massive infrastructure change, the advent of a whole new fossil fuel supply chain, or a “pollution delivery system”. The building of a continent-wide network of pipelines, some thousands of miles long, to transport the crude, as well as refinery expansions on the US side of the Great Lakes to process the raw goo into gas. Pipeline and refinery expansion applications are being made and approved right now with little general awareness of the potential long-term damage to the environment.

Alberta Oil Sands - the most destructive project on Earth.

-Oil sands mining is licensed to use twice the amount of fresh water that the entire city of Calgary uses in a year.
-At least 90% of the fresh water used in the oil sands ends up in ends up in tailing ponds so toxic that propane cannons are used to keep ducks from landing.
-Processing the oil sands uses enough natural gas in a day to heat 3 million homes.
-The toxic tailing ponds are considered one of the largest human-made structures in the world. -The ponds span 50 square kilometers and can be seen from space.
-Producing a barrel of oil from the oil sands produces three times more greenhouse gas emissions than a barrel of conventional oil.

Current Canadian Minority Prime Minister Stephen Harper is looking like ‘the fool on the hill’ on the global stage with many nations using hard words like ’saboteur’ to explain Harper’s actions when it comes to the global climate change debate, but in reality, he’s only protecting his own interests. He won’t be prime minister forever and when he does return to the fine province of Alberta he’ll be able to rightly share in that province’s modern day ‘black gold rush!’ Stephen Harper refuses to show leadership and put hard caps on Canada’s global warming emissions — all so the tar sands can keep growing. No matter how much Canadians clamor to join the global fight against climate change, we are being held hostage by the tar sands.

The tar sands have quickly grown to become the most destructive project on Earth. Their greenhouse gas emissions are the main reason Canada’s emissions keep rising, the main reason we cannot live up to international agreements, the main reason we are becoming an international pariah on the most important issue facing humanity.

Is it really worth it to literally destroy the environment? The World’s fresh water supply is fast disappearing, not the result of human consumption but from wasteful oil extraction from Alberta’s oil sands. The water is being contaminated by the oil extraction process. Millions of liters of fresh water per day are used by the oil extraction refineries. That water will never be fit for human or animal consumption ever again. It is a loss of the most essential element on Earth. Fresh water is essential for the survival of humanity and every living thing on Earth. Water is a ubiquitous chemical substance that is composed of hydrogen and oxygen and is vital for all known forms of life. It is essential for growing the food we need to survive. Approximately 70% of freshwater is consumed by agriculture.

Oil is not essential. It isn’t essential for the survival of all humanity. Oil only puts money in the pockets of a very select few. The amount of money they receive for destroying the environment and humanity can never be fully spent and it can’t be taken with them when they die. Perhaps the only way these greedy politicians and business people will see what they are destroying is to force them to live the rest of their lives on the banks of the oil sludge lakes they created. Force them to live off of the land they destroyed and drink from the waste water they created. Only then would they realize that even their own existence is being destroyed by their greed.

It works 100% of the time to eradicate cancer completely, and cancer does not recur even years later. That is how researchers describe the most convincing cancer cure ever announced.

The weekly injection of just 100 billionths of a gram of a harmless glyco-protein (a naturally-produced molecule with a sugar component and a protein component) activates the human immune system and cures cancer for good, according to human studies among breast cancer and colon cancer patients, producing complete remissions lasting 4 and 7 years respectively. This glyco-protein cure is totally without side effect but currently goes unused by cancer doctors.

Normal Gc protein (also called Vitamin-D binding protein) , an abundant glyco-protein found in human blood serum, becomes the molecular switch to activate macrophages when it is converted to its active form, called Gc macrophage activating factor (Gc-MAF). Gc protein is normally activated by conversion to Gc-MAF with the help of the B and T cells (bone marrow-made and thymus gland-made white blood cells). But, as researchers explain it themselves, cancer cells secrete an enzyme known as alpha-N-acetylgalactosaminidase (also called Nagalase) that completely blocks conversion of Gc protein to Gc-MAF, preventing tumor-cell killing by the macrophages. This is the way cancer cells escape detection and destruction, by disengaging the human immune system. This also leaves cancer patients prone to infections and many then succumb to pneumonia or other infections.

The once-weekly injection of minute amounts of Gc-MAF, just 100 nanograms (billionths of a gram), activates macrophages and allows the immune system to pursue cancer cells with vigor, sufficient to produce total long-term cures in humans.

Nobuto Yamamoto, director of the Division of Cancer Immunology and Molecular Biology, Socrates Institute for Therapeutic Immunology, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, says this is “probably the most potent macrophage activating factor ever discovered.”

Once a sufficient number of activated macrophages are produced, another Gc-MAF injection is not needed for a week because macrophages have a half-life of about six days. After 16-22 weekly doses of Gc-MAF the amount of Nagalase enzyme fell to levels found in healthy people, which serves as evidence tumors have been completely eliminated. The treatment was fool-proof - - - it worked in 100% of 16 breast cancer patients and there were no recurrent tumors over a period of 4 years, says a report in the January 15 issue of the International Journal of Cancer. [International Journal Cancer.2008 January15; 122(2):461-7]

In another startling follow-up report by Dr. Yamamoto and colleagues, published in July 2008 issue of Cancer Immunology Immunotherapy, Gc-MAF therapy totally abolished tumors in 8 colon cancer patients who had already undergone surgery but still exhibited circulating cancer cells (metastases). After 32-50 weekly injections, ”all colorectal cancer patients exhibited healthy control levels of the serum Nagalase activity, indicating eradication of metastatic tumor cells,”said researchers, an effect that lasted 7 years with no indication of cancer recurrence either by enzyme activity or CT scans, said researchers. [Cancer Immunology, Immunotherapy Volume 57, Number 7 / July 2008] Published in an early online edition of this journal, this confirming report has received no attention by the new media so far, despite its striking importance.

Gc-MAF treatment for cancer has been agonizingly slow to develop. Dr. Yamamoto first described this immuno-therapy in 1993. [The Journal of Immunology, 1993 151 (5); 2794-2802]

In a similar animal experiment published in 2003, researchers in Germany, Japan and the United States collaborated to successfully demonstrate that after they had injected macrophage activating factor (Gc-MAF) into tumor-bearing mice, it totally eradicated tumors. [Neoplasia 2003 January; 5(1): 32–40]

In 1997 Dr. Yamamoto injected GcMAF protein into tumor-bearing mice, with the same startling results. A single enzyme injection doubled the survival of these mice and just four enzyme injections increased survival by 6-fold. [Cancer Research 1997 Jun 1; 57(11):2187-92]

In 1996 Dr. Yamamoto reported that all 52 cancer patients he had studied carried elevated blood plasma levels of the immune inactivating alpha-N-acetylgalactosaminidase enzyme (Nagalase), whereas healthy humans had very low levels of this enzyme. [Cancer Research 1996 Jun 15; 56(12):2827-31]

In the early 1990s, Dr. Yamamoto first described how the human immune system is disengaged by enzymes secreted from cancer cells, even filing a patent on the proposed therapy. [US Patent 5326749, July 1994; Cancer Research 1996 June 15; 56: 2827-31]

Activated Gc protein has been used in humans at much higher doses without side effect. This Gc macrophage activating factor (Gc-MAF) has been shown to be effective against a variety of cancers including breast, prostate, stomach, liver, lung, uterus, ovary, brain, skin, head/neck cancer, and leukemia.

Although GcMAF is also called Vitamin-D binding protein, the activation of macrophages does not require Vitamin D.

It cannot be said the Gc-MAF cancer cure has gone unheralded. Reuters News covered this developing story in January 2008. But the news story still did not receive top billing nor did it fully elucidate the importance of the discovery, actually made years ago, that the human body is capable of abolishing cancer once its immune system is properly activated.

GcMAF is a naturally made molecule and is not patentable, though its manufacturing process is patent protected. There is no evidence of any current effort to commercialize this therapy or put it into practice. Should such an effective treatment for cancer come into common practice, the income stream from health-insurance plans for every oncology office and cancer center in the world Would likely be reduced to the point of financial insolvency and hundreds of thousands of jobs would be eliminated.

The National Cancer Institute estimates cancer care in the U.S. costs ~$72 billion annually (2004). Furthermore, about $55 billion of cancer drugs are used annually, none which have not significantly improved survival rates throughout the history of their use. If a typical cancer patient had to undergo 30 GcMAF injections at a cost of $150 per injection, that would cost ~$4500, not counting doctor’s office visits and follow-up testing. For comparison, gene-targeted cancer drugs range from $13,000 to $100,000 in cost per year and produce only marginal improvements in survival (weeks to months). [Targeted Oncology 2007 April, 2 (2); 113-19]

Up to this point, the National Cancer Institute is totally silent on this discovery and there is no evidence the cancer care industry plans to quickly mobilize to use this otherwise harmless treatment.

Sadly, the treatment you have just read about is not available anywhere. Its inventor is attempting to patent a version of it to profiteer off of it even though there is no need to improve upon the GcMAF molecule - - it worked without failure to completely cure four different types of cancer with no long-term remissions and without side effect. While GcMAF is produced by every healthy adult, there are no centers available to extract it from blood samples and inject it into patients with malignancies. Hopefully, someday, doctors will write protocols to do this and submit them to institutional review boards so GcMAF treatment can be performed on an experimental basis. GcMAF is a naturally-made molecule that cannot be patented. This article was written to reveal that there are proven cancer cures that go unused.

“Our enemies are innovative and resourceful, and so are we. They never stop thinking about new ways to harm our country and our people, and neither do we.” —George W Bush Washington, D.C., Aug. 5, 2004

Al Qaeda didn’t take away the US people’s rights and freedoms the US government did that. Al Qaeda didn’t bankrupt the US the US government did with their $trillion embezzlement of US Tax dollars. Al Qaeda didn’t create a housing bubble and then started taking away your homes through orchestrated foreclosures. Al Qaeda didn’t cause millions of Americans to lose their jobs the US government did. Al Qaeda is not a terrorist organization your government is. A clear and present danger exists in the US today and the government is the only real terrorist threat to the rights, freedoms and prosperity of the US people.

The Iraqi people, the Afghan people, bin Laden, the Taliban, Al Qaeda and Muslim extremists are not your enemy. The US government is your enemy. The US government took away your rights and freedoms. No terrorist organization robbed the American people of their inalienable rights and freedoms the US government did with the passing of their unpatriotic Patriot Act. The Bush and Obama governments’ Patriot Act was first drafted not after the attacks of September 11, 2001 but during the Clinton administration by the”One Hundred Seventh Congress of the United States of America AT THE FIRST SESSION Begun and held at the City of Washington on Wednesday, the third day of January, two thousand and one. (January 3, 2001)” An Act To deter and punish terrorist acts in the United States and around the world, to enhance law enforcement investigatory tools, and for other purposes. Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled ~ Uniting and Strengthening America by Providing Appropriate Tools Required to Intercept and Obstruct Terrorism (USA PATRIOT ACT) Act of 2001. The US government then formed the Nazi Gestapo style Department of Homeland Security to act as the “Secret State Police” of the United States government ~ to investigate and spy on US citizens, to arrest and hold US citizens indefinitely without due process of the law for opposing the criminal actions of the US government, to protect the US government from US citizens exercising their right to demand their government adhere to the rule of law of the United States of America - the US Constitution, and to strip the US people of their inalienable rights and freedoms guaranteed to them by the United States Constitution.

The US government illegally spies on you. The US government tortures people. The US government kidnaps and imprisons people without due process of the law. The US government attacks and injures you whenever you exercise you right to free speech and legally petition your government for change. The US government robbed you and gave $trillions to the bankers of the privately owned Federal Reserve banks. The US government was the one who infected you with the swine flu virus.

