On the evening of 24 March 1999 US president Bill Clinton ordered NATO air strikes against the Yugoslav Federation. This was the first time in its 50 years of existence that NATO has taken military action against a sovereign state. Kosovo is a province of the Serb Republic of the Yugoslav Federation, and its ethnic contradictions and bloody conflicts are in the final analysis an internal affair of the Yugoslav Federation. In the US launching military attacks against a sovereign state in this fashion without UN Security Council authorization, the US and NATO violated to a serious degree the “UN Charter” and the principles of international law. Why was the western countries headed by the United States so keen on interfering in the Kosovo crisis and launch a major attack on the Yugoslav Federation?

The United States, under the Clintons (Bill and Hillary) and other western countries declared that their intervention in the Kosovo crisis is for the sake of preserving “human rights” and preventing a “genocidal” mass slaughter there, and also preventing this conflict from involving neighboring countries and threatening European security.

Are these the true facts? No.

Bill Clinton’s air strikes killed at least 10 times more civilians than the combined death toll from both sides involved in the civil war. The civil war was never an armed attack against any NATO member country and that fact alone means NATO violated its law. Then what was the US NATO hidden agenda?

Having absorbed Poland, the Czech Republic, and Hungary, NATO has had the insatiable desire to continue to expand toward the former Soviet Union. And the Yugoslav Federation is a state in an extremely important strategic position in the Balkans and also has good relations with Russia; it has thus become an obstacle on the road of NATO’s further eastward expansion.

Back in 1999 NATO forces waved the white flag of “peacekeeping” as it launched air strike after air strike against the civilian population of the Yugoslav Federation to forcibly occupy Kosovo. This military action had nothing to do with peacekeeping. It was launched by the US, under Bill and Hillary Clinton, to split and weaken the Yugoslav Federation and reduce Russia’s sphere of influence and establish a European security pattern dominated by NATO (US). This is the first strategic conspiracy of the United States government to use NATO to launch wars that “fit” the US foreign policies and agenda in contradiction and contravention of the UN Charter and Intentional Laws and treaties.

Then US Secretary of Defense Cohen has said that NATO’s credibility was on the line in Kosovo. Why did he say that? After the end of the cold war, NATO should have died a natural death following the demise of the Warsaw Pact. Yet in addition to ceaselessly expanding eastward, NATO also wants to formulate a so-called new strategy of development in the next century, and the core of this new strategy is to expand NATO’s functions and scope and to intervene militarily, without UN authorization, in all crises outside NATO’s defense area that are held to threaten the security of the alliance. NATO held a summit in Washington in April 1999 (at the request of US President Clinton) where this new strategy was discussed, and the Kosovo civil war (not the international crisis that Bill and Hillary Clinton claimed) become a “touchstone” for the United States to test this new strategy.

Since the end of the cold war, it has been the consistent aim of the United States to establish a one-pole world dominated by itself. Former US Secretary of State Albright said undisguisedly, regarding the Kosovo peace accord, that it would be “a table without legs” unless there were troops stationed there.

This means that if the Yugoslav Federation signs the peace accord, NATO forces will enter Kosovo without firing a shot; and if the Yugoslav Federation refused to sign, NATO forces will fight their way into Kosovo — no matter whether the accord is reached or not, NATO troops will enter and occupy Kosovo.

Having occupied Kosovo NATO forces could directly press up to the CIS (The Commonwealth of Independent States (CIS) is a regional organization whose participating countries are former Soviet Republics, formed during the break up of the Soviet Union.), dismantle Russian control over the CIS (Commonwealth of Independent States), and then directly insert NATO force southward into the Middle East. In this way the road would be open for the United States to use NATO to intervene militarily throughout the globe and dominate the world. NATO’s military interventions in Kosovo and now Afghanistan were driven entirely by US interests. This is the most important US strategic conspiracy in the US launching air strikes against the Yugoslav Federation. NATO’s involvement in the illegal attack and occupation of Afghanistan is it’s second move against Russia. Only after US and NATO forces were on the ground in Afghanistan could the US dare to move and take control of the Middle East oil. Now that US and NATO forces were on the ground in Afghanistan the US launched an attack on Iraq in March of 2003.

Even though US president Barry (Barrack isn’t his legal name) Obama promised to withdraw US troops from Iraq immediately after he was elected president that has not happened. He has broken the promise that gave him the White House. Why did he break his promise to the people of the United States? The US domination agenda. Obama hasn’t withdrawn troops from Iraq and Obama has increased the number of troops in Afghanistan for one reason. Another war. As I write this article the United States government is planning for another war of aggression. Several sources within Obama’s own administration and the US military have revealed that the US is going to attack Iran. The US troops are not going to be withdrawn from Iraq. Obama had no intentions of keeping his promise. The troops in Iraq are going to be used by the US government to launch an attack on Iran. Obama told congressional leaders in February of 2009 that he’s planning to pull all combat troops out of Iraq by August 2010. What he’s saying is that all US troops are going to pull out of Iraq and pour into Iran in an invasion that should take place by August 2010. Obama and the government needed more US and NATO troops in Afghanistan not to fight the Taliban but to fight Russia should Russia protect it’s ally and interests in Iran. The US is also presently arming Taiwan to the teeth because China has major contracts with Iran and when the US attacks Iran the US expects Taiwan to keep China busy.

When you stop and look at the: increase in US and NATO troops in Afghanistan, the renewed rhetoric and threats by the US against Iran, the US arming of Taiwan despite China’s repeated formal protests and the US and NATO arming former Soviet block countries it becomes obvious that the US is planning to start another World War. The US attack on Iran, either directly or through Israel, will start WWIII. It is as though the US government intentionally wants to start a World War. Why? So that the US government, both Democrats and Republicans, won’t go down in history as the ones who bankrupted the US through both parties’ involvement in the US Federal Reserve robbery of the United States and its people. The embarrassment, the shame and the indictments against US government officials, from both parties, including Mr Obama, is what they want to avoid. Starting another World War is their get out of jail free card. As soon as one US state after another declares bankruptcy the US government will have lost its hidden agenda of World domination. The US government believes that the time is now to make its move. Before the American people find out just what their government did to their country. George HW Bush was quoted saying: “if the American people ever find out what we have done, they will chase us down the streets and lynch us.”

Unocal Vice President John J. Maresca— later to become a Special Ambassador to Afghanistan—testified before the House of Representatives that until a single, unified, US friendly government is in place in Afghanistan, the trans-Afghan pipeline will not be built.

Most criminal investigations require six basic questions to be answered. “Who, what, when, where, why, and how?” You answer these questions, you have the criminal, and you solve the crime. “Who” is simple – that’s the victim, the person or persons who was assaulted, robbed, murdered. The “who” is the criminal’s ultimate choice. What he did, when he did it, where he did it, and perhaps how he did it, are usually self evident after the crime.

It’s the “why” that is, many times, hard to understand. Not the “why” that has a simple answer— money, frustration, anger, rage, or stupidity. The “whys” that are hard to answer are the less obvious, the less sensible ones; the ones that prove to be the most difficult for us to understand.

Most lawyers who go on television to discuss a crime will say that motive, the why of a crime, is not important. In fact, motive is not a legal element of a crime. However, intent or “mens rea,” the mental purpose of performing an act that is forbidden by law, is a legal element of a crime. Motive is the reason, the why, sometimes the darkest chapter in the darkest book in the massive library we call the human mind.

Motive is important because without an understanding of why people commit certain crimes in the way they do, we are left to begin at square one on every investigation

The US government planned for, prepared for, initiated and waged a war of aggression against Afghanistan in violation of international treaties, agreements or assurances, immediately following this HOUSE COMMITTEE ON INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS hearing. NATO member countries are guilty of this crime of Crimes against Peace ((i)Planning, preparation, initiation or waging of a war of aggression or a war in violation of international treaties, agreements or assurances; (ii) Participation in a common plan or conspiracy for the accomplishment of any of the acts mentioned under (i)) as they are willing participants and co-conspirators in this war of aggression against the sovereign state of Afghanistan and its people.

The following US House of Representative hearing held on FEBRUARY 12, 1998 is the burden of proof that the US is guilty of crimes against peace and waging an illegal war of aggression against Afghanistan. The US government of Bill and Hillary Clinton was lobbied by the US oil giant Unicol to replace (overthrow) the Afghan Taliban government and replace it with one “that has the confidence of governments, lenders and our company”. The US government began planning to overthrow the Taliban government and replace it with a pro US leader 3 years before 9/11.

The complete text of the hearing can be found at the following link: http://commdocs.house.gov/committees/intlrel/hfa48119.000/hfa48119_0.HTM#2. We begin this report with page 30 of the hearing.

TESTIMONY

BY

JOHN J. MARESCA

VICE PRESIDENT, INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS

UNOCAL CORPORATION

TO

HOUSE COMMITTEE ON INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS

SUBCOMMITTEE ON ASIA AND THE PACIFIC

FEBRUARY 12, 1998

WASHINGTON, D.C.

Mr. Chairman, I am John Maresca, Vice President, International Relations, of Unocal Corporation.

Unocal is one of the world’s leading energy resource and project development companies. Our activities are focused on three major regions — Asia, Latin America and the U.S. Gulf of Mexico. In Asia and the U.S. Gulf of Mexico, we are a major oil and gas producer. I appreciate your invitation to speak here today. I believe these hearings are important and timely, and I congratulate you for focusing on Central Asia oil and gas reserves and the role they play in shaping U.S. policy.

Today we would like to focus on three issues concerning this region, its resources and U.S. policy:

The need for multiple pipeline routes for Central Asian oil and gas.

The need for U.S. support for international and regional efforts to achieve balanced and lasting political settlements within Russia, other newly independent states and in Afghanistan.

The need for structured assistance to encourage economic reforms and the development of appropriate investment climates in the region. In this regard, we specifically support repeal or removal of Section 907 of the Freedom Support Act.

For more than 2,000 years, Central Asia has been a meeting ground between Europe and Asia, the site of ancient east-west trade routes collectively called the Silk Road and, at various points in history, a cradle of scholarship, culture and power. It is also a region of truly enormous natural resources, which are revitalizing cross-border trade, creating positive political interaction and stimulating regional cooperation. These resources have the potential to recharge the economies of neighboring countries and put entire regions on the road to prosperity.

About 100 years ago, the international oil industry was born in the Caspian/Central Asian region with the discovery of oil. In the intervening years, under Soviet rule, the existence of the region’s oil and gas resources was generally known, but only partially or poorly developed.

As we near the end of the 20th century, history brings us full circle. With political barriers falling, Central Asia and the Caspian are once again attracting people from around the globe who are seeking ways to develop and deliver its bountiful energy resources to the markets of the world.

The Caspian region contains tremendous untapped hydrocarbon reserves, much of them located in the Caspian Sea basin itself. Proven natural gas reserves within Azerbaijan, Uzbekistan, Turkmenistan and Kazakhstan equal more than 236 trillion cubic feet. The region’s total oil reserves may reach more than 60 billion barrels of oil — enough to service Europe’s oil needs for 11 years. Some estimates are as high as 200 billion barrels. In 1995, the region was producing only 870,000 barrels per day (44 million tons per year [Mt/y]).

By 2010, Western companies could increase production to about 4.5 million barrels a day (Mb/d) — an increase of more than 500 percent in only 15 years. If this occurs, the region would represent about five percent of the world’s total oil production, and almost 20 percent of oil produced among non-OPEC countries.

One major problem has yet to be resolved: how to get the region’s vast energy resources to the markets where they are needed. There are few, if any, other areas of the world where there can be such a dramatic increase in the supply of oil and gas to the world market. The solution seems simple: build a “new” Silk Road. Implementing this solution, however, is far from simple. The risks are high, but so are the rewards.

Finding and Building Routes to World Markets

One of the main problems is that Central Asia is isolated. The region is bounded on the north by the Arctic Circle, on the east and west by vast land distances, and on the south by a series of natural obstacles — mountains and seas — as well as political obstacles, such as conflict zones or sanctioned countries.

This means that the area’s natural resources are landlocked, both geographically and politically. Each of the countries in the Caucasus and Central Asia faces difficult political challenges. Some have unsettled wars or latent conflicts. Others have evolving systems where the laws — and even the courts — are dynamic and changing. Business commitments can be rescinded without warning, or they can be displaced by new geopolitical realities.

In addition, a chief technical obstacle we face in transporting oil is the region’s existing pipeline infrastructure. Because the region’s pipelines were constructed during the Moscow-centered Soviet period, they tend to head north and west toward Russia. There are no connections to the south and east.

Depending wholly on this infrastructure to export Central Asia oil is not practical. Russia currently is unlikely to absorb large new quantities of “foreign” oil, is unlikely to be a significant market for energy in the next decade, and lacks the capacity to deliver it to other markets.

Certainly there is no easy way out of Central Asia. If there are to be other routes, in other directions, they must be built.

Two major energy infrastructure projects are seeking to meet this challenge. One, under the aegis of the Caspian Pipeline Consortium, or CPC, plans to build a pipeline west from the Northern Caspian to the Russian Black Sea port of Novorossisk. From Novorossisk, oil from this line would be transported by tanker through the Bosphorus to the Mediterranean and world markets.

The other project is sponsored by the Azerbaijan International Operating Company (AIOC), a consortium of 11 foreign oil companies including four American companies — Unocal, Amoco, Exxon and Pennzoil. It will follow one or both of two routes west from Baku. One line will angle north and cross the North Caucasus to Novorossisk. The other route would cross Georgia and extend to a shipping terminal on the Black Sea port of Supsa. This second route may be extended west and south across Turkey to the Mediterranean port of Ceyhan.

But even if both pipelines were built, they would not have enough total capacity to transport all the oil expected to flow from the region in the future; nor would they have the capability to move it to the right markets. Other export pipelines must be built.

Unocal believes that the central factor in planning these pipelines should be the location of the future energy markets that are most likely to need these new supplies. Just as Central Asia was the meeting ground between Europe and Asia in centuries past, it is again in a unique position to potentially service markets in both of these regions — if export routes to these markets can be built. Let’s take a look at some of the potential markets.

Western Europe

Western Europe is a tough market. It is characterized by high prices for oil products, an aging population, and increasing competition from natural gas. Between 1995 and 2010, we estimate that demand for oil will increase from 14.1 Mb/d (705 Mt/y) to 15.0 Mb/d (750 Mt/y), an average growth rate of only 0.5 percent annually. Furthermore, the region is already amply supplied from fields in the Middle East, North Sea, Scandinavia and Russia. Although there is perhaps room for some of Central Asia’s oil, the Western European market is unlikely to be able to absorb all of the production from the Caspian region.

Central and Eastern Europe

Central and Eastern Europe markets do not look any better. Although there is increased demand for oil in the region’s transport sector, natural gas is gaining strength as a competitor. Between 1995 and 2010, demand for oil is expected to increase by only half a million barrels per day, from 1.3 Mb/d (67 Mt/y) to 1.8 Mb/d (91.5 Mt/y). Like Western Europe, this market is also very competitive. In addition to supplies of oil from the North Sea, Africa and the Middle East, Russia supplies the majority of the oil to this region.

The Domestic NIS Market

The growth in demand for oil also will be weak in the Newly Independent States (NIS). We expect Russian and other NIS markets to increase demand by only 1.2 percent annually between 1997 and 2010.

Asia/Pacific

In stark contrast to the other three markets, the Asia/Pacific region has a rapidly increasing demand for oil and an expected significant increase in population. Prior to the recent turbulence in the various Asian/Pacific economies, we anticipated that this region’s demand for oil would almost double by 2010. Although the short-term increase in demand will probably not meet these expectations, Unocal stands behind its long-term estimates.

Energy demand growth will remain strong for one key reason: the region’s population is expected to grow by 700 million people by 2010.

It is in everyone’s interests that there be adequate supplies for Asia’s increasing energy requirements. If Asia’s energy needs are not satisfied, they will simply put pressure on all world markets, driving prices upwards everywhere.

The key question is how the energy resources of Central Asia can be made available to satisfy the energy needs of nearby Asian markets. There are two possible solutions — with several variations.

Export Routes

East to China: Prohibitively Long?

One option is to go east across China. But this would mean constructing a pipeline of more than 3,000 kilometers to central China — as well as a 2,000-kilometer connection to reach the main population centers along the coast. Even with these formidable challenges, China National Petroleum Corporation is considering building a pipeline east from Kazakhstan to Chinese markets.

Unocal had a team in Beijing just last week for consultations with the Chinese. Given China’s long-range outlook and its ability to concentrate resources to meet its own needs, China is almost certain to build such a line. The question is what will the costs of transporting oil through this pipeline be and what netback will the producers receive.

South to the Indian Ocean: A Shorter Distance to Growing Markets

A second option is to build a pipeline south from Central Asia to the Indian Ocean.

One obvious potential route south would be across Iran. However, this option is foreclosed for American companies because of U.S. sanctions legislation. The only other possible route option is across Afghanistan, which has its own unique challenges.

The country has been involved in bitter warfare for almost two decades. The territory across which the pipeline would extend is controlled by the Taliban, an Islamic movement that is not recognized as a government by most other nations. From the outset, we have made it clear that construction of our proposed pipeline cannot begin until a recognized government is in place that has the confidence of governments, lenders and our company.

In spite of this, a route through Afghanistan appears to be the best option with the fewest technical obstacles. It is the shortest route to the sea and has relatively favorable terrain for a pipeline. The route through Afghanistan is the one that would bring Central Asian oil closest to Asian markets and thus would be the cheapest in terms of transporting the oil.

Unocal envisions the creation of a Central Asian Oil Pipeline Consortium. The pipeline would become an integral part of a regional oil pipeline system that will utilize and gather oil from existing pipeline infrastructure in Turkmenistan, Uzbekistan, Kazakhstan and Russia.

The 1,040-mile-long oil pipeline would begin near the town of Chardzhou, in northern Turkmenistan, and extend southeasterly through Afghanistan to an export terminal that would be constructed on the Pakistan coast on the Arabian Sea. Only about 440 miles of the pipeline would be in Afghanistan.

This 42-inch-diameter pipeline will have a shipping capacity of one million barrels of oil per day. Estimated cost of the project — which is similar in scope to the Trans Alaska Pipeline — is about US$2.5 billion.

There is considerable international and regional political interest in this pipeline. Asian crude oil importers, particularly from Japan, are looking to Central Asia and the Caspian as a new strategic source of supply to satisfy their desire for resource diversity. The pipeline benefits Central Asian countries because it would allow them to sell their oil in expanding and highly prospective hard currency markets. The pipeline would benefit Afghanistan, which would receive revenues from transport tariffs, and would promote stability and encourage trade and economic development. Although Unocal has not negotiated with any one group, and does not favor any group, we have had contacts with and briefings for all of them. We know that the different factions in Afghanistan understand the importance of the pipeline project for their country, and have expressed their support of it.

A recent study for the World Bank states that the proposed pipeline from Central Asia across Afghanistan and Pakistan to the Arabian Sea would provide more favorable netbacks to oil producers through access to higher value markets than those currently being accessed through the traditional Baltic and Black Sea export routes.

This is evidenced by the netback values producers will receive as determined by the World Bank study. For West Siberian crude, the netback value will increase by nearly $2.00 per barrel by going south to Asia. For a producer in western Kazakhstan, the netback value will increase by more than $1 per barrel by going south to Asia as compared to west to the Mediterranean via the Black Sea.

Natural Gas Export

Given the plentiful natural gas supplies of Central Asia, our aim is to link a specific natural resource with the nearest viable market. This is basic for the commercial viability of any gas project. As with all projects being considered in this region, the following projects face geo-political challenges, as well as market issues.

Unocal and the Turkish company, Koc Holding A.S., are interested in bringing competitive gas supplies to the Turkey market. The proposed Eurasia Natural Gas Pipeline would transport gas from Turkmenistan directly across the Caspian Sea through Azerbaijan and Georgia to Turkey. Sixty percent of this proposed gas pipeline would follow the same route as the oil pipeline proposed to run from Baku to Ceyhan. Of course, the demarcation of the Caspian remains an issue.

Last October, the Central Asia Pipeline, Ltd. (CentGas) consortium, in which Unocal holds an interest, was formed to develop a gas pipeline that will link Turkmenistan’s vast natural gas reserves in the Dauletabad Field with markets in Pakistan and possibly India. An independent evaluation shows that the field’s resources are adequate for the project’s needs, assuming production rates rising over time to 2 billion cubic feet of gas per day for 30 years or more.

In production since 1983, the Dauletabad Field’s natural gas has been delivered north via Uzbekistan, Kazakhstan and Russia to markets in the Caspian and Black Sea areas. The proposed 790-mile pipeline will open up new markets for this gas, travelling from Turkmenistan through Afghanistan to Multan, Pakistan. A proposed extension would link with the existing Sui pipeline system, moving gas to near New Delhi, where it would connect with the existing HBJ pipeline. By serving these additional volumes, the extension would enhance the economics of the project, leading to overall reductions in delivered natural gas costs for all users and better margins. As currently planned, the CentGas pipeline would cost approximately $2 billion. A 400-mile extension into India could add $600 million to the overall project cost.

As with the proposed Central Asia Oil Pipeline, CentGas cannot begin construction until an internationally recognized Afghanistan government is in place. For the project to advance, it must have international financing, government-to-government agreements and government-to-consortium agreements.

“Our enemies are innovative and resourceful, and so are we. They never stop thinking about new ways to harm our country and our people, and neither do we.” —George W Bush Washington, D.C., Aug. 5, 2004

Al Qaeda didn’t take away the US people’s rights and freedoms the US government did that. Al Qaeda didn’t bankrupt the US the US government did with their $trillion embezzlement of US Tax dollars. Al Qaeda didn’t create a housing bubble and then started taking away your homes through orchestrated foreclosures. Al Qaeda didn’t cause millions of Americans to lose their jobs the US government did. Al Qaeda is not a terrorist organization your government is. A clear and present danger exists in the US today and the government is the only real terrorist threat to the rights, freedoms and prosperity of the US people.

The Iraqi people, the Afghan people, bin Laden, the Taliban, Al Qaeda and Muslim extremists are not your enemy. You own government is your enemy. Your government took away your rights and freedoms. No terrorist organization robbed the American people of their inalienable rights and freedoms their government did with the passing of their unpatriotic Patriot Act. The Bush and Obama governments’ Patriot Act was first drafted not after the attacks of September 11, 2001 but during the Clinton administration by the “One Hundred Seventh Congress of the United States of America AT THE FIRST SESSION Begun and held at the City of Washington on Wednesday, the third day of January, two thousand and one. (January 3, 2001)“ An Act To deter and punish terrorist acts in the United States and around the world, to enhance law enforcement investigatory tools, and for other purposes. Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled ~ Uniting and Strengthening America by Providing Appropriate Tools Required to Intercept and Obstruct Terrorism (USA PATRIOT ACT) Act of 2001. The US government then formed the Nazi Gestapo style Department of Homeland Security to act as the “Secret State Police” of the United States government ~ to investigate and spy on US citizens, to arrest and hold US citizens indefinitely without due process of the law for opposing the criminal actions of the US government, to protect the US government from US citizens exercising their right to demand their government adhere to the rule of law of the United States of America - the US Constitution, and to strip the US people of their inalienable rights and freedoms guaranteed to them by the United States Constitution.

Your government illegally spies on you. Your government tortures people. Your government kidnaps and imprisons people without due process of the law. Your government attacks and injures you whenever you exercise you right to free speech and legally petition your government for change. Your government robbed you and gave $trillions to the bankers of the privately owned Federal Reserve banks. Your government was the one who infected you with the swine flu virus.

According to a report issued by the US Department of State on April 2004, thirty-five (35) American citizens died from international terrorism world-wide in 2003.- The extent of the harm to U.S. citizens does not either warrant a “war on terrorism”: In the same year as 35 U.S. citizens were killed for political reasons world-wide, 16,503 persons were murdered and 93,433 persons were raped in the U.S. alone (FBI statistics). This alone demonstrates that the motive for the “war on terrorism” is not the number of victims nor their identities. During the same year 5 million people died from smoking related illness. Which is a bigger threat to life?

JFK - “Let us call a truce to terror. Let us invoke the blessings of peace. And as we build an international capacity to keep peace, let us join in dismantling the national capacity to wage war.”

JFK - “We are not afraid to entrust the American people with unpleasant facts, foreign ideas, alien philosophies, and competitive values. For a nation that is afraid to let its people judge the truth and falsehood in an open market is a nation that is afraid of its people.”

JFK - “Our duty as a party is not to our party alone, but to the nation and, indeed, to all mankind. Our duty is not merely the preservation of political power but the preservation of peace and freedom.”

United States Declaration of Independence

“We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness. That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed, That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness. Prudence, indeed, will dictate that Governments long established should not be changed for light and transient causes; and accordingly all experience hath shewn, that mankind are more disposed to suffer, while evils are sufferable, than to right themselves by abolishing the forms to which they are accustomed. But when a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same Object evinces a design to reduce them under absolute Despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such Government, and to provide new Guards for their future security.”

In the BBC’s documentary called “The Power of Nightmares“ top CIA officials openly admit that Al Qaeda is a total and complete fabrication, never having existed at any time. This highly revealing BBC documentary digs deep into the roots of the war on terror, only to find that much of the widespread fear in the post-9/11 world has been fabricated by those in power for their own interests. Fear has been used widely in the media to manipulate the public into giving up civil liberties and turning over power to elite groups with their own hidden agendas. The Power of Nightmares clearly demonstrates that the nightmare vision of a powerful, united terrorist organization waiting to strike our societies is largely an illusion. Wherever the BBC team looked for Al Qaeda, from the mountains of Afghanistan to the sleeper cells in America, they found that we are chasing a phantom enemy. The documentary exposes the Bush administration’s need for a reason that complied with the Laws so they could go after “the bad guy of their choice” namely laws that had been set in place to protect us from mobs and “criminal organizations” such as the Mafia. They paid Jamal al Fadl, hundreds of thousands of dollars to back the U.S. Government’s story of Al Qaeda, a “group” or criminal organization they could “legally” go after.

“Al Qaeda is not an organization. Al Qaeda is a way of working … but this has the hallmark of that approach.” People the US claim to be Al Qaeda are not Al Qaeda they are actually POWs and Resistance Fighters, taken from the countries the US illegally attacked. They are POWs and Resistance Fighters who have been illegally deported, tortured and murdered by the US and NATO forces . The people who are fighting to free their country and countrymen from the illegal US and NATO invasion and occupations are called Al Qaeda by the US government because the US government needed an enemy. If the US people knew the truth that Al Qaeda doesn’t exist the US would not be in Iraq or Afghanistan. Al Qaeda is the US government propaganda, used to falsely and illegally justify the US and NATO invasion and occupation of Iraq and Afghanistan. Both attacks, wars and occupations of Iraq and Afghanistan are deemed by US, Canadian and International Law as crimes against peace, crimes against humanity, wars of aggression and war crimes. The Iraqi, Afghan and Taliban people the US call terrorists are guilty of no crime. The Iraqi, Afghan and Taliban people are doing exactly as any country would do if attacked and occupied by a foreign state’s military, they are resisting. They are freedom fighters. Their actions of killing US and NATO soldiers are legal as their battles against the US and NATO forces are one of self-defense whereas the actions of the US and NATO are clearly attacks of aggression - war crimes. The US, Canadian and NATO countries are the terrorists. The US, Canadian and NATO countries are the enemy as they attacked Iraq and Afghanistan. Iraq and Afghanistan did not attack the US, Canada or any other NATO country. The people of Iraq and Afghanistan are the innocent victims of US, Canadian and NATO wars of aggression, crimes against peace, crimes against humanity and war crimes - kidnapping, deporting, torture and murder.

On June 16, 2004 staff members of the National Commission on Terrorist Attacks Upon the United States testified that Osama bin Laden met with a top Iraqi official in 1994 but found “no credible evidence” of a link between Iraq and Al Qaeda in attacks against the United States. No link has ever been found between Al Qaeda and Iraq or Al Qaeda and Afghanistan because Al Qaeda does not exist. Al Qaeda Is a Complete Fabrication. The CIA is trying to tell us something that they publicly can’t with their “official” terrorist buster logo. They are stating that terrorists are like ghosts. Everyone is afraid of them, but nobody has proof they even exist.

Another eye-opening video available online for free viewing is Unconstitutional. In this documentary, interviews with ranking members of Congress, top legal experts, and even a former CIA chief describe many insidious efforts to take away freedoms guaranteed under the US Constitution for over 200 years.

Compelling video footage shows US citizens, from law-abiding store clerks to a US Olympian, who have been the victims of unconstitutional policies established under the Patriot Act. Members of Congress describe the replacement of the previously agreed upon Patriot Act by another version quietly slipped into its place just hours before the final vote in Congress, leaving no one time to read the many devastating changes inserted at the last minute.

Unconstitutional: The War on Our Civil Liberties, is the third in a series of Public Interest Pictures films that follows Unprecedented: The 2000 Presidential Election and Uncovered: The War on Iraq. True to their legacy, Unconstitutional provides the facts and stories that illuminate administration lies, wrongheaded policies, and the real victims of these actions–the American people. Here, you’ll get the real story behind the USA PATRIOT Act and other administration policies that tries, illegally, to strip the US people of their Constitutional Rights and Freedoms. Their goal is to one day permanently suspend the United States Constitution after launching another attack against their own country, the US, and falsely blame the totally fictitious terrorist organization they call Al Qaeda. They will launch another 9/11 style attack against the US but this time they will declare Martial Law.

The martial law in the U.S. is closely tied with the right of habeas corpus, which is in essence the right to a hearing on lawful imprisonment, or more broadly, the supervision of law enforcement by the judiciary. The ability to suspend habeas corpus is often equated with martial law. Article 1, Section 9 of the U.S. Constitution states, “The Privilege of the Writ of Habeas Corpus shall not be suspended, unless when in Cases of Rebellion or Invasion the public Safety may require it.”

In United States law, martial law is limited by several court decisions that were handed down between the American Civil War and World War II. In 1878, Congress passed the Posse Comitatus Act, which forbids military involvement in domestic law enforcement without congressional approval. On October 1, 2002 United States Northern Command was established (in direct violation of the Posse Comitatus Act) to provide command and control of Department of Defense homeland defense efforts and to coordinate defense support of civil authorities.[11].

On June 15, 1995, Norman Olson, along with militia leaders from other states, testified before the United States Senate Subcommittee on Terrorism. Olson’s opening statement included the following:

One other important point needs to be made. Since The Constitution is the limiting document upon the government, the government cannot become greater than the granting power. That is, the servant cannot become greater than its master. Therefore, should the chief executive or the other branch of government or all branches together act to suspend The Constitution under a rule of martial law, all power granted to government would be cancelled and differed back to the granting power. That is the people. And I’ll conclude with this statement: Martial law shall NOT be possible in this country as long as the people recognize the bill of rights as inalienable.

Al Jazeera used by the US government as it’s propaganda media outlet for its “War of Terror”

Al Jazeera is the largest and most controversial Arabic News Channel in the Middle East, offering news coverage 24 hours a day from around the world and focusing on the hottest regions of conflict. Founded in 1996, and based in Qatar, the Al Jazeera news network is the fastest growing network among Arab communities and Arabic speaking people around the world. It has been the main propaganda news media for the US immediately following the September 11, 2001 attacks, when the US government paid Al Jazeera to broadcast videos in which Osama bin Laden and Sulaiman Abu Ghaith defending and justifying the attacks. That broadcast has since been proven by both US government and International government officials as fakes. The fake video tapes that were sent to Al Jazeera through the CIA was created in the US at Allied Media Corp.

Every time Al Jazeera reported on a new video or audio from Al Qaeda or bin Laden which makes threats against the US the audio or video was actually made in the studios of Allied Media Corp. The financial trail connects the Bush administration to Allied Media Corp. Government documents reveal the work that Allied Media Corp was paid to do for the Bush administration to terrorize the American people. The Bush administration was able to strip the American people of their inalienable rights and freedoms because of the video and audio tapes that were made by Allied Media Corp and aired by Al Jazeera. The US government paid Allied Media Corp to produce video tapes and audio tapes that made terrorist threats against the American people. This is essentially the US making threats against itself.

Allied Media Corp has recently erased it’s connection with Al Jazeera. Its website use to have an entire section dedicated to Al Jazeera and it programming that was made in the US under the direction of Allied Media Corp. To further distance itself from its former main financial backer, the Bush administration, Allied Media Corp now markets itself under the name AMC. To try and erase its involvement in US government propaganda and terrorism via Bush administration ordered fake Al Qaeda tapes Allied Media Corp is not only erasing all Al Jazeera connection but is contacting independent news agencies including nbGAzette.com to get independent news agencies to erase any and all mention of connection between Allied Media Corp and Al Jazeera. This is our response. The truth cannot be concealed. The truth cannot be altered. History cannot be changed.

The following link no longer works. It existed for the entire George W Bush presidency. Allied Media Corp makes Al Jazeera terrorists threat videos

Every video, every audio tape of bin Laden or the phantom Al Qaeda making threats against the US has been made in the USA. The studios of Allied Media Corp has been making the videos and audio tapes for the former Bush administration to further the US War of Terror and wars of aggression against its own people and other sovereign nations. The post 9/11 video tape of bin Laden supposedly confessing to carrying out the attacks against the US was a fake and the person we are suppose to believe is bin Laden is an actor. George W Bush used Allied Media Corp to create videos and audio tapes of actors portraying bin Laden and al Qaeda making threats against the US in order to influence and coerce Congress into giving him dictatorial powers and rob the US people of their civil rights and freedoms. bin Laden did not take away your freedom the Bush White House did. bin Laden did not attack the US on September 11, 2001 your own government did. bin Laden didn’t bankrupt the US your own government did - throughout history all major empires have collapsed as a result of very costly prolonged wars of aggression campaigns. bin Laden and Saddam Hussein didn’t kill over 1 million innocent Iraqi civilians your US government did - first the Clinton administration, then George W Bush and Dick Cheney’s administration and now Obama’s administration. Al Qaeda is and always has been a Made in the USA terrorist organization. Terrorism is a Made in the US political agenda.

Just as dreams are not real, neither are these nightmares. The idea that we are threatened by a hidden and organised terrorist network is an illusion. It is a myth that has spread unquestioned through politics, the security services and the international media. The terrorist organization Al Qaeda does not exist and never did. Al Qaeda is the US government’s code name for illegal CIA terrorist operations against foreign states and the US people.

History and concrete evidence confirms that both the Bush and the Obama administrations are mimicking the actions and aggressions of Hitler’s Nazi Germany. The entire World is negligent in their duty to prevent the revival of Nazism (Nazism is the ideology and practice of the Nazis, especially the policy of racist nationalism, national expansion, and state control of the economy). International agencies like the UN, NATO and the ICC are all either stupid or complicit for allowing the Bush and Obama administrations to continue their wars of aggression. It is absolute lunacy for the World to see the facts before them and not act to end the senseless slaughter of millions of innocent people. The facts clearly declare that Afghanistan, Iraq, Pakistan or Iran did not have anything to do with the criminal acts (hijackings) of September 11, 2001 yet they are the target of military attacks by the US. No country did anything against the US or any other country to warrant these unprovoked attacks by the US. All US attacked countries are victims. The US is the aggressor. The US attacked and now occupy Afghanistan and Iraq. They are now planning to attack Iran.

The people of Afghanistan and Iraq need our help to end the unlawful occupations of their country. The Afghan and Iraqi people who are resisting the US with lethal force are not terrorists they are defending their country from an enemy that has attacked and now occupy their country. If Canada were attacked by the US Canadians would take up arms against the invading enemy. If the US was actually attacked (no armed attack by a foreign country occurred on 9/11) the American people would also take up arms and defend their country.

The people of Afghanistan and Iraq are doing what any loyal and patriotic person would do - defend their country and family from the daily attacks and continued occupation of their homeland by a foreign country. Even if Iran is providing weapons to the Iraqi Resistance, Iran is not a terrorist state the US is. Iran has not attacked and does not occupy any country. The US has attacked 2 countries without provocation. The US continues to attack and kill the civilians of Iraq, Afghanistan and Pakistan, countries that never attacked the US. The US has murdered over 1 million civilians in their wars of aggression they call “War on Terror”. The entire legal system in the US and around the World are negligent in their duty to uphold the law. They are negligent for allowing the criminals and terrorists in the US White House to continue to attack and murder innocent people. They are negligent for not stopping the Bush and the Obama White House from plunging the World into another World War.

Adm. Michael Mullen, chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, said that the Pentagon is planning “potential” military actions against Iran. Planning for and preparing for any military action against any country without provocation, cause or self-defense is a crime.

In 1950, the Nuremberg Tribunal defined Crimes against Peace, in Principle 6, specifically Principle VI(a), submitted to the United Nations General Assembly, as:
(i) Planning, preparation, initiation or waging of a war of aggression or a war in violation of international treaties, agreements or assurances;

During the trial, the chief American prosecutor, Robert H. Jackson, stated:

To initiate a war of aggression, therefore, is not only an international crime; it is the supreme international crime differing only from other war crimes in that it contains within itself the accumulated evil of the whole.

Over 50 years ago the US wrote the laws that defined what is a war crime and they made it law so as to prevent any future wars of aggression and crimes against humanity. Today it is the US government which is breaking every law that has been written and passed to safeguard the World from another World War. Today the US tortures POWs. Today the US publicly threatens another country with nuclear annihilation. The US is planning to nuke Iran and has already tried twice but thankfully someone in the US Air Force has thwarted both unlawful, inhuman, immoral and crime against humanity attacks. While campaigning for the Democratic Presidential Nomination Hillary Clinton publicly threatened to wipe Iran off of the face of the Earth if she became president.

Addressing the United Nations on the 60th anniversary of the liberation of Auschwitz, then United Nations Secretary General Kofi Annan remarked, “On occasions such as this, rhetoric comes easily. We rightly say ‘never again.’ But action is much harder. Since the Holocaust the world has, to its shame, failed more than once to prevent or halt genocide.”

Following World War II, the international community cried “never again” in response to the Holocaust, and the newly formed United Nations adopted the Genocide Convention as a pledge to ensure that such horrors would never be repeated. Since that time, however, the world community has failed to prevent the occurrence of genocide in places like Cambodia (Khmer Rouge), Iraq (US 2003 unprovoked attack), Bosnia (both by their own government and the unlawful bombings ordered by Bill Clinton that killed more civilians than the civil warring factions), Darfur and Rwanda.

World Leaders Decry Unprovoked US Attack against Iraq
March 20, 2003

The declaration of war brought fierce criticism from world leaders today, as Russia accused the US of committing “a big political mistake” and France expressed its “regret” over the strikes.

His views were echoed by Abdul Hadi Awang, the president of the conservative Islamic opposition in Malaysia, who said: “This despicable war exposes the ugliness of America and its allies.”

It is time for us to ally ourselves to oppose the US axis of evil. Enough is enough. How do we end this US aggression against innocent sovereign states, without injuring or killing any innocent civilians? How do we stop any further unprovoked and unlawful attacks of foreign sovereign states by the US? We apply the game of chess and send our special forces to remove the leaders of the United States who have started these unlawful wars of aggressions.

In the game of chess the objective is to remove your opponent’s king in as few moves as possible. The object of the game is to checkmate your opponent’s king, whereby the king is under immediate attack (in “check”) and there is no way to remove it from attack on the next move. The game is over as soon as you capture your opponent’s king and your opponent surrenders to you. Wars of aggression can be ended quickly simply by applying the game of chess to your self-defense strategy. Defend your people by taking the course of action that will quickly capture and remove your opponent’s leadership.

There is absolutely no need, cause or justification for anyone to start a war. Any international incident can be resolved peacefully. Those who start wars are nothing more than criminals with a criminal intent to cause the death of another human being. The most effective course of action to end any war is to go after the person or persons who gave the order to attack another country. One person does not have the authority to launch a war against another especially in a democratic society. If a leader of one country decides to go to war with another country that leader is committing crimes that include crimes against peace, crimes against humanity and war crimes.

International law and domestic law allow lethal force to be used in self-defense against armed attacks.

Whether it’s George W Bush or Barack Hussein Obama engaged in an unprovoked attacks against Iraq, Afghanistan, Iran and Pakistan or the United States own terrorist cell, the CIA, kidnapping foreign citizens from around the World, it’s legal to use lethal force in response to those kinds of attacks. There’s no special protection given to heads of state that protects them from the otherwise lawful use of lethal force in self-defense. Nuremberg established that heads of state have no immunity from responsibility for aggressive war. There’s no logical legal principle that says it’s better to spare George W Bush or Barack Hussein Obama’s life, when they are the head war criminals who started the war and continue to wage wars of aggressions against sovereign foreign states and kill and continue to kill tens of thousands or hundreds of thousands of innocent people.

Aggression unopposed becomes a contagious disease. ~ Jimmy Carter

Laws of armed conflict

Any uniformed member of the Military is a lawful target under the laws of armed conflict. If he is the head policy maker (commander-in-chief, prime minister, president, emperor, chancellor, king or queen) in deciding to launch an aggressive war, then he’s committing an international crime; denying him any right to the kind of protection we give hospital workers or Red Cross workers or the like. If we want to deter aggression, we have to extract a cost from those who are making the decisions. A warmongering leader is not willing to put his own safety at risk, and so it’s very important that we make it clear that we have the legal right to go after even heads of state engaged in massive international aggression. George W Bush needlessly and recklessly sacrificed over 4000 of his country’s young men and women in his war against Iraq. He and Obama are certainly willing to give up thousands more in their wars of terrorism and aggression against Iraq and Afghanistan and threats and acts of aggression against Iran, Pakistan and Yemen. George W Bush was not willing to put his own safety at risk, and so it’s very important that we make it clear that the US people and the international community have the legal right to go after even heads of state engaged in massive international aggression.