According to a report issued by the US Department of State on April 2004, thirty-five (35) American citizens died from international terrorism world-wide in 2003.- The extent of the harm to U.S. citizens does not either warrant a “war on terrorism”: In the same year as 35 U.S. citizens were killed for political reasons world-wide, 16,503 persons were murdered and 93,433 persons were raped in the U.S. alone (FBI statistics). This alone demonstrates that the motive for the “war on terrorism” is not the number of victims nor their identities. During the same year 5 million people died from smoking related illness. Which is a bigger threat to life?

JFK - “Let us call a truce to terror. Let us invoke the blessings of peace. And as we build an international capacity to keep peace, let us join in dismantling the national capacity to wage war.”

JFK - “We are not afraid to entrust the American people with unpleasant facts, foreign ideas, alien philosophies, and competitive values. For a nation that is afraid to let its people judge the truth and falsehood in an open market is a nation that is afraid of its people.”

JFK - “Our duty as a party is not to our party alone, but to the nation and, indeed, to all mankind. Our duty is not merely the preservation of political power but the preservation of peace and freedom.”

United States Declaration of Independence

“We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness. That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed, That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness. Prudence, indeed, will dictate that Governments long established should not be changed for light and transient causes; and accordingly all experience hath shewn, that mankind are more disposed to suffer, while evils are sufferable, than to right themselves by abolishing the forms to which they are accustomed. But when a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same Object evinces a design to reduce them under absolute Despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such Government, and to provide new Guards for their future security.”

Bound by oath to support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic - including the US government.

United States Federal law requires everyone who enlists or re-enlists in the Armed Forces of the United States to take the enlistment oath. The oath of enlistment into the United States Armed Forces is administered by any commissioned officer to any person enlisting or re-enlisting for a term of service into any branch of the military. The officer asks the person, or persons, to raise their right hand and repeat the oath after him. The oath is traditionally performed in front of the United States Flag and other flags, such as the state flag, military branch flag, and unit guidon may be present.

In the Armed Forces EXCEPT the National Guard (Army or Air)

I, (NAME), do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic; that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the same; and that I will obey the orders of the President of the United States and the orders of the officers appointed over me, according to regulations and the Uniform Code of Military Justice. So help me God.

In the National Guard (Army or Air)

I, (NAME), do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will support and defend the Constitution of the United States and the State of (STATE NAME) against all enemies, foreign and domestic; that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the same; and that I will obey the orders of the President of the United States and the Governor of (STATE NAME) and the orders of the officers appointed over me, according to law and regulations. So help me God.

Presidential Oaths of Office

“I do solemnly swear (or affirm) that I will faithfully execute the office of President of the United States, and will to the best of my ability, preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the United States.”

Oath of Allegiance

The United States Oath of Allegiance (officially referred to as the “Oath of Allegiance,” 8 C.F.R. Part 337 (2008)) is an oath that must be taken by all immigrants who wish to become United States citizens.

I hereby declare, on oath, that I absolutely and entirely renounce and abjure all allegiance and fidelity to any foreign prince, potentate, state, or sovereignty of whom or which I have heretofore been a subject or citizen; that I will support and defend the Constitution and laws of the United States of America against all enemies, foreign and domestic; that I will bear true faith and allegiance to the same; that I will bear arms on behalf of the United States when required by the law; that I will perform noncombatant service in the Armed Forces of the United States when required by the law; that I will perform work of national importance under civilian direction when required by the law; and that I take this obligation freely without any mental reservation or purpose of evasion; so help me God.

Pledge of Allegiance

The Pledge of Allegiance of the United States is an oath of loyalty to the national flag and the republic of the United States of America.

I pledge allegiance to the flag of the United States of America, and to the republic for which it stands, one nation under God, indivisible, with liberty and justice for all.

There are no oaths taken by any US citizen or US military personnel to preserve, protect and defend the United States government or even the United States president. Only monarchies and dictatorships require their people to serve and protect the government, especially the leader.

The history books of today do not tell the student a lot of what happened leading to and during the United States revolutionary war. They didn’t just fight the British. They were British subjects, a state of siege and repression of rights and liberties had existed for many years and a state of war had existed for two years prior to the signing of the Declaration, and they fought their own government for independence!

Most of the US citizens of today take their liberties so much for granted. They shouldn’t, for in taking liberty for granted, they have lost much of it. All governments progress from liberty to tyranny and despotism, unless carefully watched and circumscribed. Much is to be learned in today’s times from the events of that time, the causes and the reasons for the uprising and indignation of the citizens in opposition to tyranny. Many parallels can be drawn as we review the happenings of today.

To Insure the Inherent Rights of the People against tyranny and despotism in their own government is the primary reason the Second Article of Amendment to the Constitution for the United States was later adopted.

Snipers are the biggest psychological deterrent on the battlefield.That the mere rumor they’re on the battlefield can send shivers through the enemy ranks. Imagine what a team of snipers inserted behind enemy lines could do to the aggressor’s chain of command.

There is absolutely no need, cause or justification for anyone to start a war. We are after all civilized human beings. Any international incident can be resolved peacefully. Those who start wars are nothing more than criminals with a criminal intent to cause the death of another human being. The most effective course of action to end any war or even prevent a war is to go after the person or persons who gave the order to attack another country. One person does not have the authority to launch a war against another especially in a democratic society. If a leader of one country decides to go to war with another country that leader is committing crimes that include; war of aggression, crimes against peace, crimes against humanity, murder, torture and other war crimes.

In the game of chess the objective is to remove your opponent’s king in as few moves as possible. The object of the game is to checkmate your opponent’s king, whereby the king is under immediate attack (in “check”) and there is no way to remove it from attack on the next move. The game is over as soon as you capture your opponent’s king and your opponent surrenders to you. Wars of aggression can be ended quickly simply by applying the game of chess to your self-defense strategy. Defend your people by taking the course of action that will quickly capture and remove your opponent’s leadership.

International law and domestic law allow lethal force to be used in self-defense against armed attacks. There’s no special protection given to heads of state that protects them from the otherwise lawful use of lethal force in self-defense. Nuremberg established that heads of state have no immunity from responsibility for aggressive war. There’s no logical legal principle that says it’s better to spare the life of a country’s leader, when he or she is the head war criminal who started the war, and killed tens of thousands or hundreds of thousands of relatively innocent people.

Any uniformed member of the Military is a lawful target under the laws of armed conflict. If he is the head policy maker (commander-in-chief, prime minister, president, emperor, chancellor, king or queen) in deciding to launch an aggressive war, then he’s committing an international crime; denying him any right to the kind of protection we give hospital workers or Red Cross workers or the like. If we want to deter aggression, we have to extract a cost from those who are making the decisions. A warmongering leader is not willing to put his own safety at risk, and so it’s very important that we make it clear that we have the legal right to go after even heads of state engaged in massive international aggression.

The only logical and legal course of action to defend ones country and countrymen from an unlawful military attack from another country is to hold the person or persons who gave the order to attack, accountable for their criminal acts. Instead of retaliating against the people of the country whose leader ordered the attack on your country and countrymen one should only attack those leaders who gave the order. No one else should suffer or pay for the crimes of the war leaders. Only the leaders who order their country to attack and murder the people of another country should suffer and pay with their lives. The Nuremberg Trial established “Legal Self-Defense” against wars of aggression, kidnappings, torture and acts of aggression against another state. The legal, honorable and patriotic course of action to end illegal wars is to target only those criminal leaders. Every country and their people has the legal right to self-defense and their legal rights include only attacks against the criminal leadership, never against innocent and defenseless civilians. As soon as the leader or leaders who gave the order to attack and kill your people are eliminated then the war will end. If someone takes over command of the military forces after the war leaders are eliminated and they too order more attacks against you, your country and your people, then they too are legal and legitimate targets. Infiltrating the enemy’s country and attacking only the leadership will end the war quickly and deter future leaders from ordering their people to attack and kill another.

Had the Allied nations succeeded in killing Adolf Hitler at the beginning of WWII the War would have ended a lot sooner and millions of lives would have been spared. A war that needlessly killed 23,100,000 Soviets, 449,800 English, 418,500 US, 5,600,000 Polish, 2,700,000 Japanese, 7,233,000 Germans, 567,600 French, 20,000,000 Chinese, 45,300 Canadians for an estimated death toll of roughly 72 million. If a team of snipers had been sent into Germany with the sole mission of killing Adolf Hilter six million European Jews would have been saved from the Holocaust.

The Taliban and the Afghan people had and continues to have the legal right to self-defense. Their legal rights includes the use of lethal force against the criminal leadership of the United States government - George W Bush, Dick Cheney and Donald Rumsfeld for ordering and commanding the illegal attack against Afghanistan and the Afghan people. The Iraqi people also have the legal right to self-defense against the unlawful armed attack against their country. International law and domestic law allows the Afghan and Iraqi people to use lethal force in self-defense against the US government’s armed attacks against their countries. Nuremberg (a tribunal held after the end of World War II, where the United States, England and the Soviet Union tried top Nazi German officials for crimes against peace, war crimes, and crimes against humanity) established that heads of state (including United States heads of state) have no immunity from responsibility for aggressive war.

The United States Chief prosecutor at Nuremberg, Robert Jackson, wrote:

“We will show these men to be the living symbols of racial hatred, terrorism and violence, and of the arrogance and cruelty of power.”

“The wrongs which we seek to condemn and punish have been so calculated, so malignant and so devastating that civilization can not tolerate their being ignored, because it can not survive their being repeated.”

“I am convinced that we have an opportunity to bring to a just judgement those who have thought it safe to wage aggressive and ruthless war.”

It does not matter how powerful a country might be. It would not matter if the aggressor had the most technologically advanced fighter jets, bombers, tank, or warships, once a sniper is able to infiltrate the aggressor’s country there is nowhere to hide. A good sniper could gain entry as a diplomat, tourist or business person. A good sniper would not need to smuggle in his or her weapon as he or she would have been trained to use the weapon of choice of the aggressive nation and acquire their weapon from the aggressive nation’s own police and military or even from citizens with hunting rifles. It took 3 weeks for the US law enforcement agencies to find and capture the Beltway sniper in October 2002 in Washington, D.C. How long would it take to find a team of highly trained and motivated snipers? That is if you even knew they were already in country.

It has been confirmed that the dispersal agent being used by BP and the government is Corexit 9500, a solvent originally developed by Exxon and now manufactured by:

Nalco Energy Services, L.P.
P.O. Box 87
Sugar Land, Texas
77487-0087

The US government had used Corexit 9500 in the past, and decided to go with what they know — no matter how dangerous that might prove to be. Corexit 9500 is a harsh petroleum-based solvent which is dangerous to people and sea life.

EMERGENCY OVERVIEW

WARNING - Combustible. Keep away from heat. Keep away from sources of ignition - No smoking. Keep container tightly closed. Do not get in eyes, on skin, on clothing. Do not take internally. Avoid breathing vapor. Use with adequate ventilation. In case of contact with eyes, rinse immediately with plenty of water and seek medical advice. After contact with skin, wash immediately with plenty of soap and water.

Wear suitable protective clothing.

Low Fire Hazard; liquids may burn upon heating to temperatures at or above the flash point. May evolve oxides of carbon (COx) under fire conditions. May evolve oxides of sulfur (SOx) under fire conditions.

HUMAN HEALTH HAZARDS - ACUTE Can cause chemical pneumonia if aspirated into lungs following ingestion.

ENVIRONMENTAL PRECAUTIONS : Do not contaminate surface water.

Dispersal of the oil does not eliminate it, nor does it decrease the toxicity of the oil. It just breaks it up into small particles, where it becomes less visible. It’s still there, spewing toxicity at an even greater rate (due to higher surface area.) But now it’s pretty much impossible to skim or trap or vacuum or even soak up at the shoreline, because most of it will never make it to the shoreline. Instead, that toxic crude oil and the dispersant will be spread all over the ocean’s waters. This is why introducing such a product into the crude oil as it comes out from the pipe is a very bad idea for the ocean.

It may not be pretty, but if the oil makes it to the shore, it can be soaked up, cleaned up. To “disperse” it means it will NEVER be cleaned up. It will just stay out there, polluting and poisoning the ocean, her inhabitants, and all the food we take from it.

BP’s use of Corexit 9500 on the oil before it rises to the surface seems to be a deliberate attempt to mask the poison, to cover up that it continues to flow out from the ocean’s floor, while making it impossible to recover. In short, BP wants to spread the toxic oil throughout the oceans of the world, pollute everywhere, rather than allow it to be seen coming to shore where BP would have to pay for its containment and clean-up.

Britain’s new Defence Secretary, Liam Fox stated on Sunday May 23, 2010 that he was seeking to pull out British troops from Afghanistan ‘as soon as possible’.

He is currently on a visit to Kabul, but before he left London, Mr Fox revealed the potential change of policy.

In remarks in a newspaper interview, Mr Fox said Britain should focus less on state-building in Afghanistan and more on speeding up the withdrawal of its troops.

“National security is the focus now. We are not a global policeman,” he told The Times.

“We have obligations to deal with poverty and human rights but that is no different in Afghanistan from dozens of other countries.

“We shouldn’t deploy British troops unless there are overwhelming humanitarian emergency considerations or a national security imperative.”

Britain’s new coalition government will not set a deadline for withdrawal from Afghanistan’s nine-year-war or lessen its commitment to aid, a team of ministers said after talks with Afghan leaders on Saturday.

Foreign Secretary William Hague, Defence Secretary Liam Fox and International Development Secretary Andrew Mitchell met with President Hamid Karzai after arriving in Kabul for talks on what is expected to be London’s top foreign policy issue.

Washington is sending more troops to Afghanistan to seize insurgent-held areas before a planned withdrawal starting in July 2011.

Some 285 British soldiers have died in Afghanistan since 2001, when the NATO mission there was launched and Britain has struggled to turn the tide on the Afghan Resistance in the restive southern Helmand province, where most of its troops are deployed.

The British contingent is part of a U.S. dominated force that is expected to grow to around 140,000 at its height in a few weeks. The ministers’ visit comes a week before Kabul hosts a peace jirga aimed at starting talks with the Taliban. Foreign Secretary William Hague said Britain strongly supported the jirga and emphasised it should be Afghan-led.

The MQ-1 Predator unmanned spy drone is used by the CIA Special Operations Group for both surveillance and strike missions. It is unmarked and is responsible for the majority of civilians being killed in both Afghanistan and Pakistan. National security law experts, inside the government and out, are in the middle of an intense debate over whether the remotely piloted attacks are legal. One leading law professor told Congress that the drone operators could be tried for “war crimes” - amounts to a program of targeted killing that violate the laws of war. These CIA officers as well as any higher-level government officials who have authorized or directed their attacks are committing war crimes. Only the United States president authorizes such strikes, especially if the mission is inside a country that the US is not at war with - like Pakistan . That makes US president Obama guilty of committing war crimes.

Air Branch is the aviation wing of the CIA’s Special Activities Division (SAD). Their role is to fly covert missions in support of CIA operations. The CIA engages in covert missions at the request of the President of the United States.

The Department of Defense Dictionary of Military and Associated Terms (Joint Publication JP1-02), defines “covert operation” as “an operation that is so planned and executed as to conceal the identity of or permit plausible denial by the sponsor. A covert operation differs from a clandestine operation in that emphasis is placed on concealment of identity of sponsor rather than on concealment of the operation.” The United States Department of Defense definition has been used by the United States and NATO since World War II.

In a covert operation, the identity of the sponsor is concealed, while in a clandestine operation the operation itself is concealed. Put differently, clandestine means “hidden,” while covert means “deniable.”

Covert operations are employed in situations where openly operating against a target would be disadvantageous. These operations are generally illegal in the target state and are frequently in violation of the laws of the sponsoring country. Operations may be directed at or conducted with allies and friends to secure their support for controversial components of foreign policy throughout the world. Covert operations may include sabotage, assassinations, support for coups d’état, or support for subversion. Tactics include the use of a false flag or front group.

False flag operations are covert operations which are designed to deceive the public in such a way that the operations appear as though they are being carried out by other entities. The name is derived from the military concept of flying false colors; that is, flying the flag of a country other than one’s own. False flag operations are not limited to war and counter-insurgency operations, and have been used in peace-time.

In the 1931 Mukden incident, Japanese officers fabricated a pretext for annexing Manchuria by blowing up a section of railway. Six years later they falsely claimed the kidnapping of one of their soldiers in the Marco Polo Bridge Incident as an excuse to invade China proper.

In the Gleiwitz incident in August 1939, Reinhard Heydrich made use of fabricated evidence of a Polish attack against Germany to mobilize German public opinion and to fabricate a false justification for a war with Poland. This, along with other false flag operations in Operation Himmler, would be used to mobilize support from the German population for the start of World War II in Europe.

On November 26, 1939 the Soviet Union shelled the Russian village of Mainila near the Finnish border. The Soviet Union attacked Finland four days afterwards, claiming the shelling to have been a Finnish military action. Russia has agreed that the attack was initiated by the Soviets. Also, the nearest Finnish artillery pieces were well out of range of Mainila.

In 1953, the U.S. and British-orchestrated Operation Ajax used “false-flag” and propaganda operations against the formerly democratically elected leader of Iran, Mohammed Mosaddeq.

In 1954, Israel sponsored bombings against US and UK interests in Cairo aiming to cause trouble between Egypt and the West. This operation, later dubbed the Lavon Affair, cost Israeli defense minister Pinhas Lavon his job. Israel (where it is known as “The Unfortunate Affair”) finally admitted responsibility in 2005.

In 1962 the United States government planned a false-flag operation called Operation Northwoods, or Northwoods, that called for the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) or other CIA operatives to commit genuine acts of terrorism in United States cities and elsewhere. These acts of US government sponsored terrorism were to be blamed on Cuba in order to create public support for a war against Cuba, which had recently become communist under Fidel Castro. One part of the Operation Northwoods plan was to “develop a Communist Cuban terror campaign in the Miami area, in other Florida cities and even in Washington.”

Operation Northwoods included proposals for hijackings and bombings followed by the introduction of phony evidence that would implicate the Cuban government. The plan stated:

“The desired resultant from the execution of this plan would be to place the United States in the apparent position of suffering defensible grievances from a rash and irresponsible government of Cuba and to develop an international image of a Cuban threat to peace in the Western Hemisphere.”

Several other proposals were included within the Operation Northwoods plan, including real or simulated actions against various U.S. military and civilian targets. The plan was drafted by the Joint Chiefs of Staff, signed by Chairman Lyman Lemnitzer and sent to the Secretary of Defense. Although part of the U.S. government’s Cuban Project anti-communist initiative, Operation Northwoods was never officially accepted and the proposals included in the plan were never executed, a revised version of Operation Northwoods was ordered by US president George W Bush and executed on September 11, 2001 by the CIA’s Air Branch - CIA Special Activities Division (SAD).

The elite pilots of SAD Air Branch, many recruited from AFSOC and the 160th SOAR, as well as civilian aviation companies, are tasked with flying everything from small light aircraft to large transport planes. Roles of Air Branch include:

* covert insertion and extraction of CIA personnel
* covert trasportation of sensitive cargo
* airborne surveillance / intelligence gathering

Air Branch Aircraft - Covert air assets available to SAD Air Branch pilots include:

* light aircraft
* turboprop transport planes
* jet airliners
* helicopters

These aircraft are usually registered to front companies - seemingly legitimate dummy corporations setup by the CIA.

Some of the actual aircraft known to be flown by the CIA include:

DHC-6 Twin Otter

Several Twin Otters are believed to be in Air Branch’s inventory. These twin-engine light aircraft are ideal transports for small SAD/SF teams due to their ability to land and takeoff from short, rough airstrips. DHC-6 aircraft with non-standard antenna arrays have been spotted in Afghanistan. These antenna indicate secure communications capability and a possible SIGINT fitment.

DCH-8 Dash 8

Like its smaller cousin, the DH-6, these Canadian-built twin-engine medium range turboprop transport planes have been spotted in Afghanistan sporting unusual attennas.

Lockheed L-100-30

The L-100-30 is the civilian version of the C-130 Hercules transport plane.

Dassault Falcon 50

This jet, which masquerades as a private business flight, used by the CIA for the covert movement of terror suspects. These so-called ‘rendition flights’ caused controversy when they came to light in 2004.

Gulfstream Aerospace G-V Gulfstream V

As with the Dassault Falcon 50, this CIA business jet are tied to rendition flights.

Boeing 737

This Boeing 737-7BC airliner is currently involved with transporting prisoners to various ‘interrogation’ centers around the world.

Boeing C-32B

A military variant of the Boeing 757, used by Air Branch for the covert insertion and extraction of personnel, C-32Bs have been spotted making fast turnarounds at airports during various crisis around the globe. It’s believed that in February 2004 a C-32B was used to covertly fly kidnapped Jean-Bertrand Aristide, the deposed President Of Haiti, into exile in Africa.

MQ-1 Predator

This unmanned spy drone is used by the CIA Special Operations Group for both surveillance and strike missions. A remarkable bit of kit, a Predator in the air above Afghanistan can be flown by an operator in Langley, USA via secure satellite remote control. A set of sensors in a turret under its chin provide its surveillance capability whilst a laser-designator and 2 AGM-114 Hellfire missiles give it teeth. CIA Predators have carried out strikes against suspected terrorists on several occasions.

Mil MI-8 / MI-17 ‘Hip’

The CIA often use Russian-built helicopters, such as MI-8/MI-17s, for covert operations. As these ubiquitous helicopters are usually commonplace in theater they create less attention than a tricked-out Black Hawk or MH-53 Pavelow and cannot be readily linked to US forces. These helos are cheap to run and easier to find spare parts for when operating outside the US military logisitical chain. They are also one of the few military helicopters capable of operating over the mountains of Afghanistan.

On September 11, 2001 several types of CIA Air Branch aircraft assets were used in the attacks. The US government had the CIA airliners repainted to look like US commercial airlines. These aircraft were then flown via secure satellite remote control into the World Trade Centers by elite pilots of SAD Air Branch. In an interview Oct. 12, 2001 with Lyric Wallwork Winik from Parade Magazine, Donald Rumsfeld let it “slip” that a missile hit the Pentaon. Rumsfeld: “Here we’re talking about plastic knives and using an American Airlines flight filed with our citizens, and the missile to damage this building and similar (inaudible) that damaged the World Trade Center.”

The United States Code at 18 U.S.C. § 2381 states “whoever, owing allegiance to the United States, levies war against them or adheres to their enemies, giving them aid and comfort within the United States or elsewhere, is guilty of treason and shall suffer death, or shall be imprisoned not less than five years and fined under this title but not less than $10,000; and shall be incapable of holding any office under the United States.”

At the federal level, Article Two of the United States Constitution (Section 4) states that “The President, Vice President, and all other civil Officers of the United States shall be removed from Office on Impeachment for, and Conviction of, Treason, Bribery, or other High Crimes and Misdemeanors.”

Obama launches his US presidential campaign August 26, 2006. Not in any state of the United States of America but in a foreign country.

Like Roosevelt and his plans to revive the economy that didn’t work Obama is headed in the same direction by spending money on programs that don’t fix the problems.

The US has a major banking problem, not a public works problem. And even if you got the contract to build a bridge, where are you going to get the loan to buy the materials, machinery, pay for the design plans, etc., if you can’t borrow money? This Obama administration is made up of people with absolutely NO business experience, none have created a company, a product, hired people, met a payroll, they are all totally ignorant of what makes the economy work.