The only logical and legal course of action to defend ones country and countrymen from an unlawful military attack from another country is to hold the person or persons who gave the order to attack, accountable for their criminal acts. Instead of retaliating against the people of the country whose leader ordered the attack on your country and countrymen one should only attack those leaders who gave the order. No one else should suffer or pay for the crimes of the war leaders. Only the leaders who order their country to attack and murder the people of another country should suffer and pay with their lives. The Nuremberg Trial established “Legal Self-Defense” against wars of aggression, kidnappings, torture and acts of aggression against another state.

The honorable and patriotic course of action to end any war is to target those leaders who gave the order to illegally attack, destroy and kill the people of another country. Every country and their people have the right to self-defense and their legal rights include only attacks against the attacking leadership, not against innocent civilians. As soon as the leader or leaders who gave the order to attack and kill your people are eliminated then the war will end. If someone takes over command of the military forces after the war leaders are eliminated and they too order more attacks against you and your country and your people, then they too are legal and legitimate targets. Infiltrating the enemy’s country and attacking only the leadership will end any war quickly and deter future warmongering leaders from ordering their armed froces to attack and kill another country and its people.

Had the Allied nations succeeded in killing Adolf Hitler at the beginning of WWII the War would have ended a lot sooner and millions of lives would have been spared. A war that needlessly killed 23,100,000 Soviets, 449,800 English, 418,500 US, 5,600,000 Polish, 2,700,000 Japanese, 7,233,000 Germans, 567,600 French, 20,000,000 Chinese, 45,300 Canadians for an estimated death toll of roughly 72 million.

If a team of snipers had been sent into Germany with the sole mission of killing Adolf Hilter six million European Jews would have been saved from the Holocaust. Snipers are the biggest psychological deterrent on the battlefield. The mere rumor they’re on the battlefield can send shivers through the enemy ranks. Imagine what a team of snipers inserted behind enemy lines could do to the aggressor’s chain of command. It does not matter how powerful a country might be. It would not matter if the aggressor had the most technologically advanced fighter jets, bombers, tank, or warships, once a sniper is able to infiltrate the aggressor’s country there is nowhere to hide. A good sniper could gain entry as a diplomat, tourist or business person. A good sniper would not need to smuggle in his or her weapon as he or she would have been trained to use the weapon of choice of the aggressive nation and acquire their weapon from the aggressive nation’s own police and military or even from citizens with hunting rifles. It took 3 weeks for the US law enforcement agencies to find and capture the Beltway sniper in October 2002 in Washington, D.C. How long would it take to find a team of highly trained and motivated snipers? That is if you even knew they were already in country.

The Nuremberg trials sets legal precedents in order to save succeeding generations from the scourge of war.

While the Nuremberg trials are, these days, seldom invoked or discussed, they were and still are, in the words of Tribunal President Sir Geoffrey Lawrence, “unique in the history of the jurisprudence of the world”. Among the most groundbreaking aspects was the drive to formally criminalise three categories of crimes, and to establish responsibility by individuals for these crimes. This was simply unprecedented.

The effort to try the Germans in an international forum was directed in large part by the United States. The chief U.S. prosecutor, U.S. Supreme Court Justice Robert Jackson, opened the prosecution.

Today, when the Nuremberg trials are remembered, they are remembered primarily for the prosecution and punishment of individuals for genocide. Equally important at the time though, especially in the first trial, was the focus on aggressive war.

Thus, the first sentence of Justice Jackson’s opening statement: “The privilege of opening the first trial in history for crimes against the peace of the world imposes a grave responsibility.”

Crimes against peace and the responsibility for them were defined in Article 6, the heart of the Charter of the IMT: “The tribunal…shall have the power to try and punish persons who…whether as individuals or as members of organisations, committed any of the following crimes…for which there shall be individual responsibility: (a) Crimes Against Peace, namely, planning, preparation, initiation or waging of a war of aggression or a war in violation of international treaties, agreements or assurances…”

The desire was not only to punish individuals for crimes but to set an international moral and legal precedent for the future. Indeed, before the end of 1946, the United Nations General Assembly unanimously adopted Resolution 95 (1), affirming “the principles of International Law recognised by the Charter of the Nuremberg Tribunal and the judgment of the Tribunal.”

Founded in the aftermath of World War II, the United Nations invoked in the first sentence of the preamble, the single most fundamental goal: “…to save succeeding generations from the scourge of war, which twice in our lifetime has brought untold sorrow to mankind…”

To this end the United Nations Charter explicitly forbids armed aggression and violations of the sovereignty of any state by any other state, except in immediate self defense (Article 2, Sec. 4 and Articles 39 and 51).

Invoking the precedent set by the United States and the Allies at Nuremberg, there can be no doubt that the U.S. led invasion of Iraq in 2003 was a war of aggression. There was no imminent threat to American security nor to the security of the world. The invasion violated the U.N. Charter as well as U.N. Security Council Resolution #1441.

As a war of aggression, the invasion falls into the Nuremberg category of Crimes Against Peace. As such, there is individual responsibility for this crime.

Thus, if Americans chose to be bound by the precedent which they helped set and for which they punished leaders of World War II Germany, they would arrest and prosecute those individuals responsible for the invasion of Iraq: George W. Bush, Dick Cheney, Donald Rumsfeld, Colin Powell, Condoleezza Rice and their enablers in government and in the media.

Those who justify the invasion of Iraq, invoking the U.S. self-declared mission to rid the world of evil, would do well to remember the words of Justice Jackson: “Our position is that whatever grievances a nation may have, however objectionable it finds the status quo, aggressive warfare is an illegal means for settling these grievances or for altering these conditions.”

And, for those who have difficulty visualising American leaders as defendants in a criminal trial, Justice Jackson’s words again: “(T)he ultimate step in avoiding periodic wars, which are inevitable in a system of international lawlessness, is to make statesmen responsible to law. And let me make clear that while this law is first applied against German aggressors, the law includes, and if it is to serve a useful purpose it must condemn, aggression by any other nations, including those which sit here now in judgement. We are able to do away with domestic tyranny and violence and aggression by those in power against the rights of their own people only when we make all men answerable to the law. This trial represents mankind’s desperate effort to apply the discipline of the law to statesmen who have used their powers of state to attack the foundations of the world’s peace and to commit aggression against the rights of their neighbours.”

The Bush and Blair administrations commenced a war against Iraq and its people in defiance of the United Nations Security Council. The Iraq war is unlawful because it was waged in contravention of international law. The relevant articles that prohibit one nation or alliance of nations waging war against any other nation or nations are embodied in Chapter VII of the 1945 United Nations Charter under the caption “Action with Respect to Threats to the Peace, Breaches of the Peace, and Acts of Aggression”. No member or members of the United Nations are entitled to wage a war against any nation in defiance of the UN Security Council. It is also clear that a “war of choice” is not permitted. A “war of necessity” in self defense if attacked by another country is permitted under Article 51 – this too is a temporary measure till the Security Council takes steps necessary to maintain international peace and security. Article 51 does not legitimize a pre-emptive war against any nation on the pretext that there is an imminent threat of attack by the said nation.

Aggressors do not have the legal right or authority to declare self-defense.

The people of Afghanistan and Iraq were attacked by the US. The people of Afghanistan and Iraq are victims of the US wars of aggression. The civilian population have been and are still being attacked by the US military - clearly defined as war crimes according to International and US laws. The Taliban are not terrorists. They were the legal governing political party of Afghanistan before the unlawful war of aggression by the US and NATO forces. The Taliban are doing what every patriotic citizen would do to defend their country and countrymen when attacked by a foreign state - they are resisting. The Taliban are Afghan civilians who have been forced to take up arms against the invaders in order to defend their country and fellow countrymen from the brutal and unlawful occupation. The Taliban did not attack the US on September 11, 2001. Iran did not attack the US on September 11, 2001. There is no threat to the US from Iran. The US has been planning to attack Iran since the Bush administration. Planning for such an attack is a criminal offense. Planning for such an attack is a crime against peace and a crime against humanity. The international community have the legal right to go after even US heads of state who have planned for, is planning for or engages in illegal aggressive wars.

“When freedom does not have a purpose, when it does not wish to know anything about the rule of law engraved in the hearts of men and women, when it does not listen to the voice of conscience, it turns against humanity and society.” ~ Pope John Paul II

The Saudi Royal family helped the US government enslave the US people by attacking the US on September 11, 2001. Immediately after Saudi Arabia attacked the US the US government under George W Bush stripped the US people of their inalienable Constitutional Rights and Freedoms with the passing of the unpatriotic Patriot Act. Today US president Obama, the first black president in US history, continues to work with the enemy of the United States to ensure that the American people remain slaves of the US government. “As I would not be a slave, so I would not be a master. This expresses my idea of democracy. Whatever differs from this, to the extent of the difference, is no democracy.” ~ Abraham Lincoln August 1, 1858

The hijackings of US Commercial airlines by Saudi Arabia, United Arab Emirate and Egypt turned logic and rationality completely upside down. Before 9/11 the US retaliated against the country or countries that attacked and killed any number of its people but after September 11, 2001 the US defied logic and rationality by attacking 2 innocent countries in retaliation for the attacks that evidence declares was financed by, recruited for by, trained by and executed by citizens of Saudi Arabia, United Arab Emirate and Egypt. The alleged 9/11 mastermind bin Laden is a billionaire Saudi with very close ties with the Saudi royal family. Today instead of the US rightfully retaliating against Saudi Arabia, the United Arab Emirate and Egypt for the hijackings and killing of some 3000 US citizens the US made war of aggression plans to attack and occupy Afghanistan and Iraq, neither having anything to do with 9/11.

On Saturday January 30, 2010 it was disclosed that the Obama administration is quietly working with Saudi Arabia (the country with the majority of 9/11 hijackers) and other Persian Gulf allies to speed up arms sales and rapidly upgrade defenses for US military seized oil terminals and other key infrastructure in Iraq and Afghanistan. The U.S. plans to triple the size of a 10,000-man protection force in Saudi Arabia, as part of a broader push that includes unprecedented coordination of air defenses and a future war of aggression between the U.S. and Arab militaries against Iran.

The military build up is an expansion of the George W. Bush war crimes administration to sell warplanes and missile systems to friendly Arab states to help the US attack Iran. The 9/11 attacking countries, the United Arab Emirates and Saudi Arabia are leading a region-wide military buildup that has resulted in more than $25 billion in U.S. arms purchases in the past two years alone.

How many Iraqis took part in the hijackings of September 11, 2001? The correct answer is 0. How many Afghanistan citizens took part in the hijackings of 9/11? The correct answer is 0. How many foreign military war planes were used in the attacks of September 11, 2001? The correct answer is 0. What is the nationality of the accused mastermind of 9/11? The correct answer is Saudi Arabia. How many hijackers were from Saudi Arabia? The correct answer is fifteen of the attackers were from Saudi Arabia, two from the United Arab Emirates, one from Egypt, and one from Lebanon. Did the US attack the country that had the mastermind and the majority of hijackers that took part in attacks of September 11, 2001? The correct answer is no. The evidence is overwhelming that Saudi Arabia was the country that planned for and executed the attacks yet even today the US is arming the countries that attacked the United States of America on September 11, 2001.

The Afghan and Iraqi people are not terrorists for attacking the US and NATO troops who have attacked their country, destroyed their homes and businesses and slaughtered their people. Your government has inhumanly tortured hundreds, perhaps thousands of innocent people whose only crime is defending their country and fellow countrymen from the unlawful war of aggression and occupation of their country by the United States and NATO countries.

“You may fool all the people some of the time, you can even fool some of the people all of the time, but you cannot fool all of the people all the time.” ~ Abraham Lincoln

No matter where you go in the World each country has the same duty to protect their country and people from an armed attack from a foreign country. Each and every country have the exact same military code of conduct that bounds their citizens to the duty to defend themselves at all costs, including giving up your life in resistance to an attack and occupation. The United States Army Code of Conduct is duplicated around the World. Read the United States Code of Conduct and substitute the United States with countries like Iraq, Afghanistan, Iran, Syria, Russia, China, Canada or any other country. The duty to fight and guard ones country and way of life is the same in every country in the World. Duty bound to not surrender, to fight on until you are dead, to command others to fight and resist, to be silent when captured is universal because you do so to defend your freedom and your right for you and your countrymen to be free from unlawful attacks and occupations by a foreign military force. The Afghan and Iraqi people are duty bound and have every legal right to defend themselves and their country from the unlawful US attack and occupation of their country. They are not terrorists or the enemy - the US, Canada and other participating NATO countries are the terrorists and the enemy.

“Four score and seven years ago our fathers brought forth on this continent, a new nation, conceived in Liberty, and dedicated to the proposition that all men are created equal.” ~ Abraham Lincoln November 19, 1863

If Canada, England or France was attacked by a foreign country, the people of those countries would immediately organize a resistance movement to drive out the attacking military forces. Resistance is the logical and most patriotic duty and action that any citizen can take up when faced with a foreign military occupation of their country. Those who resist attacks and occupation are the ultimate heroes. Taking up arms to defend your country and fellow countrymen is courageous and honorable. Iraqi and Afghanistan citizens are not terrorists they are their country’s heroes - defending their country and countrymen from the unlawful US attacks and occupation. US propaganda labels the resistance as terrorists. US propaganda is used because if the US people realized that the Iraqi and Afghan people are the innocent victims of the Bush administration greed for oil the US would not be in either Iraq or Afghanistan. The US people don’t realize that it is solely the blame of the Bush administration and the Obama administration for the inevitable collapse of the US. The unlawful, unprovoked and unjustified wars of aggression against Iraq and Afghanistan is bankrupting the US.

Let every American, every lover of liberty, every well wisher to his posterity, swear by the blood of the Revolution, never to violate in the least particular, the laws of the country; and never to tolerate their violation by others. ~ Abraham Lincoln January 27, 1838

John McCain: “… after we were able to help the Afghan freedom fighters and drive the Russians out of Afghanistan, we basically washed our hands of the region. Those “freedom fighters” were of course the mujaheddin in Afghanistan waging jihad against the Soviets, including one Osama bin Laden and one Zayman Al Zawahiri. We backed and funded them … we certainly supported the factions fighting alongside him, factions every bit as militantly Islamic as bin Laden–as even the State Department concedes.”

On September 27, 2001 the FBI issued a Press Release naming the alleged hijackers of September 11, 2001. Nowhere does it name any Afghanistan (including the Taliban) or Iraqi national. 9/11 was not an act of war. It was a criminal act. It was an attack that launched the US agenda in the Middle East. Evidence already in possession by the US own FBI implicates Saudi Arabia for the attacks, as the majority of hijackers and the alleged mastermind were all Saudi nationals. Because of this evidence the US wars in Afghanistan and Iraq are illegal, as they are both wars of aggression. Anyone who has participated in and continues to participate in these unlawful wars are war criminals.

FBI Press Release

AMERICAN AIRLINES #77
BOEING 757

1) Khalid Almihdhar - Saudi national
2) Majed Moqed - Saudi national
3) Nawaf Alhazmi - Saudi national
4) Salem Alhazmi - Saudi national
5) Hani Hanjour - resident of Phoenix, Arizona, and San Diego, California

AMERICAN AIRLINES #11
BOEING 767

1) Satam M.A. Al Suqami- Saudi national
2) Waleed M. Alshehri - Saudi national - a pilot
3) Wail M. Alshehri - residence(s): Hollywood, Florida; Newton, Massachusetts -Believed to be a pilot
4) Mohamed Atta - Egyptian national - a pilot
5) Abdulaziz Alomari - Saudi national - a pilot

UNITED AIRLINES #175
BOEING 767

1) Marwan Al-Shehhi -Possible residence(s): Hollywood, Florida - a pilot
2) Fayez Rashid Ahmed Hassan Al Qadi Banihammad - residence(s): Delray Beach, Florida
3) Ahmed Alghamdi
4) Hamza Alghamdi - residence(s): Delray Beach, Florida
5) Mohand Alshehri - residence(s): Delray Beach, Florida

UNITED AIRLINES #93
BOEING 757

1) Saeed Alghamdi - residence: Delray Beach, Florida
2) Ahmed Ibrahim A. Al Haznawi - Saudi national
3) Ahmed Alnami - residence: Delray Beach, Florida
4) Ziad Samir Jarrah - a pilot

Alleged Mastermind of the 9/11 attacks
USAMA BIN LADEN - Saudi Arabian

The FBI released 19 photographs of individuals believed to be the hijackers (none were foreign soldiers, airmen or navy crewmen) of the four airliners that crashed on September 11, 01

“Don’t interfere with anything in the Constitution. That must be maintained, for it is the only safeguard of our liberties. And not to Democrats alone do I make this appeal, but to all who love these great and true principles.” ~ Abraham Lincoln August 27, 1856 Speech at Kalamazoo, Michigan

In 1991 Hulda Regehr Clark discovered the source of HIV. Once the source became clear the cure became obvious. But would it work? She cured 53 cases in a row, all using her method. In her book The Cure for All Diseases she reveals NEW research findings that shows all diseases have simple explanations and cures once their true cause is known. This book describes the causes of both common and extraordinary diseases and gives specific instructions for their cure. The book contains many case histories of diabetes, high blood pressure, seizures, chronic fatigue syndrome, migraines, Alzheimer’s Parkinsons, multisclerosis, and others showing that all of these can be simply cured!

The Basis of the her discoveries:

HIV is a virus.
AIDS is a condition.
Sometimes they occur together.
Sometimes they occur separately.

HIV stands for Human Immunodeficiency Virus.
AIDS stands for Acquired Immune Deficiency Syndrome

Hulda Regehr Clark discovered that the human intestinal fluke (Fasciolopsis buskii) is the source of the HIV virus. This parasite typically lives in the intestine where it might do little harm, causing only colitis, Crohn’s disease, or irritable bowel syndrome, or perhaps nothing at all. But if it invades a different organ, like the uterus or the kidneys or liver, it does a great deal of harm. If it establishes itself in the thymus, it causes HIV/AIDS!

It only establishes itself in the thymus in some people. These people have benzene in their bodies. All HIV patients (100%) have both benzene and a stage of the intestinal fluke in their thymuses. The solvent benzene is responsible for letting the fluke establish itself in the thymus. In order to get HIV, you must have both the parasite and benzene in your body. The HIV virus belongs to this fluke. It is not difficult to kill this parasite and all its stages.

“AIDS is a condition. When the thymus gland cannot “make” enough T cells, your immunity is lowered. Benzene is the cause of AIDS. Different toxins accumulate in different organs. If you eat or rub in the tiniest bit of benzene it goes directly to the thymus. It damages the thymus so much that everything else is allowed to land there, too: The mercury from metal tooth fillings, the copper from your copper water pipes etc. Is it any wonder that the thymus can’t turn out T cells when it is full of bits of your toothpaste, your hand lotion, your hair spray, toxic food and beverages?” Dr. Hulda Clark. From her book “The Cure for HIV/AIDS”

The human species is now heavily infested with parasites, particularly the intestinal fluke Fasciolopsis buskii, the sheep liver fluke Fasciola hepatica, the pancreatic fluke of cattle Eurytrema pancreatica, the human liver fluke Clonorchis sinensis and the common roundworm, Ascaris. The increase in fluke parasitism is due to the establishment of a new “biological reservoir” in cattle, fowl and household pets. The increase in Ascaris parasitism is probably due to harboring of household pets.

At the same time, microcontamination of the human food supply with derivatives of the petroleum industry has occurred; these include solvents, antiseptics and numerous products used directly in the food industry. In the presence of benzene, Fasciolopsis buskii can complete its entire life cycle in the human body, not requiring a snail as an intermediate host, as it usually does. Other solvents contributing to parasitism include isopropyl alcohol, methanol, xylene, and toluene which now occur as residues in our foods and pollute our body products such as toothpaste, mouthwash, lotions and cosmetics. These solvents are also contaminants of animal feed, and thus are responsible for establishing the new biological reservoir or source of infection of flukes.

Different solvents accumulate preferentially in different organs, a phenomenon known as organotropism. Benzene accumulates in the thymus, resulting in damage to the thymus and completion of the life cycle of Fasciolopsis in the thymus. A stage in the life cycle of Fasciolopsis brings with it the HIV virus. This stage is normally found in snails, and indeed, I have found many snails infected with HIV. In the human, its preferred tissues of colonization are the thymus and penis in the male and the thymus and vagina in the female. The HIV virus has not yet become a human virus, since it disappears within 24 hours after the last fluke stage has been destroyed. However, it could become a true human virus through mutation, no doubt. For this reason it is of paramount importance to end this new kind of parasitism in humans quickly.

Removal of all solvents from the patient’s lifestyle and destruction of all fluke stages as well as elimination of undercooked beef, turkey, chicken and dairy products in the diet results in quick recovery, generally less than one week, from HIV infection. HIV/AIDS could be eradicated in a very short time by clearing our food animals and household pets of fluke parasites and by monitoring all food and feed for solvents.

The cause of benzene accumulation in some persons and not in others appears to be due to a lack of a vitamin, riboflavin (vitamin B2), eating more of a common food toxin, 4,5 benzopyrene, and more of a mycotoxin, zearalenone.

4,5 benzopyrene is present in grilled, broiled (flame heated) foods, even ordinary toast, while zearalenone is plentiful in chips, popcorn and brown rice.

Vitamin B2, 100 mg. This is the vitamin that helps detoxify benzene! Take one to three a day. While recovering from AIDS you need 3 tablets three times a day.

Since developmental stages of the intestinal fluke are found in blood, breast milk, saliva, semen, and urine and can be seen directly in these body fluids using a low power microscope, it follows that this parasite can be transmitted not only through sexual contact and blood, but by kissing on the mouth and breast feeding, and childbearing. However, the recipient would develop HIV/AIDS only if benzene were accumulated in his or her body.

The herbal parasite cleanse

Getting rid of all parasites would be absolutely impossible using clinical medicines that can kill only one or two parasites each. Such medicines also tend to make you quite ill. Imagine taking 10 such drugs to kill a dozen of your parasites! Good news, perhaps, for the drug makers but not for you.

Yet three herbs can rid you of over 100 types of parasites! And without so much as a headache! Without nausea! Without any interference with any drug that you are already on! Does this sound too fantastic? Just too good to be true? They are natures gift to us.The herbs are:

* Black Walnut Hulls (from the black walnut tree)
* Wormwood (from the Artemisia shrub)
* Common Cloves (from the clove tree)

These three herbs must be used together. Black walnut hull and wormwood kill adults and developmental stages of at least 100 parasites. Cloves kill the eggs. Only if you use them together will you rid yourself of parasites. If you kill only the adults, the tiny stages and eggs will soon grow into new adults. If you kill only the eggs, the million stages already loose in your body will soon grow into adults and make more eggs. They must be used together as a single treatment.

Benzene, the cause of AIDS and Cigarette Smoke

Benzene is present in cigarette smoke and accounts for half of all human exposure to this health hazard. Short-term, high level exposure to benzene, through inhalation or ingestion, causes damage to the central nervous system and can lead to:

* paralysis
* coma
* convulsions
* dizziness
* sleepiness
* rapid heart rate
* tightness in the chest
* tremors
* rapid breathing

Long-term exposure to benzene can cause:

* decreased red blood cells through damage to bone marrow
* anemia
* leukemia
* excessive bleeding
* genetic damage
* negative effects on the immune system

Benzene is a known cause of acute myleoid leukemia, and cigarette smoke is a major source of benzene exposure. Among U.S. smokers, 90% of benzene exposures come from cigarettes.

Evidence is now coming to light that the World Health Organization deliberately declared a pandemic for the Swine Flu in April 2009 for the sole purpose of profitable gain. The beneficiaries of this Global fraud are the drug pusher industry, the Obama Administration - to push through Obama’s health care reform bill and finance construction of new “No Cure” research labs.

The WHO was promised very lucrative research grants and funding to construct new research labs if they went along with the drug pusher companies and Obama’s fake public health threat. In exchange for declaring a fake Swine Flu pandemic (later called the H1N1 pandemic by the WHO so as not to reveal their usage of the exact same terrorism ploy where the Gerald Ford Administration conspired to mandatory vaccinate the entire US population against the also fake swine flu outbreak of 1976) the WHO received $millions for research grants and brand new buildings like the one in Louisiana. The Louisiana premier biomedical research center started construction on a new $25 million, state-funded clinical research building. The expansion at the Pennington Biomedical Research Center is expected to be completed in 18 months and to bring 300 new jobs to the facility. ‘’

On Jan 6th, 2010 is was announced that UNL has also been awarded $8 million in federal stimulus funds from the National Institutes of Health to expand the Ken Morrison Life Sciences Research Center, home to the Nebraska Center for Virology.

The grant will enable UNL to construct a 26,000-square-foot laboratory wing on the north side of the Morrison building on East Campus. The addition will include up to seven research laboratories, lab support facilities, and office and seminar space using the modular laboratory planning approach featured in the original building.

Preliminary planning is complete and the design for the addition is being developed. Bids are expected to be let early 2011, construction is slated to begin spring 2011 and the addition should be completed by summer 2012.

WHO modifies pandemic definition to suit a financial agenda

The World Health Organization made it easier to classify the flu outbreak as a pandemic by changing its definition to omit “enormous numbers of deaths and illness” just prior to making its declaration.

The previous definition of a pandemic stated:

An influenza pandemic occurs when a new influenza virus appears against which the human population has no immunity, resulting in several, simultaneous epidemics worldwide with enormous numbers of deaths and illness. With the increase in global transport and communications, as well as urbanization and overcrowded conditions, epidemics due the new influenza virus are likely to quickly take hold around the world.

The WHO revised that definition, omitting the section indicating “enormous numbers of deaths and illness.” It now states:

A disease epidemic occurs when there are more cases of that disease than normal. A pandemic is a worldwide epidemic of a disease. An influenza pandemic may occur when a new influenza virus appears against which the human population has no immunity. With the increase in global transport, as well as urbanization and overcrowded conditions in some areas, epidemics due to a new influenza virus are likely to take hold around the world, and become a pandemic faster than before. WHO has defined the phases of a pandemic to provide a global framework to aid countries in pandemic preparedness and response planning. Pandemics can be either mild or severe in the illness and death they cause, and the severity of a pandemic can change over the course of that pandemic.

In a July 21 interview with Der Spiegel magazine, Epidemiologist Tom Jefferson, formerly a general practitioner in the British Army asked, “Don’t you think there’s something noteworthy about the fact that the WHO has changed its definition of pandemic?” , “The old definition was a new virus, which went around quickly, for which you didn’t have immunity, and which created a high morbidity and mortality rate. Now the last two have been dropped, and that’s how swine flu has been categorized as a pandemic.”

He said he saw no difference in the definition between the swine flu and a normal flu epidemic. Jefferson told the magazine that there are hundreds of other viruses that can be deadly, but researchers aren’t as interested in those because the money isn’t as readily available.

Teresa Forcades, a nun at the monastery of Sant Benet, in Montserrat-Barcelona, Spain, is a physician specializing in internal medicine who received her education at the State University of New York. She also earned a Ph.D. in public health from the University of Barcelona. Forcades addressed the WHO definition switch.

She noted that the H1N1 virus has a high infection rate but lower mortality rate than the annual seasonal flu virus.

The old definition was a new virus, which went around quickly which created a high morbidity and mortality rate.

“How could WHO declare a pandemic, taking into account that this virus has a mortality rate lower than the yearly virus?” Teresa Forcades asked. “Then how come there isn’t a pandemic every year if the yearly virus is worse than this new virus? How come we don’t declare a pandemic every year?”

During an average U.S. winter, normal seasonal flu strains result in an average of 200,000 hospitalizations and 36,000 deaths – about 10 times the current swine-flu death rate reported by the CDC.

Drug makers and pharmaceuticals have too much influence over public health authority decisions concerning pandemics and other public health issues. Any and all lobbying by these for profit drug pusher enterprises of any government must be banned. Declaring a fake or false pandemic amounts to fraud. It is the most heinous of all frauds in that it puts the lives and the health of millions at risk. All those involved in this massive 2009 Obama H1N1 virus pandemic (1976 Swine Flu) terrorism conspiracy must be held accountable for their unlawful acts of terrorism, vaccine poisoning and murder by lethal injection of a poison. Each and every vaccine that has been made for their designer influenza virus is more harmful and deadlier than the actual virus. The H1N1 vaccines contains banned adjuvants and banned live virus. In legal terms a ban means the addition of adjuvants and the live virus is illegal - an indictable offense, a criminal offense. The use of adjuvants was banned after the 1976 Ford Swine Flu vaccination program because of the very strong or delayed side effects. Side-effects from the vaccine containing adjuvants caused hundreds of cases of Guillain–Barré syndrome (a paralyzing neuromuscular disorder) and deaths whereas the 1976 Swine Flu only claimed 1 life - a US soldier (an Army private at the biological research lab at Fort Dix).

Another adjuvant that has been added to the H1N1 vaccines is called squalene, which was also an additive in the vaccine suspected of causing illness among soldiers in the first Gulf War - now proven to be the cause of Gulf War Syndrome. Squalene is an oil that was also used to vaccinate soldiers at Fort Dix (without their informed consent) in 1951. There are also trace amounts of formaldehyde or a compound called thimerosal (which contains mercury). Obama even campaigned to ban mercury when he was governor of Illinois, believing such compounds have led to allergies and even autism in children administered vaccines.

Flu vaccines containing adjuvants have not been approved for use in the US until the 2009 Obama Swine Flu was released by the Obama administration to help them push through a new health insurance program that forces every American to pay for health care insurance or face jail time. Biological weapons expert, Marc S Griswold, took the 1976 Swine Flu virus from the US biological weapons research facility in Fort Detrick Maryland to Mexico during Obama’s hastened trip to Mexico on April 16, 2009, one day after millions of Americans petitioned Obama for change in a nation wide Tax Day Tea Party Revolt on April 15, 2009.

SARS proves a fake pandemic

SARS was more lethal and contagious than this Obama released virus yet no pandemic was ever declared and no nation wide, World wide, vaccination program was ever launched to try and stop the spread. The SARS outbreak was not considered a pandemic even though it lasted between the months of November 2002 and July 2003, with 8,096 known infected cases and 774 deaths (a case-fatality rate of 9.6%) worldwide being listed in the World Health Organization’s (WHO) 21 April 2004 concluding report. Tens of thousands were quarantined World wide and on 23 April the WHO declared a travel advisory urging postponement of non-essential travel to include Toronto - a travel ban. Why wasn’t SARS warranted a pandemic declaration or a World wide vaccination? If the H1N1 virus was declared a pandemic by the WHO, which would mean that it was more contagious and dangerous than the SARS outbreak, why didn’t Obama and the WHO even bother to follow standard emergency medical protocol for containing a declared pandemic and order a quarantine? Obama even went on international TV to warn the public that this influenza virus could kill millions “unless” the US public and the World population gets vaccinated. The answer is profit. The dope dealers at the major drug companies got $billions from the US government and other countries around the World immediately after the WHO declared a pandemic. The WHO got $billions for new research grants and new construction. TV, cable networks and newspapers got $millions in badly needed advertising funding to air the WHO and Obama H1N1 terrorism threats against the American and World population. Obama got his health insurance reform bill that adds an additional eight percent onto every American’s payroll as a new tax to cover the costs of Obama’s new money laundering health care insurance scheme.

So how many have been killed by the Obama influenza outbreak so that the drug pushing industry, the WHO and Obama can profit? World wide several thousand. That means they sacrificed thousands of lives to obtain a profit. They not only killed those thousands they murdered them because the majority contracted the Swine Flu virus not from casual contact with another infected person, they were injected with the virus through the vaccines. Millions of healthy people (healthy meaning not sick) went to vaccination sites and were infected (became sick) after they received the vaccine. Millions were infected by way of the vaccine that contained the live virus. Thousands were murdered by lethal injection of the live virus that is in every vaccine. People have been convicted of murder for infecting another with the AIDS virus. So can the WHO, the drug pusher companies and the people in the Obama administration - including Obama as he is the one who ordered Marc S Griswold to release the Swine (H1N1) Flu virus that killed thousands World wide.

HYC - Hydrocarbons and HYT - Hydrothermal deposits throughout Haiti. One of the poorest nations on Earth sitting on 1.5 trillion barrels of Black Gold.

There is evidence that the United States found oil in Haiti decades ago and due to the geopolitical circumstances and big business interests of that era made the decision to keep Haitian oil in reserve for when Middle Eastern oil had dried up. This is detailed by Dr. Georges Michel in an article dated March 27, 2004 outlining the history of oil explorations and oil reserves in Haiti and in the research of Dr. Ginette and Daniel Mathurin.

There is also evidence that these very same big US oil companies and their inter-related monopolies of engineering and defense contractors made plans, decades ago, to use Haiti’s deep water ports either for oil refineries or to develop oil tank farm sites or depots where crude oil could be stored and later transferred to small tankers to serve U.S. and Caribbean ports. This is detailed in a paper about the Dunn Plantation at Fort Liberte in Haiti.

In Haiti, between 1994 to 2004 when the people had a voice in government, there was an intense grassroots movement to figure out how to exploit Haiti’s resources. There was a plan, where in the book “Investing In People: Lavalas White Book under the direction of Jean-Betrand Aristide (Investir Dans L’Humain), the Haitian majority “were not only told where the resources were, but that — they did not have the skills and technology to actually extract the gold, to extract the oil.” In 2004 the US kidnapped Jean-Betrand Aristide and is escorted on a US-charted jet to the Central African Republic. Aristide, his wife Mildred and his brother-in-law are taken at gunpoint by US soldiers to the airport. Aristide is warned by US diplomat Luis Moreno that if he does not leave Haiti, thousands of Haitians would die and rebel leader Guy Philippe would attack the palace and kill him. Moreover, the US warns Aristide that they are withdrawing his US-provided security. The US orchestrated a coup to prevent the Haitian people from knowing that they own huge reserves of oil.

The US has only recently constructed its fifth largest embassy in the world - fifth only besides the US embassy in China, Iraq, Iran and Germany - in tiny Haiti.

Within a C-SPAN coverage of the Energy Commission, aired June 10, 2008, four US Congressmen were televised talking to each other about how there is 1.5 trillion barrels of oil/gas off the shores of the US. Reportedly, they did not give the EXACT location of where this 1.5 trillion oil/gas reserves is. So, could it be in Haiti?

At the beginning of 20th century, the physical and political card of the Island of Haiti, drawn up in 1908 by Mr. Alexandre Poujol and Henry Thomasset, announced a significant oil reservoir in Haiti in the vicinity of source of Rio Todo El Mondo, Affluent of right-hand side of the river Artibonite, more known today under the name of Rivière of Thomonde. According to the geological study there are many places in Haiti and the Dominican Republic which present all the criteria geologic of presence of THE BLACK GOLD in Haiti ~ la plaine des Cayes, la plaine de Léogane, la plaine du Cul-de-Sac, la plaine des Gonaïves et la Savane désolée, la Plaine du Nord. The Island of Gonâve and literal correspondents for the layers offshore oil rig. In this list, one should not forget the large sedimentary basin of Plateau Central.

In the Fifties, the Knappen-Tippen-Abbet Company had carried out drillings in Gonâve, in plain of plaine de Cul-de-Sac, Plateau-Central and in the area of Gonaïves. All of these drillings had proved extremely promising and the results were beyond expectations. However, the big multinational oil companies operating in Haiti pushed for the discovered deposits not to be exploited.

The Haitian OIL was to be kept a secret for when the Middle Eastern supplies are depleted. That is exactly what is happening. The wells of Knappen-Tippen-Abbet were numbered, carefully padlocked, or sealed with cement and forgotten.

These oil deposits were not to be made public to the Haitians. The US and other superpowers do not want Haiti to become a powerful nation. The exploitation of these Oil Reservoirs would remove Haiti from the poorest Nation’s list in the Western hemisphere.

In their dramatic search for oil, the Cubans developed a technology and a know-how of which the Haitian people could, in exchange of their services, offer to the Cubans part of the national oil production and give them a share of profits. The US is now pouring 10,000 US Marines into Haiti, not for humanitarian aid but to safeguard their interests in the 1.5 trillion barrels of oil/gas that belongs to the impoverished Haitian people.

The nutrient Glucarate (D-glucaric acid) is a powerful, natural and safe cancer fighter. It detoxifies cancer causing agents from the environment, such as the carcinogens in barbecued meat. In recent medical research studies, it dramatically reduced the incidence of breast, colon, prostate, lung and other cancers - in some cases by more than 50 percent.

Other common name(s): calcium glucarate, calcium D-glucarate, D-glucarate

Glucarate is a phytochemical or plant compound found in many fruits and vegetables, including apples, grapefruit, broccoli, brussels sprouts, and bean sprouts. It also occurs naturally in the body in very small amounts.

Glucarate reduces the risk of colon, lung, liver, skin, prostate, and other types of cancer by increasing the body’s ability to eliminate cancer-causing toxins that come from diet and the environment. Medical research has shown that glucarate may hinder the formation of breast and uterine tumors by helping the body remove excess estrogen and other hormones that promote these diseases.

In dietary supplement form, glucarate is most commonly sold as Calcium D-glucarate. Cancer research labs discovered in the 1980s, that glucarate supplements showed anti-cancer properties in cancer cells and laboratory animals. Once in the body, glucarate changes to a substance (d-glucaro-1,4-lactone) that is thought to inhibit a liver enzyme called beta-glucuronidase. This enzyme slows the elimination of certain hormones and chemicals from the body. By acting against beta-glucuronidase, glucarate may allow the body to get rid of these substances more quickly. Several studies have found higher levels of beta-glucuronidase in the tissues of people with cancer than in those without cancer.

A number of animal studies published in peer-reviewed medical journals have found that fewer breast cancer tumors developed and existing tumors shrank in rats that were given dietary glucarate. Animal studies also found that dietary glucarate slowed the development of tumors in the colon, lung, liver, skin, and prostate. These results suggest that dietary glucarate is worthy of further study to evaluate its possible role in preventing and treating cancer in humans.

Glucarate is sold as a dietary supplement. There are no known side effects linked to its use. Glucarate is a much safer cancer fighter than pre existing cancer treatment that uses drugs and radiation ~ most drug treatments have mild to very severe side effects.

Calcium D-Glucarate is known for:

* Estrogen Removal - Calcium-D-Glucarate allows the body to excrete used hormones, such as estrogen before they can become reabsorbed. Large doses of Calcium-D-Glucarate have been shown to lower serum estrogen levels in rats by 23 percent. Many breast cancers are estrogen-dependent.

* Tumor Prevention - Animal studies have shown positive results regarding the use of Calcium D-Glucarate for detoxifying carcinogens in the colon, skin, lung, breast, and liver.

* Lipid Lowering - D-Glucarate reduced total serum cholesterol up to 12 percent, LDL-cholesterol up to 28 percent, and triglycerides up to 43 percent.

There are over 200 different variations of the disease according to the National Cancer Institute? Having the ability to grow in any organ in the body, this wicked disease claimed the lives of seven million people worldwide. Deaths are expected rise to over 10 million per year by 2020. It ranks as the number 2 cause of death in the United States behind heart disease. Lung, colon, prostate and breast cancer account for more than half of cancer deaths in the United States. Over 14,000 chemicals are added to the food supply in the United States today. Due to exposure from various sources, tracing a chronic illness to one toxin can be a daunting task; subsequently the connections are often never made.

Many have successfully conquered cancer naturally and safely. All have had their cancer fighting success stories discredited by the 200 billion dollar cancer industry? Why? Billions have been thrown at the cancer industry in an attempt to find a cure; donations, fundraisers, the cancer walks and black tie events, yet we’re told absolutely no cure exists. Chemotherapy uses pharmaceutical drugs to destroy cancer cells throughout the entire body; in this process healthy cells are also killed, damaging the immune system, making the body weak and prone to further illness. Side effects include: bleeding problems, havoc to the digestive tract, memory changes as well as sexual and fertility changes. Yet, due to the profitability, hospitals and doctors continue to recommend chemotherapy, regardless of its 2.1% success rate over five years!

Mammograms which were suppose to protect women by early detection of breast cancer; in actuality they increase the risk due to harmful radiation exposure, claims Dr. Russell Blaylock-Brain Surgeon / Neuroscientist. The U.S. Preventive Task Force is now stating that women should not have yearly mammograms until the age of 50, and then only every two years.

If better alternatives exist, then why do mainstream media and big pharmaceutical companies persist in using inferior treatments which do more harm than good? The diagnoses, every time, is profit. If an alternative to harmful chemotherapy and drugs existed then a cure for the $200 billion cancer industry would also be discovered. Do you really think that the cancer research industry would ever come out and announce a cure for cancer and risk losing $billions in future research funding? The fact is there is a cure for cancer, heart disease and other easily curable diseases. Profit is keeping you from being cured. How stupid does the cancer industry think we are? Decades of research that has cost $billions and the supposed best scientific minds cannot find a cure. Who are they kidding? Not me and not millions more who are are now fighting cancer by rejecting the harmful chemotherapy and drugs that the $200 billion cancer industry is peddling. Simple and cheap alternatives like supplementing our diet with Glucarate, exercising, creating Vitamin D naturally and free of charge with sun exposure and filtering out chlorine from our water supply are just a few of the many alternatives to prevent and treat cancer and other easily curable diseases.