Who creates jobs? Government? Banks? Hah! Obama you’re clueless. The political class think that economies revolve around them, that Washington makes things happen, that politicians are the most important players. Bankers and the political class can’t imagine a decentralized world where good things happen…without them. But in the real world, that’s exactly how good things happen, and how jobs are created. When government sets simple rules that everyone understands and then gets out of the way, free people create jobs.

The United States Constitution declared that America would be a country of limited government. That provided the simple and understandable rules that allowed America to grow into one of the richest countries in the World.

Today’s political class thinks that they can improve on that, but they can’t. Their micromanagement kills jobs. When Washington threatens to drastically change the rules of the game with health care mandates, cap and trade, financial regulation, government ownership (GM), a stimulus, and a “jobs bill”, the private sector can’t make investments with any confidence. Free people, left alone, create prosperity.

Did Obama serve in the military? No and yet he is now commander-in-chief of one of the most advanced and powerful militaries on Earth. Obama lacks the training, the discipline and know how on how to defend the United States of America. A commander-in-chief is the commander of a nation’s military forces or significant element of those forces. As a practical term it refers to the military competencies that reside in a nation-state’s executive, head of state or government. Obama is incompetent as a military leader.

Is Obama a natural born US citizen? No. His birth certificate is irrelevant - Obama’s lawyers (paid for with US tax dollars) made sure Obama’s original birth certificate never goes public. Screams Obama has something to hide - like his true nationality. Public school records documents a totally different person than who we know of today. A student loan for Obama says it all - government money given to Obama for his education as a foreign student, not as a US citizen. Obama applied for and received education funding from the US government as a declared (by Obama) foreign student.

Does Obama have the experience to be president of the United States of America? No. We never heard of Obama until Obama made a very publicised and televised taxpayer funded trip to Kenya in August 2006. The New York Times published a report on Obama’s trip called “Obama Gets a Warm Welcome in Kenya” on August 26, 2006. In this report the New York Times launches Obama’s campaign for the presidency of the United States of America.

If Senator Barack Obama is ever thinking of running for president — or changing careers to rock star — he got excellent practice in Nairobi on Friday.

Local newspapers overflowed with breathless coverage, including the headline, “Village beats the drums for returning son.”

Mr. Obama, a freshman Democratic senator from Illinois, was in Kenya’s capital on Friday as part of a tightly scripted four-country tour in Africa to raise awareness for AIDS and to reconnect with his roots.

It’s a shame, but Obama has duped the ignorant and arrogant into voting for him, and now he’s proving that at best, he can read a speech, but on leadership, he’s clueless. It’s too late now. You wasted your vote on a nobody. On someone who clearly never qualified for the highest office of the United States of America- the US presidency. His trip to Kenya in 2006 was an elaborate publicity stunt, one that tricked the American people into accepting Obama, a foreigner with no military, business, financial or diplomatic experience, as their future leader.

The GESTAPO - German Intelligence Agencies (the GIA) was one of the primary agencies for the persecution of the Jews. The persecution of the Jews under the Nazi regime is a story of increasingly severe treatment, beginning with restrictions, then seizure and spoliation of property, commitment to concentration camps, deportation, slave labor, and finally mass murder.

Israel (the name given to Jacob after his fight with the Angel of God - therefore Israel means the one who struggles with God or anti-God ) continues to be aggressive against the Palestinian people by using military force against the Palestinian civilian population. Israel always justifies their attacks by claiming self-defense but the real story is that Israel has been planing a genocide of the Palestinian people. Israel has been committing atrocities by cutting off food and medical supplies for the Palestinian people. Not one of the news media in the US has been reporting on the UN declaration that Israel is guilty of crimes against humanity for attacking the Palestinian civilian population. No media in the US is reporting on the countless Israeli military attacks against the civilian population of Gaza. Israel is trying to steal more Palestinian land to expand their illegitimate state of Israel. No one can recognize the state of Israel because Israel was formed from land stolen from the Palestinian people at the end of WWII by the Allied nations. The Allied nations did nothing to stop the genocide of the Jewish people by the Roman Catholic Nazi army. The Allied nations did not want the Jewish people in their country and neither did Austrian born (not German) Adolf Hitler. We all know what Hitler did - sent the Jewish people to concentration camps for extermination.

The Allied nations formed the new Jewish concentration camp called Israel in 1948. They stole land from the Palestinian people to create Israel. The justification for the US and other Allied Nations to form the State of Israel was ostensibly to save the Jewish people from centuries of European anti-Semitism, which culminated in the holocaust against Jews, Slavs, gypsies, communists, disabled people and homosexuals executed by German Nazis. But the state was not located in Europe, and the people who have paid the price and suffered the most were not Germans but Palestinians and other Arabs, with whom Jews had lived peacefully in the Middle East for the past 2000 years. The real reason for the Allies to agree to the formation of Israel was to segregate the Jewish people from the rest of the World. Exactly the same agenda of Hitler and his Nazi SS and Gestapo officers, with one exception, the Allies had no immediate plans to mass murder the Jews.

Israel is an illegitimate state - nothing more than a Jewish Concentration Camp - envisioned by Hitler and built by the US allies. The same ideology that sent the Jewish people to concentration camps for extermination infects both the US and Israeli (anti-Jewish) governments.

At the end of WWII the US smuggled hundreds of top Nazi SS officers, Gestapo agents and scientists involved in experiments on the Jewish people in the concentration camps. Operation Paperclip (Project Paperclip) saw hundreds of Nazi officials given asylum in the US (Fort Bliss) from prosecution for their crimes against humanity. Scientists who committed atrocities by using human beings as lab rats have formed the US biological weapons division of the US military. Nazi scientists who developed the first operational jet fighter, the Messerschmitt Me 262, and V-2 rocket formed the US ballistic missile weapons programs and later form NASA. Nazi Gestapo (German Intelligence Agencies) agents were brought to the US and formed the FBI and the Central Intelligence Agency - the CIA. Those same Nazi officials smuggled into the US under Operation Paperclip destroyed the League of Nations (which was responsible for the fall of Nazi Germany) and formed the United Nations (its ironic that they would choose UN which means “To reverse or undo the result of a specified action”) and their first order of business was to create the new Jewish concentration camp they deceivingly called Israel.

The Israeli flag marks the Jews for segregation. It is the post WWII version of the yellow star, the symbol of Nazi persecution. If you look closely at the Antisemitism symbol, the Star of Solomon (mistakenly refered to as the Star of David) is actually made up of 2 pyramids symbolizing the continued Jewish enslavement (enslavement - the state of being a slave)

The oldest reference to using mandatory articles of clothing to identify and distinguish Jews from the rest of society was in 807 CE. In this year, Abbassid caliph Haroun al-Raschid ordered all Jews to wear a yellow belt and a tall, cone-like hat.

It was in 1215 that the Fourth Lateran Council, presided over by Roman Catholic Pope Innocent III, made its infamous decree. Canon 68 declared:

Jews and Saracens [Muslims] of both sexes in every Christian province and at all times shall be marked off in the eyes of the public from other peoples through the character of their dress.

This Roman Catholic Council represented all of Christendom and thus this decree was to be enforced throughout all of the Christian countries.

The use of a badge was not instantaneous throughout Europe nor were the dimensions or shape of the badge uniform. As early as 1217, King Henry III of England ordered Jews to wear “on the front of their upper garment the two tables of the Ten Commandments made of white linen or parchment.” In France, local variations of the badge continued until Louis IX decreed in 1269 that “both men and women were to wear badges on the outer garment, both front and back, round pieces of yellow felt or linen, a palm long and four fingers wide.”

In Germany and Austria, Jews were distinguishable in the latter half of the 1200’s when the wearing of a “horned hat” otherwise known as a “Jewish hat” — an article of clothing that Jews had worn freely before the crusades — became mandatory. It wasn’t until the fifteenth century when a badge became the distinguishing article in Germany and Austria.

The use of badges became relatively widespread throughout Europe within a couple of centuries and continued to be used as distinctive markings until the age of Enlightenment. In 1781, Joseph II of Austria made major torrents into the use of a badge with his Edict of Tolerance and many other countries discontinued their use of badges very late in the eighteenth century.

When did the Nazis come up with the idea of re-using the Jewish badge?

The first reference to a Jewish badge during the Nazi era was made by the German Zionist leader, Robert Weltsch. During the Nazi declared boycott upon Jewish stores on April 1, 1933, yellow Stars of David were painted on windows. In reaction to this, Weltsch wrote an article entitled “Tragt ihn mit Stolz, den gelben Fleck” (”Wear the Yellow Badge with Pride”) which was published on April 4, 1933. At this time, Jewish badges had yet even to be discussed among the top Nazis.

It is believed that the first time that the implementation of a Jewish badge was discussed among the Nazi leaders was right after Kristallnacht in 1938. At a meeting on November 12, 1938, Reinhard Heydrich made the first suggestion about a badge.

But it wasn’t until after the Second World War began in September 1939 that individual authorities implemented a Jewish badge in the occupied territories of Poland. For instance, on November 16, 1939, the order for a Jewish badge was announced in Lodz.

We are returning to the Middle Ages. The yellow patch once again becomes a part of Jewish dress. Today an order was announced that all Jews, no matter what age or sex, have to wear a band of “Jewish-yellow,” 10 centimeters wide, on their right arm, just below the armpit.

Various locales within occupied Poland had their own regulations about size, color, and shape of the badge to be worn, until Hans Frank made a decree that affected all of the Government General in Poland. On November 23, 1939, Hans Frank, the chief officer of the Government General, declared that all Jews above ten years of age were to wear a white badge with a Star of David on their right arm.

It wasn’t until nearly two years later that a decree, issued on September 1, 1941, issued badges to Jews within Germany as well as occupied and incorporated Poland. This badge was the yellow Star of David with the word “Jude” (”Jew”) and worn on the left side of one’s chest.

The Israeli flag we see today was adopted as an identifying mark for all Jews - an article of cloth to purposely and intentionally identify and distinguish Jews from the rest of society. The flag of Israel was adopted on October 28, 1948, five months after the Nazi UN declared the State of Israel from stolen Palestinian land on 14 May 1948 (few know that neighboring Arab states attacked the next day and since then, Israel has fought, using US supplied military aid, a series of wars with all of the neighboring Arab states). Today Jewish people are marked with the same Antisemitism symbol (yellow star) used by Hitler to mark the Jews for extermination. Ever since the Jewish people have been unwittingly immigrating to the Nazi concentration camp called Israel. The Nazi formed CIA has been propagating Antisemitism ever since.

Nazi Germany did not fall as the majority of key figures lived on to form the backbone military and intelligence agencies of the United States. Those same Nazi officers and officials quickly created their new Jewish concentration camp they called Israel. The Nazi CIA (formerly called the Central Intelligence Office during WWII) has since its formation been deceiving the Jewish people. The Jewish people don’t realize that the Israeli Mossad (Israeli Intelligence Agencies) is actually the modern day German Gestapo. “Mossad” is the Hebrew word for institute or institution. The “Mossad Le’aliyah Bet” was a small, unorthodox Zionist organization whose mission in 1938 was to bring Jews to the British mandate of Palestine. This was done to subvert the British quotas on Jewish immigration. It was officially established in 1948, immediately after the Nazi war criminals were smuggled into the US in Operation Paperclip. The Nazi war criminals convinced the US government to create the state of Israel in order to concentrate all Jews from around the World. The Germans were much more advanced than the US that the US government negotiated a trade-off in exchange for the technology and the intelligence gathering techniques the US desired. The first term of the agreement was to dissolve the League of Nations as it was an embarrassment to the Germans because it successfully defeated the Germans. The US government agreed and immediately formed the United Nations as a tool for the US agenda of Global domination. The UN is headquarters in the US and is mandated by the US government not by its members. Secondly the Nazi SS officers were key to the new US intelligence network against the communist Soviet Union. The US government formed the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) and used Nazi SS officers as its first CIA agents. To work on rounding up all the Jews and trick them to go willingly to the Jewish Concentration Camp called Israel the Nazi Gestapo was used to form the Mossad. The Mossad was and is, even today, responsible for intelligence collection, counter-terrorism, covert operations such as paramilitary activities and political assassinations, and the facilitation of aliyah where it is banned. Aliyah (Hebrew: ascent) refers to Jewish immigration to the Land of Israel. The Mossad is performing the same duties as the Nazi Gestapo - the official secret police of Nazi Germany who were also responsible for facilitating aliyah (concentration of the Jewish people).

The army units within the Gestapo were taught many torture techniques, and were also taught many of the practices that German doctors in Dachau tested on the inmates of concentration camps. The Gestapo, during its tenure, operated without any restrictions by civil authority, meaning that its members could not be tried for any of their police practices. This unconditional authority added an elitist element to the Gestapo; its members knew that whatever actions they took, no consequences would arise. The US CIA also operates without any restrictions by civil authority. Its members know that whatever actions they take (including the assassination of its own US president (JFK) and attacking the US on 9/11 and torture) , no consequences would arise - its members have not and will not be tried for any of their illegal activities.

The true symbol of the Jewish people
One of the oldest symbols of the Jewish faith is the menorah, a seven-branched candelabrum used in the Temple. The menorah is a symbol of the Jews and their mission is to be “a light unto the nations.” The sages emphasize that light is not a violent force; Jews are to accomplish its mission by setting an example, not by using force.

The founding of the Zionist State, May 14, 1948, is in direct contradiction to the teachings of the Torah, which forbids the establishment of a Jewish State and commands Jews to remain in exile until released from that exile by God Himself without any human intervention. At which time all Nations of the world will live together in peace.

Two thousand years ago, at the time of the destruction of the holy Temple, the Jewish people were commanded by the Creator (kesubos 111a)

* Not to go up en masse to the land of Israel
* Not to rebel against the nations
* Not to in any way attempt to end the exile

Torah faithful Jews are to behave in a civil, honest and grateful manner towards their host nations throughout the world.

The Zionist intervention against God’s will by establishing the ‘State of Israel’, represents a direct rebellion against God and the Torah, a rebellion which has generated untold pain and suffering, to Jew and non-Jew alike.

On the anniversary of the founding of this heretical Zionist State, Torah true Jews mourn the attempt to transform Judaism from a religion into a secular entity and the attempt to uproot the Torah teachings. We mourn the sacrilege it has produced: desecration of the Sabbath, loss of modesty, and a litany of violations against many laws of our faith and Jewish teachings, amongst them the command of compassion for our fellow beings.

We mourn the subjugation, expulsion and horrific oppression of the Palestinian people, in a continuing chain of events, from the time of the foundation of the ‘State’, culminating in the recent tragic onslaught on Gaza. The list goes on and on…

On the tragic day of this anniversary, we fast and gather in Synagogues around the world, praying for a total, speedy and peaceful dismantlement of the heretical Zionist ‘State of Israel’, to be replaced by a free Palestine and a free Jerusalem entirely in accordance with the aspirations of the Palestinian people.

May we then merit that this year will be the year when the glory of the Almighty will be revealed over the whole world, when all nations will live in peace and join together in the service of one God, soon in our days.

1) What is “The People of Israel” ?

* The People of Israel have existed for thousands of years.
* They have their own particular, essential nature.
* The Torah is the source of their essential nature.
* Without Torah and Faith there is no People of Israel.
* Whoever denies the Torah and the Faith is no longer part of the People of Israel.
* The purpose of the People of Israel in this world is Divine Service.
* Their salvation is occupation in Divine Service.

2) What is Zionism?

* Zionism is a relatively new thing.
* It has only existed for a century.
* Zionism redefines the true essential nature of the People of Israel, and substitutes for it a completely contradictory and opposite character - a materialistic worldly nation.
* Their misfortune is lack of what other nations possess, i.e. a state and army.
* Their salvation is possession of a state and army etc.
* This is clearly spelled out in the circles of Zionist thought, and among the leaders of the Zionist State, that through changing the nature and character of the People of Israel and by changing their way of thinking they can set before the People of Israel “their salvation” — a state and an army.

The People of Israel oppose the so-called “State of Israel” for four reasons:

FIRST — The so-called “State of Israel” is diametrically opposed and completely contradictory to the true essence and foundation of the People of Israel, as is explained above. The only time that the People of Israel were permitted to have a state was two thousand years ago when the glory of the creator was upon us, and likewise in the future when the glory of the creator will once more be revealed, and the whole world will serve Him, then He Himself (without any human effort or force of arms) will grant us a kingdom founded on Divine Service. However, a worldly state, like those possessed by other peoples, is contradictory to the true essence of the People of Israel. Whoever calls this the salvation of Israel shows that he denies the essence of the People of Israel, and substitutes another nature, a worldly materialistic nature, and therefore sets before them, a worldly materialistic “salvation,” and the means of achieving this “salvation” is also worldly and materialistic i.e. to organize a land and army. However, the true salvation of the People of Israel is to draw close to the Creator. This is not done by organization and force of arms. Rather it is done by occupation to Torah and good deeds.

SECOND — Because of all of this and other reasons the Torah forbids us to end the exile and establish a state and army until the Holy One, blessed He, in His Glory and Essence will redeem us. This is forbidden even if the state is conducted according to the law of the Torah because arising from the exile itself is forbidden, and we are required to remain under the rule of the nations of the world, as is explained in the book VAYOEL MOSHE. If we transgress this injunction, He will bring upon us (may we be spared) terrible punishment.

THIRD — Aside from arising from exile, all the deeds of the Zionists are diametrically opposed to the Faith and the Torah. Because the foundation of the Faith and Torah of Israel is that the Torah was revealed from heaven, and there is reward for those who obey it and punishment for those who transgress it. The entire People of Israel is required to obey the Torah, and whoever doesn’t want to, ceases to be part of the congregation of Israel.

FOURTH — Aside from the fact that they themselves do not obey the Torah they do everything they can to prevent anyone they get under their power from fulfilling the commands of the Torah, the claims to freedom of religion are lies. They fight with all of their strength to destroy the Faith of Israel.

The Zionists claim that they are the saviors of Israel, but this is refuted by twelve things:

FIRST — If one contemplates the two thousand years of our exile, take any hundred years even the hardest, one will not find as much suffering, bloodshed, and catastrophes for the People of Israel in the period of the Zionists, and it is known that most of the suffering of this century was caused by the Zionists, as our Rabbis warned us would be the case.

SECOND — It is openly stated in books written by the founders of Zionism that the means by which they planned to establish a state was by instigating anti-Semitism, and undermining the security of the Jews in all the lands of the world, until they would be forced to flee to their state. And thus they did - They intentionally infuriated the German people and fanned the flames of Nazi hatred, and they helped the Nazis, with trickery and deceit, to take whole Jewish communities off to the concentration camps, and the Zionists themselves admit this. (See the books Perfidy, Min Hameitzor, etc.). The Zionists continue to practice this strategy today. They incite anti-Semitism and then they present themselves as the “saviors”. Here are two replies given by Leaders of the Zionists during World War II, when they were asked for money to help ransom Jews from the Nazis. Greenbaum said “One cow in Palestine is worth more than all the Jews in Poland.”
Weitzman said, “The most important part of the Jewish people is already in the land (of Israel) and those who are left, are unimportant”.

THIRD — We see that most of world Jewry lives in security and under good physical conditions, and have no desire to go live in the Zionist State. Whereas many people have left the Zionist State to live under better conditions in other lands.

FOURTH — The Zionists make a great deal of propaganda to induce people to immigrate to their state. If their state is so beneficial why do they have to make so much propaganda.

FIFTH — Because nobody wants the Zionists to “save” them. The only way they can get immigrants is by promising poor people material benefits, and even then very few people respond.

SIXTH — The Zionist State is always threatened by the dangers of war. Whereas the rest of world Jewry live in peace and security, (Except in a few places where the Zionists have undermined their security and fanned the flames of hatred)

SEVENTH — The Zionist State could not continue to exist without economic support from Jews living outside of the Zionist State.

EIGHTH — The Zionist State is on the verge of economic collapse, and their money is nearly worthless.

NINTH — The Zionist State persecute all Jews who are loyal to their Faith.

TENTH — They start wars that endanger the Jewish People, for the sake of their own political interests.

ELEVENTH - According to the Torah the path of safety is following ways of peace not starting fights with other nations, as the Zionists do.

TWELFTH — Even if the Zionists could and would provide physical security it would be at the expense of our Faith and Our Torah the true People of Israel prefer death rather than life at such a cost.

It is therefore clear that Zionism is not the savior of the people of Israel. Rather it is their greatest misfortune. Even though there are some observant Jews and rabbis, who approve of the Zionists, this is not the opinion of the Torah. The Zionists have enough control over the American news media to make sure that only their side of the story is heard. They make it look like all Jewry and their rabbis are Zionists, but this is false propaganda.

The most important Rabbis and the majority of religious Jewry are opposed to Zionism, but their voice is not heard because of Zionist control of American news media. The Zionists terrorize everyone who speaks out against them. That part of the Jewish masses which is fooled by Zionist propaganda puts pressure on their Rabbis not to speak out.

Between the terror and the pressure of the masses most of the Rabbis are prevented from speaking out.

Three testimonies of the true opinion of the Torah.

1) In the past two thousand years of the dangers and sufferings of exile not once did any of the Sages of Israel suggest that we make a state to protect ourselves. In every generation we had thousands of Sages well versed in the Torah.

2) We have thousands of legal work of Torah law that have been handed down to us by the Sages of all generations. Not once do we see a word suggesting the establishment of a state. What we do find is warnings against it.

3) The founders of Zionism were all atheists who denied the Torah. All the Torah Sages of that time opposed them and opposed Zionism, saying that Zionism would lead only to destruction.

However the true People of Israel will never change their nature or give up their Faith because of the strength the Creator gives them. Zionism is a foreign growth in the body of the Jewish People. The end will be that it will rid itself of this foreign growth and remain pure. Zionism has overcome the Jewish people by force, fraud and terror, but none of this will help them because the truth will always remain with the help of the Creator.

Zionism will not replace the Jewish People. The Jewish People will remain strong in their faith and the Zionist State will cease to exist. It is therefore, the Jewish people’s demand that the State that calls itself ISRAEL, should cease to exist. Since this won’t be done, the Jewish people demand that Zionists cease to call themselves “Israel”, because their entire being is in complete opposition to the true People of Israel. The true People of Israel deny Zionists permission to call themselves by that name. The Zionist leaders have no right to set themselves up as the representatives and spokesmen of the true People of ISRAEL.

Since we know they will not fulfill this demand either we feel that at least we cry out the truth. The truth will always remain the truth. By no means or force can the truth be changed. Even if all the world would say that one and one is three, the truth will remain that one and one is two.

Let the truth be declared. The use of the Name “ISRAEL” by that State is a complete falsification. The People of Israel have nothing to do with that State. Zionism and its State have no share and no part in the true ISRAEL.

As the illegal Afghan war and occupation continues a report from Geneva is stating that US troops have and continue to torture and execute prisoners in Afghanistan. Such actions are deemed by US law, Canadian Law and International Law as war crimes.

Seymour Hersh, an investigative journalist with the New Yorker, made the revelation of US troops torturing and executing prisoners in Afghanistan during the Global Investigative Journalism Conference in Geneva.

“I’ll tell you right now, one of the great tragedies of my country is that Mr. Obama is looking the other way, because equally horrible things are happening to prisoners, to those we capture in Afghanistan,” Hersh said.

He alleged that US forces were engaged in ‘battlefield executions’ and other heinous offences.

“They’re being executed on the battlefield. It’s unbelievable stuff going on there that doesn’t necessarily get reported. Things don’t change,” Hersh noted.