There is no difference between the actions taken by terrorists who attacked New York City on September 11, 2001 and the actions taken by the WHO, the CDC and the Obama government who have terrorized the American people and the World population into being infected with the A-H1N1 virus through vaccines and nasal sprays

The World Health Organization and the CDC are all terrorizing the US public and the World population with predictions to the effect that millions will die unless people get the swine flu vaccine. This is terrorism - the systematic use of terror especially as a means of coercion. Coercion is the practice of forcing another party to behave in an involuntary manner (whether through action or inaction) by use of threats, intimidation, trickery, or some other form of pressure or force. Such actions are used as leverage, to force the victim to act in the desired way. Coercion may involve the actual infliction of physical pain/injury or psychological harm in order to enhance the credibility of a threat. The threat of further harm may lead to the cooperation or obedience of the person being coerced. They, the World Health Organization, the CDC and the Obama government, are using terror to coerce the World population to submit to being vaccinated against a virus that has killed only a fraction of the number of people who have died each year from the seasonal flu. For decades the seasonal flu killed thousands and no pandemic was ever issued. Over 36,000 people have died each year from the seasonal flu in the US alone and there has never been a pandemic alert issued. The seasonal flu has killed tens of thousands of people before the first swine flu outbreak and will kill thousands more than the swine flu.

Before the swine flu outbreak in April of 2009 the seasonal virus had killed thousands of people since January 2009 and is expected to keep killing hundreds of people every week for the rest of the year. When the first case of the swine flu was reported, self-proclaimed experts warned the US government and other countries’ governments that as a new strain, the swine flu will be harder to stop because there aren’t any vaccines to fight it. This was not a warning but a threat - a terrorist threat. From day one they set out to terrorize the general population. This was premeditated. Both the World Health Organization and the CDC receive most of their funding from the drug companies. Drug companies have financed this terrorist attack against the American people and the World population. They had the WHO and the CDC declare a pandemic that did not and still does not exist for a virus that is easily defeated by the body’s own immune system. Their motive for this terrorist attack is profit. They made $billions when the WHO and the CDC declared a pandemic and forced the US government to spend $billions on making a vaccine that is not needed and should not be used because they all contain the actual (live) swine flu virus. Title 18 Section 175 of the US Criminal Code - Whoever knowingly develops, produces, stockpiles, transfers, acquires, retains, or possesses any biological agent, toxin, or delivery system for use as a weapon, or knowingly assists a foreign state or any organization to do so, or attempts, threatens, or conspires to do the same, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned for life or any term of years, or both. The inclusion of any live virus in any disseminating device (vaccine syringe) is a violation of the law as it is considered a biological weapon and the use of such disseminating device is bio-terrorism.

The designer A-H1N1 virus still has a very long way to go to match the roughly 36,000 deaths that seasonal influenza causes in the United States each year. The only way it will surpass the death toll of the seasonal influenza is if someone deliberately and systematically infects millions with the live virus through A-H1N1 vaccines and nasal sprays. That is exactly what is now happening. The WHO, the CDC and the US government are all guilty of launching a bio-terrorist attack against the World population. They have launched a terrorist campaign that intends to terrorize the US people and the World population into being vaccinated for a virus that is extremely mild compared to the seasonal flu. Mild because the regular seasonal flu kills a hundred times more people each week than the A-H1N1 virus has collectively over the past 9 months. Mild because the swine flu is not as contagious as the regular flu virus. The A-H1N1 virus can’t even be considered contagious. The regular seasonal flu is spread easily whereas the A-H1N1 virus can only spread if injected directly into the blood stream through vaccines or nasal sprays. The WHO and the CDC are doing exactly that - injecting a live virus directly into the blood stream of everyone who gets their vaccine. If that person should die they will declare that they died of the swine flu and their terrorism has more fuel to trick more people into getting vaccinated. How they contracted the swine flu in the first place is purposely (intent) left out of the press releases because the vast majority of the people who have died from the swine flu have died only after being infected with the swine flu through the vaccine.

Since January 2009, over 13,000 people have died of complications from seasonal flu, according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention’s weekly report on the causes of death in the nation. No fewer than 800 flu-related deaths were reported in any week between January 1 and April 18, 2009 - the date of the first case of the swine flu for the US - the day Special agent Marc S. Griswold who was serving as the lead advance special agent for Obama on his April 16, 2009 trip to Mexico flew back to the US from Mexico on a commercial airline sick with the Swine Flu virus.

The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention’s weekly report looks at deaths in the 122 largest cities in the United States. Worldwide, the annual death toll from the seasonal flu is estimated to be between 250,000 and 500,000. About 9 out of 10 of those deaths are among people older than 65. Most times, they already have health problems that the flu makes worse. “Regular influenza can be taxing,” Dr. Brian Currie stated. Currie is vice president and medical director at Montefiore Medical Center in Bronx, New York. “It causes their underlying disease to decompensate and then they don’t have the reserves to get through it. “While it may not be the direct cause listed on the death certificate, it certainly contributed.”

Seeking to put the swine flu outbreak in perspective, Los Angeles County public health officer Dr. Jonathan Fielding echoed other public officials calling it “cause for concern, but not for alarm.”

“Given the size of L.A. County, given the traffic between here and Mexico, it would be very surprising if we didn’t have any cases,” Fielding said. He said the county, where the CDC had confirmed 10 cases of swine flu, sees more than 1,000 flu-related deaths every year. “So it would also not be surprising if there were deaths with swine flu — even if it had the pattern of seasonal flu,” he said. “Thus far, the pattern we see in the United States is very similar to that of seasonal flu — relatively mild to moderate cases.”

According to the World Health Organization (WHO), a pandemic can start when three conditions have been met:

* emergence of a disease new to a population;
* agents infect humans, causing serious illness; and
* agents spread easily and sustainably among humans.

A disease or condition is not a pandemic merely because it is widespread or kills many people; it must also be infectious. For instance, cancer is responsible for many deaths but is not considered a pandemic because the disease is not infectious or contagious. Seasonal flu is very infectious but has never been declared a pandemic.

Now to show you that the WHO falsely declared the A-H1N1 or swine flu virus a pandemic - based on their own conditions.

First of all the A-H1N1 virus is not a new disease. It is a rename of a 1976 influenza outbreak called the Swine Flu. As before the WHO and US government jumped the gun by declaring a pandemic during Gerald Ford’s presidency whereby they planned for and started a vaccination of the entire US population against the 1976 swine flu. What happened is no surprise. The pandemic never came to be. Instead thousands were infected by the vaccine and became very sick and thousands suffered severe neurological damage as a result of the side-effects of the vaccine. Years later it was determined that the vaccine caused more deaths and more severe health issues than the actual 1976 Swine Flu. So the A-H1N1 does not meet even the first condition set by the WHO as they are already all too familiar with the Swine Flu influenza virus. The deception is there for profit as the WHO gets funding from the US government and from the drug companies. Without financial support from the drug industry the WHO cannot be profitable. As in 1976 the WHO declared a pandemic in order to get funding. Today they are declaring a pandemic for a larger profit. Why should the US auto makers be the only ones to get $billions from the US people through Obama’s bonus packages. Declare a pandemic when none exist and wait for $billions to come your way.

The second condition is a play on words. Agents infect humans, causing serious illness. Agents are what’s put in a vaccine or the so-called antidote. Everyone who has contracted the A-H1N1 virus contradicted it by the administration of a drug treatment like Tamiflu or the vaccine illegally containing the live swine flu virus. The treatment in the form of anti-viral drugs like Tamiflu and vaccines are the agents that are causing serious illness. All reported cases have started out as being mild flu like symptoms. It is only after the people feel mildly sick that they seek medical help. It is after they all have received treatment in the form of an anti-viral drug or a vaccine that they become very ill and even die. The agent in all cases is the treatment.

The last condition agents spread easily and sustainably among humans is totally untrue. The Swine Flu virus last 3 to 4 days, untreated. Based on WHO and CDC website reports when the 1976 Swine Flu virus re-emerged. For the first 3 months they stated that the Swine Flu virus is mild and lasts 3 to 4 days. Now they are changing their story because now they are seeking to make some money by pushing drugs for the drug companies. The drug companies and Obama promised them $billions if they declared a pandemic and started brainwashing the US public to accept a nationwide vaccination program.

Ask the WHO what is in the vaccine. Ask your doctor what is in the vaccine. Ask them more specifically if a very small amount of the A-H1N1 organism is formulated into the vaccine. If they say it isn’t they are flat out lying to you. Every antidote or vaccine every made contains the actual organism that causes the disease. Look in any medical journal and you will see stated that a vaccine is 1) a biological preparation (made in a lab) 2) typically contains a small amount of a virus organism and or 3) is live micro-organisms that have been cultivated under lab conditions using related but less dangerous organisms to produce an immune response. Each and every description notes that the actual organism is used to make a vaccine. It does not matter how you play with the wording what you are always getting when you get vaccinated is infected with the actual virus. All it takes is one organism to cause an illness. The logic of washing you hands regularly in order not to be infected with any virus is to wash away even that one little micro-organism.

A micro-organism is an organism that is microscopic. It is too small to be seen by the naked human eye. You can’t even see it. So if all it takes is one organism that is so small that you can’t even see it to make you very sick how many of these micro-organisms are used to make a vaccine? Does the vaccine contain 1, 10, 100, 1000, or even 1 million micro-organisms? How many is required by WHO standards to make a vaccine? If all it takes is 1 then 1 is one too many and here lies the proof that vaccines do more harm than good as they infect healthy people.

I for one am not going to be infected by the vaccine. I for one will exercise my right to refuse any treatment that will harm me. The Hippocratic Oath is an oath traditionally taken by physicians swearing to ethically practice medicine. Included in this oath is this sentence:

“I will apply dietic measures for the benefit of the sick according to my ability and judgement; I will keep them from harm and injustice.

I will neither give a deadly drug to anybody if asked for it, nor will I make a suggestion to this effect.”

Any doctor or nurse who participates in the A-H1N1 vaccination program is violating their oath. Knowing that the vaccine actual contains small amounts of the micro-organism means that they know the vaccine will cause the recipient harm. Based on well documented prior cases concerning specifically the brain damage and deaths caused as a result of the last swine flu vaccination program, from Ford’s presidency, the WHO, the CDC, Obama and every doctor in the US and around the World knows that the vaccine and anti-viral drug treatment for the H1N1 virus are all deadly drugs. Patient charts will show that only after being given the A-H1N1 vaccine or anti-viral drug like Tamiflu thousands in the US became severely ill and over 13,277 World wide have died. They contracted the A-H1N1 virus and became very ill and some even died after being given a vaccine and anti-viral drugs. The evidence clearly shows that there is no pandemic and there never was. There will be a genocide if the entire US population is continued to be terrorized and gets vaccinated with the actual A-H1N1 virus that is in every vaccine.

Between 48% to 62% of Canadians not only question but oppose our engagement of troops in this illegal war of aggression against the Afghan people. A war fought not out of self-defense or against terrorism but explicitly for exploiting the oil and natural gas supplies of the Caspian / Central Asian region.

Evidence is now being collected for use in the 2010 indictments against Canadian Prime Minster Stephen Harper, Defense Minister Peter Gordon MacKay, former Prime Ministers Jean Chrétien and Paul Martin for Crimes Against Peace, Genocide, Crimes Against Humanity and War Crimes.

The time has come for all of us to stand up for the rights of our fellow man. It is time for us to help the people of Afghanistan regain their freedom from the unlawful act of aggression and military occupation by the US, Canada and NATO countries. The attacks against the US on September 11, 2001 were criminal acts (Unlawful Seizure of Aircrafts) not acts of war. No foreign state or foreign military attacked the US on September 11, 2001. The attackers were criminals with the criminal intent to cause harm to the US. There is absolutely no evidence that Afghanistan took part in the attacks of 9/11. Not one hijacker was a Afghan citizen nor a Taliban. Link to FBI list of individuals believed to be the hijackers of the four airliners that crashed on September 11, 2001 is found here - http://www.fbi.gov/pressrel/pressrel01/092701hjpic.htm. No Afghan military aircraft took part in the attacks. There is absolutely no link between Afghanistan and the attacks of September 11, 2001. The US FBI Most Wanted Posted for bin Laden doesn’t even mention the attacks of September 11, 2001. That means the US government doesn’t even have any evidence to link bin Laden to 9/11. That means the US, Canadian and NATO military attack against Afghanistan is illegal. That means the US, Canadian and NATO military attack against Afghanistan is an illegal war of aggression - Crimes Against Humanity and War Crimes.

Canadian Criminal Code

Crimes Against Humanity and War Crimes Act, S.C. 2000, c. 24 - An Act respecting genocide, crimes against humanity and war crimes and to implement the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court, and to make consequential amendments to other Acts.

Crimes Against Humanity and War Crimes Act, S.C. 2000, c. 24 http://www.canlii.org/en/ca/laws/stat/sc-2000-c-24/latest/sc-2000-c-24.html declares:

6. (1) Every person who, either before or after the coming into force of this section, commits outside Canada

(a) genocide,
(b) a crime against humanity, or
(c) a war crime,

is guilty of an indictable offence and may be prosecuted for that offence in accordance with section 8.

Conspiracy, attempt, etc.
(1.1) Every person who conspires or attempts to commit, is an accessory after the fact in relation to, or counsels in relation to, an offence referred to in subsection (1) is guilty of an indictable offence.

Punishment
(2) Every person who commits an offence under subsection (1) or (1.1)

(a) shall be sentenced to imprisonment for life, if an intentional killing forms the basis of the offence; and
(b) is liable to imprisonment for life, in any other case.

Definitions
(3) The definitions in this subsection apply in this section.

“crime against humanity” means murder, extermination, enslavement, deportation, imprisonment, torture, sexual violence, persecution or any other inhumane act or omission that is committed against any civilian population or any identifiable group and that, at the time and in the place of its commission, constitutes a crime against humanity according to customary international law or conventional international law or by virtue of its being criminal according to the general principles of law recognized by the community of nations, whether or not it constitutes a contravention of the law in force at the time and in the place of its commission.

“genocide” means an act or omission committed with intent to destroy, in whole or in part, an identifiable group of persons, as such, that at the time and in the place of its commission, constitutes genocide according to customary international law or conventional international law or by virtue of its being criminal according to the general principles of law recognized by the community of nations, whether or not it constitutes a contravention of the law in force at the time and in the place of its commission.

“war crime” means an act or omission committed during an armed conflict that, at the time and in the place of its commission, constitutes a war crime according to customary international law or conventional international law applicable to armed conflicts, whether or not it constitutes a contravention of the law in force at the time and in the place of its commission.

Interpretation — customary international law
(4) For greater certainty, crimes described in articles 6 and 7 and paragraph 2 of article 8 of the Rome Statute are, as of July 17, 1998, crimes according to customary international law, and may be crimes according to customary international law before that date. This does not limit or prejudice in any way the application of existing or developing rules of international law.

Interpretation — crimes against humanity
(5) For greater certainty, the offence of crime against humanity was part of customary international law or was criminal according to the general principles of law recognized by the community of nations before the coming into force of either of the following:

(a) the Agreement for the prosecution and punishment of the major war criminals of the European Axis, signed at London on August 8, 1945; and

(b) the Proclamation by the Supreme Commander for the Allied Powers, dated January 19, 1946.

The US, Canadian and NATO military (armed) attacks against Afghanistan is a violation of US, Canadian and International Law and Treaties. The attack was and is still illegal as Afghanistan did not attack the US, Canada or any other NATO (North Atlantic Treaty Organization) nation.

A war of aggression is a military conflict waged absent the justification of self-defense. Waging such a war of aggression is a crime under the customary international law. The International Military Tribunal at Nuremberg, which followed World War II, called the waging of aggressive war “essentially an evil thing…to initiate a war of aggression…is not only an international crime; it is the supreme international crime, differing only from other war crimes in that it contains within itself the accumulated evil of the whole.”

In 1945, the London Charter of the International Military Tribunal defined three categories of crimes, including crimes against peace. This definition was first used by Finland to prosecute the political leadership in the War-responsibility trials in Finland. The principles were later known as the Nuremberg Principles.

In 1950, the Nuremberg Tribunal defined Crimes against Peace, in Principle 6, specifically Principle VI(a), submitted to the United Nations General Assembly, as:

(i) Planning, preparation, initiation or waging of a war of aggression or a war in violation of international treaties, agreements or assurances;
(ii) Participation in a common plan or conspiracy for the accomplishment of any of the acts mentioned under (i).

The United Nations Charter

* Article 1: The Purposes of the United Nations are:

1. To maintain international peace and security, and to that end: to take effective collective measures for the prevention and removal of threats to the peace, and for the suppression of acts of aggression or other breaches of the peace, and to bring about by peaceful means, and in conformity with the principles of justice and international law, adjustment or settlement of international disputes or situations which might lead to a breach of the peace;

2. To develop friendly relations among nations based on respect for the principle of equal rights and self-determination of peoples, and to take other appropriate measures to strengthen universal peace;

* Article 2, paragraph 4

All Members shall refrain in their international relations from the threat or use of force against the territorial integrity or political independence of any state, or in any other manner inconsistent with the Purposes of the United Nations.

The North Atlantic Treaty
Washington D.C. - 4 April 1949

The Parties to this Treaty reaffirm their faith in the purposes and principles of the Charter of the United Nations and their desire to live in peace with all peoples and all governments.

They are determined to safeguard the freedom, common heritage and civilisation of their peoples, founded on the principles of democracy, individual liberty and the rule of law. They seek to promote stability and well-being in the North Atlantic area.

They are resolved to unite their efforts for collective defence and for the preservation of peace and security. They therefore agree to this North Atlantic Treaty :

Article 1

The Parties undertake, as set forth in the Charter of the United Nations, to settle any international dispute in which they may be involved by peaceful means in such a manner that international peace and security and justice are not endangered, and to refrain in their international relations from the threat or use of force in any manner inconsistent with the purposes of the United Nations.

Article 2

The Parties will contribute toward the further development of peaceful and friendly international relations by strengthening their free institutions, by bringing about a better understanding of the principles upon which these institutions are founded, and by promoting conditions of stability and well-being. They will seek to eliminate conflict in their international economic policies and will encourage economic collaboration between any or all of them.

Article 3

In order more effectively to achieve the objectives of this Treaty, the Parties, separately and jointly, by means of continuous and effective self-help and mutual aid, will maintain and develop their individual and collective capacity to resist armed attack.

According to Canadian and customary international law or conventional international law Prime Minster Stephen Harper, Defense Minister Peter Gordon MacKay, former Prime Ministers Jean Chrétien and Paul Martin are guilty of indictable offences. Canada’s attack against Afghanistan is a war of aggression, a military conflict waged absent the justification of self-defense. Canada was not attacked by Afghanistan. Canada attacked Afghanistan and to this day continues a military occupation of Afghanistan. To this day Stephen Harper illegally authorizes Canadian soldiers to hunt down and murder all Taliban members, which according to Canadian and International Laws is defined as the criminal offense called genocide - a criminal act committed with intent to destroy, in whole or in part, an identifiable group of persons (the Taliban). The Afghan people and the Taliban are not the enemy. The leaders of the US, Canada and NATO are the enemy. They are the ones who launched an illegal war against a country that did not attack the US, Canada or any NATO country - waged absent the justification of self-defense.

It is our duty as Canadians to set an example. We are a country of countries. We are a peaceful nation and we are peace keepers. We have an ethical, moral and legal responsibility to the World. We have a duty to make things right again and it all begins with indicting Prime Minster Stephen Harper, Defense Minister Peter Gordon MacKay, former Prime Ministers Jean Chrétien and Paul Martin for Crimes Against Peace, Genocide, Crimes Against Humanity and War Crimes. When we make Prime Minster Stephen Harper, Defense Minister Peter Gordon MacKay, former Prime Ministers Jean Chrétien and Paul Martin accountable for their crimes against the Afghan people then other nations will do the same.

2010 will be the year when wrongs are made right. When the Afghanistan victims of these grave and gross injustices will finally see justice. When Canadian government officials are indicted for Crimes Against Peace, Genocide, Crimes Against Humanity and War Crimes. Only then can Canada become a peacekeeping nation again.

Who among you will be peacemakers and support indicting Prime Minster Stephen Harper, Defense Minister Peter Gordon MacKay, former Prime Ministers Jean Chrétien and Paul Martin for Crimes Against Peace, Genocide, Crimes Against Humanity and War Crimes? Who among you will step up, and formally file charges of Crimes Against Peace, Genocide, Crimes Against Humanity and War Crimes against Prime Minster Stephen Harper, Defense Minister Peter Gordon MacKay, former Prime Ministers Jean Chrétien and Paul Martin with the Supreme Court of Canada and make right the wrong that our government has done to the innocent people of Afghanistan? Who among you will contribute legal counsel so that the indictments are filed legally and properly? Our motive is not one of financial gain. Our motive is not one of political or religious extremism. Our motive is to hold our elected officials accountable for their actions and when their actions are deemed illegal, pursuant to Canadian and International Law and Treaties, indict them for the crimes that they commit. Our motive is to give back the Afghan people their freedom and restore peace - the stated purpose and goal of the United Nations, the North Atlantic Treaty, and of all peacemakers.

“We are quite convinced, based on this study, that there is an association between cancer and chlorinated water.” - Medical College Of Wisconsin research team

The addition of chlorine to our drinking water began in the late 1800s and by 1904 was the standard in water treatment, and for the most part remains so today. We don’t use chlorine because it’s the safest or even the most effective means of disinfection, we use it because it is the cheapest. In spite of all our technological advances, we essentially still pour bleach in our water before we drink it. The long term effects of chlorinated drinking water have just recently being recognized. According to the U.S. Council Of Environmental Quality, “Cancer risk among people drinking chlorinated water is 93% higher than among those whose water does not contain chlorine.”

Dr. Joseph Price wrote a highly controversial book in the late sixties titled Coronaries/Cholesterol/Chlorine and concluded that nothing can negate the incontrovertible fact, the basic cause of atherosclerosis and resulting entities such as heart attacks and stroke, is chlorine.” Dr. Price later headed up a study using chickens as test subjects, where two groups of several hundred birds were observed throughout their span to maturity. One group was given water with chlorine and the other without. The group raised with chlorine, when autopsied, showed some level of heart or circulatory disease in every specimen, the group without had no incidence of disease. The group with chlorine under winter conditions, showed outward signs of poor circulation, shivering, drooped feathers and a reduced level of activity. The group without chlorine grew faster, larger and displayed vigorous health. This study was well recepted in the poultry industry and is still used as a reference today. As a result, most large poultry producers use dechlorinated water. It would be a common sense conclusion that if regular chlorinated tap water is not good enough for the chickens, then it probably is not good enough for us humans!

There is a lot of well founded concern about chlorine. When chlorine is added to our water, it combines with other natural compounds to form Trihalomethanes (chlorination byproducts), or THMs. These chlorine byproducts trigger the production of free radicals in the body, causing cell damage, and are highly carcinogenic. “Although concentrations of these carcinogens (THMs) are low, it is precisely these low levels that cancer scientists believe are responsible for the majority of human cancers in the United States“. The Environmental Defense Fund

Simply stated chlorine is a pesticide, as defined by the U.S. EPA, who’s sole purpose is to kill living organisms. When we consume water containing chlorine, it kills some part of us, destroying cells and tissue inside our body. Dr. Robert Carlson, a highly respected University of Minnesota researcher who’s work is sponsored by the Federal Environmental Protection Agency, sums it up by claiming , “the chlorine problem is similar to that of air pollution”, and adds that “chlorine is the greatest crippler and killer of modern times!”

Breast cancer, which now effects one in every eight women in North America, has recently been linked to the accumulation of chlorine compounds in the breast tissue. A study carried out in Hartford Connecticut, the first of it’s kind in North America, found that, “women with breast cancer have 50% to 60% higher levels of organochlorines (chlorination byproducts) in their breast tissue than women without breast cancer.”

One of the most shocking components to all of these studies is that up to 2/3s of our harmful exposure to chlorine is due to inhalation of steam and skin absorption while showering. A warm shower opens up the pores of the skin and allows for excelerated absorption of chlorine and other chemicals in water. The steam we inhale while showering can contain up to 50 times the level of chemicals than tap water due to the fact that chlorine and most other contaminants vaporize much faster and at a lower temperature than water. Inhalation is a much more harmful means of exposure since the chlorine gas (chloroform) we inhale goes directly into our blood stream. When we drink contaminated water the toxins are partially filtered out by our kidneys and digestive system. Chlorine vapors are known to be a strong irritant to the sensitive tissue and bronchial passages inside our lungs, it was used as a chemical weapon in World War II. The inhalation of chlorine is a suspected cause of asthma and bronchitis, especially in children… which has increased 300% in the last two decades. “Showering is suspected as the primary cause of elevated levels of chloroform in nearly every home because of chlorine in the water.” Dr Lance Wallace, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency.

Chlorine in shower water also has a very negative cosmetic effect, robbing our skin and hair of moisture and elasticity, resulting in a less vibrant and youthful appearance. Anyone who has ever swam in a chlorinated pool can relate to the harsh effects that chlorine has on the skin and hair. What’s surprising is that we commonly find higher levels of chlorine in our tap water than is recommended safe for swimming pools.

Aside from all the health risks related to chlorine in our water, it is the primary cause of bad taste and odor in drinking water. The objectionable taste causes many people to turn to other less healthful beverages like soft drinks, tea or other sweetened drinks. A decreased intake of water, for any reason, can only result in a lower degree of health.

The good news is that chlorine is one of the easiest substances to remove from our water. How can you remove the chlorine from the water? Install a Brita (or similar) filter that attaches to your faucet. There are also water pitchers with filters available that will purify the water. In-line filters, which sit under your kitchen sink, are also an effective way to remove chlorine. The least expensive method of filtering your drinking water is by boiling or even setting water out in a large glass container in the sun for a few hours.

George W. Bush photographed with war crimes co-defendants in the Cabinet Room of the White House in December 2001. From left: Vice President Dick Cheney, George W Bush, National-Security Adviser Condoleezza Rice, White House chief of staff Andrew Card, C.I.A. director George Tenet (seated), and Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld.

The U.S. war in Afghanistan began in 2001 as a war of aggression similar to the attack on Iraq. Prior to the start of that war on Oct. 7, 2001, the Taliban government in Kabul offered to hand over Osama Bin Laden, the US alleged al-Qaeda leader, if the U.S. provided proof he was responsible for the 9/11 attacks.

Bush deemed Kabul’s response insufficient and he attacked without adequately seeking an alternative or peaceful way to resolve differences…and the UN was not given a proper role. This attack violated Article 2 of the UN Charter that states “All members shall refrain…from the threat or use of force against the territorial integrity…of any state…”

Neither Afghanistan nor Iraq attacked the United States, so neither war was based on self-defense. Preemptive war is not an accepted form of self-defense under international law.

On June 5, 2006, reporter Ed Hass contacted the FBI Headquarters to learn why Bin Laden’s Most Wanted poster did not indicate that Usama was also wanted in connection with 9/11. He spoke with Rex Tomb, Chief of Investigative Publicity for the FBI. When asked why there is no mention of 9/11 on Bin Ladens Most Wanted web page, Tomb said, “The reason why 9/11 is not mentioned on Usama Bin Ladens Most Wanted page is because the FBI has no hard evidence connecting Bin Laden to 9/11.”

The list of U.S. war crimes committed in Afghanistan alone include the following:

# The U.S. bombed the children’s hospital in Kabul and a hospital in Herat, resulting in 100 deaths. This violated the Red Cross Convention of 1864 that established even military hospitals as “neutral” and that must be “respected by belligerents.”

# Clearly marked Red Cross warehouses were bombed on three occasions in the Afghan War during October 2001, a violation of the Geneva Convention of 1929 that protects “the personnel of Voluntary Aid Societies.”

# During its 2001 offensive in Afghanistan, at least 1,000 civilians were killed by U.S. carpet bombing. This violates Protocol 1 to the Geneva Conventions prohibiting “indiscriminate attacks” against civilians.

# While the Hague Convention of 1899 requires that prisoners be “humanely treated,” this was often not the case in Afghanistan where the conditions in the prisons were so shocking that Canadian forces stopped sending prisoners to the American-run prisons at the end of 2005, preferring to send them to facilities run by the Afghan government.

# Although the Geneva Convention of 1949 forbids “violence to life and person, in particular murder of all kinds,” captives were murdered in Afghanistan’s prisons. Some were chained naked to the ceiling, cell doors, and the floor. One man, Ait Idr, had his face forced into a toilet that was repeatedly flushed. Another, Mohammed Ahmed Said Haidel, was hit with his arms tied behind his back until his head began to bleed. Another, Ahmed Darabi, was hung by his arms and repeatedly beaten, though he survived—unlike (a) taxicab driver (named) Dilawar, who died from the same treatment.

# Prisoners of war “shall be lodged in buildings or in barracks,” says the POW Convention of 1929 but many cells at American-run prisons in Afghanistan lack windows and adequate ventilation. Some prisons lacked heat during cold weather so that prisoners died of exposure. What’s more, some prisoners have been held in solitary confinement for years.

# Where the Geneva Convention decrees sick or wounded prisoners “shall not be transferred as long as their recovery may be endangered by the journey,” some prisoners transferred in Afghanistan were thrown to the ground from helicopters and badly injured. Still others were kicked or beaten en route and others died while stuffed into sealed cargo containers. Not surprisingly, the deaths of some Afghan prisoners have never been recorded, another war crimes violation.

Aggressive war was first declared to be illegal when the U.S. and France coauthored and later ratified the multilateral Kellogg-Briand Pact of 1928, thus incorporating that document into what the U.S. Constitution calls ”the law of the land.” Furthermore, the U.S. is a signatory to both the United Nations Charter and the Nuremberg Charter of 1945, and the Tokyo Charter of 1946.

The Nuremberg Charter, for example, defines crimes against peace as “planning, preparation, initiation or the waging of a war of aggression, or a war in violation of international treaties…,” a definition that fits U.S. actions in Afghanistan during 2001.

It is not only the peoples of Afghanistan and Iraq whose rights have been trampled, for today the globe is being transformed into an unchecked superpower playpen where might appears to make right. Hundreds of years of human rights progress are in serious jeopardy as long as governmental war criminals live blissfully in the knowledge that they will never be accountable for their crimes.

The more the public observes reference in the news to possible war crimes violations, the more decision makers will be accountable. Otherwise, the impunity of high Bush administration officials for the immense violations documented….threatens to turn back the clock on human progress by shredding the Magna Carta, the American Constitution, the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, the Hague and Geneva Conventions, and similar agreements that have advanced humanity from barbarism toward civilized behavior.

Bush has accomplished a transformed United States where leaders have abandoned democratic principles and loyal citizens are profoundly ashamed of how the ideals of the country they love so much have been abandoned. Something must be done or Americans will believe that whatever Bush has done was right.

Bringing George W. Bush and his administration to justice for war crimes is the most compelling way in which to dispel the fiction that what has been done was necessary and proper. Otherwise, the specter of war crimes will continue to haunt the world, and civilization itself will unravel helplessly.

On Oct. 7, 2001 the United States. launched a war of terror against Afghanistan. U.S. leaders are continuing a war that is now opposed by a majority of the American public. A CNN/Opinion Research Corporation survey released on Sept. 1 indicated that 57 percent of Americans questioned stated they oppose the Afghan war. The percentage in opposition to the war is the highest ever in CNN polling since the war began.

President Obama has repeatedly referred to Afghanistan as a “war of necessity.” The initial invasion was “justified” as a self-defense reaction to 9/11 according to the Bush regime. But a National Security Presidential Directive (NSPD) was submitted to the White House on September 9, 2001 that essentially outlined the same war plan that the United States put into play after the 9/11 attacks. The 9/11Commission Report stated that on Sept. 10, 2001, the Bush administration agreed on a plan to oust the Taliban regime by force if it refused to hand over Osama bin Laden. The 9/11 attacks served as a convenient excuse to do what the United States was already intent on doing—attacking Afghanistan.

What have eight years of war accomplished?

Thousands of Afghans have been killed and millions continue to be refugees —either within Afghanistan or in nearby nations. The Afghan economy is shattered and Afghanistan is among the poorest countries in the world. Women are still oppressed as they were under the Taliban. This year the Afghanistan legislature passed a law that requires Shi’ite women to get permission from their husbands to go to school, visit a doctor, to work, and to do other ordinary activities. President Karzai who was originally hand-picked by the United States signed the legislation to advance his election chances within Shi’a areas. Government corruption is so extensive that even the U.S. State Department has condemned it. The recent “democratic” elections are still being contested because of massive fraud. War and drug lords are part of the government. One of Karzai’s vice-presidential running mates, Mohammad Qasim Fahim, is a notorious human rights abuser. In many areas such as poverty rates, life expectancy, unemployment, child mortality, life expectancy, and lack of human rights, Afghanistan is near the worst in the world. Afghanistan is number one in opium production, not under the Taliban rule but under US and NATO occupation. Entire US battalions are used to protect the Opium fields of Afghanistan - to ensure that the fields are not destroyed as the illegal drug trade has financed all CIA illegal black opts since Vietnam.

After taking office, Obama escalated the war by sending additional troops to Afghanistan, with 68,000 to be there by November. There are also 38,000 NATO troops present and Afghan conscripts include 216,000 police and soldiers. As of March 2009, the U.S. military also employed 68,000 “mercenaries” in Afghanistan. These mercenaries do not include other hired killers on the payrolls of the State Department or other U.S. agencies. And despite nearly 400,000 personnel working for the U.S. military, “The insurgents (resistance groups) control or contest a significant portion of the country,” according to General McChrystal. So McChrystal wants to nearly double the Afghan conscripts, and increase U.S. forces by up to 45,000 more troops according to various Pentagon “leakers.”

In September CIA Director Panetta announced that the CIA is adding extra bases in Afghanistan to support the military buildup in Afghanistan and Pakistan. Since taking office, Obama has asked Congress for more funds to expand the U.S. ran prison in Bagram, which holds prisoners taken in the US war of aggression and terror in Afghanistan and those captured and kidnapped by U.S. forces and their allies from around the world. Bagram’s record of human rights abuses rivals Guantanamo’s.

In addition to escalating the Afghan war, Obama has expanded the war into neighboring Pakistan by launching frequent missile strikes. The United States has pressured Pakistan to attack Islamic militants within the country and civil war has broken out in parts of the country as a result. Continuing to expand the war of terror into nuclear-armed Pakistan is a dangerous proposition.

U.S. military leaders openly admit that they are engaged in a “long war” in the Afghanistan region. Depending on which one you listen to, the war will last anywhere from 5 years to a few more decades. Obama claims the United States must fight this war so that the Taliban and al Queda can not retake control of the country. Supporting the U.S. government to defeat the Taliban and their allies will not advance the interests of the Afghan or American people. It was in the interest of the US government to put the Taliban in power after the Taliban and other Afghanistan nationalists groups successfully ousted the Soviet Union from Afghanistan, ending the Soviet occupation of Afghanistan. Now it is only in the interest of the US government to commit genocide against the very same people who liberated the Afghan people from the Soviet war of aggression and occupation. The US needs the Afghanistan opium to finance all their future illegal CIA operations of terror, sabotage and political assassinations using CIA recruited operatives called al Queda. If the US leaves Afghanistan the Taliban would surely wipe out the Opium drug trade, just as they did in March of 2001. The Taliban are not drug warlords the US imposed Afghanistan government is made up entirely of drug warlords - including US imposed Afghan President Hamid Karzai. The Taliban would also take back control of the Trans-Afghanistan Pipeline (TAP or TAPI) that the US stole from them when the US illegally attacked Afghanistan on October 7, 2001.

This war must be ended, not escalated. The U.S. and NATO must withdraw its forces. We must deliver a powerful message to the world that people in the United States will not allow their government to commit war crimes in Afghanistan.

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff,

v.

1. George Walker Bush,
3. Richard Bruce “Dick” Cheney,
4. Donald Henry Rumsfeld, and
5. Barack Hussein Obama
Defendants.

VERDICT FORM

We, the jury, unanimously find the following:

Count 1
A) We, the jury, find the defendant George Walker Bush
GUILTY
of the crime of crimes against peace - planning, preparation, initiation, or waging of wars of aggression, or a war in violation of international treaties, agreements or assurances, or participation in a common plan or conspiracy for the accomplishment of any of the foregoing - against the sovereign nation of Afghanistan and its people.

B) We, the jury, find the defendant Richard Bruce “Dick” Cheney
GUILTY
of the crime of crimes against peace - planning, preparation, initiation, or waging of wars of aggression, or a war in violation of international treaties, agreements or assurances, or participation in a common plan or conspiracy for the accomplishment of any of the foregoing - against the sovereign nation of Afghanistan and its people.

C) We, the jury, find the defendant Donald Henry Rumsfeld
GUILTY
of the crime of crimes against peace - planning, preparation, initiation, or waging of wars of aggression, or a war in violation of international treaties, agreements or assurances, or participation in a common plan or conspiracy for the accomplishment of any of the foregoing - against the sovereign nation of Afghanistan and its people.

D) We, the jury, find the defendant Barack Hussein Obama
GUILTY
of the crime of crimes against peace - planning, preparation, initiation, or waging of wars of aggression, or a war in violation of international treaties, agreements or assurances, or participation in a common plan or conspiracy for the accomplishment of any of the foregoing - against the sovereign nation of Afghanistan and its people.

Count 2
A) We, the jury, find the defendant George Walker Bush
GUILTY
of the crime of Crimes against humanity - Murder, extermination, enslavement, deportation, and other inhumane acts committed against the Afghanistan civilian population, during the war, and the persecutions on political, racial or religious grounds in execution of or in connection with any crime within the jurisdiction of International Law, whether or not in violation of the domestic law of the country where perpetrated.

B) We, the jury, find the defendant Richard Bruce “Dick” Cheney
GUILTY
of the crime of Crimes against humanity - Murder, extermination, enslavement, deportation, and other inhumane acts committed against the Afghanistan civilian population, during the war, and the persecutions on political, racial or religious grounds in execution of or in connection with any crime within the jurisdiction of International Law, whether or not in violation of the domestic law of the country where perpetrated.

C) We, the jury, find the defendant Donald Henry Rumsfeld
GUILTY
of the crime of Crimes against humanity - Murder, extermination, enslavement, deportation, and other inhumane acts committed against the Afghanistan civilian population, during the war, and the persecutions on political, racial or religious grounds in execution of or in connection with any crime within the jurisdiction of International Law, whether or not in violation of the domestic law of the country where perpetrated.

D) We, the jury, find the defendant Barack Hussein Obama
GUILTY
of the crime of Crimes against humanity - Murder, extermination, enslavement, deportation, and other inhumane acts committed against the Afghanistan civilian population, during the war, and the persecutions on political, racial or religious grounds in execution of or in connection with any crime within the jurisdiction of International Law, whether or not in violation of the domestic law of the country where perpetrated.

Count 3
A) We, the jury, find the defendant George Walker Bush
GUILTY
of the crime of WAR CRIMES including violations of laws or customs of war. In subsection (c)(3), the term “grave breach of common Article 3” means any conduct (such conduct constituting a grave breach of common Article 3 of the international conventions done at Geneva August 12, 1949), as follows: Torture, Cruel or inhuman treatment, Murder, Mutilation or maiming, Intentionally causing serious bodily injury, Rape, Sexual assault or abuse, and Taking hostages.

B) We, the jury, find the defendant Richard Bruce “Dick” Cheney
GUILTY
of the crime of WAR CRIMES including violations of laws or customs of war. In subsection (c)(3), the term “grave breach of common Article 3” means any conduct (such conduct constituting a grave breach of common Article 3 of the international conventions done at Geneva August 12, 1949), as follows: Torture, Cruel or inhuman treatment, Murder, Mutilation or maiming, Intentionally causing serious bodily injury, Rape, Sexual assault or abuse, and Taking hostages.

C) We, the jury, find the defendant Donald Henry Rumsfeld
GUILTY
of the crime of WAR CRIMES including violations of laws or customs of war. In subsection (c)(3), the term “grave breach of common Article 3” means any conduct (such conduct constituting a grave breach of common Article 3 of the international conventions done at Geneva August 12, 1949), as follows: Torture, Cruel or inhuman treatment, Murder, Mutilation or maiming, Intentionally causing serious bodily injury, Rape, Sexual assault or abuse, and Taking hostages.

D) We, the jury, find the defendant Barack Hussein Obama
GUILTY
of the crime of WAR CRIMES including violations of laws or customs of war. In subsection (c)(3), the term “grave breach of common Article 3” means any conduct (such conduct constituting a grave breach of common Article 3 of the international conventions done at Geneva August 12, 1949), as follows: Torture, Cruel or inhuman treatment, Murder, Mutilation or maiming, Intentionally causing serious bodily injury, Rape, Sexual assault or abuse, and Taking hostages.

The cheapest, cleanest and most abundant source of fuel is all ready on tap. The technology is already here to break free of the oil dependency.

Ever wonder what it would be like to not pay the high cost of fuel? Ever wonder if there is a better, cheaper, safer and environmentally friendly fuel source? The truth is we had it all along, for millions of years. The one thing that sustains all life - plants, animals and humans - is also the source of our past, present and future energy needs. The oldest, cheapest and cleanest fuel source is water. Water covers 71% the Earth’s surface, the oceans contain 97.2% of Earth’s water. The Antarctic ice sheet, which contains 90% of all fresh water on Earth. All ready knew that. What most of you don’t tend to remember is that water is composed of two gases - Oxygen and Hydrogen. Water is known as H2O with Hydrogen content being 2 parts to 1 part Oxygen. So what? Oxygen is what we all breath, including the engines in our vehicles. Hydrogen is the most abundant of the chemical elements, constituting roughly 75% of the universe’s elemental mass. To the point, hydrogen is a flammable gas making it a viable fuel source.

You’ve heard of hydrogen fuel cells being tested in new vehicles. They have made vehicles that run on hydrogen fuel cells, or in other words on hydrogen. If they already have the technology to run our vehicles on hydrogen why haven’t we gotten away from the pollution and war causing oil? The answer is profit. Once the technology gets out and it is, the general population will have access to unlimited “free” fuel. Until they can monopolize all the water in the World they will develop new hydrogen technology at a crawl pace. Look at the oil companies today. They are the top of the Fortune 500. Record profits are being made.

Every ship that sets to sea already has access to an unlimited supply of fuel. Every ocean vessel can sail without ever stopping to refuel. No more contaminating the water when ships dump their bilge water before entering ports. Their clean burning fuel is sea water. Sea water can be split into its Oxygen and Hydrogen gases and the hydrogen can be used to power the ship’s engines. The technology is there to drastically reduce our dependency on oil today. A Canadian owned company in Ontario Canada is working on a “H2O - Water for Fuel Project” that uses sea water as the fuel source for electricity generators, gas stoves, barbecues, gas furnaces, gas fireplaces and gas lamps. The same device being developed can be modified to provide hydrogen gas from sea water to power the engines of every ship that sets sail carrying cargo, grain, and tourists. This device will drastically reduce the operating costs for every ocean vessel.

With Global Warming being blamed for the rising sea water levels using sea water as fuel is another viable solution to prevent shorelines from disappearing. We can’t drink sea water so why not convert it to an energy source. By doing so we also would be reoxygenating the air we breathe. When we extract the Hydrogen (H2) from the water (H2O) we are left with Oxygen. Something we and every other living creature on Earth needs to live.

Vitamin D made naturally and free of charge from exposure to the Sun is the only pill you will ever need to prevent influenza, cancers and other diseases.

Vitamin D is the “miracle nutrient” that activates your immune system to defend you against invading micro-organisms — including seasonal flu and swine flu. In August 2009, an important study was published by researchers at Oregon State University. This study reveals something startling: Vitamin D is so crucial to the functioning of your immune system that the ability of vitamin D to boost immune function and destroy invading micro-organisms has been conserved in the genome for over 60 million years of evolution.

The fact that this vitamin-D mediated immune response has been retained through millions of years of evolutionary selection, and is still found in species ranging from squirrel monkeys to baboons and humans, suggests that it must be critical to their survival, researchers say.

“The existence and importance of this part of our immune response makes it clear that humans and other primates need to maintain sufficient levels of vitamin D,” said Adrian Gombart, an associate professor of biochemistry and a principal investigator with the Linus Pauling Institute at Oregon State University.

In primates, this action of “turning on” an optimal response to microbial attack only works properly in the presence of adequate vitamin D, which is actually a type of hormone that circulates in the blood and signals to cells through a receptor. Vitamin D is produced in large amounts as a result of sun exposure, and is available in much smaller amounts from dietary sources.

Vitamin D prevents the “adaptive” immune response from over-reacting and reduces inflammation, and appears to suppress the immune response. However, the function of the new genetic element this research explored allows vitamin D to boost the innate immune response by turning on an antimicrobial protein. The overall effect may help to prevent the immune system from overreacting.

What this study reveals is that without sufficient levels of vitamin D circulating in your blood, you’re a ripe, juicy target for influenza (H1N1 or otherwise). If you lack vitamin D, your immune system can’t “activate” to do its job. That’s why people who are deficient in vitamin D so frequently get winter colds.

But people who are high in vitamin D have the nutritional power to activate their immune system so that it can respond to invading pathogens. Crucially, vitamin D also manages to balance immune response and prevent inflammation — the leading cause of death in the 1918 influenza pandemic.

So not only does vitamin D protect you from the initial infection; it also prevents your body from over-reacting and killing you with inflammation (which typically gets expressed as bacterial pneumonia, an infection of the lungs).

Smart people today are doing two things:

1) Saying NO to vaccines.
2) Saying YES to vitamin D.

If you take vitamin D, you don’t need a vaccine!

Sources for vitamin D - Where can you get vitamin D? There’s some vitamin D naturally present in fish oils and marine omega-3 oils, but the two most abundant sources are:

1) Sunlight
2) Vitamin D supplements

You can get sunlight for free by exposing your skin to the sun. You can get vitamin D supplements at just about any vitamin retailer (local or online). Vitamin D is easy to get. Your body actually manufactures it when you’re exposed to the sun.

The sun provides the basis for all life on earth The sun is the source of energy for all plants, animals and humans. Can sunlight help prevent cancers and other diseases such as type 1 diabetes, cardiovascular disease, and certain autoimmune and chronic diseases? The answer is yes. In recent years we’ve all been trained to fear the sun, due to the threat of skin cancer. Nothing could be further from the truth. If the sun causes cancer, man wouldn’t be here today. Contrary to popular belief, sunbathing actually helps heal cancer of the skin while sunblock (which contains harmful chemicals and toxins) increases cancer risk . Now there is a growing belief that exposure to the sun may not actually cause skin cancer. It is the chemicals that we put on our skin that is actually causing skin cancer. Chemicals that are in the sunblocks, colognes, perfumes, moisturisers and soaps. As a study published in the prestigious Cancer journal indicates, exposure to sun actually decreases cancer rates” The light and heat from the sun are indispensable to all nature. Humanity is also part of nature and needs sunlight for health and well being, for vitality and happiness. Sunlight was used for centuries to prevent and cure diseases. Sunlight can heal us and help us in the future. Sunlight helps the body heal wounds and injuries and overcome virtually any illness. Dr. Carl Hoffminster wrote that soldiers in World War II healed and survived much better when their open wounds and broken bones were exposed to sunlight.

The research supporting vitamin D (made naturally and free of charge by your body from exposure to sunlight) and its ability to halt influenza is overwhelming. And yet the vaccine industry (and the doctors who push vaccines) don’t want you to know about vitamin D. Why is that?

It’s because if people knew the truth about vitamin D, the vaccine industry would collapse. Who needs a vaccine if you’ve got a powered-up immune system to do the job automatically? Plus, your immune system is natural, while vaccines are completely unnatural injections of toxic chemicals that are increasingly being linked to not just autism, but seizures, brain damage and death. Why risk a vaccine when vitamin D is so remarkably safe?

You’ll need at least 4000 IU a day just to prevent deficiency, according to many nutrition experts. Some people take 8000 IU a day. You don’t even need to spend any money to the Vitamin D your body needs to maintain a healthy immune system as all it takes is at least 30 minutes of sunlight every day.

National “health” officials are making a crucial mistake with the swine flu. Instead of ordering more vaccines, they should be recommending vitamin D supplements to the population. For less than the cost of the vaccines, we could provide vitamin D supplementation to every man, woman and child in America. We would not only end the swine flu pandemic, we would also see cancer rates plummet!

Perhaps that’s why our health authorities don’t dare recommend vitamin D — the financial impact on the cancer industry would just be too great. The vaccine makers would lose billions, and the cancer industry could lose tens of billions. Diabetes rates would fall, depression would fade away in many people, kidney function would improve and a long list of other diseases would be prevented or reversed following adequate vitamin D intake.

Vitamin D is the answer to our national health care problems. Just one nutrient, if distributed freely to everyone, could probably slash our national health care costs by one-third within five years and yet they dare not mention it. “It’s not approved by the FDA,” they say. So the CDC won’t mention it. The WHO won’t recommend it. The FDA pretends it doesn’t exist, and the doctors aren’t allowed to prescribe it.

Here it is — vitamin D — the great CURE for influenza. It’s here right now. It’s cheap, it’s safe, and it’s available. Yet it’s being utterly ignored.

There is an agenda under way to keep the American people deficient in vitamin D and ignorant about its healing properties. This is a conscious, planned scheme that seeks to keep the people misinformed while pumping them full of vaccines, chemotherapy and prescription drugs instead of teaching them the simple nutritional cures that exist right now.

With the swine flu or any future pandemic, the populations suffering the highest death rates will be those with the highest rates of vitamin D deficiency. And the vaccine? It offers no protection compared to the power of the vitamin D.

The laws of biochemistry cannot be suspended by FDA bureaucrats

To any doctor or health authority who scoffs at the notion of vitamin D being far more useful than vaccines, ask them this question: If vitamin D has no purpose in human health, then why have the immune system genes that are specifically activated by vitamin D persisted in the genome (which is now the human genome) for more than sixty million years?

Why is the human immune system programmed to use vitamin D to activate itself?

Why does human skin generate vitamin D in response to sun exposure?

To doctors this is all just coincidence! There is no specific reason that vitamin D genes exist at all!

But it gets even more bizarre: According to the FDA, vitamin D has no beneficial biological effects in the human body! It’s true: The FDA says that any substance that has a beneficial (therapeutic) effect in the human body must be a DRUG, not a nutrient. And vitamin D has never been approved as a drug. Therefore, it is inert.

Do you follow that? Vitamin D has no benefit to the human body because the FDA says so. How’s that for bureaucratic arrogance? It’s like saying gravity doesn’t apply in our world because we haven’t yet “approved” the laws of physics. But one step off a high ledge reveals, indeed, that the laws of gravity are still in effect, and so are the laws of biochemistry.

You need vitamin D, not a vaccine

Your body doesn’t need a vaccine to combat the swine flu (or seasonal flu, for that matter). What it needs is vitamin D, restful sleep, adequate hydration with clean water, and good nutrition. These things make the vaccine obsolete.

They’re safe, affordable, natural and readily available. You don’t have to wait in line to get vitamin D, and you don’t need a doctor’s prescription. There’s no needle involved, and there’s no risk of you suffering a seizure or permanent brain damage, either - all side effects of the swine flu vaccine.

With sufficient levels of vitamin D in your blood, your immune system will do its job to protect you from swine flu, bird flu, human flu or even the pandemic infectious nonsense being spread around by the CDC, FDA and WHO. Your immune system has all the technology it needs right now to keep you alive from almost any widely-circulating micro-organism… as long as it has the biochemical tools (like vitamin D) to “activate” its adaptive response.

Without a functioning immune system, you would have been killed by micro-organisms a thousand times over by now? Your immune system saves your life every day, quietly, behind the scenes. It is the reason you’re breathing right now as you read this article. Receiving a vaccine injection is the ultimate insult to your own body because it admits that you have no faith in the very same immune system that has already saved your life countless times.

Don’t put your faith in chemical injections. Believe in your immune system — and give it the nutritional tools it needs to keep on saving your life.

Vitamin D also happens to be a powerful anti-cancer medicine that can both prevent and help reverse breast cancer. Exciting new research conducted at the Creighton University School of Medicine in Nebraska has revealed that supplementing with vitamin D and calcium can reduce your risk of cancer by an astonishing 77 percent. This includes breast cancer, colon cancer, skin cancer and other forms of cancer. This research provides strong new evidence that vitamin D is the single most effective medicine against cancer, far outpacing the benefits of any cancer drug known to modern science. The best way to get Vitamin D is by exposure to sunlight. Sunlight triggers the formation of vitamin D in the skin, which can be activated in the liver and kidneys into a hormone with great activity. This activated form of vitamin D causes “cellular differentiation” - essentially the opposite of cancer.

This research on vitamin D is such good news that the American Cancer Society, of course, had to say something against it. An ACS spokesperson, Marji McCullough, strategic director of nutritional epidemiology for the American Cancer Society, flatly stated that nobody should take supplements to prevent cancer. Why would the American Cancer Society — which claims to be against cancer — actually dissuade people from taking supplements that slash their cancer risk by 77 percent? The answer - the ACS is an organization that actually prevents prevention and openly supports the continuation of cancer as a way to boost its power and profits. The ACS is the wealthiest non-profit in America and has very close ties to pharmaceutical companies, mammography equipment companies and other corporations that profit from cancer. The cancer industry is a multi-billion dollar industry. Just about everything the public is told about fighting cancer or finding a cure for cancer by these cancer institutions is a lie. Those “race for the cure” cancer walks are a complete scam. They really aren’t searching for any way to prevent cancer or cure cancer, they’re only searching for new patented drugs to profit from cancer.

US TERRORIST ATTACK BEGINS — The USS Donald Cook launches three Tomahawk Land Attack Missiles towards Iraq, March 20, 2003. That day will forever be known as Iraq’s 9/11 where the US launched an unprovoked surprise terrorist attack against the sovereign state of Iraq and the innocent people of Iraq. On that day the US did not attack the Iraqi military it cowardly attacked and murdered Iraqi civilians while they slept

The CIA is the covert action arm of the President’s foreign policy advisers. In that capacity it overthrows or supports foreign governments while reporting “intelligence” justifying those activities. It shapes its intelligence, even in such critical areas as foreign countries’ nuclear weapons capability, to support presidential policy. Disinformation is a large part of its covert action responsibility, and the American people are the primary target of its lies.

The CIA is a rogue organization, out of control. The CIA’s main mission and purpose is to implement the policies of the President of the United States. The CIA carries out unofficial U.S. government policy. That the CIA is a terrorist organization implies that the United States is a terrorist state. Considering the millions of deaths that the U.S. has caused and the enormous suffering that its international policies produce, its hypocrisy in condemning other countries as “terrorist states” would be ludicrous if it were not so tragic.

The CIA has been a terrorist organization from its beginnings, when it included a large number of former Nazis — former members of the Gestapo and the Nazi military intelligence (such as Reinhard Gehlen). Unlike smaller terrorist organizations such as ETA the CIA does not normally engage in terrorism by sending its own employees to plant bombs, etc. Rather, it tends to act through intermediaries and recruited foreign nationals including mercenaries, agents and operatives. The CIA sometimes makes use of U.S. military personnel - used widely in the Vietnam war and extensively in the US Wars of Terror.

Evidence that the CIA is a terrorist organization is clear from its record of terrorist activities (deceptively called “counterinsurgency” or “low intensity conflict”). Here are just a few easily verified examples:

* During the Vietnam war the CIA conducted Operation Phoenix, an assassination program. The goal was not only to eliminate those Vietnamese who might oppose the U.S. (which in practice meant most of the population of Vietnam) but also to terrorize the entire population of South Vietnam and to suppress opposition to the occupying U.S. forces. Over 20,000 Vietnamese were murdered, often at random.
* The CIA also recruited a mercenary army in Vietnam (financed by profits from the CIA’s heroin smuggling), particularly from among the Hmong villagers, which was used to terrorize the civilian population and to prevent them from assisting the Viet Cong.
* The CIA organized and financed (with the profits from its cocaine smuggling) the activities of the Contras in Nicaragua, who murdered tens of thousands of civilians, and tried to disrupt the economy, in an attempt to destabilize the legitimate Sandinista government. (For this the U.S. was condemned in the World Court for engaging in international terrorism, and it rejected a U.N. security council resolution calling upon it to observe international law.)
* The CIA planned and organized the military coup d’etat in 1973 in Chile which overthrew the legitimately elected government of Salvador Allende (because he would not implement economic policies designed in Washington to favor American corporations doing business in Chile) and brought to power the regime of General Augusto Pinochet; this regime abducted, tortured and killed thousands of Chilean citizens in an attempt to suppress opposition.
* The CIA organized and supported the Turkish government’s persecution of its Kurdish minority during the 1990s, resulting in tens of thousands of deaths and millions of refuges; the aim being the suppression of Kurdish culture and the elimination of Kurdish demands for a separate state.
* The September 11th attacks on the World Trade Center and the Pentagon are widely regarded as terrorist acts. There is evidence of CIA involvement.

The concept of “terrorism” is not clear and there is no generally agreed upon definition of the term. It is, however, a tactic, a means to a particular end. A tactic can always be used, and is always a possible course of action for some group or other. Once this is understood it is clear that it is ridiculous to declare a “War on Terrorism” — one cannot defeat a tactic. To declare a war on terrorism is to declare perpetual war (which, in fact, is the intention). When the US declared al-Qaeda a terrorist group they declared themselves to be terrorists. Al-Qaeda is a cover for CIA terrorist activities and attacks against both foreign and domestic civilian populations. 9/11 has already been declared the work of Al-Qaeda. If the accused is widely accepted as being the group that planned for and carried out the attacks of 9/11 then it is equally accepted that the US government attacked its own people on 9/11. There is clear and concrete evidence that the US government ordered the CIA to plan for a terrorist attack against the US and its people. It was already decided on that the US would blame a newly formed CIA terrorist cell named al-Qaeda for the attacks and use this clear act of treason as an excuse to attack any state they fraudulently declared as supporters of their home grown terrorist cell al-Qaeda. al-Qaeda naming is the US tool for initiating any new or forthcoming policies of the US president. al-Qaeda is a phantom terrorist group. The CIA is given $billions to commit terrorist attacks against any nation, including the US. al-Qaeda threats are the US president’s threats. al-Qaeda terrorist attacks are the US president’s attacks.

In September 2001 President George W. Bush declared a “War on Terrorism” and vowed to destroy all terrorist organizations “with a global reach”. For the good of both America and the rest of the world the US should start with the largest international terrorist organization of them all — their own CIA. To end the US wars of aggressions, every nation on Earth has to only target the CIA. First ban entry of any “suspected” CIA agent from entering ones country, as their mission is always the same - terrorism, namely to recruit and train the people of the country they enter to commit terrorist acts against the US targeted country. The CIA is not and never was a peace keeping organization. Their mandate is to infiltrate and destroy from within the country they illegally enter. They are murders, assassins, saboteurs, kidnappers, thieves and spies. They carry out the illegal orders of the United States president.

Extraordinary Rendition, Torture and Disappearances in the “War on Terror”

Human rights groups and several public inquiries in Europe have found the U.S. government, with the complicity of numerous governments worldwide, to be engaged in the illegal practice of extraordinary rendition, secret detention, and torture.

The U.S. government-sponsored program of renditions is an unlawful practice in which numerous persons have been illegally detained and secretly flown to third countries, where they have suffered additional human rights abuses including torture and enforced disappearance. No one knows the exact number of persons affected, due to the secrecy under which the operations are carried out.

The existence and locations of the facilities — referred to as “black sites” in classified White House, CIA, Justice Department and congressional documents — are known to only a handful of officials in the United States and, usually, only to the president and a few top intelligence officers in each host country.

“Ninety-five percent of the work of intelligence agencies around the world is disinformation and deception,” Andreas von Bulow, former parliamentary official responsible for the budget for Germany’s intelligence agencies, told American Free Press in December 2001.

“If what I say is right, the whole US government should end up behind bars” and “They have hidden behind a veil of secrecy and destroyed the evidence - that they invented the story of 19 Muslims working within Osama bin Laden’s al-Qa’eda - in order to hide the truth of their own covert operation”

Like Nazi Germany of 1933, American news stands today carry a mainstream news dedicated to pushing the government’s version of the truth for 9/11 while viciously smearing independent researchers as extremists who peddle fantasies and make poisonous claims.

The inactions of US government on 9/11, the investigation that never followed, the USA PATRIOT Act, and the propaganda being disseminated by the mainstream news, are strikingly similar to actions attributed to the Nazi ministers Joseph Goebbels and Hermann Gvring.

In Afghanistan, the hidden US agenda has always been oil and natural gas. “ French authors Jean-Charles Brisard and Guillaume Dasquie published a book entitled Bin Laden: The Forbidden Truth which tells of the negotiations for oil pipeline rights in Afghanistan that collapsed in August 2001 after the U.S. told the Taliban: Accept our offer of a carpet of gold or you’ll get a carpet of bombs.”

The Bush administration was expecting the Taliban to cooperate with the US plans for exploiting the oil resources of Central Asia. The US was sure until August 2001, that the Taliban, as a source of stability in Central Asia, would enable US oil companies and their US subsidiaries to construct an oil pipeline across Central Asia. Then all of a sudden in August 2001, a trusted partner of USA, quickly became terrorists when the Taliban realized that their national interest was going to be robed by the US and they dared to refuse to accept US conditions for their support in exploitation of oil resources from central Asia.

As a last hope in the talks between the Bush administration and the Taliban, which began in February 2001, shortly after Bush’s inauguration a Taliban emissary arrived in Washington in March with presents for the new chief executive, (an expensive Afghan carpet). But the talks themselves were less than cordial. Brisard said; “At one moment during the negotiations, the US representatives told the Taliban, ‘either you accept our offer of a carpet of gold, or we bury you under a carpet of bombs’.”

The Bush administration outright threatened to bomb the Taliban unless they came around and allowed the US to build the trans-Afghan Pipeline. These threats were made against the Taliban and the Afghan people months before the US airline hijackings that took place on September 11, 2001.

The trans-Afghan pipeline has always been the hidden agenda for the US. It is the sole motive for the US attacking and occupying Afghanistan. The US has declared that the mission in Afghanistan could last for decades and the reasoning behind this assertion is to protect US oil interests, the trans-Afghan pipeline. The US attacked Afghanistan, not to apprehend bin Laden, but to overthrow the Taliban government and install a government of their choosing. A pro-US government which would assist the US efforts to secure a multibillion dollar natural gas pipeline and an oil pipeline project involving the US firm Unocal (On August 10, 2005, Unocal merged with Chevron Corporation and became a wholly owned subsidiary) and the Saudi group Delta Oil (never forget that the majority of September 11, 2001 US commercial airline hijackers were Saudis, as is bin Laden). The two companies reached an argument with the former Soviet republic Turkmenistan for the pipeline which would go through Afghanistan into Pakistan long before the US airline hijackings of September 11, 2001. The hijackings were a false-flag plan Code named Operation Northwoods that called for CIA or other operatives to commit apparent acts of terrorism in U.S. cities to create public support for a war. It included plans for hijackings and bombings followed by the use of phony evidence that would blame the terrorist acts on a foreign government. The US government implemented their plans to control the flow of the oil and natural gas of the Caspian Region soon after the CIA and their foreign national operatives executed Operation Northwoods.

With the US government staged hijackings of 9/11 an ulterior motive (an invented political excuse) was presented to invade Afghanistan - to get Osama bin Laden, the great elusive boogeyman. And because Saddam Hussein, the leader of a country which just so happens to have one of the largest oil reserves in the World, was allegedly in league with bin Laden, the US launched its war against Iraq on March 20, 2003.

Both US attacks against Afghanistan and Iraq were unprovoked and premeditated. Both attacks were planned for and prepared for long before the hijackings of US commercial airlines on September 11, 2001. The hijackings were criminal acts and so are the US attacks and occupations of Afghanistan and Iraq. The hijackings were acts of terrorism and so are the US attacks against Afghanistan and Iraq. Terrorism is the use of violence and threats to intimidate or coerce, esp. for political purposes. The US government threatened both Afghanistan and Iraq with violence. The US government used terrorists tactics to intimidate and coerce the Taliban into handing over control of the trans-Afghan pipeline to the US oil company Unicol. “Either you accept our offer of a carpet of gold, or we bury you under a carpet of bombs” is clearly a threat, an act of terrorism, by the US government. In a televised address to the nation on March 17, 2003, shortly before the US officially begins its illegal invasion of Iraq, President George W. Bush gave Saddam Hussein an ultimatum, warning the Iraqi leader that if he and his sons do not leave Iraq within 48 hours, the US will use military force to topple his government. “… all Iraqi military and civilian personnel should listen carefully to this warning. In any conflict, your fate will depend on your action. Do not destroy oil wells, a source of wealth that belongs to the Iraqi people. Do not obey any command to use weapons of mass destruction against anyone, including the Iraqi people. War crimes will be prosecuted. War criminals will be punished. And it will be no defense to say, “I was just following orders.” ~ George W Bush

The televised address to the nation on March 17, 2003 is clearly a threat, an act of state terrorism by the US government against the sovereign state of Iraq, its leader and its people. Terrorism was used by the United States to delegitimize political or foreign opponents, and legitimize the United State’s own use of terror against them.

Who are the real terrorists? The Taliban who are defending their country and countrymen from an armed attack by the US and NATO countries or the US government? The evidence is clear. The verdict is clear. The US government, for they attacked 2 countries that did not attack the US or any other country. The US government, for they launched an armed attack, in violation of US and International Law and Treaties, against Afghanistan and Iraq for the sole purpose of seizing control of both country’s oil and natural gas assets. The US “War on Terror” is clearly a US “War of Terror”.

John F Kennedy warned us on June 10, 1963 of a Pax Americana enforced on the world by American weapons of war. “What kind of peace do we seek? Not a Pax Americana enforced on the world by American weapons of war. Not the peace of the grave or the security of the slave. I am talking about genuine peace, the kind of peace that makes life on earth worth living, the kind that enables men and nations to grow and to hope and to build a better life for their children - not merely peace for Americans but peace for all men and women - not merely peace in our time but peace for all time.” – John F. Kennedy.

Kennedy was warning Americans of the secretive plan called “Operation Northwoods”. Operation Northwoods was drafted by the Joint Chiefs of Staff (Almirant George W. Anderson Jr. (Chief of Navy Operations), General George H. Decker (Chief of the Land Forces section), General Leyyman L. Leymnintzer (Chief of the Joint Chief of Staff), General Curtis E. LeMay (Chief of the Air Force section), General David M. Shoup (Commander of the Marines) ) and signed by then-Chairman Lyman Lemnitzer, and sent to the Secretary of Defense Robert McNamara on March 13, 1962

The plan called for CIA controlled terrorist operations against the United States. A CIA “Group W” (an ad hoc unit directed by William Harvey) plan that specifically called for:

“a group of conspiratorial passengers who could be students, for example, would be on board of this ghost-company’s charter flight under the control of the CIA. Once they were flying over Florida (revised by the Bush administration to include New York City and Washington DC), an empty and without-a-pilot identical plane would follow the route. The conspiratorial passengers (passengers from American Airlines Flight 11 from Boston to Los Angeles, United Airlines Flight 175 from Boston to Los Angeles, American Airlines Flight 77 from Dulles to Los Angeles and United Airlines Flight 93 from Newark to San Francisco) would then be taken to a CIA secret base. The plane would ask for help by saying it had been attacked (revised again by the Bush administration to being hijacked). Then, the plane would blow up.”

The implementation of Operation Northwoods would cost the lives of many American citizens, civilians and military men, which was actually the key element for their manipulative functions. The attacks of 9/11 cost the lives of many American citizens, civilians and military men and women.

When Chairman Lyman Lemnitzer presented the CIA Group W Operation Northwoods plans to John F. Kennedy, Kennedy opposed the plan and refused to involve the US in any such overt war. John F. Kennedy regarded Lemnitzer as a hysterical and extremist anti-communist backed up by unscrupulous multinational companies. It was then that President Kennedy understood the real meaning of his antecessor, President Eisenhower, warning when the year before, in his farewell address he said:

“The responsible of the government must be aware of an illegitimate influence whether it comes or not from the military-industrial complex. The risk of developing or using a usurped power exists and will remain present. We must not allow this threat to prevent us from our liberties and democratic processes. Nothing must be considered completely achieved. Only the proper surveillance and awareness can guarantee the balance between the lobby of the huge industrial and military machinery we have developed and our pacific methods and objectives so that security and freedom can work together”. John F Kennedy was murdered on November 22, 1963. The false flag attack scenario against the US by the US government, code named Operation Northwoods, actually played out on September 11, 2001.

“I will promise you this, that if we have not gotten our troops out by the time I am president, it is the first thing I will do. I will get our troops home. We will bring an end to this war. You can take that to the bank. ” - Barack Obama Campaign Promise - October 27, 2007

Abraham Lincoln - “America will never be destroyed from the outside. If we falter and lose our freedoms, it will be because we destroyed ourselves.”

Bill of Rights Amendment XIV
Section 1. … “No state shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.”

When the World Trade Towers collapsed, most Americans simply refused to believe suggestions that the attacks had been staged by parties working for the US Government itself. Americans were afraid to, even as news reports surfaced proving that the US Government had announced plans for the invasion of Afghanistan early in the year, plans into which the attacks on the World Trade Towers which angered the American people into support of the already-planned war fit entirely too conveniently.

But so trapped are Americans by their belief in their own bravery that they will themselves to be blind to the evidence before their eyes, so that they can nod in agreement with the government while still imagining themselves to have courage, even as they avoid the one situation which most requires real courage; to stand up to the government’s lies and deceptions.

Immediately after the September 11, 2001 attacks the US Government requested temporary extraordinary powers, powers specifically banned under Constitutional law, but powers the government is claiming they need to have to deal with the “terrorists”.

The response of the United States Government to a frightened and enraged U.S. citizenry over the September 11 attacks on the Pentagon and World Trade Center has been eerily reminiscent of Hitler’s strategy following the burning of the Reichstag. As well, the rapidity and recklessness with which the Bush administration and the U.S. Congress have abrogated the Bill of Rights places the U.S. Government squarely in the same camp with the “enemies of freedom” they purport to oppose.

The Anti-Terrorism Act of 2001

The U.S. House of Representatives Judiciary Committee steam rolled through the US Congress a bill which would dramatically increase the power of U.S. law enforcement agencies. Attorney General John Ashcroft insisted that the FBI needed additional surveillance and enforcement powers immediately and the Department of Justice demanded the bill be enacted by September 28. The House Judiciary committee was scheduled to vote on the Bush administration’s bill on the morning of September 25; however, in response to an outcry the vote was rescheduled to take place only two days after the catastrophic attacks on the World Trade Center and the Pentagon. The Senate voted for anti-terrorist legislation which increased Internet surveillance after senators were given just 30 minutes to read the measure.

The Anti-Terrorism Act of 2001 eliminated the legal requirement for government agents to obtain permission from a judge before being allowed to search homes and download computer files. Under the law, the information gathered could be used in court, a legal change which presently violates constitutional protections against search and seizure. The bill would also eliminate the requirement for a judge to sign a warrant in order for government agents to obtain billing records from hotels, phone companies, and other businesses, replacing judicial review with an administrative subpoena. Essentially, agencies would be able to sign their own search warrants and conduct searches in routine secrecy, without having to notify the subject of the search.

Additionally, this law gives broad surveillance powers to the federal government, and authorizes the issuance of wiretaps by a secret seven-judge court in Washington, D.C. The DOJ bill imposes a host of Wiretap Act expansions which are not limited to terrorism investigations, and which vastly increase the power of the federal government to conduct surveillance of the reading habits and correspondence of the American people. The DOJ bill expanded the power of the police to record the phone numbers of incoming and outgoing phone calls on a phone line to include surveillance of Internet surfing and e-mail.

Coverage on Monday, September 24, of the Anti-Terrorism Act was limited to Attorney General John Ashcroft’s testimony urging hasty passage of the sweeping new police powers sought by the Bush administration. Although Ashcroft’s testimony was open to television cameras, the committee’s Republican staff ordered camera crews to leave when civil liberties and free-speech advocates were called to testify. This happened in violation of House rules which state, “Whenever a hearing or meeting conducted by a committee or subcommittee is open to the public, those proceedings shall be open to coverage by audio and visual means.”

“The Patriot Act: The Most Abominable, Unconstitutional, Hateful Law from the Point of Freedom since the Alien & Sedtion Act of 1798!” - unconstitutionality of the act is that it violated the Tenth Amendment: “The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people.”

The Office of Homeland Security

On the evening of September 20, 2001 President Bush allied himself with the worst enemies of freedom. He made a seemingly innocuous — even a comforting-sounding — announcement. He said he had created the cabinet-level Office of Homeland Security, with Pennsylvania governor Tom Ridge as its head.

Most people were utterly unaware of the significance of Bush’s new bureaucracy. But for anyone watching the advance of police-state policies in America, absolutely nothing could have been more ominous. The Homeland Defense Agency is not a new idea. Conceived by a bi-partisan commission headed by former senators Gary Hart and Warren Rudman, this Clinton-era conception, ‘The Phase III Report Of The U.S. Commission On National Security/21st Century,’ is nothing less than the framework for a permanent military-bureaucratic American police state.

The new Homeland Defense Agency is the lynchpin of a plan that extensively reorganizes both the executive and legislative functions of the U.S. government. Among other things, the plan makes the National Guard a national police force. It extensively federalizes both the study and the work of science, mathematics, and engineering. It creates numerous new sub-bureaucracies. The Homeland Security agency itself is to ‘be built upon the Federal “Emergency Management Agency, with the three organizations currently on the front line of border security - the Coast Guard, the Customs Service, and the Border Patrol - transferred to it.’ The plan calls for the new agency to oversee activities of the Department of Defense, as well as to assume a variety of duties now held by agencies from the Department of Commerce to the FBI.”

Bush: “If I take away our freedom then they can’t hate us for it”

The US people has yet to realize that their own government is intentionally destroying their own country. bin Laden didn`t take away your freedom the Bush administration did. bin Laden didn’t attack the US on September 11, 2001 the Bush administration did. bin Laden isn`t kidnapping, torturing and detaining without charge thousands of foreigners and US citizens, the Bush administration did and Obama has ordered these illegal actions to continue. bin Laden and phantom terrorists aren`t bankruptcy the US, the Bush administration did and Obama is putting the nail in the coffin.

The US government hates your freedoms - your freedom of religion, your freedom of speech, your freedom to vote and assemble and disagree with their illegal policies and agendas.

The events of September 11, 2001 should have strengthened the resolve of the US government to work harder to safeguard the rights and freedoms of the US people. After all it is the stated policy of the US government to “not negotiate with terrorists”. After all George W Bush accused bin Laden and terrorists of trying to take away your freedom. Bush stated “On September the 11th, enemies of freedom committed an act of war against our country. … They hate our freedoms — our freedom of religion, our freedom of speech, our freedom to vote and assemble and disagree with each other.”

bin Laden didn’t draw up the Patriot Act - the US government did.

“Just six weeks after the September 11 attacks, a panicked Congress passed the “USA PATRIOT Act,” an overnight revision of the nation’s surveillance laws that vastly expanded the government’s authority to spy on its own citizens and reduced checks and balances on those powers, such as judicial oversight. The government never demonstrated that restraints on surveillance had contributed to the attack, and indeed much of the new legislation had nothing to do with fighting terrorism. Rather, the bill represented a successful use of the terrorist attacks by the FBI to roll back unwanted checks on its power. . . . Under these changes and other authorities asserted by the Bush Administration, U.S. intelligence agents could conduct a secret search of an American citizen’s home, use evidence found there to declare him an “enemy combatant,” and imprison him without trial. The courts would have no chance to review these decisions — indeed, they might never even find out about them.” ~ Jay Stanley and Barry Steinhardt,

USA PATRIOT ACT of 2001 - aka “Public Law No: 107-56,” aka “Ashcroft’s police-state bill,” illegally passed into law on 26 October 2001.

* Section 106 - Unlawful PRESIDENTIAL AUTHORITY (seizure of assets without due process)

* Section 201 - Unlawful AUTHORITY TO INTERCEPT WIRE, ORAL, AND ELECTRONIC COMMUNICATIONS RELATING TO TERRORISM

* Section 202 - Unlawful AUTHORITY TO INTERCEPT WIRE, ORAL, AND ELECTRONIC COMMUNICATIONS RELATING TO COMPUTER FRAUD AND ABUSE OFFENSES

* Section 203 - Unlawful AUTHORITY TO SHARE CRIMINAL INVESTIGATIVE INFORMATION

* Section 206 - Unlawful ROVING SURVEILLANCE AUTHORITY UNDER THE FOREIGN INTELLIGENCE SURVEILLANCE ACT OF 1978

* Section 207 - Unlawful DURATION OF FISA SURVEILLANCE OF NON-UNITED STATES PERSONS WHO ARE AGENTS OF A FOREIGN POWER

* Section 213 - Unlawful AUTHORITY FOR DELAYING NOTICE OF THE EXECUTION OF A WARRANT

* Section 215 - Unlawful ACCESS TO RECORDS AND OTHER ITEMS UNDER THE FOREIGN INTELLIGENCE SURVEILLANCE ACT

* Section 216 - Unlawful MODIFICATION OF AUTHORITIES RELATING TO USE OF PEN REGISTERS AND TRAP AND TRACE DEVICES

* Section 218 - FOREIGN INTELLIGENCE INFORMATION

* Section 316 - Unlawful ANTI-TERRORIST FORFEITURE PROTECTION

* Section 351 - Unlawful AMENDMENTS RELATING TO REPORTING OF SUSPICIOUS ACTIVITIES

* Section 358 - Unlawful BANK SECRECY PROVISIONS AND ACTIVITIES OF UNITED STATES INTELLIGENCE AGENCIES TO FIGHT INTERNATIONAL TERRORISM

* Section 411 - Unlawful DEFINITIONS RELATING TO TERRORISM

* Section 501 - Unlawful ATTORNEY GENERAL’S AUTHORITY TO PAY REWARDS TO COMBAT TERRORISM

* Section 802 - Unlawful DEFINITION OF DOMESTIC TERRORISM

* Section 808 - DEFINITION OF FEDERAL CRIME OF TERRORISM

* Section 901 - Unlawful RESPONSIBILITIES OF DIRECTOR OF CENTRAL INTELLIGENCE REGARDING FOREIGN INTELLIGENCE COLLECTED UNDER FOREIGN INTELLIGENCE SURVEILLANCE ACT OF 1978

* Section 904 - Unlawful TEMPORARY AUTHORITY TO DEFER SUBMITTAL TO CONGRESS OF REPORTS ON INTELLIGENCE AND INTELLIGENCE-RELATED MATTERS

* Section 1008 - Unlawful FEASIBILITY STUDY ON USE OF BIOMETRIC IDENTIFIER SCANNING SYSTEM WITH ACCESS TO THE FBI INTEGRATED AUTOMATED FINGERPRINT IDENTIFICATION SYSTEM AT OVERSEAS CONSULAR POSTS AND POINTS OF ENTRY TO THE UNITED STATES

The Patriot Act took away the rights and freedom of the US people. It infringed and denies the people of the United States of American their inalienable rights and freedom. See for yourself. The Bill of Rights has been attacked by the both the Bush and Obama government. The Patriot Act clearly violates the US supreme law, the US Constitution. The Patriot Act clearly is in violation of the First Amendment, Fourth Amendment, Fifth Amendment, Sixth Amendment, Seventh Amendment, Eighth Amendment, Ninth Amendment and Tenth Amendment. The Bush Administration’s Patriot Act is clearly in violation of US Law. It is an attack on the rights and freedoms of the US people.

The Bill of Rights

The Preamble to the Bill of Rights:

Congress of the United States begun and held at the City of New-York, on Wednesday the fourth of March, one thousand seven hundred and eighty nine.

THE Conventions of a number of the States, having at the time of their adopting the Constitution, expressed a desire, in order to prevent misconstruction or abuse of its powers, that further declaratory and restrictive clauses should be added: And as extending the ground of public confidence in the Government, will best ensure the beneficent ends of its institution.

RESOLVED by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America, in Congress assembled, two thirds of both Houses concurring, that the following Articles be proposed to the Legislatures of the several States, as amendments to the Constitution of the United States, all, or any of which Articles, when ratified by three fourths of the said Legislatures, to be valid to all intents and purposes, as part of the said Constitution; viz.

ARTICLES in addition to, and Amendment of the Constitution of the United States of America, proposed by Congress, and ratified by the Legislatures of the several States, pursuant to the fifth Article of the original Constitution.

Amendments

* First Amendment – Establishment Clause, Free Exercise Clause; freedom of speech, of the press, and of assembly; right to petition

Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.

* Second Amendment – Right to keep and bear arms.

A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.

* Third Amendment – Protection from quartering of troops.

No Soldier shall, in time of peace be quartered in any house, without the consent of the Owner, nor in time of war, but in a manner to be prescribed by law.

* Fourth Amendment – Protection from unreasonable search and seizure.

The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.

* Fifth Amendment – due process, double jeopardy, self-incrimination, eminent domain.

No person shall be held to answer for any capital, or otherwise infamous crime, unless on a presentment or indictment of a Grand Jury, except in cases arising in the land or naval forces, or in the Militia, when in actual service in time of War or public danger; nor shall any person be subject for the same offence to be twice put in jeopardy of life or limb; nor shall be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself, nor be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor shall private property be taken for public use, without just compensation.

* Sixth Amendment – Trial by jury and rights of the accused; Confrontation Clause, speedy trial, public trial, right to counsel

In all criminal prosecutions, the accused shall enjoy the right to a speedy and public trial, by an impartial jury of the State and district where in the crime shall have been committed, which district shall have been previously ascertained by law, and to be informed of the nature and cause of the accusation; to be confronted with the witnesses against him; to have compulsory process for obtaining witnesses in his favor, and to have the Assistance of Counsel for his defense.

* Seventh Amendment – Civil trial by jury.

In suits at common law, where the value in controversy shall exceed twenty dollars, the right of trial by jury shall be preserved, and no fact tried by a jury, shall be otherwise re-examined in any court of the United States, than according to the rules of the common law.

* Eighth Amendment – Prohibition of excessive bail and cruel and unusual punishment.

Excessive bail shall not be required, nor excessive fines imposed, nor cruel and unusual punishments inflicted.

* Ninth Amendment – Protection of rights not specifically enumerated in the Bill of Rights.

The enumeration in the Constitution, of certain rights, shall not be construed to deny or disparage others retained by the people.

* Tenth Amendment – Powers of states and people.

The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the states, are reserved to the states respectively, or to the people.

The USA Patriot Act is forbidden by The United States Constitution - a Bill of attainder

A bill of attainder (also known as an act or writ of attainder) is an act of the legislature declaring a person or group of persons guilty of some crime and punishing them without benefit of a trial. The United States Constitution forbids both the federal and state governments to enact bills of attainder, in Article 1, Sections 9 and 10, respectively. It was considered an excess or abuse of the British monarchy and Parliament. No bills of attainder have been passed since 1798, that is until 2001. The Bush administration illegally passed a bill of attainder when they drew up and made law the USA Patriot Act. The Patriot Act is the US government usurping the law by declaring unjustly and unlawfully a person or group of persons guilty of some crime and punishing them without benefit of a trial. The Bush administration violated US law when he and his government imposed the designation of “enemy combatant,” on all who opposed the Bush administration’s policies and agendas, not only in Iraq or Afghanistan but within the United States itself. The designation of “enemy combatant” and the new Obama designation of “unlawful combatant” falsely and unlawfully allowed the United States government to hold suspected terrorists at length without criminal charges. The “enemy combatant” or “unlawful combatant” designations are both bill of attainders that illegally declares a person or group of persons guilty of some crime and punishing them without benefit of a trial - The United States Constitution forbids both the federal and state governments from enacting such illegal bills of attainder.