Hersh who worked for many years at The New York Times also helped break the story that detainees at the Abu Ghraib prison in Iraq were being tortured by their US jailers.

The report comes as the International Committee of the Red Cross (ICRC) has recently confirmed reports about the existence of a secret detention facility at a US airbase in Bagram in Afghanistan.

Human rights groups say Bagram and other US-ran jail facilities have remained US torture centers since the toppling of the Taliban regime in Afghanistan nine years ago.

War crimes are “violations of the laws or customs of war”; including “murder, the ill-treatment or deportation of civilian residents of an occupied territory to slave labor camps”, “the murder or ill-treatment of prisoners of war”, the killing of hostages, “the wanton destruction of cities, towns and villages, and any devastation not justified by military, or civilian necessity”

The United States Environmental Weapon of Mass Destruction - HAARP, Gokoma Alaska

What is a weapon of mass destruction? A weapon of mass destruction (WMD) is a weapon that can kill large numbers of humans (and other life forms) and/or cause great damage to man-made structures (e.g. buildings), natural structures (e.g. mountains), or the biosphere in general. A WMD is most certainly not a crudely made bomb that someone makes to blow up a car or frag a few innocent bystanders. A WMD is what the United States military and CIA have stockpiled. The United States not only possesses WMDs it has used weapons of mass destruction.

During its recent history the U.S. possessed(es) four types of weapons of mass destruction: nuclear weapons, chemical weapons, biological weapons and now environmental weapons. The U.S. is the only country to have used nuclear weapons in combat. It has used biological weapons in the US (blankets purposely infected with smallpox were given to Native American Indians to wipe them out and again in 2009 US president Barack Obama ordered the release of the Swine Flu Virus aka A-H1N1 virus) and chemical weapons of mass destruction in Vietnam and Laos (Agent Orange). The US has also used chemical, biological and depleted nuclear weapons in Iraq and Afghanistan.

Nuclear weapons have twice been deployed in wartime: two nuclear weapons were used by the United States against Japan in World War II in the atomic bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki. Altogether, the two bombings killed an estimated 200,000 Japanese citizens and injured another 130,000. The overwhelming majority of the casualties were civilian.

The U.S. conducted an extensive nuclear testing program. 1,054 tests were conducted between 1945 and 1992. The exact number of nuclear devices detonated is unclear because some tests involved multiple devices while a few failed to explode or were designed not to create a nuclear explosion. The last nuclear test by the United States was on September 23, 1992; the U.S. has signed but not ratified the Comprehensive Test Ban Treaty.

Currently, the United States nuclear arsenal is deployed in three areas:

* Land-based intercontinental ballistic missiles, or ICBMs;
* Sea-based, nuclear submarine-launched ballistic missiles, or SLBMs; and
* Air-based nuclear weapons of the U.S. Air Force’s heavy bomber group

The United States is one of the five “Nuclear Weapons States” under the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty, which the US ratified in 1968. On October 13, 1999, the U.S. Senate rejected ratification of the Comprehensive Test Ban Treaty, having previously ratified the Partial Test Ban Treaty in 1963. The U.S. has not, however, tested a nuclear weapon since 1992, though it has tested many non-nuclear components and has developed powerful supercomputers in an attempt to duplicate the knowledge gained from testing without the actual tests themselves.

The exact number of nuclear weapons possessed by the United States is difficult to determine. Different treaties and organizations have different criteria for reporting nuclear weapons, especially those held in reserve, and those being dismantled or rebuilt:

* As of 1999, the U.S. was said to have 12,000 nuclear weapons of all types stockpiled
* In its Strategic Arms Reduction Treaty (START) declaration for 2003, the U.S. listed 5968 deployed warheads as defined by START rules.
* For 2007, the Bulletin of the Atomic Scientists listed the U.S. with about 5,400 total nuclear warheads: around 3,575 strategic and 500 nonstrategic warheads; and about 1,260 additional warheads held in the inactive stockpile. Other warheads are in some step of the disassembly process.
* The exact number as of Sept. 30, 2009, was 5,113 warheads, according to a U.S. fact sheet released May,3 2010.

In 2010, the Pentagon disclosed that the current size of its nuclear arsenal is a total of 5,113 warheads operationally deployed, kept in active reserve and held in inactive storage. The figure does not include the estimated 4,600 warheads that have been retired and scheduled for dismantlement. The number of operationally deployed strategic warheads stands at 1,968.

Today the US possesses and has used another new weapon of mass destruction - HAARP or High Frequency Active Auroral Research Program. The High Frequency Active Auroral Research Program (HAARP) is a weather weapon of mass destruction facility jointly funded by the US Air Force, the US Navy, the University of Alaska and the Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (DARPA). The US military installation HAARP operates on an Air Force owned site near Gakona, Alaska. HAARP is a weapon of mass destruction as it a military facility that actively tests and deliberately manipulates the climate for the US government. It constitutes a weapon of conquest capable of selectively destabilising agricultural and ecological systems of entire regions.

World renowned scientist Dr. Rosalie Bertell confirms that “US military scientists are working on weather systems as a potential weapon. The methods include the enhancing of storms and the diverting of vapor rivers in the Earth’s atmosphere to produce targeted droughts or floods.”

Already in the 1970s, former National Security advisor Zbigniew Brzezinski had foreseen in his book “Between Two Ages” that:

“Technology will make available, to the leaders of major nations, techniques for conducting secret warfare, of which only a bare minimum of the security forces need be appraised… Techniques of weather modification could be employed to produce prolonged periods of drought or storm. “

Marc Filterman, a former French military officer, outlines several types of “unconventional weapons” using radio frequencies. He refers to “weather war,” indicating that the U.S. and the Soviet Union had already “mastered the know-how needed to unleash sudden climate changes (hurricanes, drought) in the early 1980s.” These technologies make it “possible to trigger atmospheric disturbances by using Extremely Low Frequency (ELF) radar [waves].”

A simulation study of future defense “scenarios” commissioned for the US Air Force calls for: “US aerospace forces to ‘own the weather’ by capitalizing on emerging technologies and focusing development of those technologies to war-fighting applications.” From enhancing friendly operations or disrupting those of the enemy via small-scale tailoring of natural weather patterns to complete dominance of global communications and counterspace control, weather-modification offers the war fighter a wide-range of possible options to defeat or coerce an adversary. In the United States, weather-modification will likely become a part of national security policy with both domestic and international applications. The US government will pursue such a policy, depending on its interests, at various levels.

Despite a vast body of scientific evidence, the issue of deliberate climatic manipulations for military use has never been explicitly part of the UN agenda on climate change. Neither the official delegations nor the environmental action groups participating in the Hague Conference on Climate Change (CO6) (November 2000) have raised the broad issue of “weather warfare” or “environmental modification techniques (ENMOD)” as relevant to an understanding of climate change.

The High-Frequency Active Aural Research Program (HAARP) based in Gokoma Alaska-jointly managed by the US Air Force and the US Navy-is part of a new generation of sophisticated weaponry under the US Strategic Defense Initiative (SDI). Operated by the Air Force Research Laboratory’s Space Vehicles Directorate, HAARP constitutes a system of powerful antennas capable of creating “controlled local modifications of the ionosphere”.

Scientist Dr. Nicholas Begich-actively involved in the public campaign against HAARP-describes HAARP as: “A super-powerful radiowave-beaming technology that lifts areas of the ionosphere (upper layer of the atmosphere) by focusing a beam and heating those areas. Electromagnetic waves then bounce back onto earth and penetrate everything-living and dead.”

Dr. Rosalie Bertell depicts HAARP as “a gigantic heater that can cause major disruption in the ionosphere, creating not just holes, but long incisions in the protective layer that keeps deadly radiation from bombarding the planet.”

HAARP has been presented to public opinion as a program of scientific and academic research. US military documents seem to suggest, however, that HAARP’s main objective is to “exploit the ionosphere for Department of Defense purposes.” Without explicitly referring to the HAARP program, a US Air Force study points to the use of “induced ionospheric modifications” as a means of altering weather patterns as well as disrupting enemy communications and radar.

According to Dr. Rosalie Bertell, HAARP is part of a integrated weapons’ system, which has potentially devastating environmental consequences: “It is related to fifty years of intensive and increasingly destructive programs to understand and control the upper atmosphere. It would be rash not to associate HAARP with the space laboratory construction which is separately being planned by the United States. HAARP is an integral part of a long history of space research and development of a deliberate military nature.

The military implications of combining these projects is alarming. The ability of the HAARP / Spacelab/ rocket combination to deliver very large amount of energy, comparable to a nuclear bomb, anywhere on earth via laser and particle beams, are frightening. The project is likely to be “sold” to the public as a space shield against incoming weapons, or, for the more gullible, a device for repairing the ozone layer.

In addition to weather manipulation, HAARP has a number of related uses: “HAARP could contribute to climate change by intensively bombarding the atmosphere with high-frequency rays. Returning low-frequency waves at high intensity could also affect people’s brains, and effects on tectonic movements cannot be ruled out.

More alarming, HAARP has the ability of modifying the World’s electro-magnetic field.

Entire national economies could potentially be destabilized through climatic manipulations. Take a good look at what has been happening in the US and around the World in just the past decade. The melting of the Glaciers in all probability is the result of the US environmental weapon of mass destruction. Motive? The untapped natural resources including natural gas and oil of Canada’s North. It would be financially impossible to mine or drill through thick glacier ice. Use HAARP to punch a hole in the ionosphere that protects the Earth from the harmful radiation of the Sun and the US creates the largest microwave oven to melt and defrost the glaciers. With all of the Glaciers being rapidly melted by the US, sea levels have proportionally risen and rain fall now causes frequent mass flooding of entire countries. Storms are all connected to the amount of precipitation in the air. A very high concentration of precipitation causes unheard of super storms and flooding in some areas of the World and record high temperatures and drought in other areas. See the obvious connection between the US weapon of mass destruction called HAARP and global warming, super storms, flooding and droughts?

The end of the Mayan calendar falls on Sunday, December 21, 2012. Will the US be responsible for the predicted end of times as we know it in 2012? Is HAARP the Pandora’s box that will end it all come 2012? With such a destructive weapon of mass destruction being used more frequently by the United States government, it is plausible.

While there is no concrete evidence of HAARP having been used, scientific findings suggest that it is at present fully operational. What this means is that HAARP could potentially be applied by the US military to selectively modify the climate of an “unfriendly nation” or “rogue state” with a view to destabilizing its national economy. Agricultural systems in both developed and developing countries are already in crisis as a result of US policies including market deregulation, commodity dumping, etc. Amply documented, IMF and World Bank “economic medicine” imposed on the Third World and the countries of the former Soviet block has largely contributed to the destabilization of domestic agriculture. In turn, the provisions of the World Trade Organization (WTO) have supported the interests of a handful of Western agri-biotech conglomerates in their quest to impose genetically modified (GMO) seeds on farmers throughout the World.

It is important to understand the linkage between the economic, strategic and military processes of the US government. In the above context, climatic manipulations under the HAARP program (whether accidental or deliberate) would inevitably exacerbate these changes by weakening national economies, destroying infrastructure and potentially triggering the bankruptcy of farmers over vast areas. Surely national governments and the United Nations should address the possible consequences of HAARP and other “non-lethal weapons” on climate change. In the meantime what can we do to stop the US government’s usage of this weapon of mass destruction. Every farmer around the World can start by suing the United States government for damages caused by HAARP to their crops and their livelihood. Every government of the regions affected by either severe drought or flooding can also start suing the United States government for damages to their economies. The members of the UN could vote and order the United States government to comply with International Treaties and immediately shut down HAARP. It isn’t too late, but action must be taken against the US government today.

Al Qaeda central headquarters, the George H.W. Bush Center for Central Intelligence in Langley, Va.

If there was a way to wipe out terrorism would you take action and wipe it out? There is a way to wipe out terrorism. You attack the source. You wipe out the organization that is solely responsible for every terrorist act committed since it’s creation. You wipe out the CIA.