The provision in the United States Constitution forbiding both the federal and state governments from enacting bills of attainder reflects the importance that the framers attached to this issue, since the unamended constitution imposes very few restrictions on state governments’ power.

Within the U.S. Constitution, the clauses forbidding attainder laws serve two purposes. First, they reinforced the separation of powers, by forbidding the legislature to perform judicial functions—since the outcome of any such acts of legislature would of necessity take the form of a bill of attainder. Second, they embody the concept of due process, which was later reinforced by the Fifth Amendment to the Constitution. The text of the Constitution, Article I, Section 9; Clause 3 is “No Bill of Attainder or ex post facto Law shall be passed”. The constitution of every State also expressly forbids bills of attainder. For example, Wisconsin’s constitution Article I, Section 12 reads:

No bill of attainder, ex post facto law, nor any law impairing the obligation of contracts, shall ever be passed, and no conviction shall work corruption of blood or forfeiture of estate.

Contrast this with the subtly more modern variation of the Texas version: Article 1 (Titled Bill of Rights) Section 16, entitled Bills of Attainder; Ex Post Facto or Retroactive Laws: Impairing Obligation of Contracts: “No bill of attainder, ex post facto law, retroactive law, or any law impairing the obligation of contracts, shall be made”.

The precedent that best reflects most of the original intention of the mandates is from Cummings v. Missouri. It states

A bill of attainder, is a legislative act which inflicts punishment without judicial trial and includes any legislative act which takes away the life, liberty or property of a particular named or easily ascertainable person or group of persons because the legislature thinks them guilty of conduct which deserves punishment.

The stated purpose of the USA Patriot Act is to “deter and punish American terrorists in the United States and around the world, to enhance law enforcement investigatory tools, and for other purposes.” One criticism of the Act is that “other purposes” often includes the detection and prosecution of non-terrorist alleged future crimes.

“The policies of the U.S. , since the end of the Cold War are complicated and vast. They involve an intent to dominate and the use of international organizations to advance U.S. economic and geopolitical interests. They also include the conversion of NATO into a surrogate military police force for globalization and U.S. world economic domination.” -Ramsey Clark, 66th United States Attorney-General (October 6, 2000)

The North Atlantic Treaty
Washington D.C. - 4 April 1949

The Parties to this Treaty reaffirm their faith in the purposes and principles of the Charter of the United Nations and their desire to live in peace with all peoples and all governments.

They are determined to safeguard the freedom, common heritage and civilisation of their peoples, founded on the principles of democracy, individual liberty and the rule of law. They seek to promote stability and well-being in the North Atlantic area.

They are resolved to unite their efforts for collective defence and for the preservation of peace and security. They therefore agree to this North Atlantic Treaty :

Article 1

The Parties undertake, as set forth in the Charter of the United Nations, to settle any international dispute in which they may be involved by peaceful means in such a manner that international peace and security and justice are not endangered, and to refrain in their international relations from the threat or use of force in any manner inconsistent with the purposes of the United Nations.
Article 2

The Parties will contribute toward the further development of peaceful and friendly international relations by strengthening their free institutions, by bringing about a better understanding of the principles upon which these institutions are founded, and by promoting conditions of stability and well-being. They will seek to eliminate conflict in their international economic policies and will encourage economic collaboration between any or all of them.

Article 3

In order more effectively to achieve the objectives of this Treaty, the Parties, separately and jointly, by means of continuous and effective self-help and mutual aid, will maintain and develop their individual and collective capacity to resist armed attack.

At a time when experts are debating whether NATO is suited to deal with the global “war on terror” (US initiated World War of Terror), new research suggests that the alliance’s own secret history has links to terrorism. This is about the creation of a global army for the new world order. NATO is part of that process. We were told that NATO was created to support the UN but the truth is NATO was formed by the New World Order elite to be their army. NATO has been selling itself as peace keepers when in fact they are aggressors. Every major conflict or civil war has been offered NATO troops as a solution to the conflict by sending in UN ‘Peace Keepers’ (Bosnia) or a UN ‘Coalition Force’ (Gulf War) or NATO Bombers, then ground troops (Kosovo) and now Afghanistan. Once installed, the NATO ‘peace keepers’ never leave (Bosnia, Kosovo, Afghanistan). The idea is to have NWO controlled ground troops in all major countries or strategic areas where significant resistance to the New World Order takeover is likely to be encountered. The US is stating that the US will be in Afghanistan for decades. They are there on the false pretence of peace keeping when in fact they are there to rob the Afghan people of the $billion proceeds from the natural gas pipeline. They are there with the support of the New World Order’s Army - NATO. They are there to grow Opium and then distribute the illegal drugs to the World. The proceeds from the Opium in Afghanistan is financing NATO and the CIA’s illegal covert operations that include terrorism, torture, kidnapping and assassinations. The sole purpose of NATO is to rob each country of their territorial sovereignty.

The corporate portion of the New World Order (NWO) pyramid is dominated by the privately owned US Federal Reserve which is controlled by international bankers and the big pharmaceutical cartels like Baxter (which is mass producing the deadly A-H1N1 laced vaccines), as well as other major multinational corporations. The Royal Family of England, namely Queen Elizabeth II and the House of Windsor, (who are, in fact, descendants of the German arm of European Royalty -the Saxe-Coburg-Gotha family which changed the name to Windsor in 1914 before the start of the NWO wars called WWI and WWII ), are high level players, along with the British oligarchy which controls the upper strata of the Illuminati. The decision making Illuminati nerve centers of this effort are in the London (especially the City of London), Basel Switzerland, and Brussels (NATO headquarters).

The United Nations, along with all the agencies working under the UN umbrella, such as the World Health Organization (WHO), are full time players in this scheme. NATO is the military tool of the NWO.

Most of the major wars, political upheavals, and economic depression/recessions of the past 100 years (and earlier) were carefully planned and instigated by the machinations of these elites. They include The Spanish-American War (1898), World War I and World War II; The Great Depression; the Bolshevik Revolution of 1917; the Rise of Nazi Germany; the Korean War; the Vietnam War; the 1989-91”fall” of Soviet Communism, the 1991 Gulf War; and the recent War in Kosovo and the US / NATO war of aggression against Afghanistan in 2001.

In Italy, on 3 August 1990, then-prime minister Giulio Andreotti revealed the existence of a secret army code-named “Gladio” - the Latin word for “sword” - within the state. His testimony before the Senate subcommittee investigating terrorism in Italy sent shockwaves through the Italian parliament and the public, as speculation arose that the secret army had possibly manipulated Italian politics through acts of terrorism.

Andreotti revealed that the secret Gladio army had been hidden within the Defense Ministry as a subsection of the military secret service, SISMI. General Vito Miceli, a former director of the Italian military secret service, could hardly believe that Andreotti had lifted the secret, and protested:

“I have gone to prison because I did not want to reveal the existence of this super secret organization. And now Andreotti comes along and tells it to parliament!” According to a document compiled by the Italian military secret service in 1959, the secret armies had a two-fold strategic purpose: firstly, to operate as a so-called “stay-behind” group in the case of a Soviet invasion and to carry out a guerrilla war in occupied territories; secondly, to carry out domestic operations in case of “emergency situations”.

The military secret services’ perceptions of what constituted an “emergency” was well defined in Cold War Italy and focused on the increasing strength of the Italian Communist and the Socialist parties, both of which were tasked with weakening NATO “from within”. Felice Casson, an Italian judge who during his investigations into right-wing terrorism had first discovered the secret Gladio army and had forced Andreotti to take a stand, found that the secret army had linked up with right-wing terrorists in order to confront “emergency situations”. The terrorists, supplied by the secret army, carried out bomb attacks in public places, blamed them on the Italian left, and were thereafter protected from prosecution by the military secret service. “You had to attack civilians, the people, women, children, innocent people, unknown people far removed from any political game,” right-wing terrorist Vincezo Vinciguerra explained the so-called “strategy of tension” to Casson.

“The reason was quite simple. They were supposed to force these people, the Italian public, to turn to the state to ask for greater security. This is the political logic that lies behind all the massacres and the bombings which remain unpunished, because the state cannot convict itself or declare itself responsible for what happened.”

Both NATO and US intelligence backed and supported the use of terror in Italy in order to discredit the political left during the Cold War. General Gerardo Serravalle, who had commanded the Italian Gladio secret army from 1971 to 1974, confirmed that the secret army “could pass from a defensive, post-invasion logic, to one of attack, of civil war”. NATO believes that war is the ultimate means of attempting to change societies and reshape nations.

It is through NATO’s constant warmongering and engagement in wars of aggression that they attempt forcibly restructure national economies and political structures. War is, potentially, the ultimate economic shock therapy. The wars in the Middle East are NATO’s stepping stones towards establishing a vision of global order that has been in the hearts and minds of the Anglo-American establishment for years. That vision is global ascendancy.

Gary Hart, a former U.S. senator from Colorado, implied on September 14 of 2001 that the “Global War on Terror” sponsored by the Bush Jr. Administration was a pretext for establishing the so-called “New World Order.” Gary Hart also implicated NATO’s role in shaping this “New World Order.” The project is to be implemented by military might. On October 7, 2001 as the U.S and NATO began their war of terror by attacking Afghanistan. Afghanistan did not attack the US or any other country. Afghanistan did not take part in the false flag attacks of September 11, 2001 against the US. There was no civil war in Afghanistan. Not a single US, Canadian or NATO states civilian has ever been killed by any Afghanistan military personnel, government official (the Taliban) or Afghan civilian. The US, Canada and NATO are the enemy. Afghanistan is the victim of a war of aggression, murder, genocide, torture and crimes against humanity as a result of the illegal actions of the US, Canada and NATO. The US, Canada and NATO are mass murdering the innocent people of Afghanistan. The US, Canada and NATO are all guilty of war crimes, crimes against peace and crimes against humanity.

NATO’s link to terrorism, war of aggression, murder, kidnapping and torture

The Italian Senate chose to be more explicit and concluded in its investigation in 2000: “Those massacres, those bombs, those military actions had been organized or promoted or supported by men inside Italian state institutions and, as has been discovered more recently, by men linked to the structures of United States intelligence.” Ever since the discovery of the secret NATO armies in 1990, research into stay-behind armies has progressed only very slowly, due to very limited access to primary documents and the refusal of both NATO and the CIA to comment. On 5 November 1990, a NATO spokesman told an inquisitive press: “NATO has never contemplated guerrilla war or clandestine operations”.

The next day, NATO officials admitted that the previous day’s denial had been false, adding that the alliance would not comment on matters of NATO military secrecy. On 7 November, NATO’s highest military official in Europe, Supreme Allied Commander Europe (SACEUR) US General John Galvin, together with NATO’s highest civilian official, Secretary-General Manfred Wörner, briefed NATO ambassadors behind closed doors. “Since this is a secret organization, I wouldn’t expect too many questions to be answered,” reasoned a senior NATO diplomat, who wished to remain unnamed. “If there were any links to terrorist organizations, that sort of information would be buried very deep indeed.” Former CIA director William Colby confirmed in his memoirs that setting up the secret armies in Western Europe had been “a major program” for the CIA. The project started after World War II in total secrecy, and access to information was limited “to the smallest possible coterie of the most reliable people, in Washington, in NATO” and in the countries concerned. Yet when in Italy in 1990 former CIA director Admiral Stansfield Turner was questioned on television on Gladio, he strictly refused to answer any questions on the sensitive issue, and as the interviewer insisted with respect for the terror victims, Stansfield angrily ripped off his microphone and shouted: “I said, no questions about Gladio!”, whereafter the interview was over.

Only the parliaments in Italy, Switzerland, and Belgium had formed a special commission to investigate the national secret army, and after months or even years of research, presented a public report. Building on this data and secondary sources from numerous European countries, “NATO’s Secret Armies” confirms for the first time that the secret networks spread across Western Europe, with great details on networks in Germany, France, Spain, Portugal, Holland, Luxemburg, Belgium, Denmark, Norway, Italy, Greece, and Turkey, as well as the strategic planning of Britain and the US. The stay-behind armies were coordinated on an international level by the so-called Allied Clandestine Committee (ACC) and the Clandestine Planning Committee (CPC), linked to NATO’s Supreme Headquarters Allied Powers Europe (SHAPE). And they used cover names such as “Absalon” in Denmark, “P26” in Switzerland, “ROC” in Norway or “SDRA8” in Belgium. Interestingly, large differences existed from country to country. In some nations the secret armies became a source of terror, while in others they remained a prudent precaution.

In Turkey, the “Counter-Guerrilla” was involved in domestic terror and torture operations against the Kurds, while in Greece, the “LOK” took part in the 1967 military coup d’état to prevent a Socialist government. In Spain, the secret army was used to prop up the fascist dictatorship of Franco, and in Germany, right-wing terrorists used the explosives of the secret army in the 1980 terror attack in Munich. In other countries, including Denmark, Norway, and Luxemburg, the secret soldiers prepared for the eventual occupation of their home country and never engaged in domestic terror or manipulation. In the context of the ongoing so-called war on terror, the Gladio data promotes the sobering insight that governments in the West have sacrificed the life of innocent citizens and covered up acts of terrorism in order to manipulate the population.

Heaven on Earth, we need it now
I’m sick of all of this hanging around
Sick of sorrow, sick of the pain
I’m sick of hearing again and again
That there’s gonna be peace on Earth

Where I grew up there weren’t many trees
Where there was we’d tear them down
And use them on our enemies
They say that what you mock
Will surely overtake you
And you become a monster
So the monster will not break you

And it’s already gone too far
Who said that if you go in hard
You won’t get hurt?

Jesus can you take the time
To throw a drowning man a line
Peace on Earth
Tell the ones who hear no sound
Whose sons are living in the ground
Peace on Earth
No whos or whys
No one cries like a mother cries
For peace on Earth
She never got to say goodbye
To see the color in his eyes
Now he’s in the dirt
Peace on Earth

They’re reading names out over the radio
All the folks the rest of us won’t get to know
Sean and Julia, Gareth and Ann and Breda
Their lives are bigger than any big idea

Jesus can you take the time
To throw a drowning man a line
Peace on Earth
To tell the ones who hear no sound
Whose sons are living in the ground
Peace on Earth
Jesus sing a song you wrote
The words are sticking in my throat
Peace on Earth
Hear it every Christmas time
But hope and history won’t rhyme
So what’s it worth
This peace on Earth

Peace on Earth
Peace on Earth
Peace on Earth

“Peace On Earth” is property of U2 and it’s producers and/or promoters and is used here pursuant to the fair use provision of the DMCA as outlined in title 17, section 107 of the United States Code

Earth Song by Michael Jackson - Jackson had expressed great interest in humanitarianism, equality and world peace. Songs such as “Earth Song”, “Can You Feel It”, “We Are the World” and “Man in the Mirror” convey this. The original Heal the World Foundation was a charitable organization founded by entertainer Michael Jackson in 1992. The foundation’s creation was inspired by his charitable single of the same name. Through his foundation, Jackson airlifted 46 tons of supplies to Sarajevo, instituted drug and alcohol abuse education and donated millions of dollars to less fortunate children.

Vast swaths of agricultural lands are disappearing at an unprecedented rate. Lands needed to grow the food to feed the World population are being sold to developers to build over priced commercial and residential complexes. Trees come down and land is stripped clean of its food bearing topsoil to make way for new massive factories and a maze of new homes.

In case you haven’t noticed new homes are being built, void of any land. No yard for your children to play in and be healthy. No yard to go out to and utilize the healing power of the sun. The sun provides the basis for all life on earth. The sun is the source of energy for all plants, and indirectly, for all animals. If the sun causes cancer, man wouldn’t be here today. Contrary to popular belief, sunbathing actually helps heal cancer of the skin while sunblock (which contains harmful chemicals and toxins) increases cancer risk . Can sunlight help prevent cancers and other diseases such as type 1 diabetes, cardiovascular disease, and certain autoimmune and chronic diseases? The answer is yes. “In recent years we’ve all been trained to fear the sun, due to the threat of skin cancer. Nothing could be further from the truth. Now there is a growing belief that exposure to the sun may not actually cause skin cancer. It is the chemicals that we put on our skin that is actually causing skin cancer. Chemicals that are in the sunblocks, colognes, perfumes, moisturisers and soaps. As a study published in the prestigious Cancer journal indicates, exposure to sun actually decreases cancer rates” The light and heat from the sun are indispensable to all nature. Humanity is also part of nature and needs sunlight for health and well being, for vitality and happiness. Sunlight was used for centuries to prevent and cure diseases. Sunlight can heal us and help us in the future. Sunlight helps the body heal wounds and injuries and overcome virtually any illness. Dr. Carl Hoffminster wrote that soldiers in World War II healed and survived much better when their open wounds and broken bones were exposed to sunlight.

Today the new homes of these massive new sub-divisions are forcing people to stay inside where they become ill, both physically and mentally, and die sooner. All because they live in homes void of any land. A society of people which lives most of their lives indoors lack the necessary sunlight exposure that helps the body heal wounds and injuries and overcome virtually any illness. A yard is also necessary for nourishing your body as it can also be used to grow your own fruit and vegetables.

While the developed and developing world engage in a pissing match on who should take the lead on addressing climate change…people (mostly the poor) die, get flooded out of their homes, while battling food shortages and disease. Meanwhile the human population continues to explode. The world needs to invest $83 billion a year in agriculture in developing countries to feed 9.1 billion people in 2050, the United Nations’ Food and Agriculture Organization projected. Nothing could be further from the truth. Money isn’t the answer. The World only needs to stop raping the land by stop using the land for new development. Instead of developing farm land, that is needed for growing food, we need to rethink how we build. We need to start renovating instead of building new homes and factories. We need to expand upwards and not outwards. We need to make better use of the land in the cities and towns. We need to start building hi rise factories instead of single story factories that take up acres of farm land. We need to build housing complexes with a center green common area where the occupants of those complexes can go outside and take advantage of the healing Sun. If we don’t start now, today, we will surely die of hunger, of disease and from wars that are fought to seize control of the last remaining land, food and water. It starts by stopping the 1% of the World population (the rich) who are stealing 99.9% of the Earth’s bounty and hoarding it.

One day we must come to see that peace is not merely a distant goal we seek, but that it is a means by which we arrive at that goal. We must pursue peaceful ends through peaceful means. ~ Martin Luther King, Jr

Unconditional war can no longer lead to unconditional victory. It can no longer serve to settle disputes. It can no longer be of concern to great powers alone. For a nuclear disaster, spread by winds and waters and fear, could well engulf the great and the small, the rich and the poor, the committed and the uncommitted alike. Mankind must put an end to war or war will put an end to mankind ~ John F. Kennedy

I hate war as only a soldier who has lived it can, only as one who has seen its brutality, its futility, its stupidity. ~ Dwight David Eisenhower

One is left with the horrible feeling now that war settles nothing; that to win a war is as disastrous as to lose one. ~ Agatha Christie

There never was a good war or a bad peace ~ Benjamin Franklin:

In peace the sons bury their fathers, but in war the fathers bury their sons. ~ Croesus

We seek peace, knowing that peace is the climate of freedom. ~ Dwight D. Eisenhower:

When the power of love overcomes the love of power the world will know peace. ~ Jimi Hendrix

Imagine all the people living life in peace. You may say I’m a dreamer, but I’m not the only one. I hope someday you’ll join us, and the world will live as one. ~ John Lennon

The real and lasting victories are those of peace, and not of war ~ Ralph Waldo Emerson

Peace is not the product of terror or fear.
Peace is not the silence of cemeteries.
Peace is not the silent result of violent repression.
Peace is the generous, tranquil contribution of all to the good of all.
Peace is dynamism. Peace is generosity.
It is right and it is duty. ~ Oscar Romero

You can’t shake hands with a clenched fist ~ Indira Gandhi

Why me?” That is the soldier’s first question, asked each morning as the patrols go out and each evening as the night settles around the foxholes. ~ William Broyles Jr

If my soldiers were to begin to think, not one would remain in the ranks ~ Frederick The Great

I didn’t raise my boy to be a soldier, I brought him up to be my pride and joy, Who dares to put a musket to his shoulder, To kill some other mother’s boy

In the End, we will remember not the words of our enemies, but the silence of our friends. ~ Martin Luther King, Jr.

The Declaration of Independence - In 1776 representatives of the thirteen United Colonies lawfully declared their freedom and independence from tyrannical English government. Turning to the “Laws of Nature and of Nature’s God,” they asserted that as one people they were free to alter their monarchial form of government and to organize a new one on such principles as seemed most likely to secure their unalienable rights. Laying the foundation for a future constitutional government, the signers declared:

When in the Course of human events, it becomes necessary for one people to dissolve the political bands which have connected them with another, and to assume among the powers of the earth, the separate and equal station to which the Laws of Nature and of Nature’s God entitle them, a decent respect to the opinions of Mankind requires that they should declare the causes which impel them to the separation.

The Declaration asserted that government by consent was an unalienable right and employed it in three ways. The first involves the unalienable right to institute a government by the consent of the governed. The Declaration notes that “Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed.” President George Washington declared, “The basis of our political systems is the right of the people to make and to alter their constitutions of government.” Abraham Lincoln called this “the leading principle - the sheet anchor of American republicanism.” This principle means that specific civil governments lawfully exist only at the behest of the people. Civil government cannot create or perpetuate itself without running roughshod over the basis of our political system. Civil government may not reorganize itself for the sake of expediency. Likewise, the federal government may exercise only those civil powers that are specifically granted to it in the Constitution. If a power is not granted, the general government does not possess it and therefore may not act as though it does possess it. Congress may not exercise jurisdiction not extended nor may it vest independent agencies with such jurisdiction.

The general principle of consent is found throughout the Constitution. The Preamble asserts, “We the People, of the United States … do ordain and establish this Constitution ….” The whole notion of constitutional government is predicated upon the requirement that people consent together to establish the form of civil government, and that political sovereignty is delegated directly to that government. Article I, section 1 reinforces this proposition. It notes that only the legislative powers specifically “granted” by the people of the United States may be exercised by the Congress. Therefore, Congress may only legislate with respect to those objects or purposes the people extended to Congress in writing.

Government by consent is based on the unalienable right to disestablish a tyrannical or lawless government, that is, the right to alter or abolish the form of government. The Declaration asserts:

[W]henever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these Ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles, and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness.

The phrase “destructive of these ends” refers to the unalienable rights which civil government is instituted to preserve. It was the right to alter or abolish the form of government which the people exercised when independence was declared. The nature of this right presumes that it is not to be exercised lightly. If wrongly employed, it could constitute treason.

“when a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same Object evinces a design to reduce them under absolute Despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such Government, and to provide new Guards for their future security.”

In other words, the people have the authority to correct, rebuke and alter their government, but not for light or transient reasons.

Article V is an excellent example of the rule regarding alteration or abolition of the national form of government. Through amendments, the people can establish a more perfect government of the United States, that is, render it better able to accomplish its purpose of securing the God-given rights of the people.

The unalienable right of government by consent is given by God to all people. Its legal expression is called government by consent and it has three components. The first is the right and duty of the people (not the civil government itself) to establish, institute or form a civil government. This takes into account the second component, the obligation to lay the foundation of that government on true principles, including the right to organize its civil powers in any lawful way so that it secures these and other rights. Thus the right of government by consent is not the right to merely establish a civil government, but to establish a civil government under the rule of law with the objective of establishing and organizing it in such a way as to better secure the rights of the people.

The third component of government by consent is the right and duty of the people to disestablish a lawless government. Lawlessness implies tyrannical or despotic government. It takes into account factors which include the duration and design of the tyranny. It also includes considerations of how long the people will tolerate being reduced to slavery before they undertake a lawful alteration, disestablishment or abolition of that government. The words “establish” and “disestablish” are employed only for contrast. The Declaration uses the phrases “institute” and “alter or abolish.” Whether these words or those of “form” and “amend” are employed is not what is preeminently important. What is important is that the creation, alteration and destruction of the form of government, subject to certain procedural and substantive prerequisites, are unalienable.

The Declaration of Independence and the Constitution, however, rightly observe that the people can organize the power of government any way they desire, as long as they believe on good evidence that it will better secure their rights. The unalienable right to organize the powers of the federal government translated constitutionally into separate executive, legislative and judicial branches. It did not translate into extending to any of these branches the power to establish any independent agency or commission with power to exercise any rule-making authority binding on the society at large or segments thereof. Likewise, separating federal power into three constitutionally defined branches permits no combination of the power of those branches in an independent agency or commission. In short, it permits no fourth branch of general government, independent or otherwise, to be created by the government. The major issues regarding the organization of the federal government were settled by the people and recorded in the Constitution in 1787 and its amendments. The organization of the powers of the general government has not been entrusted by the Constitution to the general government itself.

Do Canadians have to obey US laws? US made laws, bills or sanctions only apply to US citizens “within” the United States. Absolutely no country has to comply with any US made laws, bill or sanction. The US government was not elected to be leader of Canada or any other country. Canada is sovereign nation. We have the right to self-government and no other country including the United States can interfere, influence, meddle or dictate Canadian policy and rule of law. US citizens are subject to the laws of the country they are guests of or entered illegally as illegal immigrants or contractors. In the case of US mercenary group Blackwater the US government might have given them immunity but immunity only applies from prosecution “within” the United States. Blackwater, US contractors, diplomats and citizens are subject to all laws of Iraq or any other country they enter at the request of US State Department. What Blackwater does is murder innocent people. No matter where you go in the World murder is a capitol crime. There is no immunity for murder - not even in the US.

Iran does not have to comply with US imposed sanctions and neither does any other country. The US seizing of Iranian assets (namely money) is illegal because the US does not have authority over any other country, their people, their government, their military or their wealth. Even in Iraq the US has absolutely no legal authority. The Iraqi people have the right and duty to their country and to their people to resist the US occupation using as much force as required to force the end of the occupation and withdrawal of all foreign troops from Iraq. Despite what the US White House claims the Iraqi people are innocent of any charge of terrorism because no Iraqi citizen was involved in 9/11. Iraq did not attack the US. Afghanistan did not attack the US. No armed attack occurred against the US. No act of war occurred against the US. There is no war against terror it is the US White House’s war of terror. They staged an attack against their own country and people so as to trick the US people into backing wars of aggression against innocent countries. The White House took away the US people’s rights and liberties - not a phantom enemy they call al Qaeda. Qaeda Arab translation is “the base”. Al Qaeda is the CIA’s base for criminal acts of terror, assassination and sabotage. Al Qaeda was created by the US to implement US policies around the World. When they air alleged al Qaeda tapes and videos the US is actually the ones making new threats against the US and other countries. The people of Iraq are resisting the illegal invasion and occupation of their country. The people of Afghanistan and their legal Taliban government are resisting the the illegal invasion and occupation of their country. The Resistance movement is not al Qaeda or terrorists. The Resistance is being named Al Qaeda and terrorists by the invaders who are guilty of war crimes and crimes against humanity.

US made laws, bills or sanctions only apply to US citizens “within” the United States. Absolutely no country has to comply with any US made laws. The moment US citizens leave the United States they are subject to the laws of the country they are guests of or entered illegally as illegal immigrants or contractors.

Any law that the US imposes on the Iraqi people for any length of time is not legal nor binding. US laws only apply to US citizens. US sanctions only apply to US businesses. Sovereignty is the exclusive right to complete political (including legislative, judicial, and or executive) control over an area of governance, people, or oneself. A sovereign is the supreme lawmaking authority, subject to no other. The US has no right to impose their will on Iraq, Iran or any other country.

The US government have been stating for the past 2 decades that it’s only a question of when a pandemic will come, not if it will come. Influenza A pandemics come every 30 years or so, severe ones every hundred years or so. The last pandemic, the Hong Kong flu, occurred in 1968 - killing 34,000 Americans. In 1918, the Great Flu Epidemic killed more than 500,000 Americans. So many millions died in other countries, they couldn’t bury the bodies. Young healthy adults, in the prime of their lives in the morning, drowning in their own inflammation by noon, grossly discolored by sunset, were dead at midnight. Their body’s own broad-spectrum natural antibiotics, called antimicrobial peptides, seemed nowhere to be found. An overwhelming immune response triggered by the over the counter drug Aspirin caused the white blood cells to release large amounts of inflammatory agents called cytokines and chemokines into the lungs of the doomed - resulting in millions of unnecessary deaths in 1918.

Today we now have another Influenza A pandemic, or so the US government has declared. The distinctions from this outbreak and past outbreaks is that this H1N1 influenza A viral outbreak was man made and intentionally released by the US government. The virus was created in the biological weapons research labs at Fort Detrick Maryland. It was created as a biological weapon for a political agenda. It was created to target a specific group of people in the US public. It is not contagious and because of this the US government had to declare a medical state of emergency in order to trick people into being infected with the H1N1 virus. The only way for anyone to be infected with the virus is to have the virus injected directly into the blood stream - via a syringe (a vaccine). Millions of people became infected with the H1N1 virus after they received the live virus laced vaccine or H1N1 drug treatment that also contained the live virus. Those who the government claimed were infected by the H1N1 virus by coming into contact with another person with the virus, were actually sick with regular flu virus (the CDC maintains that seasonal flu kills 36000 Americans each year compared to just 3,198 H1N1 death for all of North America). Seasonal flu kills between 4,000 to 8,000 Canadians and between 250,000 and 500,000 people worldwide each year. Yet as of late last week, seven months into this outbreak, H1N1 has killed a little as 161 Canadians and an estimated 6,260 people around the globe. The US government distorted the facts in order to launch a nation wide vaccination program. Millions are now infected with the H1N1 virus as a direct result of being vaccinated - the vaccine is the pandemic.

All those who have been infected with the US government made and dispersed H1N1 virus can be cured - naturally, safely and in most cases free of charge. The WHO and the CDC have both stated that there is no cure for the H1N1 virus. There are many cures. A group of scientists from UCLA published a remarkable paper in the prestigious journal, Nature. In the article, the UCLA group confirmed two other recent studies, showing that a naturally occurring steroid hormone - a hormone most of us take for granted - was, in effect, a potent antibiotic. Instead of directly killing bacteria and viruses, the steroid hormone under question increases the body’s production of a remarkable class of proteins, called antimicrobial peptides. The 200 known antimicrobial peptides directly and rapidly destroy the cell walls of bacteria, fungi, and viruses, including the influenza virus, and play a key role in keeping the lungs free of infection. The steroid hormone that showed these remarkable antibiotic properties was plain old vitamin D - 2,000 units of vitamin D every day for the duration of the influenza season.

Vitamin D is unique in the vitamin world by virtue of three facts.

First, it’s the only known precursor of a potent steroid hormone, calcitriol, or activated vitamin D. Most other vitamins are antioxidants or co-factors in enzyme reactions. Activated vitamin D - like all steroid hormones - damasks the genome, turning protein production on and off, as your body requires. That is, vitamin D regulates genetic expression in hundreds of tissues throughout your body. This means it has as many potential mechanisms of action as genes it damasks.

Second, vitamin D does not exist in appreciable quantities in normal human diets. True, you can get several thousand units in a day if you feast on sardines for breakfast, herring for lunch and salmon for dinner. The only people who ever regularly consumed that much fish are peoples, like the Inuit, who live at the extremes of latitude. The milk Americans depend on for their vitamin D contains no naturally occurring vitamin D; instead, the U.S. government requires fortified milk to be supplemented with vitamin D, but only with what we now know to be a paltry 100 units per eight-ounce glass.

The vitamin D steroid hormone system has always had its origins in the skin, not in the mouth. Until quite recently, when dermatologists and governments began warning us about the dangers of sunlight, humans made enormous quantities of vitamin D where humans have always made it, where naked skin meets the ultraviolet B radiation of sunlight. We just cannot get adequate amounts of vitamin D from our diet. If we don’t expose ourselves to ultraviolet light, we must get vitamin D from dietary supplements.

The third way vitamin D is different from other vitamins is the dramatic difference between natural vitamin D nutrition and the modern one. Today, most humans only make about a thousand units of vitamin D a day from sun exposure; many people, such as the elderly or African Americans, make much less than that. How much did humans normally make? A single, twenty-minute, full body exposure to summer sun will trigger the delivery of 20,000 units of vitamin D into the circulation of most people within 48 hours. Twenty thousand units, that’s the single most important fact about vitamin D. Compare that to the 100 units you get from a glass of milk, or the several hundred daily units the U.S. government recommend as “Adequate Intake.” It’s what we call an “order of magnitude” difference.

Humans evolved naked in sub-equatorial Africa, where the sun shines directly overhead much of the year and where our species must have obtained tens of thousands of units of vitamin D every day, in spite of our skin developing heavy melanin concentrations (racial pigmentation) for protecting the deeper layers of the skin. Even after humans migrated to temperate latitudes, where our skin rapidly lightened to allow for more rapid vitamin D production, humans worked outdoors. However, in the last three hundred years, we began to work indoors; in the last one hundred years, we began to travel inside cars; in the last several decades, we began to lather on sunblock and consciously avoid sunlight. All of these things lower vitamin D blood levels. The inescapable conclusion is that vitamin D levels in modern humans are not just low - they are aberrantly low.

In the last several years, dozens of medical studies have called attention to worldwide vitamin D deficiency, especially among African Americans and the elderly, the two groups most likely to die from influenza. Cancer, heart disease, stroke, autoimmune disease, depression, chronic pain, depression, gum disease, diabetes, hypertension, and a number of other diseases have recently been associated with vitamin D deficiency. Was it possible that influenza was as well?

There exists 3 medical mysteries: (1) although the influenza virus exists in the population year-round, influenza is a wintertime illnesses; (2) children with vitamin D deficient rickets are much more likely to suffer from respiratory infections; (3) the elderly in most countries are much more likely to die in the winter than the summer (excess wintertime mortality), and most of that excess mortality, although listed as cardiac, is, in fact, due to influenza.

Vitamin D, specifically Vitamin D deficiency explain these three mysteries, mysteries that account for hundreds of thousands of deaths every year? Studies have found the influenza virus is present in the population year-around; why is it a wintertime illness? Even the common cold got its name because it is common in cold weather and rare in the summer. Vitamin D blood levels are at their highest in the summer but reach their lowest levels during the flu and cold season. Could such a simple explanation explain these mysteries?

The British researcher, Dr. R. Edgar Hope-Simpson, was the first to document the most mysterious feature of epidemic influenza, its wintertime surfeit and summertime scarcity. He theorized that an unknown “seasonal factor” was at work, a factor that might be affecting innate human immunity. Hope-Simpson was a general practitioner who became famous in the late 1960’s after he discovered the cause of shingles. British authorities bestowed every prize they had on him, not only because of the importance of his discovery, but because he made the discovery own his own, without the benefit of a university appointment, and without any formal training in epidemiology (the detective branch of medicine that methodically searches for clues about the cause of disease).

After his work on shingles, Hope-Simpson spent the rest of his working life studying influenza. He concluded a “seasonal factor” was at work, something that was regularly and predictably impairing human immunity in the winter and restoring it in the summer. He discovered that communities widely separated by longitude, but which shared similar latitude, would simultaneously develop influenza. He discovered that influenza epidemics in Great Britain in the 17th and 18th century occurred simultaneously in widely separated communities, before modern transportation could possibly explain its rapid dissemination. Hope-Simpson concluded a “seasonal factor” was triggering these epidemics. Whatever it was, he was certain that the deadly “crop” of influenza that sprouts around the winter solstice was intimately involved with solar radiation. Hope-Simpson predicted that, once discovered, the “seasonal factor” would “provide the key to understanding most of the influenza problems confronting us.”

Hope-Simpson had no way of knowing that vitamin D has profound effects on human immunity, no way of knowing that it increases production of broad-spectrum antimicrobial peptides, peptides that quickly destroy the influenza virus. We have only recently learned how vitamin D increases production of antimicrobial peptides while simultaneously preventing the immune system from releasing too many inflammatory cells, called chemokines and cytokines, into infected lung tissue.

In 1918, when medical scientists did autopsies on some of the fifty million people who died during the 1918 flu pandemic, they were amazed to find destroyed respiratory tracts; sometimes these inflammatory cytokines had triggered the complete destruction of the normal epithelial cells lining the respiratory tract. It was as if the flu victims had been attacked and killed by their own immune systems. This is the severe inflammatory reaction that vitamin D has recently been found to prevent.

Clinical research has shown that annual fluctuations in vitamin D levels explain the seasonality of influenza. The periodic seasonal fluctuations in 25-hydroxy-vitamin D levels, which cause recurrent and predictable wintertime vitamin D deficiency, predispose human populations to influenza epidemics. That influenza is a symptom of vitamin D deficiency in the same way that an unusual form of pneumonia (pneumocystis carinii) is a symptom of AIDS. George Bernard Shaw was right when he said, “the characteristic microbe of a disease might be a symptom instead of a cause.”

Vitamin D explains the following 14 observations:

1. Why the flu predictably occurs in the months following the winter solstice, when vitamin D levels are at their lowest,

2. Why the flu disappears in the months following the summer solstice,

3. Why influenza is more common in the tropics during the rainy season,

4. Why the cold and rainy weather associated with El Nino Southern Oscillation (ENSO), which drives people indoors and lowers vitamin D blood levels, is associated with influenza,

5. Why the incidence of influenza is inversely correlated with outdoor temperatures,

6. Why children exposed to sunlight are less likely to get colds,

7. Why cod liver oil (which contains vitamin D) reduces the incidence of viral respiratory infections,

8. Why scientists found that vitamin D-producing UVB lamps reduced colds and flu in schoolchildren and factory workers,

9. Why scientists found that volunteers, deliberately infected with a weakened flu virus - first in the summer and then again in the winter - show significantly different clinical courses in the different seasons,

10. Why the elderly who live in countries with high vitamin D consumption, like Norway, are less likely to die in the winter,

11. Why children with vitamin D deficiency and rickets suffer from frequent respiratory infections,

12. Why an observant physician (Rehman), who gave high doses of vitamin D to children who were constantly sick from colds and the flu, found the treated children were suddenly free from infection,

13. Why the elderly are so much more likely to die from heart attacks in the winter rather than in the summer,

14. Why African Americans, with their low vitamin D blood levels, are more likely to die from influenza and pneumonia than Whites are.

High doses of Vitamin D kills the flu. The governments keep natural medicine very quiet because there is no money in it. Vitamin D increases the immune system by 3-5 times and is BETTER than any vaccine at helping the immune system beat both the h5n1 (bird flu) virus and the H1N1 (Swine Flu) virus.

Research from PubMed: In 1981, R. Edgar Hope-Simpson proposed that a ’seasonal stimulus’ intimately associated with solar radiation explained the remarkable seasonality of epidemic influenza. Solar radiation triggers robust seasonal vitamin D production in the skin; vitamin D deficiency is common in the winter, and activated vitamin D, 1,25(OH)2D, a steroid hormone, has profound effects on human immunity. 1,25(OH)2D acts as an immune system modulator, preventing excessive expression of inflammatory cytokines and increasing the ‘oxidative burst’ potential of macrophages. Perhaps most importantly, it dramatically stimulates the expression of potent anti-microbial peptides, which exist in neutrophils, monocytes, natural killer cells, and in epithelial cells lining the respiratory tract where they play a major role in protecting the lung from infection. Volunteers inoculated with live attenuated influenza virus are more likely to develop fever and serological evidence of an immune response in the winter. Vitamin D deficiency predisposes children to respiratory infections. Ultraviolet radiation (either from artificial sources or from sunlight) reduces the incidence of viral respiratory infections, as does cod liver oil (which contains vitamin D). An interventional study showed that vitamin D reduces the incidence of respiratory infections in children.

One reason why the flu may be more contagious in the winter time is because of the lack of sunlight. During the winter months people spend most of the time indoors. During the summer months people spend most of the time outdoors. The lack of sunlight, when we find shelter from the cold, prevents our skin from producing sufficient levels of vitamin D. There is now documented evidence about the roles of solar ultraviolet-B radiation and vitamin D in reducing case-fatality rates from the 1918-1918 influenza Pandemic in EU. “There are two mechanisms whereby vitamin D can reduce the risk of death once the pandemic influenza virus infection took hold: reduced production of pro-inflammatory cytokines and reduced risk of bacterial pneumonia. The type of vitamin D which can fight viruses can ONLY be made from natural sunlight. It is known as D3, which is made from sunlight when 7-dehydrocholesterol in our skin reacts with UV light. It is then twice activated in the liver and kidney to make 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D. This attaches to receptors on genes that control their expression, which turn protein production on or off. Vitamin D regulates the expression of more than 1,000 genes throughout the body. They include genes in macrophages, cells in the immune system that, among other things, ATTACK AND DESTROY VIRUSES.”

Definition of Cure - To heal, to make well, to restore to good health. Vitamin D is therefore a cure for the H1N1 virus

NEWS UPDATE

Hundreds of thousands of swine flu shots for children have been recalled because tests indicate the vaccine doses lost some strength, government health officials said Tuesday.

The shots, made by Sanofi Pasteur, were distributed across the country last month and most have already been used, according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

The issue is the vaccine’s strength. Tests done before the shots were shipped showed that the vaccines were strong enough. But tests done weeks later indicated the strength had fallen slightly below required levels.

Why the potency dropped isn’t clear. “That’s the $64,000 question,” said Len Lavenda, a Sanofi Pasteur spokesman.

The answer to the mystery is simple. The H1N1 virus cannot survive past 7 days. Biological weapons expert Marc S Griswold, who travelled to Mexico with President Obama on April 16, 2009 is the first documented and confirmed A-H1N1 swine flu infection case. The agent is patient zero. Patient zero infected several members of his family in Anne Arundel County, prompting assurances from the White House that the president was safe.

Marc S. Griswold, a former Secret Service agent who was serving as the lead advance special agent for Energy Secretary Steven Chu on president Obama’s April trip to Mexico, said in an interview that the minor cough he developed in Mexico grew into swine flu. Although he has recovered and is back to work, he and his family have watched in shock as his illness has sparked national security concerns, severely strained his relationship with his brother (Griswold probably infected his nephew) and put his family at the center of rumors and panic in his Severna Park neighborhood. Griswold said in frustration on the front steps of his house. “We’ve been told we’re not contagious. We’re already past the seven-day mark for that.”

How did the H1N1 virus spread globally?

Biological weapons expert Marc S. Griswold returned from Mexico on April 18, officials said, on United Flight 822 to Dulles International Airport. Washington Dulles International Airport is a public airport located 25 miles (40 km) west of the central business district of Washington, D.C., in Dulles, Virginia. Dulles is served by nearly a dozen U.S.-flagged carriers and nearly two dozen international carriers. Airlines serving Dulles provide non-stop service to over 80 domestic destinations and to over 40 international destinations. On a typical day, Dulles sees 1,000 to 1,200 flight operations.

When word got out that Agent Marc S. Griswold was infected with the H1N1 virus the government was only concerned about the health of president Obama. No one sought to contact everyone on the same flight as Griswold. If you have a confirmed case of an influenza outbreak the immediate response is for the government to immediately track down everyone who came in contact with Patient Zero and initiate a quarantine. No one, not even Obama, bothered to spring into to action to prevent the spread of the H1N1 virus that the WHO has declared a pandemic. Obama, the WHO and the CDC failed to do their job to protect the people from this influenza outbreak. It is as if they wanted it to happen. Instead of quarantining Griswold, his family, and everyone who came in contact with Griswold on United Airlines Flight 822 they allowed the H1N1 influenza virus to spread. Dulles international airport was the hub for the H1N1 virus to spread globally.

Obama has a responsibility to the people. As president he failed as miserably as George W Bush’s handling of Hurricane Katrina. Obama’s complete inaction shows complacency. Inaction could also imply conspiracy. Perhaps the rumours are true. Did Obama order a biological attack against Mexico and his own country? What was Obama’s motive to unleash a biological weapons grade influenza strain? What was the means? What opportunity did he have? Motive could be the Tax Day Tea Party which millions of ordinary US citizens participated in as a nation wide protest against Obama’s government policies and out of control spending that occurred on April 15, 2009 - the day before Obama landed in Mexico. Not even in office 100 days the people were angrily protesting and petitioning Obama and his government for change. Did Obama fear they would ask for his resignation? Did he react out of anger because the US people no longer saw him as their saviour and out of anger ordered the H1N1 virus released? He surely had the means. Fort Detrick where this new viral infection was created is just outside Washington DC. He did have Air Force One at his disposal as a means to transport the virus from Fort Detrick to Mexico. Air Force one is considered US soil no matter where it lands and as such no country can board it or inspect it. He did have an excuse to go to Mexico right away. Mexico had a very violent and deadly drug war going on until the first case of H1N1 virus was reported in Mexico. Before the H1N1 virus outbreak the news was reporting daily about the battle between the Mexican government and the drug lords. Bodies were being discovered by US border guards on a daily bases. That has all but stop as a result of the H1N1 flu.

Bioterrorism is terrorism by intentional release or dissemination of biological agents (bacteria, viruses, or toxins); these may be in a naturally-occurring or in a human-modified form.

According to the US-based Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC): A bioterrorism attack is the deliberate release of viruses, bacteria, or other germs (agents) used to cause illness or death in people, animals, or plants. These agents are typically found in nature, but it is possible that they could be changed to increase their ability to cause disease, make them resistant to current medicines, or to increase their ability to be spread into the environment.

The very definition of bioterrorism (deliberate release of viruses, bacteria, or other germs (agents) used to cause illness or death in people, animals, or plants.) makes the H1N1 vaccine a bioweapon because it contains an adjuvant (additive) designed to weaken the immune system, and replicated RNA from the virus responsible for the 1918 pandemic Spanish flu, causing global sickness and mass death.

Looks like we are in for a long cold winter. One thing for sure is that millions of people are going to pay dearly to heat their homes this winter. Those with a tight budget are going to be affected the most. Any increase in electrical, gas or oil costs is going to reduce their budget drastically. Well Paul W Kincaid, Canadian owner and inventor of the FuelReducer.com line of products is going to let you in on a secret that will help you save hundreds of dollars on your home heating bill this winter. This is a free tip, a gift.

For the past 5 years Paul W Kincaid has been experimenting with several ways to help you heat your home. The most cost effective heating source is the ordinary incandescent light bulb. For as little as $1 you have a heating source that will help you heat your home.

How many of you have accidentally touched a light bulb that is on? Its very painful. Your skin has just suffered a first degree burn from touching the very hot light bulb. How many have gotten a first degree burn from touching a baseboard heater? Not very many if at all because the baseboard heater isn’t as hot as the light bulb. The ordinary $1 incandescent light bulb is a very cheap source of heat. The higher the wattage of the light bulb the hotter the lighter bulb will be. A 100 watt bulb will give off more heat than a 50 watt incandescent light bulb and even more heat than a mercury contaminated fluorescent light bulb. The best kept secret is that an incandescent light bulb is a very cheap source of heat. Paul W Kincaid has been using 100 watt incandescent light bulbs to help heat his residence. By using incandescent light bulbs your heating bill will be reduced as your oil furnace, baseboard heater or gas furnace will not have to kick on as much. A baseboard heater consumes as much as 1000 watts and more to maintain a comfortable room temperature. An incandescent light bulb can help maintain that same comfortable room temperature using a fraction of the energy and at a fraction of the cost. The best light fixtures to use are the ones like the one pictured at the top of this article. The metal reflector absorbs the heat from the incandescent light bulb and acts as a heat element. The incandescent light bulb is very hot and the heat will transfer to the metal reflector shade making the shade a heat source too.

A word of caution. The deflector shade will get hot. If you have children make sure they are out of reach. The ideal height is as low as possible to the ground. Heat will rise so if you place it too high you will defeat the purpose of the light as a heating source. You don’t see a baseboard heater installed near the ceiling. They are always installed just a few inches off of the floor because in order for them to be effective the heat must be able to rise and fill the room. The same applies to using an incandescent light bulb as a heating source. The lower the better.

See for yourself. Go ahead and leave the lights on. Use 100 watts incandescent light bulbs in the winter to help heat your home and lower your heating bill. The metal deflector light sockets in the photo can be bought at your local hardware store including Home Depot, Canadian Tire and any photography store.

Paul W Kincaid is currently working on developing new technology that will drastically reduce our dependency on oil. FuelReducer’s H2O - Water for Fuel Project is focusing on fuelling the World with sea water instead of oil or gas. FuelReducer has recently developed a prototype that separates water (H2O) into Hydrogen and Oxygen using a low radio frequency. The amount of energy needed to split the water into a fuel and the life giving oxygen is very small. The applications are endless. Hydrogen fuel from sea water can be used to fuel electrical power generators, gas stoves, emergency power generators, boat engines, barbecues and gas furnaces to name a few.

By using less oil and natural gas to heat your home means a drop in demand for oil and natural gas. This will strongly deter gas and oil companies from advocating the US government to attack oil and natural gas rich foreign states. Both US attacks against Iraq and Afghanistan were lobbied for by the US oil companies. The US oil companies donated millions to both Bush and Obama’s presidential bids. They put both Bush and Obama in office. They put them there because both Bush and Obama agreed to steal the oil and natural gas of oil rich countries like Iraq and Afghanistan and put the US oil industry donors in control. The only way for Bush and Obama to steal the very lucrative natural resources of Iraq and Afghanistan was with wars - US wars of terror, US wars of aggressions against both Iraq and Afghanistan.

Using sea water as a fuel source will wipe out the warmongering US oil companies like Halliburton (a United States-based oilfield services corporation which Dick Cheney headed until he became vice-president of the United States. Halliburton has close to 300 subsidiaries, affiliates, branches, brands and divisions worldwide most of which are now building the Trans-Afghanistan Pipeline), Chevron Corporation (In 1992, George P. Shultz (Ronald Reagan’s Secretary of State from 1982–1989), who was a board member of Chevron Corporation, recommended Rice for a spot on the Chevron board. Chevron was pursuing a $10 billion development project in Kazakhstan and, as a Soviet specialist, Rice knew the President of Kazakhstan, Nursultan Nazarbayev. She traveled to Kazakhstan on Chevron’s behalf and, in honor of her work, in 1993, Chevron named a 129,000-ton supertanker SS Condoleezza Rice. In 2001, Chevron Corporation acquired Texaco to form ChevronTexaco.), ExxonMobil, CentGas (consortium formed in the 1990s to develop and build the Trans-Afghanistan Pipeline to link Turkmenistan’s abundant proven natural gas reserves with growing markets in Pakistan through Afghanistan), Union Oil Company of California (Unocal lobbied the US government to attack Afghanistan and remove the Taliban government and replace it with a US controlled government. On August 10, 2005, Unocal merged with Chevron Corporation and became a wholly owned subsidiary. Unocal has now ceased operations as an independent company, but continues to conduct many operations as Union Oil Company of California, a Chevron company.). It will stop the US aggressions against sovereign foreign states with vast oil and natural gas supplies. Using sea water as the fuel for the World will also dramatically lower pollution output that carbon base fuels produce. Using sea water as the fuel for the World means the total elimination of harmful emissions.

Obama waited until after he was declared the 2009 Nobel Peace Prize recipient to announce an escalation of the US war of aggression against Afghanistan by sending 30,000 more troops.

Text of Obama’s Nobel Peace Prize speech

… the most profound issue surrounding my receipt of this prize is the fact that I am the Commander-in-Chief of a nation in the midst of two wars. One of these wars is winding down. The other is a conflict that America did not seek; one in which we are joined by forty three other countries - including Norway - in an effort to defend ourselves and all nations from further attacks.

Still, we are at war, and I am responsible for the deployment of thousands of young Americans to battle in a distant land. Some will kill. Some will be killed.

Why Obama should be stripped of Nobel Peace Prize

Yes Obama you are Commander-in-Chief of a nation in the midst of two wars. Wars that the US started. Wars of aggression against two innocent countries. The war of aggression against Afghanistan was a war that the US sought. The US sought to overthrow the Taliban government in 1998, 3 years prior to the attacks of September 11, 2001. Attacks that Afghanistan nor its Taliban government had no part in. The evidence is clear and indisputable. Afghanistan did not attack the US. The US attacked Afghanistan. None of the hijackers of 9/11 were Taliban or Afghan citizens. The hijackers were Saudi Arabian. There was never a threat from Afghanistan.

The US decided in 1998 to overthrow the Taliban government and install a pro US government. Feb. 28, 1998 - Unocal VP International Relations addressed US House of Representatives clearly stating that the Taliban government should be removed and replaced by a government acceptable to his company. He argued that creation of a 42 inch oil pipeline across Afghanistan would yield a Western profit increase of 500% by 2015. At the request of US Unocal Corporation the US government decided in 1998 to overthrow the Taliban government and take complete control of the Trans-Afghanistan Pipeline (TAP or TAPI)- a natural gas and oil pipeline that US oil companies is to build to transport Caspian Sea natural gas from Turkmenistan through Afghanistan into Pakistan and then to India. The US is joined by forty three other countries - including Norway - in a war of aggression against the country of Afghanistan. The US and forty three other countries are all guilty of war crimes, crimes against peace and crimes against humanity. Their motive is not one of self-defense or peace it is simply greed - to steal the Trans-Afghanistan Pipeline building project and revenue away from the Afghan people and give it all to US oil companies.

Regarding the placement of the Unocal Pipeline, a US Official delivered this ultimatum to the Taliban (via the Pakistani delegation acting as their interlocutors): “Either you accept our offer of a carpet of gold, or we bury you under a carpet of bombs.” ~ May 15, 2001

Niaz Naik, a former Pakistani Foreign Secretary, was told by senior American officials in mid-July that military action against Afghanistan would go ahead by the middle of October. ~ July 2001

Oct. 7, 2001 US Military unprovoked armed aerial bombardment began in Afghanistan without any UN Resolution authorizing such a blatant violation of International law and treaties.

The Purposes of the United Nations are:

1. To maintain international peace and security, and to that end: to take effective collective measures for the prevention and removal of threats to the peace, and for the suppression of acts of aggression or other breaches of the peace, and to bring about by peaceful means, and in conformity with the principles of justice and international law, adjustment or settlement of international disputes or situations which might lead to a breach of the peace;

Article 2

# All Members shall settle their international disputes by peaceful means in such a manner that international peace and security, and justice, are not endangered.

# All Members shall refrain in their international relations from the threat or use of force against the territorial integrity or political independence of any state, or in any other manner inconsistent with the Purposes of the United Nations.

War of aggression against Afghanistan key players

* Dick Cheney, VP: Until 2000 - President of Halliburton (in position to build the Afghan pipeline).
* Condoleezza Rice, National Security Advisor: 1991-2000 - Manager of Chevron Oil, and Kazakhstan go-between.
* Donald Evans, Sec. Commerce: former CEO, Tom Brown, Inc. (a $1.2 billion oil company).
* Gale Norton, Sec. Interior: former national chairwoman of the Coalition of Republican Environmental Advocates - funded by, among others, BP Amoco.
* Thomas White, Secretary of the Army: former Vice Chairman of Enron and a large shareholder of that company’s stock.

“I will promise you this, that if we have not gotten our troops out by the time I am president, it is the first thing I will do. I will get our troops home. We will bring an end to this war. You can take that to the bank. ” - Barack Obama Campaign Promise - October 27, 2007

President Barack Obama plans to send 30,000 more troops to Afghanistan over six months, an accelerated timetable — with an endgame built in — that would have the first Marines there as early as Christmas. Gasps and disbelief echoed through the Nobel Hall in Oslo as Barack Obama was unveiled as the winner of the 2009 Peace Prize. How can a warmonger (a warmonger is a pejorative term that is used to describe someone who is eager to encourage a people or nation to go to war.) receive a noble peace prize? The answer is money. With $trillions stolen from the US people and money laundered through the privately owned US Federal Reserve bankers anyone can buy any title or award.

It was a jarring moment when Obama, in the midst of receiving the Nobel peace prize, said of his troops in Afghanistan “will kill. Some will be killed.” He lauded Mohandas Gandhi and Martin Luther King Jr., preachers of nonviolent action. But he added, “A nonviolent movement could not have halted Hitler’s armies. So what action, what movement is required to halt the US’s armies? According to Obama, who is now wrongly bestowed the honor of peace maker the only solution to stop his armies is violence. The legal precedents set by the Nuremberg Tribunal established that even Obama is responsible and accountable for his crimes . The establishment in law of crimes “against humanity” – acts offending the whole of mankind by their very nature – in Article 6 of the charter, and the attributing of individual (as opposed to state) responsibility for such crimes, voided any and all immunity shrouding the heads of state and the architects of mass atrocity.

The Nuremberg tribunals were the first international courts established to try crimes against international law, and they firmly established the responsibility of individuals, at whatever level they participate in atrocities, as well as denying immunity to political leaders. And substantively, crimes against humanity—meaning atrocities on a large scale—was articulated for the first time as a criminal offence, to be joined not long after by genocide as the most egregious offences in the international legal lexicon. Benjamin Ferencz, chief prosecutor for the United States at the tribunal, stated in the trial against the Nazi Einsatzgruppen: “The case we present is a plea of humanity to law … if these men be immune then the law has lost its meaning and man must live in fear”.

During the trial, the chief American prosecutor, Robert H. Jackson, stated:

To initiate a war of aggression, therefore, is not only an international crime; it is the supreme international crime differing only from other war crimes in that it contains within itself the accumulated evil of the whole.

Make no mistake: Evil does exist in the world and its all emanating from the US government. The US government is no different than Hitler’s Nazi Regime. The US government is carbon copying Hitler’s Nazi Imperialism. The US government is the axis of evil. The US government must be stopped. The US government must be held accountable. The US government must be put on trial for their crimes against humanity. The US government must face their Nuremberg Tribunal.

The Statue of Liberty represents, freedom, liberty, justice and also the friendship of foreign nations who also believe in freedom and fair and equal treatment for all. No terrorist took away the freedom, liberty and justice of the American people - the US government did that. Terrorists didn’t draw up the Patriot Act, create the Department of Homeland Security, spy illegally on Americans, launch 2 unprovoked armed attacks against 2 foreign states, abolish habeas corpus, kidnap, deport, torture and murder foreign civilians - the US government did that.

“After 4+ years of research since retirement in 2002, I am 100% convinced that the attacks of September 11, 2001 were planned, organized, and committed by treasonous perpetrators that have infiltrated the highest levels of our government. It is now time to take our country back”

“We cannot let the pursuit of justice fail. Those of us in the military took an oath to “support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic. Just because we have retired does not make that oath invalid, so it is not just our responsibility, it is our duty to expose the real perpetrators of 9/11 and bring them to justice, no matter how hard it is, how long it takes, or how much we have to suffer to do it.”

“We owe it to those who have gone before us who executed that same oath, and who are doing the same thing in Iraq and Afghanistan right now. Those of us who joined the military and faithfully executed orders that were given us had to trust our leaders. The violation and abuse of that trust is not only heinous, but ultimately the most accurate definition of treason!” - Lt. Col. Guy S. Razer, MS, U.S. Air Force (ret).

Americans, all it takes to have a trial is one solid piece of evidence to take to a federal judge. The US people don’t have to wait for the government to launch an investigation and trial into who ordered and executed the attacks of September 11, 2001. Evidence still exists even after 8 years and any American citizen or group can file charges with any federal court in the US with the evidence they have.

There is no statute of limitation on any charge involving a murder, including attempted. If a victim died (2,976 victims in the September 11, 2001 attacks) because of the attack and it can be proven, the bad guy(s) would face murder charges. Americans don’t need the White House or Congress’s permission to file charges of treason or murder - the US courts are bound by law to hear all cases put before them by the citizens of the United States of America.

Silenced by US for exposing US dirty little secret.
Benazir Bhutto declared in an interview just before she was assassinated by the CIA, that bin Laden Is Dead. bin Laden being confirmed dead means US NATO war in Afghanistan is a war crime. War in Afghainstan illegal under US, Canadian, British and International Law. Declared 6 minutes and 10 seconds (6:10) into the interview. Benazir Bhutto was assassinated December 27, 2007 just 13 days before a general election that she was well placed to win.

Benazir Bhutto paid the ultimate price for stating that the US imperial policy of propping up tin horn dictators causes world terrorism. She dared to say so. The late Benazir Bhutto laid “terrorism” at the White House doorstep, blaming US policies for causing, fueling and inspiring what US regimes call “terrorism”.

“When the United States aligns with dictatorships and totalitarian regimes, it compromises the basic democratic principles of its foundation — namely, life, liberty and justice for all. Dictatorships such as Musharraf’s suppress individual rights and freedoms and empower the most extreme elements of society. Oppressed citizens, unable to represent themselves through other means, often turn to extremism and religious fundamentalism.” ~ Benazir Bhutto,

The root causes of “terrorism” are US imperialistic policies, specifically the material and diplomatic support of dictators like Musharraf and earlier, Saddam Hussein and the Shah of Iran, et al. War is a racket fought by the masses for privileged elites, big corporations, and venal politicians like Bush. The war racket creates victims in the US and enemies –potential terrorists –abroad.

War policies benefit a tiny elite, no-bid contractors like Halliburton, Blackwater and their stockholders. The war against Iraq is financed by America’s working poor and middle classes who continue to pay for the war with their lives abroad and with their jobs, their retirement prospects, and their access to health care at home.

Just two days after 9/11, I learned from Congressional staffers that Republicans on Capitol Hill were already exploiting the atrocity, trying to use it to push through tax cuts for corporations and the wealthy. … We now know that from the very beginning, the Bush administration and its allies in Congress saw the terrorist threat not as a problem to be solved, but as a political opportunity to be exploited. The story of the latest terror plot makes the administration’s fecklessness and cynicism on terrorism clearer than ever. ~ Hoping for Fear, by Paul Krugman, Using Fear Commentary, NY Times

Americans are less safe under the dictators of “Imperial America”. According to the Pew Research Center, American skepticism about the war in Iraq has increased steadily from its inception. The war in Iraq, like American imperial policies cause terrorism.

The US, Canadian and NATO war of aggression against Afghanistan, that was illegally waged beginning October 7, 2001 wasn’t a war against terror but a war of aggression to take away the financial future of the Afghan people - the Trans-Afghanistan Pipeline

Central Asia Gas Pipeline, Ltd. (CentGas) was a consortium formed in the 1990s to develop a project to build the Trans-Afghanistan Pipeline to link Turkmenistan’s abundant proven natural gas reserves with growing markets in Pakistan. The Group led by Union Oil Company of California (Unocal) and Delta Oil Company, Ltd., of Saudi Arabia had also considered an extension of the line to the New Delhi area. Regional and political instability proved too great a challenge to overcome and the project eventually was cancelled after Unocal (the largest CentGas investor) withdrew from the consortium.

The Trans-Afghanistan Pipeline (TAP or TAPI) is a natural gas pipeline being developed by the Asian Development Bank. The pipeline will transport Caspian Sea natural gas from Turkmenistan through Afghanistan into Pakistan and then to India. The abbreviation comes from the first letters of those countries. Proponents of the project see it as a modern continuation of the Silk Road. The AfghanTaliban government was expected to receive 8% of the project’s revenue. But that figured was changed to 0% when the US decided that they wanted complete control of the Trans-Afghanistan Pipeline in 1998 and plans for an invasion were drawn up by the Clinton administration and executed by the George W Bush administration. They had decided in 1998 that they would devise a plan to take control of the Trans-Afghanistan Pipeline by staging a false flag terrorist attack on US soil and blame the Taliban government. The attacks of September 11, 2001 was the false flag attack that gave the US an excuse to attack Afghanistan and take the economic future of the Afghan people from them - the Trans-Afghanistan Pipeline.

The original project started in March 1995 when an inaugural memorandum of understanding between the governments of Turkmenistan and Pakistan for a pipeline project was signed. In August 1996, the Central Asia Gas Pipeline, Ltd. (CentGas) consortium for construction of a pipeline, led by U.S. oil company, Unocal was formed. On 27 October 1997, CentGas was incorporated in formal signing ceremonies in Ashgabat, Turkmenistan by several international oil companies along with the Government of Turkmenistan. In January 1998, the Taliban, selecting CentGas over Argentinian competitor Bridas Corporation, signed an agreement that allowed the proposed project to proceed. In June 1998, Russian Gazprom relinquished its 10% stake in the project. Unocal withdrew from the consortium on 8 December 1998 after negotiations between them and the Taliban government broke off. The Taliban wanted a bigger stake in the project for the Afghan people. The Taliban were seeking to guarantee the prosperity of the Afghan people as a result of the Trans-Afghanistan Pipeline but the US wasn’t willing to give the Afghan people their fair share of the profits.

The 1,680 kilometres (1,040 mi) pipeline will run from the Dauletabad gas field to Afghanistan. From there TAPI will be constructed alongside the highway running from Herat to Kandahar, and then via Quetta and Multan in Pakistan. The final destination of the pipeline will be the Indian town of Fazilka, near the border between Pakistan and India.

The US government used the Saudi 9/11 attacks as an excuse to use unlawful military force against Afghanistan. A crime against peace, in international law, refers to “planning, preparation, initiation, or waging of wars of aggression, or a war in violation of international treaties, agreements or assurances, or participation in a common plan or conspiracy for the accomplishment of any of the foregoing”. This definition of crimes against peace was first incorporated into the Nuremberg Principles and later included in the United Nations Charter.

To initiate a war of aggression, therefore, is not only an international crime; it is the supreme international crime differing only from other war crimes in that it contains within itself the accumulated evil of the whole.

The interdiction of aggressive war was confirmed and broadened by the United Nations’ Charter, which states in article 2, paragraph 4 that:

All Members shall refrain in their international relations from the threat or use of force against the territorial integrity or political independence of any state, or in any other manner inconsistent with the Purposes of the United Nations.

* The “territorial integrity” rule means that it is a crime of aggression to use armed force with intent permanently to deprive a state of any part or parts of its territory, not excluding territories for the foreign affairs of which it is responsible;

* The “political independence” rule means that it is a crime of aggression to use armed force with intent to deprive a state of the entirety of one or more of the prerequisites of statehood, namely: defined territory, permanent population, constitutionally independent government and the means of conducting relations with other States;

* The “sovereignty” rule means that it is a crime of aggression to use armed force with intent to overthrow the government of a state or to impede its freedom to act unhindered, as it sees fit, throughout its jurisdiction.

The US began planning for and preparing for an attack against Afgahnistan in 1998 - a war of aggression with the sole purpose to take control of the Trans-Afghanistan Pipeline. The US plan to simply take control of the natural gas of Central Asia is laid out in the 1998 US Congress Hearing U.S. INTERESTS IN THE CENTRAL ASIAN REPUBLICS.

Excerpts from this Congressional hearing in 1998 whereby the US laid out its plan to seize control of the Central Asian Natural Gas and Oil:

48–119 CC
1998
U.S. INTERESTS IN THE CENTRAL ASIAN REPUBLICS HEARING

BEFORE THE

SUBCOMMITTEE ON ASIA AND THE PACIFIC

OF THE

COMMITTEE ON INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS

HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES ONE HUNDRED FIFTH CONGRESS

SECOND SESSION

THURSDAY, FEBRUARY 12, 1998
House of Representatives,
Subcommittee on Asia and the Pacific,
Committee on International Relations,

Mr. BEREUTER. I would like to proceed to the subject of the hearing for today, U.S. interests in the Central Asian Republics. I do have a statement. One hundred years ago, Central Asia was the arena for a great game played by Czarist Russia, Colonial Britain, Napoleon’s France, and the Persian and the Ottoman Empires. Allegiances meant little during this struggle for empire building, where no single empire could gain the upper hand. One hundred years later, the collapse of the Soviet Union has unleashed a new great game, where the interests of the East India Trading Company have been replaced by those of Unocal and Total, and many other organizations and firms.

Today the Subcommittee examines the interests of a new contestant in this new great game, the United States. The five countries which make up Central Asia, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan, Turkmenistan, and Uzbekistan, attained their independence in 1991, and have once again captured worldwide attention due to the phenomenal reserves of oil and natural gas located in the region. In their desire for political stability as well as economic independence and prosperity, these nations are anxious to establish relations with the United States. In response, last November, Secretary of Energy Frederico Pena led a Presidential mission to the Caspian-Central Asian region for discussions. The area’s energy resources were also discussed during November visits to Washington of Kazakhstani President Nazarbayev and Uzbek Prime Minister Sultanov.

Kazakhstan and Turkmenistan possess large reserves of oil and natural gas, both on-shore and off-shore in the Caspian Sea, which they urgently seek to exploit. Uzbekistan has oil and gas reserves that may permit it to be self-sufficient in energy and gain revenue through exports. Estimates of Central Asian oil reserves vary widely, but are usually said to rival those of the North Sea or Alaska. More accurate estimates of oil and gas resources await wider exploration and the drilling of test wells.

Stated U.S. policy goals regarding energy resources in this region include fostering the independence of the States and their ties to the West; breaking Russia’s monopoly over oil and gas transport routes; promoting Western energy security through diversified suppliers; encouraging the construction of east-west pipelines that do not transit Iran; and denying Iran dangerous leverage over the Central Asian economies.

In addition, as has been noted by Deputy Secretary of State Strobe Talbott, the United States seeks to discourage any one country from gaining control over the region, but rather urges all responsible States to cooperate in the exploitation of regional oil and other resources.

Central Asia would seem to offer significant new investment opportunities for a broad range of American companies which, in turn, will serve as a valuable stimulus to the economic development of the region. Japan, Turkey, Iran, Western Europe, and China are all pursuing economic development opportunities and challenging Russian dominance in the region. It is essential that U.S. policymakers understand the stakes involved in Central Asia as we seek to craft a policy that serves the interests of the United States and U.S. business.

On the other hand, some question the importance of the region to U.S. interests, and dispute the significance of its resources to U.S. national security interests. Others caution that it will take a great deal of time and money to bring these resources to world markets. Still others point to civil and ethnic conflicts in Tajikistan and Afghanistan as a reason to avoid involvement beyond a minimal diplomatic presence in the area.

Unocal foresees a pipeline which would become part of a regional system that will gather oil from existing pipeline infrastructure in Turkmenistan, Uzbekistan, Kazakhstan and Russia. The 1,040-mile long oil pipeline would extend south through Afghanistan to an export terminal that would be constructed on the Pakistan coast. This 42-inch diameter pipeline will have a shipping capacity of one million barrels of oil per day. The estimated cost of the project, which is similar in scope to the trans-Alaska pipeline, is about $2.5 billion.

…

The Central Asia and Caspian region is blessed with abundant oil and gas that can enhance the lives of the region’s residents, and provide energy for growth in both Europe and Asia. The impact of these resources on U.S. commercial interests and U.S. foreign policy is also significant. Without peaceful settlement of the conflicts in the region, cross-border oil and gas pipelines are not likely to be built. We urge the Administration and the Congress to give strong support to the U.N.-led peace process in Afghanistan. The U.S. Government should use its influence to help find solutions to all of the region’s conflicts.

U.S. assistance in developing these new economies will be crucial to business success. We thus also encourage strong technical assistance programs throughout the region. Specifically, we urge repeal or removal of section 907 of the Freedom Support Act. This section unfairly restricts U.S. Government assistance to the government of Azerbaijan and limits U.S. influence in the region.

Developing cost-effective export routes for Central Asian resources is a formidable task, but not an impossible one. Unocal and other American companies like it are fully prepared to undertake the job and to make Central Asia once again into the crossroads it has been in the past. Thank you, Mr. Chairman.
…
Mr. BEREUTER. .. I do recognize and agree with you about the place where the major oil demand is growing in the world. I understand why a southern directed route is more advantageous to serve that. I heard what you had to say about the inadequacy of a pipeline to serve the oil potential if exploited in that region. I wonder if you could address this point to start with. Given the long history of violence in Afghanistan, can Unocal reasonably expect a pipeline to remain secure?

Mr. MARESCA. First, on the question about Afghanistan, of course we’re not in a phase where we are negotiating on a contract because there is no recognized government really to negotiate with. However, we have had talks and briefings with all the factions. It is clear that they all understand the significance for their country of this pipeline project, and they all support it, all of them. They all want it. They would like it to start tomorrow. All of the factions would like it to start tomorrow if we could do it.

So I believe that over time, if it’s built, it would be secure. I believe that the Afghans will see it as a national asset once it’s built. It will provide them with many millions of dollars in transit fees. It will provide them with real jobs and technology and a lot of other things. It’s not going to be built until there is a single Afghan Government.

So what did the US do? On October 7, 2001 the US attacked Afghanistan, not out of self-defense but to take from the Afghan people its very lucrative financial future. The only way the Trans-Afghanistan Pipeline can be built is by invading Afghanistan and installing a government that the US government can control. A single Afghan Government that was installed by military force and kept there by military force. To distract the people of Afghanistan, the US, Canada and other NATO nations the US government came up with a plan that would falsely accuse the Taliban of being terrorists by allegedly harbouring a Saudi born and US made terrorist - bin Laden. Make no mistake, the illegal war and occupation of the sovereign state of Afghanistan will continue so long as the US remains in control of the oil and natural gas of the Caspian Region. In order to achieve that the US, Canada and NATO must commit and are committing the worst war crime of all war crimes - the genocide of the Taliban.

Friday, 27 December, 2002 the BBC reported “Central Asia pipeline deal signed”. An agreement has been signed in the Turkmen capital, Ashgabat, paving the way for construction of a gas pipeline from the Central Asian republic through Afghanistan to Pakistan. After the US illegally invaded and ousted the legal Taliban government of the sovereign state of Afghanistan the governments of the US occupied Afghanistan, Turkmenistan and Pakistan decided to push ahead with plans for the ambitious 1,500-kilometre-long gas pipeline. The leaders of the three countries have now signed a framework agreement defining the legal aspects of setting up a consortium to build and operate the pipeline. The trans-Afghanistan pipeline will begin exporting Turkmen gas via Afghanistan to Pakistani ports, from where it could reach world markets. India is the largest potential buyer and the US installed Afghan President (CIA money man during the Soviet occupation of Afghanistan and drug warlord), Hamid Karzai, said Delhi was welcome to join the project.

The U.S. Army’s Law of Land Warfare (Field Manual 27-10) states:

498. Crimes Under International Law ~ Any person, whether a member of the armed forces or a civilian, who commits an act which constitutes a crime under international law is responsible therefor and liable to punishment. Such offenses in connection with war comprise:

a. Crimes against peace.
b. Crimes against humanity.
c. War crimes.

Although this manual recognizes the criminal responsibility of individuals for those offenses which may comprise any of the foregoing types of crimes, members of the armed forces will normally be concerned, only with those offenses constituting “war crimes.”

John Lennon and Yoko Ono wanted the Vietnam War to end. “Happy Xmas (War Is Over)” was their plea to end war. This Holiday Season make this song our universal call for “Peace”

Letter from a U.S. citizen “addressed to the World” - January 16, 2007

There is a large majority of Americans who are terrified by our governments inability to hear our voices. We do not want war. Not with you, not with anyone. We admire your ancient culture and respect your religious beliefs. While our government takes steps toward instigating another illegal war, this time on your great nation, we, the majority of United States citizens, are trying everything that is in our power to prevent this.

You surround yourself with only people who agree with you, until they agree no more. Don’t you dare think that you stand for me or the vast majority of American people. You never have. We are not nearly as ignorant as you would like to believe we are.

PEACE QUOTES

You cannot shake hands with a clenched fist. ~Attributed to both Golda Meir and Indira Gandhi

An eye for eye only ends up making the whole world blind. ~Mahatma Gandhi

I think that people want peace so much that one of these days government had better get out of their way and let them have it. ~Dwight Eisenhower

We seek peace, knowing that peace is the climate of freedom. ~Dwight D. Eisenhower

The real differences around the world today are not between Jews and Arabs; Protestants and Catholics; Muslims, Croats, and Serbs. The real differences are between those who embrace peace and those who would destroy it; between those who look to the future and those who cling to the past; between those who open their arms and those who are determined to clench their fists. ~William J. Clinton, 1997

Peace cannot be achieved through violence, it can only be attained through understanding. ~Ralph Waldo Emerson

The British and US Government calls the Taliban “terrorists” and “extremists”, but people in Kandahar associate it with security. Before the 2001 invasion, they say, they could walk the streets safely. Now even a simple outing to the local market is seen as a risk. I think life under the Taliban was very good,” said Maria Farah, a mother of five. “If we did not have a full stomach, we could at least get some food and go to sleep, and if we went out somewhere there were no problems. How about now? If we go out, we don’t know if we will arrive home or not. If there is an explosion and the Americans are passing, they will just open fire on everyone. The security problems are too much here.”

When the Taliban implemented a ban on opium cultivation in early 2001, U.S. officials were most complimentary. The Bush administration did more than praise the Taliban’s proclaimed ban of opium cultivation. In mid-May, 2001, Secretary of State Colin Powell announced a $43 million grant to Afghanistan in addition to the humanitarian aid the United States had long been providing to agencies assisting Afghan refugees. $43 million was very serious money to Afghanistan’s theocratic masters. Both the U.S. and UN reported that the Taliban had virtually wiped out the poppy crop in 2000-2001.

The United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime (UNODC) recently published a report revealing the latest findings on opium production in Afghanistan. Since the US invaded and now occupy Afghanistan the UN reports that “opium cultivation has exploded to unprecedented levels.” Afghanistan under US and NATO occupation has now become “the world’s biggest source of illicit drugs, surpassing the output of entire countries like Colombia (coca), Morocco (cannabis), and Myanmar (opium)—which have populations up to twenty times larger.”

Washington’s support for the Taliban government came to an especially calamitous end in September 2001 when the Bush administration falsely accused the Taliban government of being linked to bin Laden’s terrorist attacks on the World Trade Center and the Pentagon that killed some 3,000 people. Even despite the US FBI finding no evidence to support Bush’s claim the US immediately attacked Afghanistan.

The FBI has officially declared that they have not even found any evidence to link bin Laden to the 9/11 attacks. Their official MOST WANTED poster for Usama bin Laden is missing bin Laden being wanted for the 9/11 attacks. Rex Tomb, Chief of Investigative Publicity for the FBI stated, “The reason why 9/11 is not mentioned on Usama Bin Laden’s Most Wanted page is because the FBI has no hard evidence connecting Bin Laden to 9/11.”

Tomb continued, “Bin Laden has not been formally charged in connection to 9/11. The FBI gathers evidence. Once evidence is gathered, it is turned over to the Department of Justice. The Department of Justice than decides whether it has enough evidence to present to a federal grand jury. In the case of the 1998 United States Embassies being bombed, Bin Laden has been formally indicted and charged by a grand jury. He has not been formally indicted and charged in connection with 9/11 because the FBI has no hard evidence connected Bin Laden to 9/11.”

The propaganda used to justify the US-led occupation in Afghanistan typically leaves out any explanation of the origins of tendencies such as Al Qaeda, the Taliban movement and other Islamist groups resisting American and NATO troops. The spin merchants of the so-called “war on terror” would have people believe that the US and its allies are fighting religious fanatics who have no support in the country and are motivated by an inexplicable and irrational hatred of Western civilisation.

On rare occasions, however, someone deviates from the script and draws attention to historical facts regarding present-day Islamic extremism that Washington and its allies prefer to leave unmentioned. One occasion was an interview on August 19 with Timemagazine with a very close American ally—Hamid Karzai, the man who was installed by the Bush administration as President of Afghanistan in 2002.

Challenged by Time to answer how an enemy could be fought that “only has annihilation as its goal”, Karzai felt compelled to note the current situation was a by-product of US support in the 1980s for the creation of an Islamic fundamentalist army to wage a jihad or holy war against a pro-Soviet regime in Afghanistan and embroil the Soviet military itself in a decade-long guerilla conflict.

Karzai told Time: “In order to fix terrorism at large, we need to remedy the wrongs of the past 30 years. Remedy means to undo. The world pushed us [Afghan jihadists] to fight the Soviets. And those who did walked away and left all the mess spread around. September 11 is a consequence of this …

“In the years of fighting against the Soviets, radicalism was the main thing. Someone like me would be called half a Muslim because we were not radical. The more radical you were the more money you were given. Radicalism became not only an ideological tool against the Soviets but a way forward economically. The more radical you presented yourself, the more money the West gave you.”

When Time protested that “it wasn’t just the West; it was Saudi Arabia, Pakistan”, who fomented Islamic extremism in Afghanistan, Karzai answered: “[T]hey were led by the West. The moderates were undermined. Afghan history and nationalism were called atheism. The more you spoke of radicalism, the better you were treated. That’s what we are paying for now.”

Karzai is intimately familiar with the US backing for Afghan jihadists in the 1980s. He ran the office of Sebghatullah Mojadeddi, the leader of one of the Mujahedin groups, and undoubtedly liaised with CIA and other US officials. His bitterness over US policy stems from the fact that the Mojadeddi faction was regarded as “moderate” as compared to the “radicals” who received the lion’s share of financial support.

From 1979 on, the US urged its allies such as Saudi Arabia and Pakistan to give military and financial aid to the Islamist-based Afghan insurgents as a means of undermining the Soviet Union. Combined with direct American funds, as much as $2 billion poured in each year—the CIA’s Afghan project was by far the largest covert operation of the entire Cold War.

The largest beneficiary of US aid during the 1980s was Gulbuddin Hekmatyar’s Hezb-e-Islami, which is believed to have received as much as $600 million in US weapons and cash. Another figure the CIA worked with closely was Jalaluddin Haqqani, a guerilla commander who built a large military force in the ethnic Pashtun provinces of southern Afghanistan.

At the same time, large sums of Saudi money were used to finance the camps to which thousands of Islamic militants came from every corner of the world between 1985 and 1992. One of the main figures involved in creating what came to be called “The Base”, or Al Qaeda in Arabic, was Osama bin Laden, the son of a Saudi Arabian billionaire. While the CIA denies ever working with the foreign fighters or so-called “Afghan Arabs”, its claims are not credible. Al Qaeda was an integral part of the overall anti-Soviet jihad in which the CIA collaborated closely with Pakistani and Saudi intelligence agencies.

US support of the Taliban

The proxy war that the Islamists fought for the United States from 1979 on was a contributing factor in the economic and political crisis that gripped the Soviet Union in the 1980s and led the Stalinist regime to restore capitalist relations and ultimately, dissolve the USSR itself.

Afghanistan, however, was virtually destroyed in the process. Before the Soviet forces withdrew in 1988, their brutal counter-insurgency tactics had killed over one million Afghans, wounded as many as 1.5 million and forced five million people to flee to Pakistan.

The US continued to back the Islamists in their campaign to overthrow the weak pro-Soviet government of Mohammad Najibullah, but increasingly relied on the Pakistani military to oversee the financing and arming of the Mujahedin. Washington’s focus had shifted. The crisis of the Soviet Union had led the US ruling elite to conclude that an opportunity existed to realise their long-held ambitions to dominate the oil-rich Middle East. The Iraqi regime of Saddam Hussein was provoked into invading Kuwait, creating the pretext for the deployment of more than half-a-million American troops into Saudi Arabia and, in March 1991, the first Gulf war against Iraq.

In Afghanistan, the Pakistani-backed forces of Gulbuddin Hekmatyar conducted a murderous civil war for control of the country against other Mujahedin factions, whose warlord commanders were receiving support from rival regional powers such as India, Iran and Russia. Hekmatyar troops, still well-equipped with American-supplied weapons, carried out several wholesale bombardments of the capital Kabul, in which much of it was destroyed and thousands of people killed. In June 1993, he was installed as the prime minister, supplanting a government in which Karzai had briefly served as deputy foreign minister.