The CIA is not a police force nor a peacekeeping organization. It is not an aid agency nor a relief agency. It is an organzition of murderers, , mercenaries, kidnappers, saboteurs, bombers, torturers and assassins. They have one objective - terrorism - violent acts which are intended to create fear (terror), are perpetrated for an ideological goal (as opposed to a lone attack), and deliberately target or disregard the safety of non-combatants (civilians). Today they carry out terrorist acts against the US and foreign states. Their newest illegal covert terrorist operation is code named Al Qaeda. Every named Al Qaeda terrorist can be traced back to being recruited by and trained by the CIA including Usma bin Laden. bin Laden was recruited by the CIA to fight the Soviet army during the Soviet invasion and occupation of Afghanistan.

The mujahideen were financed, armed and trained by the United States CIA during the administrations of Carter and Reagan, and also by Saudi Arabia, Pakistan under Zia-ul-Haq, Iran, the People’s Republic of China and several Western European countries. Pakistan’s secret service, Inter-Services Intelligence (ISI), was used as an intermediary for most of these activities to disguise the sources of support for the resistance. One of the CIA’s longest and most expensive covert operations was the supplying of billions of dollars in arms to the Afghan mujahideen militants. The arms included Stinger missiles, shoulder-fired, antiaircraft weapons that they used against Soviet helicopters and later against commercial airliners. Osama bin Laden was among the recipients of U.S. arms. Between $3–$20 billion in U.S. funds were funneled into the country to train and equip the mujahideen with weapons, including Stinger surface-to-air missiles.

US financing of the mujahideen Islamic insurgency actually started before the Soviets invaded. The CIA was very active in the region with orders from Carter to “suck” the Soviets into Afghanistan. U.S. policy, unbeknownst even to the Mujahideen, was part of a larger strategy “to induce a Soviet military intervention.” National Security Advisor Zbigniew Brzezinski stated:

“According to the official version of history, CIA aid to the Mujahadeen began during 1980, that is to say, after the Soviet army invaded Afghanistan, 24 Dec 1979. But the reality, secretly guarded until now, is completely otherwise. That secret operation was an excellent idea. It had the effect of drawing the Soviets into the Afghan trap…. The day that the Soviets officially crossed the border, I wrote to President Carter “We now have the opportunity of giving to the Soviet Union its Vietnam War.”

Under Reagan, U.S. support for the mujahideen evolved into an official U.S. foreign policy, known as the Reagan Doctrine, which included U.S. support for anti-Soviet movements in Afghanistan, Angola, Nicaragua, and elsewhere. Ronald Reagan praised mujahideen as “freedom fighters”.

Even after the mujahideen successfully drove the Soviets out of Afghanistan the CIA stayed in the region. It had more terrorist operations with new terrorist recruits to work on for the US government. During the Clinton administration the CIA provided propaganda for an upcoming terrorist operation against the United States of America. It created terrorist training camps in the mountains that border Pakistan and Afghanistan. The CIA made Saudi Arabian billionaire nationalist USAMA BIN LADEN leader of their Al Qaeda training camps and had him make regular appearances at these camps in order to recruit Pakistani, Afghan, Saudi, Egyptian and United Arab Emirate nationals. To make the fake Al Qaeda threat to the US look real then US president Bill Clinton ordered air strikes on these CIA terrorist training camps. No air strike ever took place, only propaganda reports issued by the CIA that they did. Then on the morning of 14 July 1999, the US government - Bill Clinton, ordered the CIA to assassinate Abdul Ahad Karzai, father of future puppet president of the future US occupied Afghanistan, Hamid Karzai, in order for the US to create a new false enemy of the US - the Taliban, and gain a needed ally.

Years before his father was assassinated by the CIA, Hamid Karzai worked for the CIA in helping to provide financial and military support for the Mujahideen during the 1980s Soviet war in Afghanistan. While Karzai’s brothers emigrated to the United States, Hamid Karzai remained in exile in Pakistan throughout the Soviet occupation. He accompanied the first Mujahideen leaders into Kabul in 1992 following the Soviet withdrawal. When the Taliban emerged in the mid 1990s, Karzai, like many other Afghans, supported them, because he saw them as a force that could finally end the violence and corruption in his country. However, he later broke with them and refused to serve as their ambassador to the United Nations, telling friends he felt the Pakistani Inter-Services Intelligence (ISI) was wrongly using them. Karzai stated that “there were many wonderful people in the Taliban.” After the US accused the Taliban of their assassination of Karzai’s father Hamid Karzai worked closely with the CIA and the US to help gather Afghan drug warlord support for the anti-Taliban movement.

As the U.S. military was preparing for a confrontation with the Taliban in September 2001, Karzai began lobbying NATO nations to purge his country of Al-Qaeda. “These Arabs, together with their foreign supporters and the Taliban, destroyed miles and miles of homes and orchards and vineyards,” he told BBC, “They have killed Afghans. They have trained their guns on Afghan lives… We want them out.” What he was actually doing is doing what he was told and air the CIA propaganda called Al-Qaeda. These Arabs he is refering to is the CIA Saudi operatives that were commanded by the now infamous bin Laden. These Arabs are part of the US, Pakistani and Saudi Arabian financed and trained terrorist cell code named Al Qaeda. The US needed to link the Taliban with their CIA terrorist cell code named Al Qaeda. The Taliban were now the new enemy of the US, for one reason only - the Trans-Afghan pipeline - a proposed natural gas pipeline from Turkmenistan across Afghanistan to Pakistan that US oil companies wanted to build and control.

The Trans-Afghan pipeline was suppose to be the financial future of the Afghan people and the Taliban was negotiating with several countries, including the US, to build this natural gas pipeline through Afghanistan. The US oil giant Unocal wanted the contract to build the pipeline. Unocal Vice President John J. Maresca—later to become a Special Ambassador to Afghanistan— testified before the House of Representatives that until a single, unified, friendly government is in place in Afghanistan, the trans-Afghan pipeline will not be built. Unocal petitioned the US government on February 12, 1998.

Immediately after this U.S. INTERESTS IN THE CENTRAL ASIAN REPUBLICS HEARING BEFORE THE SUBCOMMITTEE ON ASIA AND THE PACIFIC, the Clinton administration made the Taliban the enemy of the US and the Afghan people and began planning for the false flag attacks against the US of September 11, 2001. Bill Clinton ordered the CIA to prepare to attack the US and blame it on the CIA recruited, financed and trained terrorists under the command of one Usama bin Laden. The US needed an excuse to go after the Taliban and remove them so that US oil companies could take control of the Afghan people’s financial future - the Trans-Afghan pipeline. On August 7, 1998 the CIA was ordered by Bill Clinton to Bomb US Embassies in Kenya and Tanzania, killing over 200. Immediately the US government of Bill Clinton blamed the attacks on al-Qaeda (the US own CIA terrorist cell). Bill Clinton ordered the bombings to coincide with the eighth anniversary of the arrival of US troops in Saudi Arabia in order to suggest an anti-US sentiment.

On August 20, 1998 the US claimed to have fired 66 missiles at six al-Qaeda training camps in Afghanistan and 13 missiles at a pharmaceutical factory in Khartoum, Sudan, in retaliation for the US embassy bombings. Back in the US President Clinton is widely accused of using the alleged missile strike to distract the US public from a personal sex scandal.

December 5, 1998: Unocal announces it is withdrawing from the CentGas pipeline consortium Reason given - President Clinton refuses to extend diplomatic recognition to the Taliban, making business there legally problematic.

The following year a top level US policy document explicitly confirms the US military’s readiness to fight a war for oil. The report, Strategic Assessment 1999, prepared for the US Joint Chiefs of Staff and the secretary of defense, states, “energy and resource issues will continue to shape international security,” and if an oil “problem” arises, “US forces might be used to ensure adequate supplies.” Oil conflicts over production facilities and transport routes, particularly in the Persian Gulf and Caspian regions, are specifically envisaged.

June 1999: Enron announces an agreement to build a $140 million power plant in the Gaza Strip, between Israel and Egypt. One of the major financiers for the project is the Saudi Binladin Group, a company owned by bin Laden’s family. This is the second attempted project between these two companies. Ninety percent complete, the construction will be halted because of Palestinian-Israeli violence and then Enron’s bankruptcy.

July-August 1999: About a dozen Afghan leaders visit the US. They are militia commanders, mostly Taliban, and some with ties to the CIA and their al-Qaeda training camps. A few are opponents of the Taliban. Their exact names and titles remain classified.

July 4, 1999: With the chances of a US pipeline deal with the Taliban looking increasingly unlikely, President Clinton finally issues an executive order prohibiting commercial transactions with the Taliban. The order also freezes the Taliban’s US assets. Clinton falsely accuses the Taliban of harboring bin Laden. Rapist Bill Clinton shows the World that the US is a sore loser.

October 12, 2000: USS Cole Bombed by the CIA and blamed on fictitious leader of the CIA own Al Qaeda terrorist cell. Seventeen US soldiers are killed and 30 are wounded. The CIA will later conclude that with just slightly better training, their attack would have killed 300 and sunk the ship.

December 19, 2000: US Seeks Taliban Overthrow; Considers Russia-US Invasion of Afghanistan - The Washington Post reports, “The United States has quietly begun to align itself with those in the Russian government calling for military action against Afghanistan and has toyed with the idea of a new raid to wipe out Osama bin Laden. Until it backed off under local pressure, it went so far as to explore whether a Central Asian country would permit the use of its territory for such a purpose.” Russia and the US are discussing “what kind of government should replace the Taliban. Thus, while claiming to oppose a military solution to the Afghan problem, the United States is now talking about the overthrow of a regime that controls nearly the entire country, in the hope it can be replaced with a hypothetical government that does not exist even on paper.”

January 21, 2001: George W. Bush is inaugurated as the 43rd US President, replacing Bill Clinton. Numerous figures in Bush’s administration have been directly employed in the oil industry, including Bush, Vice President Cheney, and National Security Adviser Rice. Rice had been on Chevron’s Board of Directors since 1991, and even had a Chevron oil tanker named after her. It is later revealed that Cheney is still being paid up to $1 million a year in “deferred payments” from Halliburton, the oil company he headed. Enron’s ties also reach deep into the administration.

March 1, 2001: CIA blows up two giant stone Buddhas of Bamiyan—ancient statues carved into an Afghan mountainside, which are considered priceless treasures. The CIA objective was to get the international community to no longer recoginze the Taliban as the government of Afghanistan. The Taliban receive great international condemnation in response to the CIA destruction of the Giant Buddha Statues.

August 2-3, 2001: A senior official in the Taliban’s defense ministry tells journalist Hamid Mir that the US will soon invade Afghanistan. Mir will later recall that he is told, “[W]e believe Americans are going to invade Afghanistan and they will do this before October 15, 2001, and justification for this would be either one of two options: Taliban got control of Afghanistan or a big major attack against American interests either inside America or elsewhere in the world.” Mir reports this information before 9/11, presumably in the newspaper in Pakistan that he works for. [Bergen, 2006, pp. 287] Interestingly, Afghan warlord Gulbuddin Hekmatyar made a similar prediction to Mir several months before (see April 2001). Also, several weeks earlier, US officials reportedly passed word to Taliban officials in a back channel meeting that the US may soon attack Afghanistan if the Taliban do not cooperate on building an oil and gas pipeline running through the country. According to one participant in the meeting, the US attack would take place “by the middle of October at the latest”

September 11, 2001: The CIA attacks New York City and Washington DC killing 3,000. Using CIA owned aircraft, painted to look like US commercial jets, the CIA flies remotely controlled unmanned aircrafts into the Towers of the World Trade Centers and the Pentagon. This is not the first time the CIA attacked the World Trade Centers. The 1993 World Trade Center bombing occurred on February 26, 1993, when a car bomb was detonated below the North Tower of the World Trade Center in New York City. The 1,500 lb (680 kg) urea nitrate–hydrogen gas enhanced device was intended to knock the North Tower (Tower One) into the South Tower (Tower Two), bringing both towers down and killing thousands of people. The accused attackers spent time at the CIA Al-Qaeda training camps in Afghanistan. Both World Trade Center attacks were ordered by the US government to steal the $billions in gold and silver bullion that were vaulted in the basements of the 2 Towers. As much as $160 Billion in bullion was stored under the Trade Center. The gold was owned by many foreign nations, central banks and official international organizations. Were Clinton failed George W Bush succeeded.