The brutality of the civil war, the desperate social conditions facing the population and the plight of millions of refugees in Pakistan created the breeding ground for the Taliban—or “religious students”. Radical Islamic clerics led by Mullah Omar won support among embittered youth with promises that harsh Islamic law would suppress the criminal warlords and give a long-suffering people respite from war. Assembling a military force in the Pakistani refugee camps in 1994, the Taliban seized control of much of Afghanistan and finally took Kabul in 1996. When it first emerged, Karzai, like many Pashtuns, backed the Taliban as the means for undermining the power of their ethnic rivals.

Pakistan, which had come to view Hekmatyar as an unreliable proxy, played a crucial role in organising the Taliban’s armed forces. Units of the Pakistani military are believed to have actively fought alongside them. Another factor in the Taliban successes was the decision by Jalaluddin Haqqani in 1995 to align his large ethnic Pashtun militia with them. Haqqani served as the Minister for Borders and Tribal Affairs in the Taliban government from 1996 until the US invasion in October 2001.

The Taliban never controlled the entire country and was engaged in virtually constant warfare against the warlords who received backing from India, Russia and, to some extent, Iran. In large areas of southern Afghanistan, however, the population, while resenting the Taliban’s enforcement of harsh sharia law and bans on female education, enjoyed their first years of relative peace in over 17 years. The legacy is a degree of sympathy and even nostalgia for the Taliban, particularly when their rule is compared with the violence of the US occupation and the corruption of the drug barons and strongmen who dominate Karzai’s puppet government.

The US government and major American oil conglomerates initially welcomed the advances by the Taliban. Rich new oil and gas fields were being developed in former Soviet Central Asian republics such as Turkmenistan and Kazakhstan and the potential existed for pipelines to be constructed through Afghanistan to refineries and ports in Pakistan and India. The US attacked and now occupy Afghanistan to build this pipeline and place it under the complete control of the US. The US robbed the Taliban and the Afghan people of its financial future when they (the US) build the pipeline and control the flow of oil and natural gas through Afghanistan.

The Israeli flag that to this day marks the Jews. If you look closely at the Antisemitism symbol, the Star of Solomon (mistakenly refered to as the Star of David) is actually made up of 2 pyramids symbolizing the continued Jewish enslavement (enslavement - the state of being a slave)

Israel (the name given to Jacob after his fight with the Angel of God - therefore Israel means the one who struggles with God or anti-God ) continues to be aggressive against the Palestinian people by using military force against the Palestinian civilian population. Israel always justifies their attacks by claiming self-defense but the real story is that Israel has been planing a genocide of the Palestinian people. Israel has been committing atrocities by cutting off food and medical supplies for the Palestinian people. Not one of the news media in the US has been reporting on the UN declaration that Israel is guilty of crimes against humanity for attacking the Palestinian civilian population. No media in the US is reporting on the countless Israeli military attacks against the civilian population of Gaza. Israel is trying to steal more Palestinian land to expand their illegitimate state of Israel. No one can recognize the state of Israel because Israel was formed from land stolen from the Palestinian people at the end of WWII by the Allied nations. The Allied nations did nothing to stop the genocide of the Jewish people by the Roman Catholic Nazi army. The Allied nations did not want the Jewish people in their country and neither did Austrian born (not German) Adolf Hitler. We all know what Hitler did - sent the Jewish people to concentration camps for extermination.

The Allied nations formed the new Jewish concentration camp called Israel. They stole land from the Palestinian people to create Israel. Israel was created to segregate the Jewish people from the rest of the World.

Israel is an illegitimate state - nothing more than a Jewish Concentration Camp - envisioned by Hitler and built by the US allies. The same ideology that sent the Jewish people to concentration camps for extermination infects both the US and Israeli (anti-Jewish) governments.

At the end of WWII the US smuggled hundreds of top Nazi SS officers, Gestapo agents and scientists involved in experiments on the Jewish people in the concentration camps. Operation Paperclip (Project Paperclip) saw hundreds of Nazi officials given asylum in the US (Fort Bliss) from prosecution for their crimes against humanity. Scientists who committed atrocities by using human beings as lab rats have formed the US biological weapons division of the US military. Nazi scientists who developed the first operational jet fighter, the Messerschmitt Me 262, and V-2 rocket formed the US ballistic missile weapons programs and later form NASA. Nazi Gestapo agents were brought to the US and formed the FBI and the Central Intelligence Agency - the CIA. Those same Nazi officials smuggled into the US under Operation Paperclip destroyed the League of Nations (which was responsible for the fall of Nazi Germany) and formed the United Nations (its ironic that they would choose UN which means “To reverse or undo the result of a specified action”) and their first order of business was to create the new Jewish concentration camp they deceivingly called Israel.

The Nazi Germans choose the flag for all the Jewish people. The flag of Israel was adopted on October 28, 1948, five months after the Nazi UN created it from stolen Palestinian land. Today Jewish people are marked with the same Antisemitism symbol (yellow star) used by Hitler to mark the Jews for extermination. Ever since the Jewish people have been unwittingly immigrating to the Nazi concentration camp called Israel. The Nazi formed CIA has been propagating Antisemitism ever since.

Nazi Germany did not fall as the majority of key figures lived on to form the backbone military and intelligence agencies of the United States. Those same Nazi officers and officials quickly created their new Jewish concentration camp they called Israel. The Nazi CIA (formerly called the Central Intelligence Office during WWII) has since its formation been deceiving the Jewish people. The Jewish people don’t realize that the Israeli Mossad is actually the modern day German Gestapo. “Mossad” is the Hebrew word for institute or institution. The Mossad is responsible for intelligence collection, counter-terrorism, covert operations such as paramilitary activities and political assassinations, and the facilitation of aliyah where it is banned. Aliyah (Hebrew: ascent) refers to Jewish immigration to the Land of Israel. The Mossad is performing the same duties as the Nazi Gestapo - the official secret police of Nazi Germany who were also responsible for facilitating aliyah (concentration of the Jewish people).

The army units within the Gestapo were taught many torture techniques, and were also taught many of the practices that German doctors in Dachau tested on the inmates of concentration camps. The Gestapo, during its tenure, operated without any restrictions by civil authority, meaning that its members could not be tried for any of their police practices. This unconditional authority added an elitist element to the Gestapo; its members knew that whatever actions they took, no consequences would arise. The US CIA also operates without any restrictions by civil authority. Its members know that whatever actions they take (including the assassination of its own US president (JFK) and attacking the US on 9/11 and torture) , no consequences would arise - its members have not and will not be tried for any of their illegal activities.

The true symbol of the Jewish people
One of the oldest symbols of the Jewish faith is the menorah, a seven-branched candelabrum used in the Temple. The menorah is a symbol of the Jews and their mission is to be “a light unto the nations.” The sages emphasize that light is not a violent force; Jews are to accomplish its mission by setting an example, not by using force.

The founding of the Zionist State, May 14, 1948, is in direct contradiction to the teachings of the Torah, which forbids the establishment of a Jewish State and commands Jews to remain in exile until released from that exile by God Himself without any human intervention. At which time all Nations of the world will live together in peace.

Two thousand years ago, at the time of the destruction of the holy Temple, the Jewish people were commanded by the Creator (kesubos 111a)

* Not to go up en masse to the land of Israel
* Not to rebel against the nations
* Not to in any way attempt to end the exile

Torah faithful Jews are to behave in a civil, honest and grateful manner towards their host nations throughout the world.

The Zionist intervention against God’s will by establishing the ‘State of Israel’, represents a direct rebellion against God and the Torah, a rebellion which has generated untold pain and suffering, to Jew and non-Jew alike.

On the anniversary of the founding of this heretical Zionist State, Torah true Jews mourn the attempt to transform Judaism from a religion into a secular entity and the attempt to uproot the Torah teachings. We mourn the sacrilege it has produced: desecration of the Sabbath, loss of modesty, and a litany of violations against many laws of our faith and Jewish teachings, amongst them the command of compassion for our fellow beings.

We mourn the subjugation, expulsion and horrific oppression of the Palestinian people, in a continuing chain of events, from the time of the foundation of the ‘State’, culminating in the recent tragic onslaught on Gaza. The list goes on and on…

On the tragic day of this anniversary, we fast and gather in Synagogues around the world, praying for a total, speedy and peaceful dismantlement of the heretical Zionist ‘State of Israel’, to be replaced by a free Palestine and a free Jerusalem entirely in accordance with the aspirations of the Palestinian people.

May we then merit that this year will be the year when the glory of the Almighty will be revealed over the whole world, when all nations will live in peace and join together in the service of one God, soon in our days.

1) What is “The People of Israel” ?

* The People of Israel have existed for thousands of years.
* They have their own particular, essential nature.
* The Torah is the source of their essential nature.
* Without Torah and Faith there is no People of Israel.
* Whoever denies the Torah and the Faith is no longer part of the People of Israel.
* The purpose of the People of Israel in this world is Divine Service.
* Their salvation is occupation in Divine Service.

2) What is Zionism?

* Zionism is a relatively new thing.
* It has only existed for a century.
* Zionism redefines the true essential nature of the People of Israel, and substitutes for it a completely contradictory and opposite character - a materialistic worldly nation.
* Their misfortune is lack of what other nations possess, i.e. a state and army.
* Their salvation is possession of a state and army etc.
* This is clearly spelled out in the circles of Zionist thought, and among the leaders of the Zionist State, that through changing the nature and character of the People of Israel and by changing their way of thinking they can set before the People of Israel “their salvation” — a state and an army.

The People of Israel oppose the so-called “State of Israel” for four reasons:

FIRST — The so-called “State of Israel” is diametrically opposed and completely contradictory to the true essence and foundation of the People of Israel, as is explained above. The only time that the People of Israel were permitted to have a state was two thousand years ago when the glory of the creator was upon us, and likewise in the future when the glory of the creator will once more be revealed, and the whole world will serve Him, then He Himself (without any human effort or force of arms) will grant us a kingdom founded on Divine Service. However, a worldly state, like those possessed by other peoples, is contradictory to the true essence of the People of Israel. Whoever calls this the salvation of Israel shows that he denies the essence of the People of Israel, and substitutes another nature, a worldly materialistic nature, and therefore sets before them, a worldly materialistic “salvation,” and the means of achieving this “salvation” is also worldly and materialistic i.e. to organize a land and army. However, the true salvation of the People of Israel is to draw close to the Creator. This is not done by organization and force of arms. Rather it is done by occupation to Torah and good deeds.

SECOND — Because of all of this and other reasons the Torah forbids us to end the exile and establish a state and army until the Holy One, blessed He, in His Glory and Essence will redeem us. This is forbidden even if the state is conducted according to the law of the Torah because arising from the exile itself is forbidden, and we are required to remain under the rule of the nations of the world, as is explained in the book VAYOEL MOSHE. If we transgress this injunction, He will bring upon us (may we be spared) terrible punishment.

THIRD — Aside from arising from exile, all the deeds of the Zionists are diametrically opposed to the Faith and the Torah. Because the foundation of the Faith and Torah of Israel is that the Torah was revealed from heaven, and there is reward for those who obey it and punishment for those who transgress it. The entire People of Israel is required to obey the Torah, and whoever doesn’t want to, ceases to be part of the congregation of Israel.

FOURTH — Aside from the fact that they themselves do not obey the Torah they do everything they can to prevent anyone they get under their power from fulfilling the commands of the Torah, the claims to freedom of religion are lies. They fight with all of their strength to destroy the Faith of Israel.

The Zionists claim that they are the saviors of Israel, but this is refuted by twelve things:

FIRST — If one contemplates the two thousand years of our exile, take any hundred years even the hardest, one will not find as much suffering, bloodshed, and catastrophes for the People of Israel in the period of the Zionists, and it is known that most of the suffering of this century was caused by the Zionists, as our Rabbis warned us would be the case.

SECOND — It is openly stated in books written by the founders of Zionism that the means by which they planned to establish a state was by instigating anti-Semitism, and undermining the security of the Jews in all the lands of the world, until they would be forced to flee to their state. And thus they did - They intentionally infuriated the German people and fanned the flames of Nazi hatred, and they helped the Nazis, with trickery and deceit, to take whole Jewish communities off to the concentration camps, and the Zionists themselves admit this. (See the books Perfidy, Min Hameitzor, etc.). The Zionists continue to practice this strategy today. They incite anti-Semitism and then they present themselves as the “saviors”. Here are two replies given by Leaders of the Zionists during World War II, when they were asked for money to help ransom Jews from the Nazis. Greenbaum said “One cow in Palestine is worth more than all the Jews in Poland.”
Weitzman said, “The most important part of the Jewish people is already in the land (of Israel) and those who are left, are unimportant”.

THIRD — We see that most of world Jewry lives in security and under good physical conditions, and have no desire to go live in the Zionist State. Whereas many people have left the Zionist State to live under better conditions in other lands.

FOURTH — The Zionists make a great deal of propaganda to induce people to immigrate to their state. If their state is so beneficial why do they have to make so much propaganda.

FIFTH — Because nobody wants the Zionists to “save” them. The only way they can get immigrants is by promising poor people material benefits, and even then very few people respond.

SIXTH — The Zionist State is always threatened by the dangers of war. Whereas the rest of world Jewry live in peace and security, (Except in a few places where the Zionists have undermined their security and fanned the flames of hatred)

SEVENTH — The Zionist State could not continue to exist without economic support from Jews living outside of the Zionist State.

EIGHTH — The Zionist State is on the verge of economic collapse, and their money is nearly worthless.

NINTH — The Zionist State persecute all Jews who are loyal to their Faith.

TENTH — They start wars that endanger the Jewish People, for the sake of their own political interests.

ELEVENTH - According to the Torah the path of safety is following ways of peace not starting fights with other nations, as the Zionists do.

TWELFTH — Even if the Zionists could and would provide physical security it would be at the expense of our Faith and Our Torah the true People of Israel prefer death rather than life at such a cost.

It is therefore clear that Zionism is not the savior of the people of Israel. Rather it is their greatest misfortune. Even though there are some observant Jews and rabbis, who approve of the Zionists, this is not the opinion of the Torah. The Zionists have enough control over the American news media to make sure that only their side of the story is heard. They make it look like all Jewry and their rabbis are Zionists, but this is false propaganda.

The most important Rabbis and the majority of religious Jewry are opposed to Zionism, but their voice is not heard because of Zionist control of American news media. The Zionists terrorize everyone who speaks out against them. That part of the Jewish masses which is fooled by Zionist propaganda puts pressure on their Rabbis not to speak out.

Between the terror and the pressure of the masses most of the Rabbis are prevented from speaking out.

Three testimonies of the true opinion of the Torah.

1) In the past two thousand years of the dangers and sufferings of exile not once did any of the Sages of Israel suggest that we make a state to protect ourselves. In every generation we had thousands of Sages well versed in the Torah.

2) We have thousands of legal work of Torah law that have been handed down to us by the Sages of all generations. Not once do we see a word suggesting the establishment of a state. What we do find is warnings against it.

3) The founders of Zionism were all atheists who denied the Torah. All the Torah Sages of that time opposed them and opposed Zionism, saying that Zionism would lead only to destruction.

However the true People of Israel will never change their nature or give up their Faith because of the strength the Creator gives them. Zionism is a foreign growth in the body of the Jewish People. The end will be that it will rid itself of this foreign growth and remain pure. Zionism has overcome the Jewish people by force, fraud and terror, but none of this will help them because the truth will always remain with the help of the Creator.

Zionism will not replace the Jewish People. The Jewish People will remain strong in their faith and the Zionist State will cease to exist. It is therefore, the Jewish people’s demand that the State that calls itself ISRAEL, should cease to exist. Since this won’t be done, the Jewish people demand that Zionists cease to call themselves “Israel”, because their entire being is in complete opposition to the true People of Israel. The true People of Israel deny Zionists permission to call themselves by that name. The Zionist leaders have no right to set themselves up as the representatives and spokesmen of the true People of ISRAEL.

Since we know they will not fulfill this demand either we feel that at least we cry out the truth. The truth will always remain the truth. By no means or force can the truth be changed. Even if all the world would say that one and one is three, the truth will remain that one and one is two.

Let the truth be declared. The use of the Name “ISRAEL” by that State is a complete falsification. The People of Israel have nothing to do with that State. Zionism and its State have no share and no part in the true ISRAEL.

Fmr. National Security Advisor Zbigniew Brzezinski with Osama bin Laden, circa 1979.

Fmr. National Security Advisor Zbigniew Brzezinski, known for his hardline policies on the Soviet Union, initiated in 1979 a campaign supporting mujaheddin (later renamed al Qaeda) in Pakistan and Afghanistan, which were run by Pakistani security services with financial support from the CIA and Britain’s MI6. This policy had the explicit aim of promoting radical Islamist and anti-Communist forces to overthrow the secular communist People’s Democratic Party of Afghanistan government in Afghanistan, which had been destabilized by coup attempts against Hafizullah Amin, the power struggle within the Soviet-supported parcham faction of the PDPA and a subsequent Soviet military intervention.

Years later, in a 1997 CNN/National Security Archive interview, Brzezinski detailed the strategy taken by the Carter administration against the Soviets in 1979:

We immediately launched a twofold process when we heard that the Soviets had entered Afghanistan. The first involved direct reactions and sanctions focused on the Soviet Union, and both the State Department and the National Security Council prepared long lists of sanctions to be adopted, of steps to be taken to increase the international costs to the Soviet Union of their actions. And the second course of action led to my going to Pakistan a month or so after the Soviet invasion of Afghanistan, for the purpose of coordinating with the Pakistanis a joint response, the purpose of which would be to make the Soviets bleed for as much and as long as is possible; and we engaged in that effort in a collaborative sense with the Saudis, the Egyptians, the British, the Chinese, and we started providing weapons to the Mujaheddin, from various sources again—for example, some Soviet arms from the Egyptians and the Chinese. We even got Soviet arms from the Czechoslovak communist government, since it was obviously susceptible to material incentives; and at some point we started buying arms for the Mujaheddin from the Soviet army in Afghanistan, because that army was increasingly corrupt.

Milt Bearden wrote in The Main Enemy that Brzezinski, in 1980, secured an agreement from the Saudi king to match American contributions to the Afghan effort (of forming al Qaeda) dollar for dollar and that Bill Casey would keep that agreement going through the Reagan administration.

In 1998, Brzezinski was interviewed by the French newspaper Nouvel Observateur on the topic of Afghanistan. He revealed that CIA support for the mujaheddin had started before the 1979 Soviet invasion, knowingly increasing the probability of a Soviet invasion. Brzezinski saw the invasion as an opportunity to embroil the Soviet Union in a bloody conflict comparable to America’s experience in Vietnam. He referred to this as the “Afghan Trap” and viewed the end of the Soviet empire as worth the cost of strengthening militant Islamic groups.

He went on to say in that interview, “What is most important to the history of the world? Some stirred-up Moslems or the liberation of Central Europe and the end of the cold war?” When the interviewer questioned him about Islamic fundamentalism representing a world menace, Brzezinski said, “Nonsense!”

In his 1997 book The Grand Chessboard, Brzezinski says that assistance to the Afghan resistance was a tactic designed to bog down the Soviet army while the United States built up a deterrent military force in the Persian Gulf to prevent Soviet political or military penetration farther south.

In the mid 1980 the US, wishing to increase its regional influence, worked with the Saudis to import an army of Saudis, Egyptians, and others into Afghanistan. The Saudis chose a member of a wealthy construction family with close royal family ties - Osama bin Laden - to lead the effort . Many of the men bin Laden recruited were connected to the Muslim Brotherhood, a regional fundamentalist group. bin Laden’s newly constructed army (shortly thereafter known as al Qaeda) successfully fought to settle Afghanistan in favor of an Afghan fundamentalist group, the Taliban. The US paid the Al Qaeda army to fight the US battles against all those who oppose the US plans for the region. With the formation of al Qaeda, with US money, the war on terror is the US war “of” terror. The US is using their own covert army to wage a fabricated threat of war against the US in order for the US government to implement US policy in the region. Public record prove that bin Laden was hand picked by Saudi Arabia and the US to form al Qaeda to orchestrate a fabricated war of terror against the US and the World.

Motive for US attacking their own country on September 11, 2001

1995 Unocal, seeking to build a pipeline across Turkmenistan, Afghanistan, and Pakistan (for delivery to energy hungry Asia via the Pakistani Arabian Sea coast), signed an agreement with Turkmenistan for natural gas purchasing rights for transport through a proposed pipeline Unocal also signed an agreement with Turkmenistan for an oil pipeline along the same route.

Aug. 13, 1996 Unocal and Delta Oil Co. of Saudi Arabia signed a memorandum of understanding with Russia’s Gazprom and Turkmenistan’s Turkmenrusgaz to build a gas pipeline from Turkmenistan to Pakistan via Afghanistan.

October 1997 Unocal and other oil companies formed Central Asia Gas Pipeline, Ltd. (CentGas) in preparation for building the trans-Afghanistan pipeline.

1997 US Congress under clinton passed a resolution declaring the Caspian and Caucasus region to be a “zone of vital American interests”.

December 1997 Unocal invited Taliban representatives to their corporate headquarters in Sugarland, TX. to discuss the pipeline project. They were thereafter invited to Washington for meetings with Clinton Administration officials.

January 1998 Unocal agreement signed between Pakistan, Turkmenistan, and the Taliban to arrange funding of the gas pipeline project, with Unocal also considering a Turkmenistan-Afghanistan-Pakistan-Arabian Sea coast oil pipeline.

1998 VP Dick Cheney, then CEO of the giant oil services company, Halliburton, stated: “I cannot think of a time when we have had a region emerge as suddenly to become as strategically significant as the Caspian.”

Preparing for 9/11

February 28, 1998 Unocal VP International Relations addressed US House of Representatives clearly stating that the Taliban government should be removed and replaced by a government acceptable to his company. - “The territory across which the pipeline would extend is controlled by the Taliban, an Islamic movement that is not recognized as a government by most other nations. From the outset, we have made it clear that construction of our proposed pipeline cannot begin until a recognized government is in place that has the confidence of governments, lenders and our company.” He argued that creation of a 42 inch oil pipeline across Afghanistan would yield a Western profit increase of 500% by 2015. http://www.ringnebul … ony_USHouse_1998.htm

August 7, 1998 US terrorism army in Afghanistan, al Qaeda, ordered to bomb two US embassies in Nairobi, Kenya and Dar es Salaam, Tanzania.

August 20, 1998 Clinton ordered a 75-80 cruise missile attacks on Afghanistan and Sudan targets.

Nov. 1998 The Trade and Development Agency commissioned Enron to perform a feasibility study an east-to-west route, crossing the Caspian Mountains and terminating in Turkey along the Mediterranean. (The route was considered impractical as it would cost an estimated $1 billion more than a route through Afghanistan.)

December 1998 Unocal issued a statement that it had withdrawn from the pipeline project on 12/4/98, noting “business reasons.”

April 30, 1999 Excluding US interests, Afghanistan, Pakistan, & Turkmenistan reactivated the pipeline project.

July 4, 1999 An executive order (13129) was issued by Clinton, freezing US held Taliban assets, & prohibiting trade plus other transactions. Move was taken by Clinton because Taliban were negotiating pipeline deals directly with Pakistan and Turkmenistan without the US.

US starts using their al Qaeda army leader bin Laden as scapegoat for their planned 9/11 attacks

October 15, 1999 Under pressure from the Clinton administration UN Security Council Resolution 1267 imposed sanctions on the Taliban, demanding that the Taliban “turn over the terrorist Usama Bin Laden without further delay…”

October 12, 2000 Clinton orders attack on The USS Cole in the Yemeni port of Aden. Fear and hatred campaign is launched against US formed al Qaeda

Bush administration gearing up for September 11, 2001 attacks

January - Feb 2001 Upon “taking” office, the Bush administration immediately engaged in active negotiations with Taliban representatives with meetings in Washington, DC, Berlin, and Islamabad. During this time the Taliban government hired Laila Helms, niece of former CIA director Richard Helms, as their go-between in negotiations with the US government.

Bush (oil) administration includes:

* Dick Cheney, VP: Until 2000 - President of Halliburton (in position to build the Afghan pipeline).
* Condoleezza Rice, National Security Advisor: 1991-2000 - Manager of Chevron Oil, and Kazakhstan go-between.
* Donald Evans, Sec. Commerce: former CEO, Tom Brown, Inc. (a $1.2 billion oil company).
* Gale Norton, Sec. Interior: former national chairwoman of the Coalition of Republican Environmental Advocates - funded by, among others, BP Amoco.
* Spencer Abraham, Sec. Energy: Up through his failed bid for senatorial reelection in the 2000, he received more oil and gas industry money than all but three other senators (January 1997 through July 2000).
* Thomas White, Secretary of the Army: former Vice Chairman of Enron and a large shareholder of that company’s stock.

US attack on Afghanistan begins before 9/11

May 15, 2001 Regarding the placement of the Unocal Pipeline, a US Official delivered this ultimatum to the Taliban (via the Pakistani delegation acting as their interlocutors): “Either you accept our offer of a carpet of gold, or we bury you under a carpet of bombs.”

July 2001 Niaz Naik, a former Pakistani Foreign Secretary, was told by senior American officials in mid-July that military action against Afghanistan would go ahead by the middle of October.

August 2, 2001 Last meeting with the Taliban (5 weeks before the 9/11/01 attack). Christina Rocca, in charge of Central Asian affairs for US government, met with the Taliban Ambassador to Pakistan (Abdul Salam Zaeef) in Islamabad, at which time Taliban representatives were reminded that the US had provided monetary relief assistance.

Augist 22, 2001 John O’Neill - Deputy director FBI, established national expert on the al-Qaeda network and in charge of that investigation, resigned in protest over the Bush Administration’s obstruction of those investigations. (New Yorker 1/14/02 )

August 23, 2001 John O’Neill accepts position as chief of security, World Trade Center buildings. Electronic security for the World Trade Center was provided by Securacom (now Stratesec), a company initially founded with Kuwaiti capital. Marvin P. Bush, President George W. Bush’s youngest brother served as a Securicom/Stratesec board member from 1993 through 2000.

Bush orders Air Force tanker planes painted to look like AA airlines to fly into World Center Buildings

September 11, 2001 George W Bush orders converted US Air Force fuel tanker planes to fly into World Trade Center Towers. The White House will blame their attack on their own country on US Saudi formed al Qaeda. Inadvertently declaring fifteen of the nineteen hijackers were from Saudi Arabia. John O’Neill, WTC security chief, and former deputy director of the FBI, where he headed investigation of the US link to al-Qaeda, was murdered before those buildings were demolished by explosives laid when Marvin P. Bush was head of security for the World Trade Center buildings.

October 7, 2001 Military operations with aerial bombardment began in Afghanistan targetting all those who could give evidence that the US government planned for and executed the attacks of September 11, 2001. US attacks innocent country to kill all potential witnesses- all members of their US terrorist army al Qaeda.

Jan. 29, 2002 CNN reported: “President Bush personally asked Senate Majority Leader Tom Daschle Tuesday to limit the congressional investigation into the events of 9/11/01”

May 30, 2002 Afghanistan, Pakistan and Turkmenistan agreed to construct a gas pipeline to the subcontinent. US military coup replaces Taliban with Afghan Opium drug warlord Hamid Karzai who had formerly functioned as a Unocal Corporation consultant. Afghanistan pipeline now again under US control.

November 2004 The annual US Government estimate for opium poppy cultivation in Afghanistan was released: approximately 206,700 hectares of poppy were grown in 2004, representing a 239% increase in production over 2003 estimates. March 2001 both the UN and the US drug Enforcement Agency went to Afghanistan an confirmed that the Taliban government had completely wiped out the Opium drug trade as per UN aggreement for international Aid. When Bush took office there was no Opium to be found in Afghanistan but in 2004 there was now 206,700 hectares of Opium growing.

Genesis 1 - In the beginning God created the heaven and the earth. The earth was without form and void, and darkness was upon the face of the deep; and the Spirit of God was moving over the face of the waters. And God said, “Let there be light”; and there was light. And God saw that the light was good; and God separated the light from the darkness. God called the light Day, and the darkness he called Night.

One of the Bible’s most basic teachings is that followers of other gods have been enticed by deceptive spirits who are utterly opposed to the God who created us and loves us. (Romans 1:18-23; 1 Corinthians 10:20; 2 Thessalonians 2:9-12; 1 Timothy 4:1) Even the first two of the ten commandments - have no other gods, make no idols - show that God regards it as a grave offense to become involved in any religion. (Exodus 20:3-4) Religion is defined as A set of beliefs, values, and practices based on the teachings of a spiritual leader. All religions are based on the religion’s congregation following the beliefs, values and practices of their spiritual leader. This is the flaw of every religion. Religions have a mortal being as their spiritual leader even though we are commanded by God to follow no other than he - the one true God. No matter how similar Christian and non-Christian religions are, their truths are laced with errors that entice their devout followers away from the one true God. We despise this biblical revelation because it forces us to make a decision - Do I choose God or do I choose religion. It sounds narrow-minded, but Jesus (not God but the son of God) affirmed that the way to God is narrow, and that few people go that way. (Matthew 7:14) Anyone really sincere, however, will seek truth no matter how unpalatable it seems.

Most religions affirm that Jesus was a great teacher or prophet. You were taught to focus on that great teacher. But by doing so, God will remain a blur. John 3:16 states “For God so loved the world, that He gave His only begotten Son, that whoever believes in Him shall not perish, but have eternal life.” Jesus was sent to us not to teach us to follow him but to be loyal followers of God. This one line of scriptures has been misinterpreted for nearly 2 thousand years. This is the main error of all religions. The actual interpretation is that whoever believes in God shall not perish, but have eternal life. All religions are based on their people believing in the messenger or prophet in lieu of (in place of; instead of) the true sovereign - God. Jesus taught us that the only way to God is not through him (Jesus) but through total unwavering devotion and dedication to God. There is no substitute for God, not even Jesus Christ.

God forbids religion - exodus 20:2-20:17

I am the Lord your God, who brought you out of the land of Egypt, out of the house of slavery; you shall have no other gods before me. You shall not make for yourself an idol, whether in the form of anything that is in heaven above, or that is on the earth beneath, or that is in the water under the earth. You shall not bow down to them or worship them; for I the Lord your God am a jealous God, punishing children for the iniquity of parents, to the third and the fourth generation of those who reject me, but showing steadfast love to the thousandth generation of those who love me and keep my commandments. You shall not make wrongful use of the name of the Lord your God, for the Lord will not acquit anyone who misuses his name.

As a means to gain power and authority over the people of the Earth man (not God) created religion. Religion is their claim to full, supreme, and universal power over their followers. They all claim to be either sent by God (messenger of or prophet), a divine substitute of God and some even claim to be God.

Roman Catholic Church is opposed to God

The Roman Catholic Church is one such religion that falsely claims divine authority. Vicar of Christ (Latin Vicarius Christi) has been used since Pope Gelasius I (served 492 - 496), alongside a few rarer ‘vicarial’ titles, as one of the titles of the Bishop of Rome—the Pope—as head of the Universal Church (see Papal primacy). A vicar is one who represents another and acts as a steward, administering the position held in lieu of the true sovereign. In the Catechism of the Catholic Church, in addition to the pope, each bishop is referred to as the “Christ’s Vicar”(§1560) to their diocese, and the conscience is called “the aboriginal Vicar of Christ.”(§1778).

The Vatican officially teaches that the Pope is the substitute for Christ Jesus, who they believe to be God. The words of the official pronouncement are:

“The Pope, Bishop of Rome and Peter’s successor, ‘is the perpetual and visible source and foundation of the unity both of the bishops and of the whole company of the faithful.’

‘For the Roman Pontiff, by reason of his office as Vicar of Christ, and as pastor of the entire Church has full, supreme, and universal power over the whole Church, a power which he can always exercise.” [Catechism of the Catholic Church, Second Edition (Washington, DC: US Catholic Conference, 1994, 1997) #882.]

[Definition: “vicar”—in the broadest sense means someone who is authorized to act as a substitute or agent for a superior / compare “vicarious”—serving in the place of someone else; assuming the position, place, or office of another person]

The Roman Catholic religion was created by Roman Emperor Constantine. He may have been a ruler of the Romans but there is no mistake - he was a mortal. Constantine was not God. He wasn’t the son of God. He claimed to have spoken to God. He claimed to be a messenger of God. Instead of embracing God he chose to create a religion devoted to Rome. For over 300 hundred years the Romans could not defeat Christ’s teachings to follow only the one true God so Constantine arrived at the conclusion that “If you can’t beat them – join them” or at least make it look like he was one of them.

Islam is opposed to God

Islam (means “to accept, surrender or submit”), the second-largest religion in the world, after Christianity is a monotheistic, Abrahamic religion originating with the teachings of the Islamic prophet Muhammad, a 7th century Arab religious and political figure. Islam means acceptance of and submission to God, and believers must demonstrate this by worshipping him, following his commands, and avoiding polytheism (Polytheism is the belief in or worship of multiple deities, such as gods and goddesses). Others describe Islam as an action of returning to God. This description is in line with the purpose of Jesus Christ and his teachings. He was sent to guide mankind back to God.

As with the Roman Catholic religion Islam was created, not by God, but by a mortal. As with the Roman Catholics they place more importance, belief, value, and devotion towards the messenger and the message than towards God. An adherent of Islam is known as a Muslim, meaning “one who submits”. Muslims believe that God revealed the Qur’an to Muhammad, who they claim to be God’s final prophet, through the angel Gabriel, and regard the Qur’an and the Sunnah (words and deeds of Muhammad a mortal) as the fundamental sources of Islam. The Qur’an states that all Muslims must believe in God, his revelations, his angels, his messengers, and in the “Day of Judgment”. They do not regard Muhammad as the founder of a new religion, but as the restorer of the original monotheistic faith of Abraham, Moses, Jesus, and other prophets. Like the Jews and Roman Catholics, Islam distorted the revelations God gave to these prophets by either altering the text, introducing a false interpretation, or both. They too are in error as they have substituted God with the messenger and a mortal’s message.

Judaism is opposed to God

Judaism is considered either the first or one of the first monotheistic religions, and is among the oldest religious traditions still being practiced today. Many of its texts and traditions are central to the other Abrahamic religions, with Jewish history and the principles and ethics of Judaism having influenced Christianity and Islam, as well as some non-Abrahamic religions. Followers of Judaism, whether converts or born into the Jewish nation (including seculars), are called Jews. The Jewish collective is regarded as an ethnoreligious group, for reasons derived from the sacred texts that define them as a nation, rather than followers of a faith. It was with the formation of Israel in 1948 that Judaism central authority is no longer vested in God, but in sacred texts, religious law and learned rabbis who interpret those texts and laws. No longer are the Jews devoted to God, they are entirely devoted to material gain and have reverted back to worshiping an idol (a cult image), another Golden calf - the State of Israel.

Jews, like the Roman Catholics and the Muslims substituted God for a mortal. They devout themselves not to their faith in God, but to mortals like the Biblical King David of Israel. In his 40 years as ruler, between approximately 1010 and 970 B.C.E., King David united the people of Israel, led them to victory in battle, conquered land and paved the way for his son, Solomon, to build the Holy Temple. Today, Jews pray daily for the coming of the “Messiah, son of David.” The Jews have substituted God for a deceased mortal being named David. The Jews pray for the coming of a descendant of this dead mortal being - son of David. They expect the Messiah to be a descendant of David - not God or the son of God. Jews no longer pray daily to God, they pray to a former king, with blood on his hands, to give them his heir to their new Kindom of Israel. The Jews have elevated David to a god like status every day by offering him prayer. Such idol worship is forbidden by God.

Whether God grants a person eternal life hinges on a single factor. That critical factor, said Jesus, is your willingness to obey God. (John 7:17) Why should God bother to open your eyes to spiritual truth and grant you eternal life if you are unwilling to respond to that truth? Yet few of us are prepared to pay that price. It involves a willingness to relinquish our hopes and dreams for the future, to forego our pet sins and anything else God may ask. Such abandonment seems crazy until we recognize who God is. The God who made and sustains the entire universe is the source of all knowledge, moral goodness and love. That means he is good, he is trustworthy, he has our best interest at heart, he is wiser than us and he loves us more than we love ourselves. Obeying God is the smartest thing anyone could ever do. Until we acknowledge this and are willing to obey, worship and devote ourselves entirely to God, and God only, we will not be granted eternal life.

Most people that I have talked to over the years agree that the US is guilty of war crimes, crimes against peace and crimes against humanity. The majority agree that the US attacked both Afghanistan and Iraq, not out of self-defense but solely as acts of aggression. Not only does the majority believe that what the US did was and is totally wrong but the evidence unequivocally declares that what the US did was and is totally wrong. Neither Afghanistan nor Iraq attacked the US on September 11, 2001. Neither country had anything to with the attacks. The majority of people in the US, Canada, the UK and other NATO countries now believe that the US should, must leave both Afghanistan and Iraq as both wars are deemed by US, Canadian, UK and International law as illegal wars of aggressions, crimes against peace, crimes against humanity and war crimes. What the majority can’t agree on is how does one force the US to end their illegal wars? How does one bring the US leaders who commited these atrocities against mankind to justice? How can there be justice when the criminals who committed these most despicable, most heinous, most vile crimes hold the highest offices of the US government? How can each and every one bring about peace? How? The answer is simple - a peaceful protest, a consumer activism involving the act of voluntarily abstaining from using, buying, or dealing with the United States - in other words a complete boycott of the United States until the US ceases all aggressions against Afghanistan and Iraq. A complete boycott of the United States until the US immediately withdraws from both Afghanistan and Iraq. A complete boycott of the United States until the US people indict, convict and punish the people of the Bush and Obama administration for their crimes.

The Dimona nuclear reactor is the source of plutonium for Israeli nuclear weapons - nuclear reactors secretly built solely for military purposes not peaceful purposes.

Which country in the Middle East has undeclared nuclear weapons…undeclared biological and chemical weapons… and no outside inspection?

Israel’s weapons of mass destruction: how they use them and how they keep the fact of their existence from the world.

An Israeli scholar is being questioned by his country’s military authorities about a book that he wrote on Israel’s nuclear weapons program. Israel government censors refused to allow publication of Avner Cohen’s book “Israel and the Bomb.” So Mr. Cohen went to the United States where the book was published.

The book outlines the Israeli’s ultra secret development of nuclear weapons. Israel’s purpose from the very beginning was to make nuclear weapons. It now accuses Iran of secretly developing nuclear weapons. There is no proof whatsoever that Iran is developing nuclear weapons. Even if they were they should be allowed as they have not made threats of nuclear bombardment as has Israel done repeatedly for the last several years. Israel has openly threatened to nuke Iran. The west took Israel’s threat so seriously that Canada, the US and Russia held an emergency meeting to address Israel’s threat of starting a nuclear war with the nuclear bombing of Iran’s Nuclear Energy Reactors. Israel was guaranteed financial support and military support in exchange for the US, Canada and Russia to pick up where George W Bush and Dick Cheney left off - falsely accusing Iran of developing weapons of mass destruction. It is Israel that has secretly developed both nuclear and biological weapons for the sole intent of military confrontation with its neighbors. Israel is the only country making threats of using a WMD, a nuclear bomb, against its neighbors. Israel is the only country in the Middle East that is actively developing and stock piling nuclear proliferation weapons. Their nuclear program is entirely militarized. Their development of nuclear weapons of mass destruction is clearly not for peaceful purposes. Israel is the only country in the Middle East who has and is attacking its neighbors. Aggression that is deemed by the UN as war crimes.

To this day no country that makes up the UN Security Council has ever tabled sanctions against Israel for their secret development of nuclear and biological weapons. To this day no country, not the US, not Canada, not Russia, not England, has taken any action to stop Israel’s aggression against its neighbors. No country has called for any action against Israel for secretly developing nuclear and biological weapons in violation of international treaties and laws. For Israel’s openly threatening a nuclear bombing of another country.

Israel has repeatedly stated that they have the right to nuke Iran. They do not have any such right. No country has any right to use any nuclear or biological weapons against any other country. Even the US didn’t have the right to drop 2 nuclear bombs on 2 civilian cities. The US secretly developed the bomb and the US is the only country in the World to actually use nuclear weapons against another country yet today a country that doesn’t have the bomb is being accused of apparent crimes against humanity. A country that doesn’t have the bomb is being attacked by countries that actually have the bomb and have used them and have threatened to use them against the World.

The Cold War Era was about the US and the Soviet Union threat of using its nuclear arsenal against each other to get what it wanted. For 60 years they threatened the destroy the World with a Nuclear Armageddon. Logically the threat is from those who have and from those who have used. There is no threat, it’s all hearsay, all false accusations. There is no threat from Iran, the threat is from Israel. The threat is from the US.

Have we not learned a lesson already. The US is making the same accusations against Iran as they did with Iraq. It is now public knowledge that George W Bush falsely accused Iraq of seeking to develop weapons of mass destruction. He committed perjury when he addressed the US Congress and the United Nations about the threat from Iraq, a threat that never existed. The US Congress declaration of war against Iraq was based on the false accusations of George W bush, Dick Cheney, Collen Powell and other Bush administration officials. They falsely accused Iraq of pursuing and developing WMDs, WMDs that have never been found. Need I remind you that Iraq did not attack the US on September 11, 2001. Neither did Afghanistan. There is however evidence that Saudi Arabia and the Israeli Mossad were involved in the 9/11 attacks yet neither countries have ever been brought to justice or attacked by the US for their crimes against the US. bin Laden and the majority of named hijackers were all Saudi Nationals. The Israeli Mossad filmed the air planes that flew into the World Trade Centers. The Israeli Mossad knew the attacks were coming and they were the only ones who have captured the attacks on video. If Israel was the good friends of the US then they would have warned the US instead of filming and applauding the attacks.