For the September 11, 2001 attacks the CIA used a modified version of a 1962 false flag attack against the United States called Operation Northwoods. The modified version that the CIA used on 9/11 blamed Al Qaeda instead of the original target - communist Cuba.

Operation Northwoods, or Northwoods, was a false-flag plan that originated within the United States government in 1962. The plan called for Central Intelligence Agency (CIA) or other operatives to commit genuine acts of terrorism in U.S. cities and elsewhere. These acts of terrorism were to be blamed on Cuba in order to create public support for a war against that nation, which had recently become communist under Fidel Castro. One part of the Operation Northwoods plan was to “develop a Communist Cuban terror campaign in the Miami area, in other Florida cities and even in Washington.”

Operation Northwoods included proposals for hijackings and bombings followed by the introduction of phony evidence that would implicate the Cuban government. The plan stated:

“The desired resultant from the execution of this plan would be to place the United States in the apparent position of suffering defensible grievances from a rash and irresponsible government of Cuba and to develop an international image of a Cuban threat to peace in the Western Hemisphere.”

Several other proposals were included within the Operation Northwoods plan, including real or simulated actions against various U.S. military and civilian targets. The plan was drafted by the Joint Chiefs of Staff, signed by Chairman Lyman Lemnitzer and sent to the Secretary of Defense. The U.S. government’s Cuban Project anti-communist initiative, Operation Northwoods was never officially accepted and the proposals included in the plan were never executed - that is until September 11, 2001.

February 14, 2002: The Israeli newspaper Ma’ariv notes: “If one looks at the map of the big American bases created in the Afghan war, one is struck by the fact that they are completely identical to the route of the projected oil pipeline to the Indian Ocean.”

If every country focused on wiping out the CIA, Al Qaeda would also be wiped out. To this day the CIA recruits foreign nationals and trains them to carry out terrorists acts - code named Al Qaeda. If every country acted to wipe out the CIA the World could be free of this terrorist menace.

The view of the Goldman Sachs Tower and Manhattan from Liberty State Park. Buildings from left to right: Liberty View Towers, Goldman Sachs Tower, Empire State Building, Chrysler Building, Metropolitan Life Tower, Trump World Tower. ~ 28 September 2002. On April 16, 2004 Goldman Sachs announced through the media that it is forging ahead with plans to build a $1.8 billion-dollar, 40-story world headquarters at Battery Park City just as it completes construction of New Jersey’s tallest building, Goldman Sachs Tower, a mile away in Jersey City. Goldman received more than $1 billion in tax-free financing called Liberty Bonds and $30 million in cash grants, as well as low-cost electric power and tax breaks towards the building of its new World Headquarters. The investment bank also announced plans to consolidate the trading and sales operations now spread between 85 Broad Street, its current headquarters, and 1 New York Plaza. The leases in those two buildings expire in 2008 and 2009; Goldman wants a new home by 2008, the bank has told state and city officials. Conveniently, Goldman Sachs received $12.9 billion in public funds through Bush’s Federal Reserve Banks Bailout Scheme then just 6 months later on 30th October 2008 it was reported that Goldman Sachs was preparing to hand out £7billion for salaries and 2008 year-end bonuses. I guess crime does pay as Goldman Sachs defrauded the US people and then gave themselves £7billion in bonuses.

Take a look at any US dollar. They all state that the paper is a “Federal Reserve Note” - top middle of every paper money. The US Federal Reserve is a group of privately owned banks that charges the American people interest to print the US currency. The US Federal Reserve banks are also the ones who claimed they were in financial trouble and got $trillions in Bush’s Reserve Banks Bailout Scheme and Obama’s Reserve Banks Bonus Scheme.

Securities fraud is a crime in which laws set to protect investors and securities traders are violated. Securities fraud is a serious offense that can carry both civil and criminal punishments. Criminal investigations can lead to imprisonment.

The most common forms of securities fraud that are:

* Insider trading (trading based on information that is not available to the public)
* Accounting fraud (keeping inaccurate books or presenting false information purposefully)
* Misrepresentation (presenting misleading or untrue information about a company, or its securities, to an investor or the public)

Another type of securities fraud is called shareholders fraud. Shareholder fraud occurs when a company conceals its debts or beefs up its earnings reports in order to mislead investors and stockholders. Shareholder fraud can cost people their retirement funds or life savings. A few prominent examples of companies that have been accused of shareholder fraud include: Enron, Tyco, WorldCom, and Adelphia.

Privately owned (not a branch of the United States government) US Federal Reserve banks tactics akin to the ones that fostered the subprime mortgages in the United States have worsened the financial crisis shaking Greece and has undermined the euro by coaching European governments to resort to securities fraud to hide their mounting debts.

As worries over Greece rattle world markets, records and interviews show that with the US Federal Reserve bank’s help, the nation engaged in a decade-long effort to skirt European debt limits. One deal created by Goldman Sachs helped obscure billions in debt from the budget overseers in Brussels.

Even as the crisis was nearing the flashpoint, banks were searching for ways to help Greece forestall the day of reckoning. In early November — three months before Athens became the epicenter of global financial anxiety — a team from Goldman Sachs arrived in the ancient city with a very illegal proposition for a government struggling to pay its bills.

The bankers, led by Goldman’s president, Gary D. Cohn, held out a financing instrument that would have pushed debt from Greece’s health care system far into the future, much as when strapped homeowners take out second mortgages to pay off their credit cards.

It had worked before. In 2001, just after Greece was admitted to Europe’s monetary union, Goldman helped the government secretly borrow billions, people familiar with the transaction said. That deal, hidden from public view because it was treated as a currency trade rather than a loan, helped Athens to meet Europe’s deficit rules while continuing to spend beyond its means.

Athens did not pursue the latest Goldman illegal proposal, but with Greece groaning under the weight of its debts and with its richer neighbors vowing to come to its aid, the deals over the last decade are raising questions about the US Federal Reserve banks’ role in the world’s latest financial drama.

As in the American subprime crisis and the implosion of the American International Group, financial derivatives played a role in the run-up of Greek debt. Instruments developed by Goldman Sachs, JPMorgan Chase and a wide range of other US Federal Reserve banks encouraged politicians to hide from their shareholders, the public, additional borrowing in Greece, Italy and possibly elsewhere.

In dozens of deals across the Continent, US Federal Reserve banks provided cash upfront (money they received illegally by way of another securities fraud scheme they executed against the US public by way of bailouts from both George W Bush and Barry Obama) in return for government payments to the US Federal Reserve Banks in the future, with those liabilities then left off the books. Greece, for example, traded away the rights to airport fees and lottery proceeds in years to come.

Critics say that such deals, because they are not recorded as loans, mislead investors and regulators about the depth of a country’s liabilities - in other words accounting fraud.

While the US Federal Reserve Banks’ illegal handiwork in Europe has received little attention on this side of the Atlantic, it has been sharply criticized in Greece and in magazines like Der Spiegel in Germany.

While Greece did not successfully benefit from Goldman’s illegal proposal in November 2009, it has had to pay Goldman Sachs about $300 million in fees for arranging the 2001 securities fraud transaction, according to several bankers familiar with the deal. But that isn’t the the final payment. The deal, saddles the government of Greece with big payments to Goldman until 2019.

The Federal Reserve is the privately owned central banking system of the United States. It was conceived by several of the world’s leading bankers in 1910 and enacted in 1913, with the passing of the Federal Reserve Act. The passing of the Federal Reserve Act was largely a response to another orchestrated financial panics and bank runs, the most severe of which being the Panic of 1907. Few people know or even realize that the Panic of 1907 was orchestrated by the very same banks that caused the current US financial crisis. Back in 1907 bankers from several privately owned banks wanted control of the United States - financial control and in order to get this control they caused the financial panic of 1907. They are also solely responsible for the current US financial crisis. They created a false financial panic in order to get their hands on $trillions of US federal tax dollars. They were successful in defrauding the American people in 1907 as they were fraudulently placed in charge of all banking for the United States of America. They were successful in defrauding the American people again in October 2008 with the theft of $700 billion from the American taxpayers and a little more than 4 months later, February 2009, another $787 billion with Barry Obama’s US Federal Reserve Banks bonuses scheme.

The main components of automobile exhaust are carbon dioxide (CO2) and water vapor (H2O). Because of the rising concern over global warming due to greenhouse gases many countries are now adopting emission standards as a means to reduce CO2 emissions. Emission standards are requirements that set specific limits to the amount of pollutants that can be released into the environment. Many emissions standards focus on regulating pollutants released by automobiles (motor cars) and other powered vehicles but they can also regulate emissions from industry, power plants, small equipment such as lawn mowers and diesel generators.

In the United States, emissions standards are managed by the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA). The state of California has special dispensation to promulgate more stringent vehicle emissions standards, and other states may choose to follow either the national or California standards.

California’s emissions standards are set by the California Air Resources Board, known locally by its acronym “CARB”. Given that California’s automotive market is one of the largest in the world, CARB wields enormous influence over the emissions requirements that major automakers must meet if they wish to sell into that market. In addition, several other U.S. states also choose to follow the CARB standards, so their rulemaking has broader implications within the U.S.

The European Union has its own set of emissions standards that all new vehicles must meet.

Canada also has its own set of emission standards. Ontario’s Drive Clean is an automobile emissions control program in Ontario, Canada. Originally, vehicles under 4,500 kg (cars, SUV, light trucks) and over three years old (and up to the 19th year) required an emission test every two years before the vehicle’s owner or lessor can renew its license plate. Starting with 2006, the test exemption was increased to five years, while the rolling exemption at 20 years ended, and all 1987 and older vehicles became exempt.

Canadian clean energy technology and solutions company, FuelReducer, is helping reduce CO2 emissions too. The newly developed FuelReducer Xe is now being tested. The FuelReducer Xe was developed to help reduce CO2 emissions. A number of emission tests have recently been carried out at various emission testing sites throughout the GTA (Greater Toronto Area). A number of different vehicles were tested twice, once without a FuelReducer Xe and then again after a FuelReducer Xe was installed. The Ontario Drive Clean emission testing equipment showed a decrease in CO2 emissions. Further testing will be done in the coming weeks and months. FuelReducer will be posting the print out for the emission testings so that you can see that the FuelReducer Xe is an effective technology for lowering carbon emissions.

Are only older cars the worse polluters? Not so. Some of the worse polluting vehicles on the road today are: the DODGE SRT-10 (Churning out 488 grams of carbon dioxide every kilometre - 488g/km), BMW M3 (309g/km), RENAULT Clio Renault Sport 200 (195g/km), VOLKSWAGEN Golf R32 4MOTION (255g/km) , FORD Ka, Post 2006 1.6 Duratec Sportka (182g/km), MERCEDES R-Class R63 AMG (387g/km), MERCEDES Viano 3.5 (284g/km), CADILLAC CTS-V (350g/km), CADILLAC Escalade 6.2 V8 (383g/km), and the BENTLEY Brooklands Coupé (465g/km) ~ according to the Environmental Transport Association following a study of more than 1,300 models of cars currently on sale in Britain.

The US federal government aims to reduce its greenhouse gas emissions by 28 percent by 2020, the White House announced in January 2010. The FuelReducer Xe can help reach that goal this year, 10 years ahead of schedule.