The book “Israel and the Bomb” states that in late 1960, the US government came to realize that Israel was constructing in Dimona a large scale nuclear reactor. The uncovering of that Israeli state secret led to various Israeli announcements that Israel had no intention of building Nuclear WMDs. On the 21st of December, 3 days after a New York Times front page story about Israel’s Reactor in Dimona, David Ben Gurion made what is still the only Prime Ministerial speech in the Knesset (Israel’s parliament) about its Nuclear Policies, stating that the Reactor is meant for peaceful uses only.

The Eisenhower administration seemed initially unwilling to pressure Israel about its nuclear facilities, but following the exposure it did demand answers about Israel’s plans. In a meeting with US Ambassador Ogden R Reid, David Ben Gurion stated that the Plutonium from the reactor will be returned to the manufacturing country, that Israel will allow visits of scientists from friendly countries in the reactor, but not international inspections, and that Israel did not plan to construct a third nuclear reactor. He also denied any intentions to construct a nuclear bomb (pp. 130-133).

When John F. Kennedy became the 35th president of the United States, US policy became hostile to Nuclear Proliferation, and Kennedy started a drive that ended in the 1968 Non Proliferation Treaty. Therefore, his policies towards Israel were meant to assure that Israel was not constructing Nuclear weapons. Since Israel was doing just that, the clashes were all but inevitable.

US Scientists started to inspect (the US’s term; Israel preferred “visit”) Dimona in 1961. Despite the US demand for 2 such visits per year, Israel’s duck-and-weave policy never allowed more then one single day visit per year.

The US continued to pressure Israel, especially towards the end of Kennedy’s administration. In April of 1963, Kennedy arranged an unplanned meeting with Shimon Peres, the architect of Israel’s reactor in Dimona and then the deputy minister for defense, in which Peres first articulated (apparently spontaneously) Israel’s formula about Nuclear weapons “Israel will not be the first country to introduce nuclear weapons to the middle east” (p. 159). Towards the end of Ben Gurion’s prime ministry, and Kennedy’s presidency, the ground rules for the “ambiguity” policy of Israel were set: Israel stated that it had no intentions to construct nuclear weapons, and it allowed US visitors, albeit in a lesser frequency then the US desired. Ben Gurion’s resignation and the assassination of Kennedy meant that their predecessors would have to continue, and refine, “ambiguity” as Israel’s policy and US’s response.

The main change in subsequent US-Israeli relationship was Israel’s increased interest in purchasing conventional weapons from the US. Strangely, Israel and the US switched roles in these two dialogues. Regarding Nuclear weapons, the US kept pressuring Israel to allow more inspections, and to authorize the US to share its belief in Israel’s peaceful intentions, while Israel evaded. In the weapons front, Israel kept asking to buy weapons, while the US tried to evade and delay. Neither side wanted to connect the subjects, because Israel was anxious not to disclose its intentions, while the US feared that pressuring Israel by withholding conventional weaponry would only further commit it to the nuclear option (p. 272). Unlike the Kennedy administration, Lyndon Johnson seems to have been willing to accept Israel’s nuclear plans, as long as they were not public. Thus “ambiguity” started to give over to “opacity” (p. 276).

Chiefly, “Opacity” meant the acknowledgement of Israel as a de-facto Nuclear power, provided that Israel made few outspoken references to its nuclear capacities. Late in the Johnson administration, the President was unwilling to tie the sale of Phantom jets to Israel to Israel’s signing the Non-Proliferation Treatment. Israel’s then ambassador to the US, Yitzhak Rabin, defined Israel agreement not to “introduce” nuclear weapons to the Middle East as an agreement not to test it (p. 409). By then Israel clearly possessed nuclear weapons. Under Nixon, the US effectively gave up contesting that definition, and gave up the increasingly embarrassing inspections of the Dimona reactor. On the 18th of July, 1970, the New York Times announced that Israel was a nuclear power, and although both Israel’s official spokespersons and the State Department denounced the article as “speculative” and “inaccurate”, neither denied it (p. 434).

Avner Cohen’s book tells the story of the creation of the Israeli bomb, and the relations between Israel and the US is just one part of this story. Yet it was the Israeli-American relationship that above all defined Israel’s continued policy of Opacity, still intact almost 35 years after that New York Times news story. In the afterwards, Cohen calls for a reconsideration of Israel’s nuclear policy, and is encouraged by the new openness of public discourse about it. Yet even if Israel’s policy was chiefly designed in response to US pressure, the bomb was build because of the Arab-Israeli conflict. In that conflict, it often seems that the more things change, the more they stay the same.

Everyone likes to say, “Hitler did this”, and, “Hitler did that”. But the truth is Hitler did very little. He was a world class tyrant, but the evil actually done by the Third Reich, from the slave-labor camps to WW2 was all done by German citizens who were afraid to question if what they were told by their government was the truth or not, and who because they did not want to admit to themselves that they were afraid to question the government, refused to see the truth behind the Reichstag Fire, refused to see the invasion by Poland was a staged fake, and followed Hitler into national disaster.

The German people of the late 1930s imagined themselves to be brave. They saw themselves as the heroic Germans depicted by the Wagnerian Operas, the descendants of the fierce Germanic warriors who had hunted wild boar with nothing but spears and who had defeated three of Rome’s mightiest legions in the Tuetenberg Forest.

But in truth, by the 1930s, the German people had become civilized and tamed, culturally obsessed with fine details in both science and society. Their self-image of bravery was both salve and slavery. Germans were required to behave as if they were brave, even when they were not.

It’s easy to look back and realize what a jerk Hitler was. But at the time, Hitler looked pretty good to the German people, with the help of the media. He was TIME Magazine’s Man Of The Year in 1938. The German people assumed they were safe from a tyrant. They lived in a Republic, after all, with strict laws regarding what the government could and more importantly could not do. Their leader was a devoutly religious man, and had even sung with the boy’s choir of a monastery in his youth.

The reality was that the German people, as individuals, had lost their courage. The German government preferred it that way as a fearful people are easier to rule than a courageous one. But the German people didn’t wish to lose their self-image of courage. So, when confronted with a situation demanding individual courage, in the form of a government gone wrong, the German people simply pretended that the situation did not exist. And in that simple self-deception lay the ruin of an entire nation and the coming of the second World War.

When the Reichstag burned down, most Germans simply refused to believe suggestions that the fire had been staged by Hitler himself. They were afraid to. But so trapped were the Germans by their belief in their own bravery that they willed themselves to be blind to the evidence before their eyes, so that they could nod in agreement with Der Fuhrer while still imagining themselves to have courage, even as they avoided the one situation which most required real courage; to stand up to Hitler’s lies and deceptions.

When Hitler requested temporary extraordinary powers, powers specifically banned under German law, but powers Hitler claimed he needed to have to deal with the “terrorists”, the German people, having already sold their souls to their self-delusions, agreed. The temporary powers were conferred, and once conferred lasted until Germany itself was destroyed.

When Hitler staged a phony invasion from Poland, the vast majority of the German people, their own self-image dependant on continuing blindness to Hitler’s deceptions, did not question why Poland would have done something so stupid, and found themselves in a war.

But Hitler knew he ruled a nation of cowards, and knew he had to spend the money to make the new war something cowards could fight and win. He decorated his troops with regalia to make them proud of themselves, further trapping them in their self-image. Hitler copied the parade regalia of ancient Rome, to remind the Germans of the defeat of the legions at the Tuetenberg Forest. Talismans were added from orthodox religions and the occult to fill the soldiers with delusions of mystical strengths and an afterlife if they fell in battle. Finally, knowing that it takes courage to kill the enemy face to face, Hitler spent vast sums of money on his wonder weapons, airplanes, submarines, ultra-long range artillery, the world’s first cruise missile and the world’s first guided missile, weapons that could be used to kill at a distance, so that those doing the killing need not have to face the reality of what they were doing.

The German people were lured into WW2 not because they were brave, but because they were cowards who wanted to be seen as brave, and found that shooting long range weapons at people they could not see took less courage than standing up to Hitler. Sent into battle by that false image of courage, the Germans were dependent on their wonder-weapons. When the wonder-weapons stopped working, the Germans lost the war.

The Fourth Reich

The American people imagine themselves to be brave. They see themselves as the heroic Americans depicted by Western Movies, the descendants of the fierce patriot warriors who had tamed the frontier and defeated the might of the British Empire.

But in truth, by the dawn of the third millennium, the American people have become civilized and tamed, culturally obsessed with fine details in both science and society. Their self-image of bravery is both salve and slavery. Americans are required to behave as if they are brave, even when they are not.

The American people assume they are safe. They live in a Republic, after all, with strict laws regarding what the government can and more importantly cannot do. Their leader is a devoutly religious man.

The reality is that the American people, as individuals, have lost their courage. The government prefers it that way as a fearful people are easier to rule than a courageous one. But Americans don’t wish to lose their self-image of courage. So, when confronted with a situation demanding courage, in the form of a government gone wrong, the American people simply pretend that the situation does not exist.

When the World Trade Towers collapsed, most Americans simply refused to believe suggestions that the attacks had been staged by parties working for the US Government itself. Americans were afraid to, even as news reports surfaced proving that the US Government had announced plans for the invasion of Afghanistan early in the year, plans into which the attacks on the World Trade Towers which angered the American people into support of the already-planned war fit entirely too conveniently.

But so trapped are Americans by their belief in their own bravery that they will themselves to be blind to the evidence before their eyes, so that they can nod in agreement with the government while still imagining themselves to have courage, even as they avoid the one situation which most requires real courage; to stand up to the government’s lies and deceptions. The vast majority of the American people, their own self-image dependant on continuing blindness to the government’s deceptions, never question why Afghanistan would have done something so stupid as to attack the United States, and as a result, Americans find themselves in a war.

Immediately after the September 11, 2001 attacks the US Government requested temporary extraordinary powers, powers specifically banned under Constitutional law, but powers the government is claiming they need to have to deal with the “terrorists”. The American people, having already sold their souls to their self-delusions, are agreeing. The temporary powers granted to the Bush administration will be no more temporary in America than they were in Germany.

The US Government knows they rule a nation of cowards. The government has had to spend the money to make the new war something cowards can fight. The government has decorated the troops with regalia to make them proud of themselves, further trapping them in their self-image. Talismans are added from orthodox religions and the occult to fill the soldiers with delusions of mystical strengths and an afterlife if they fall in battle.

Finally, knowing that it takes courage to kill the enemy face to face, the United States government has spent vast sums of money on wonder weapons, airplanes, submarines, ultra-long range artillery, cruise missiles, and guided missiles, weapons that kill at a distance, so that those doing the killing need not have to face the reality of what they are doing.
As mentioned above, Hitler was TIME Magazine’s Man Of The Year in 1938. Stalin was TIME Magazine’s Man Of The Year for 1939 and 1942. Both of these men, and many others also celebrated by the media, were unimaginable monsters. The lesson from these facts is that it isn’t easy to spot a genocidal tyrant when you live with one, especially one whom the press supports and promotes.

Tyrants become obvious only when looking back, after what they have done becomes known. The German people did not stand up to Hitler because their media betrayed them, just as the American media is betraying the American people by willingly, voluntarily, even proudly, abandoning its traditional role as watchdog against government abuse.

It is the very nature of power that it attracts the sort of people who should not have it. The United States, as the world’s last superpower, is a prize that attracts men and women willing to do absolutely anything to win that power, and hence are also willing to do absolutely anything with that power once they have it. If one thinks about it long enough, one will realize that all tyrants, past and most especially present, MUST use deception on their population to initiate a war.

No citizen of a modern industrialized nation will send their children off to die in a war to grab another nation’s resources and assets, yet resources and assets are what all wars are fought over. The nation that wishes to initiate a war of conquest must create the illusion of an attack or a threat to start a war, and must always give their population of cowards an excuse never to question that carefully crafted illusion.

It is naive, not to mention racist to assume that tyrants appear only in other nations and that somehow America is immune simply because we’re Americans. America has escaped the clutches of a dictatorship thus far only through the efforts of those citizens who, unlike the Germans of the 1930s, have the moral courage to stand up and point out where the government is lying to the people.

Unless more Americans are willing to have that kind of individual courage, then future generations may well look back on the American people with the same harshness of judgement with which we look back on the 1930s Germans.

A war of aggression is a military conflict waged absent the justification of self-defense. Waging such a war of aggression is a crime under the customary international law. Wars without international legality (e.g. not out of self-defense, not sanctioned by the United Nations Security Council, and not sanctioned by Article 51 of the Charter of the United Nations) are wars of aggression. The International Military Tribunal at Nuremberg, which followed World War II, called the waging of aggressive war “essentially an evil thing…to initiate a war of aggression…is not only an international crime; it is the supreme international crime, differing only from other war crimes in that it contains within itself the accumulated evil of the whole.”

The Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court refers to the crime of aggression as one of the “most serious crimes of concern to the international community”, and provides that the crime falls within the jurisdiction of the International Criminal Court (ICC).

In 1950, the Nuremberg Tribunal defined Crimes against Peace, in Principle 6, specifically Principle VI(a), submitted to the United Nations General Assembly, as:

(i) Planning, preparation, initiation or waging of a war of aggression or a war in violation of international treaties, agreements or assurances;
(ii) Participation in a common plan or conspiracy for the accomplishment of any of the acts mentioned under (i).

During the trial, the chief American prosecutor, Robert H. Jackson, stated:

To initiate a war of aggression, therefore, is not only an international crime; it is the supreme international crime differing only from other war crimes in that it contains within itself the accumulated evil of the whole.

For committing this crime, the Nuremberg Tribunal sentenced a number of persons responsible for starting World War II. One consequence of this is that nations who are starting an armed conflict must now argue that they are either exercising the right of self-defense, the right of collective defense, or - it seems - the enforcement of the criminal law of jus cogens.

The United Nations Charter

* Article 1:

The Purposes of the United Nations are:

1. To maintain international peace and security, and to that end: to take effective collective measures for the prevention and removal of threats to the peace, and for the suppression of acts of aggression or other breaches of the peace, and to bring about by peaceful means, and in conformity with the principles of justice and international law, adjustment or settlement of international disputes or situations which might lead to a breach of the peace;
2. To develop friendly relations among nations based on respect for the principle of equal rights and self-determination of peoples, and to take other appropriate measures to strengthen universal peace;

* Article 2, paragraph 4

All Members shall refrain in their international relations from the threat or use of force against the territorial integrity or political independence of any state, or in any other manner inconsistent with the Purposes of the United Nations.

Bush confesses to war crimes again during a White House speech on terrorism

George W. Bush’s speech on September 6, 2006, President Bush’s Speech on Terrorism from the White House amounted to a public confession to criminal violations of the 1996 War Crimes Act. He implicitly admitted authorizing disappearances, extrajudicial imprisonment, torture, transporting prisoners between countries and denying the International Committee of the Red Cross access to prisoners.

These are all serious violations of the Geneva Conventions. The War Crimes Act makes grave breaches of the Geneva Conventions and all violations of Common Article 3 punishable by fines, imprisonment or, if death results to the victim, the death penalty.

At the same time, Bush asked Congress to amend the War Crimes Act in order to retroactively protect him and other U.S. officials from prosecution for these crimes, and from civil lawsuits arising from them. He justified this on the basis that “our military and intelligence personnel involved in capturing and questioning terrorists could now be at risk of prosecution under the War Crimes Act . . . ,” and insisted that “passing this legislation ought to be the top priority” for Congress.

The only real beneficiaries of such amendments to the War Crimes Act would be Bush himself and other civilian officials who have assisted him in these crimes — Rumsfeld, Cheney, Gonzales, Rice, Cambone, Tenet, Goss, Negroponte and an unfortunately long list of their deputies and advisors.

The central myth of the Bush administration’s War on Terror is that the world faces an unprecedented threat from terrorism that renders obsolete the existing laws of war and international behavior.

The purpose of the Hague and Geneva Conventions is to provide all people with certain protections in times of war, to place some limits on the otherwise limitless human suffering that war inflicts. Arguably, governments have agreed to rules of war precisely so that they can continue to wage limited war without plunging their societies into the total chaos that would result from unrestricted use of increasingly destructive modern weapons against entire populations. The Geneva Conventions afford different status to different classes of people, giving rise to different protections for combatants, prisoners of war and civilians. However the notion that certain classes of people fall entirely beyond the protection of these Conventions is not a serious interpretation, unless one is talking of something other than human beings.

For eight years, U.S. government officials have justified unlawful actions with political arguments that have no legal merit. Now that the political tide has turned, Bush and his associates have behaved like other war criminals throughout history, marshalling what power they had left to shield themselves from the legitimate consequences of their actions.

There is evidence that America could have had an economic motive for replacing the government in Afghanistan. Did this influence America’s decision to invade Afghanistan and replace the government? The evidence presented below may be sufficient to raise serious questions about the motivations behind U.S. President Bush’s decision to invade Afghanistan, especially in light of Bush’s substantial links with the oil industry. Furthermore, recent reports indicate that the September the 11th disaster, which triggered the “war on terror” military campaign, could have been prevented.

IN 1998 AMERICA WANTED NEW GOVERNMENT IN AFGHANISTAN TO ALLOW CONSTRUCTION OF OIL PIPELINE

America has wanted a new government in Afghanistan since at least 1998, three years before the attacks on 11 September 2001. The official report from a meeting of the U.S. Government’s foreign policy committee on 12 February 1998, available on the U.S. Government website, confirms that the need for a West-friendly government was recognised long before the War on Terror that followed September 11th:

“The U.S. Government’s position is that we support multiple pipelines… The Unocal pipeline is among those pipelines that would receive our support under that policy. I would caution that while we do support the project, the U.S. Government has not at this point recognized any governing regime of the transit country, one of the transit countries, Afghanistan, through which that pipeline would be routed. But we do support the project.”
U.S. House of Reps., “U.S. Interests in the Central Asian Republics”, 12 Feb 1998

“The only other possible route [for the desired oil pipeline] is across, Afghanistan which has of course its own unique challenges.”

“U.S. Interests in the Central Asian Republics”, 12 Feb 1998

“CentGas can not begin construction until an internationally recognized Afghanistan Government is in place.”
“U.S. Interests in the Central Asian Republics”, 12 Feb 1998

The Afghanistan oil pipeline project was finally able to proceed in May 2002. This could not have happened if America had not taken military action to replace the government in Afghanistan.

The war on Afghanistan was sold to the public as a reaction to the attacks on 11 September 2001. However, the war was planned before the infamous 9/11 disaster, and the military action began long before the World Trade Center fell.

The conquest of Afghanistan had been planned since at least 12 February 1998, and 9/11 happened just in time to secure public support for the attacks.

TIMELINE

3rd November 1998 - attacks stop US oil pipeline: Up to 80 cruise missiles were fired at Afghanistan and Sudan in August. An American-funded training project in Afghanistan has closed down as a result of the US cruise missile attack on the country in August. The programme was funded by the American oil company, Unocal, which was once hoping to be involved in building a gas pipeline across the country from Turkmenistan to Pakistan. ~ BBC News, “US attack closes US project”, 3 November 1998.

2nd January 1999 - US strikes targets in Afghanistan: No sooner had the Taliban won a series of victories in the north, than the US launched an attack on camps in Afghanistan run by Saudi dissident Osama bin Laden, who had allegedly masterminded the bombing of US embassies in East Africa. ~ BBC News, “Afghanistan: Campaign of conflict”, 2 January 1999.

15th March 2001 - allies invade Afghanistan: India is believed to have joined Russia, the USA and Iran in a concerted front against Afghanistan’s Taliban regime. Military sources in Delhi, claim that the opposition Northern Alliance’s capture of the strategic town of Bamiyan, was precipitated by the four countries’ collaborative effort. ~ Janes International Security News, “India joins anti-Taliban coalition”, 15 March 2001.

3rd September 2001 - allies deploy huge task-force for “fictional” conflict: The aircraft carrier HMS Illustrious has sailed from Portsmouth to lead the biggest Royal Navy and Royal Marine deployment since the Falklands. HMS Illustrious is the flagship of three groups of warships travelling to the Middle East to take part in exercise “Saif Sareea 2”. More than 24 surface ships from Britain, plus two nuclear submarines, will be completing the 13,000 mile round trip. The operation, costing nearly £100m, will end with a major exercise before Christmas that will also involve the Army, Royal Air Force and Armed Forces of Oman. The strike force has been put together to take part in a conflict between the fictional forces of the so-called state of ‘Alawham’ and those of Oman. ~ BBC News, Carrier heads for the Middle East, 3 September 2001.

11th September 2001 - the war comes home to America: *** 9/11 ***

16th September 2001 - Bush prepares America to wage war overseas: “I want to remind the American people that the prime suspect’s [Osama Bin Laden] organisation is in a lot of countries,” Mr Bush told reporters on the White House lawn. ~ BBC News, “America widens ‘crusade’ on terror”, 16 September 2001.

18th September 2001 - diplomat reveals 9/11 “response” began before 9/11: A former Pakistani diplomat has told the BBC that the US was planning military action against Osama Bin Laden and the Taliban even before last week’s attacks. Niaz Naik, a former Pakistani Foreign Secretary, was told by senior American officials in mid-July that military action against Afghanistan would go ahead by the middle of October. Mr Naik said US officials told him of the plan at a UN-sponsored international contact group on Afghanistan which took place in Berlin. The wider objective, according to Mr Naik, would be to topple the Taliban regime and install a transitional government of moderate Afghans in its place - possibly under the leadership of the former Afghan King Zahir Shah. Mr Naik was told that Washington would launch its operation from bases in Tajikistan, where American advisers were already in place. He was told that Uzbekistan would also participate in the operation and that 17,000 Russian troops were on standby. Mr Naik was told that if the military action went ahead it would take place before the snows started falling in Afghanistan, by the middle of October at the latest. ~ BBC News, “US ‘planned attack on Taliban’”, 18 September 2001.

THE “WAR ON TERROR”: AN EXCUSE TO ADVANCE US ENERGY INTERESTS?

In 1998 US Vice-President Dick Cheney said in a speech to oil industrialists: “I cannot think of a time when we have had a region emerge as suddenly to become as strategically significant as the Caspian” From 1995 until 2000, Cheney served as Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer of Halliburton, a Fortune 500 company and market leader in the energy sector.

Within four years the US military had overthrown the government of Afghanistan, and the construction of the Caspian Sea oil pipeline by US oil corporations had begun.

The ‘war on terror’ is being used as an excuse to further US energy interests in the Caspian. ~ BBC News, “Race to unlock Central Asia’s energy riches”, 29 December 1997.

“American oil companies, together with Pakistan, have shown strong interest in an alternative route that would carry Turkmen gas, via Afghanistan, to the Pakistani port of Karachi.” ~ The Guardian, The new Great Game, 20 October 2003.

In May 2001, the mainstream media widely reported that the new U.S. Bush Administration had awarded the Taliban forty-two million dollars to support the eradication of opium production in Afghanistan. Less well known is the fact that, shortly after taking office, the Bush Administration had quietly resumed negotiations with the Taliban. In an important new book, Bin Laden: The Forbidden Truth (2001), French authors Jean-Charles Brisard and Guillaume Dasquie have revealed that the Bush Administration worked long and hard to “decouple” bin Laden from the Taliban and lay the foundations for U.S. diplomatic recognition and pipelines for oil and natural gas.

Brisard and Dasquie have drawn on numerous sources, including discussions with John O’Neill, the former FBI Deputy Director who retired in July 2001. Ironically, O’Neill then became security director for the World Trade Center, where he died in the September 11 attacks. According to the authors, O’Neill resigned from the FBI because the State Department had continually blocked his investigation into al-Qa’ida’s roots in Saudi Arabia. The authors report that O’Neill bitterly complained about the ability of the U.S. oil companies and their State Department allies to thwart an investigation that might offend the Saudi royal family and jeopardize U.S. economic interests in that country.

Brisard and Dasquie’s account of the negotiations between the Bush Administration and the Taliban between February and August 2001, provides a helpful framework for understanding the eventual U.S. decision to topple the Afghan regime after the tragedy of September 11. The authors have explained that Washington saw the Taliban as a potential partner who could provide stability in Afghanistan and benefit from the construction of pipelines by U.S. corporations. But, in a series of meetings in Washington, Islamabad, and Berlin, U.S. officials demanded that the Taliban surrender bin Laden and invite other Afghan political forces to join their government.

When the Bush government refused to provide proof and evidence that bin Laden was responsible for the attacks on the US on September 11, 2001 (the US FBI could not find any evidence to link bin Laden to 9/11) the Taliban equivocated over and eventually refused the US demands, U.S. officials threatened to take military action against them - a direct violation of the UN Charter Article 2, paragraph 4 “All Members shall refrain in their international relations from the threat or use of force against the territorial integrity or political independence of any state, or in any other manner inconsistent with the Purposes of the United Nations.” . As Brisard revealed in an interview in Paris, at one point in the negotiations, these officials told the Taliban, “Either you accept our offer of a carpet of gold, or we bury you under a carpet of bombs.” As Jonathan Steele and his colleagues reported in the Guardian (”Threat of US strikes passed to Taliban weeks before NY attack,” Sept. 22, 2001), U.S. representatives told Russian, Iranian, and Pakistani diplomats at a mid-July 2001 meeting in Berlin that Washington was seriously contemplating this option. Although these U.S. officials have since denied making such a threat, former Pakistan Foreign Minister Niaz Naik, who was present at the meeting, confirmed their remarks in an interview with the Guardian reporters. Is it a coincidence that the deadliest terrorist attacks in U.S. history occurred just several weeks after negotiations with the Taliban broke down?

When the Taliban and other Afghan groups were formed to fight the Soviet Union war and occupation of Afghanistan US President Reagan (Vice President George H. W. Bush and 16th Deputy Director of the CIA Robert Gates) called them freedom fighters and welcomed them to the US White House. Now that the US is the aggressors and the ones occupying Afghanistan under military force the US Canada and other NATO countries calls those same freedom fighters terrorists and al Qaeda.

You would have to be pretty stupid to not see who the victims are in the US attacks and occupations of Iraq and Afghanistan. That is exactly what everyone in the US, Canada, England, France and other allies of the US are - unbelievably stupid. You are stupid because you cannot see the wrong that the US has done to the people of Afghanistan and Iraq. Do the math stupid. How many Iraqis took part in the hijackings of September 11, 2001? The correct answer is 0. How many Afghanistan citizens took part in the hijackings of 9/11? The correct answer is 0. How many foreign military war planes were used in the attacks of September 11, 2001? The correct answer is 0. What is the nationality of the accused mastermind of 9/11? The correct answer is Saudi Arabia. How many hijackers were from Saudi Arabia? The correct answer is fifteen of the attackers were from Saudi Arabia, two from the United Arab Emirates, one from Egypt, and one from Lebanon. Did the US attack the country that had the mastermind and the majority of hijackers that took part in attacks of September 11, 2001? The correct answer is no. The evidence is overwhelming that Saudi Arabia was the country that planned for and executed the attacks because a member of the Saudi royal family was the mastermind of the attacks and the majority of the hijackers were Saudi and Valerie Plame traced the financing of the 9/11 attacks to the Saudis yet the US went and attacked and now occupy 2 countries that had no part whatsoever in the attacks against the US.

You are all stupid for believing that the Afghan and Iraqi people are terrorists for attacking the US troops who have attacked their country, destroyed their homes and businesses and slaughtered their people. You are stupid for allowing your government to inhumanly torture innocent people whose only crime is defending their country and fellow countrymen from the unlawful war of aggression and occupation of their country. No matter where you go in the World each country has the same duty to protect their country and people from an armed attack from a foreign country. Each and every country have the exact same military code of conduct that bounds their citizens to the duty to defend themselves at all costs, including giving up your life in resistance to an attack and occupation. The United States Army Code of Conduct is duplicated around the World. Read the United States Code of Conduct and substitute the United States with countries like Iraq, Afghanistan, Iran, Syria, Russia, China, Canada or any other country. The duty to fight and guard ones country and way of life is the same in every country in the World. Duty bound to not surrender, to fight on until you are dead, to command others to fight and resist, to be silent when captured is universal because you do so to defend your freedom and your right for you and your countrymen to be free from unlawful attacks and occupations by a foreign military force. The Afghan and Iraqi people are duty bound and have every legal right to defend themselves and their country from the unlawful US attack and occupation of their country. They are not terrorists or the enemy - the US, Canada and other participating NATO countries are the terrorists and the enemy.

If Canada, England or France was attacked by a foreign country, the people of those countries would immediately organize a resistance movement to drive out the attacking military forces. Resistance is the logical and most patriotic duty and action that any citizen can take up when faced with a foreign military occupation of their country. Those who resist attacks and occupation are the ultimate heroes. Taking up arms to defend your country and fellow countrymen is courageous and honorable. Iraqi and Afghanistan citizens are not terrorists they are their country’s heroes - defending their country and countrymen from the unlawful US attacks and occupation. US propaganda labels the resistance as terrorists. US propaganda is used because if the US people realized that the Iraqi and Afghan people are the innocent victims of the Bush administration greed for oil the US would not be in either Iraq or Afghanistan. The US people don’t realize that it is solely the blame of the Bush administration and the Obama administration for the inevitable collapse of the US. The unlawful, unprovoked and unjustified wars of aggression against Iraq and Afghanistan is bankrupting the US.

John McCain: “… after we were able to help the Afghan freedom fighters and drive the Russians out of Afghanistan, we basically washed our hands of the region. Those “freedom fighters” were of course the mujaheddin in Afghanistan waging jihad against the Soviets, including one Osama bin Laden and one Zayman Al Zawahiri. We backed and funded them … we certainly supported the factions fighting alongside him, factions every bit as militantly Islamic as bin Laden–as even the State Department concedes.”

Canada’s JTF2 Black Ops unit delivering prisoners of war from the illegal US wars of aggression to the CIA/US forces for torture. Former Canadian Prime Minister Jean Chretien announced October 7 that the Canadian Armed Forces will join the US war of aggression against Afghanistan. The announcement came only hours after US and British warplanes began bombing Kabul and other Afghan cities. All the opposition parties welcomed Canada’s participation in the war of aggression against Afghanistan, with the exception of the New Democratic Party. NDP leader Alexa McDonough has opposed the US-led assault on Afghanistan, saying that the fight against terrorism should be waged under the aegis of the United Nations - according to the law. The unlawful mission has since been sustained and extended by both the Martin and Harper governments.

Last week the Canadian press revealed that the Canadian military, operating illegally in Afghanistan, are guilty of war crimes for knowing that every Afghan POW (prisoner of war) captured in battle and handed over to US controlled prisons were tortured. The story clearly shows that the Canadian government knew that the POWs were being tortured but ordered that it be kept out of the press. The Canadian government is guilty of war crimes, not only for torture but for simply participating in the US war of aggression against Afghanistan. A war of aggression is a military conflict waged absent the justification of self-defense. Waging such a war of aggression is a crime under the customary international law.

The International Military Tribunal at Nuremberg, which followed World War II, called the waging of aggressive war “essentially an evil thing…to initiate a war of aggression…is not only an international crime; it is the supreme international crime, differing only from other war crimes in that it contains within itself the accumulated evil of the whole.”

The Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court refers to the crime of aggression as one of the “most serious crimes of concern to the international community”, and provides that the crime falls within the jurisdiction of the International Criminal Court (ICC).

In 1945, the London Charter of the International Military Tribunal defined three categories of crimes, including crimes against peace. This definition was first used by Finland to prosecute the political leadership in the War-responsibility trials in Finland. The principles were later known as the Nuremberg Principles.

Former leaders of Hitler’s Third Reich were put on trial in Nuremberg, Germany at the end of WWII for the very same crimes that are now being committed by the US, Canada and NATO. The Nuremberg trial was conducted by a joint United States-British-French-Soviet military tribunal, with each nation supplying two judges. Leaders of Hitler’s Third Reich faced four counts of indictment:

Count 1 - CONSPIRACY to commit crimes alleged in the next three counts.

Count 2 - CRIMES AGAINST PEACE including planning, preparing, starting, or waging aggressive war.

Count 3 - WAR CRIMES including violations of laws or customs of war.

Count 4 - CRIMES AGAINST HUMANITY including murder, extermination, enslavement, persecution on political or racial grounds, involuntary deportment, and inhumane acts against civilian populations.

All four counts apply to the military actions of the US, Canada and NATO against Afghanistan and it’s people. In 1950, the Nuremberg Tribunal defined Crimes against Peace, in Principle 6, specifically Principle VI(a), submitted to the United Nations General Assembly, as:

(i) Planning, preparation, initiation or waging of a war of aggression or a war in violation of international treaties, agreements or assurances;
(ii) Participation in a common plan or conspiracy for the accomplishment of any of the acts mentioned under (i).

U.S. Code
TITLE 18 > PART I > CHAPTER 118 > § 2441

§ 2441. War crimes

(a) Offense.— Whoever, whether inside or outside the United States, commits a war crime, in any of the circumstances described in subsection (b), shall be fined under this title or imprisoned for life or any term of years, or both, and if death results to the victim, shall also be subject to the penalty of death.

(b) Circumstances.— The circumstances referred to in subsection (a) are that the person committing such war crime or the victim of such war crime is a member of the Armed Forces of the United States or a national of the United States (as defined in section 101 of the Immigration and Nationality Act).

(c) Definition.— As used in this section the term “war crime” means any conduct—
(1) defined as a grave breach in any of the international conventions signed at Geneva 12 August 1949, or any protocol to such convention to which the United States is a party;
(2) prohibited by Article 23, 25, 27, or 28 of the Annex to the Hague Convention IV, Respecting the Laws and Customs of War on Land, signed 18 October 1907;
(3) which constitutes a grave breach of common Article 3 (as defined in subsection (d)) when committed in the context of and in association with an armed conflict not of an international character; or
(4) of a person who, in relation to an armed conflict and contrary to the provisions of the Protocol on Prohibitions or Restrictions on the Use of Mines, Booby-Traps and Other Devices as amended at Geneva on 3 May 1996 (Protocol II as amended on 3 May 1996), when the United States is a party to such Protocol, willfully kills or causes serious injury to civilians.

(d) Common Article 3 Violations.—
(1) Prohibited conduct.— In subsection (c)(3), the term “grave breach of common Article 3” means any conduct (such conduct constituting a grave breach of common Article 3 of the international conventions done at Geneva August 12, 1949), as follows:
(A) Torture.— The act of a person who commits, or conspires or attempts to commit, an act specifically intended to inflict severe physical or mental pain or suffering (other than pain or suffering incidental to lawful sanctions) upon another person within his custody or physical control for the purpose of obtaining information or a confession, punishment, intimidation, coercion, or any reason based on discrimination of any kind.
(B) Cruel or inhuman treatment.— The act of a person who commits, or conspires or attempts to commit, an act intended to inflict severe or serious physical or mental pain or suffering (other than pain or suffering incidental to lawful sanctions), including serious physical abuse, upon another within his custody or control.
(C) Performing biological experiments.— The act of a person who subjects, or conspires or attempts to subject, one or more persons within his custody or physical control to biological experiments without a legitimate medical or dental purpose and in so doing endangers the body or health of such person or persons.
(D) Murder.— The act of a person who intentionally kills, or conspires or attempts to kill, or kills whether intentionally or unintentionally in the course of committing any other offense under this subsection, one or more persons taking no active part in the hostilities, including those placed out of combat by sickness, wounds, detention, or any other cause.
(E) Mutilation or maiming.— The act of a person who intentionally injures, or conspires or attempts to injure, or injures whether intentionally or unintentionally in the course of committing any other offense under this subsection, one or more persons taking no active part in the hostilities, including those placed out of combat by sickness, wounds, detention, or any other cause, by disfiguring the person or persons by any mutilation thereof or by permanently disabling any member, limb, or organ of his body, without any legitimate medical or dental purpose.
(F) Intentionally causing serious bodily injury.— The act of a person who intentionally causes, or conspires or attempts to cause, serious bodily injury to one or more persons, including lawful combatants, in violation of the law of war.

The law of war is a body of law concerning acceptable justifications to engage in war (jus ad bellum) and the limits to acceptable wartime conduct (jus in bello). The law of war is considered an aspect of public international law (the law of nations) and is distinguished from other bodies of law, such as the domestic law of a particular belligerent to a conflict, that may also provide legal limits to the conduct or justification of war.

Among other issues, modern laws of war address declarations of war, acceptance of surrender and the treatment of prisoners of war, military necessity along with distinction and proportionality, and the prohibition of certain weapons that may cause unnecessary suffering.

Laws of war are intended to mitigate the evils of war by:

* Protecting both combatants and noncombatants from unnecessary suffering;
* Safeguarding certain fundamental human rights of persons who fall into the hands of the enemy, particularly prisoners of war, the wounded and sick, and civilians;
* Facilitating the restoration of peace - We are in year 8 of this war of aggression, the most evil of all war, against a country that did not attack and were not involved in any way in the attacks in the US on September 11, 2001 or any other country before then and since then.

Declaration of war

In the United States, only Congress which makes the rules for the military has the power under the Constitution to “declare War” . Declarations have the force of law and are intended to be executed by a Commander in Chief when called into actual service. The last time United States passed a bill with the title “Declaration of War” was in 1942, against Romania. Since then, the United States Congress has never declared war against any country. The US has never “legally” declared war against Afghanistan nor Iraq. The US government has only used the term “Authorization to use Military Force”. The fact that war was never declared against Afghanistan means that the war is illegal as it does not have the force of law. The US, Canada and NATO never declared war when they attacked Afghanistan. Their attack and occupation does not have the force of law. “Authorization to use military Force” is a gross usurpation of the United Constitution as Article Six establishes the United States Constitution and the laws and treaties of the United States made in accordance with it as the supreme law of the land. The US is member of the United Nations and as such is legally required to abide by and adhere to the UN Charter. Article 2 of the UN Charter strictly forbids all signing members making threats or using force against the territorial integrity or political independence of any state.

All Members shall refrain in their international relations from the threat or use of force against the territorial integrity or political independence of any state, or in any other manner inconsistent with the Purposes of the United Nations.

The illegal war of aggression against Afghanistan

Despite what the US, Canadian and NATO leaders claim the United Nations never authorized the use of military force against either Afghanistan or Iraq. No such authorization could ever be given to any country because the UN Charter (an International treaty) states that it is illegal to threat or use of force against the territorial integrity or political independence of any state.

The UN Security Council issued two resolutions in 2001 in regards to Afghanistan. The first one that was issued concerning Afghanistan was less than 2 months before the 9/11 attacks - United Nations Security Council Resolution 1363. Adopted unanimously by the Security Council at its 4352nd meeting, on 30 July 2001. It is this resolution that George W Bush fraudulent claims that the UN authorized use of military force against Afghanistan. The September 11, 2001 attacks had not even occurred yet. July 30 2001, according to everyone’s calendar, is 43 days before September 11, 2001. Nowhere in this resolution does it authorize use of force by any country. The next UN Security Council Resolution concerning Afghanistan occurs a month after the US, Canada and NATO attacks the innocent country of Afghanistan - Security Council resolution 1378. Adopted unanimously by the Security Council at its 4415th meeting, on 14 November 2001. Again there is no mention of allowing the US or any other country to use military force against Afghanistan. All UN Security Council Resolution for 2001 can be found at the following link: http://www.un.org/docs/scres/2001/sc2001.htm. Nowhere is there any mention of allowing military force against Afghanistan. In fact United Nations Security Council Resolution 1366, Adopted unanimously by the Security Council at its 4360th meeting, on 30 August 2001, reaffirms the role of the Security Council in the prevention of armed conflicts - “Reiterating the purposes and principles enshrined in the Charter of the United Nations and reaffirming its commitment to the principles of the political independence, sovereign equality and territorial integrity of all States,”

Legal Afghan Resistance and illegal US Unlawful Combatants

During conflict, punishment for violating the laws of war may consist of a specific, deliberate and limited violation of the laws of war in reprisal. Soldiers who break specific provisions of the laws of war lose the protections and status afforded as prisoners of war, but only after facing a “competent tribunal” (GC III Art 5). At that point they become an unlawful combatant but they must still be “treated with humanity and, in case of trial, shall not be deprived of the rights of fair and regular trial”, because they are still covered by GC IV Art 5. According to the laws of war soldiers become unlawful combatants when they break specific provisions of the laws of war. The US fraudulently declares the Afghan resistance which are fighting in self-defense from the US unlawful war of aggression as unlawful combatants. The Afghan Taliban and other resistance groups are not breaking any laws. The Afghan Taliban and other resistance groups are the only ones operating within the law as their fight is one of self-defense. The Taliban and other resistance groups are killing US, Canadian and NATO troops legally. They are the ones being unlawfully attacked by US, Canadian and NATO troops. They, the Taliban and the Afghan resistance, are defending their country and their fellow countrymen from the unlawful war of aggression, crimes against peace, war crimes against humanity that are being committed on a daily basis by the US, Canada and NATO.

Self-defense is the act of defending oneself, one’s property or the well-being of another from physical harm. In the United States, the defense of self-defense allows a person attacked to use reasonable force in their own defense and the defense of others. A person may use physical force to prevent imminent physical injury, however a person may not use deadly physical force unless that person is in reasonable fear of serious physical injury or death.

Canadian Criminal Code, Sections 34-37

34. (1) Every one who is unlawfully assaulted without having provoked the assault is justified in repelling force by force if the force he uses is not intended to cause death or grievous bodily harm and is no more than is necessary to enable him to defend himself.

(2) Every one who is unlawfully assaulted and who causes death or grievous bodily harm in repelling the assault is justified if
(a) he causes it under reasonable apprehension of death or grievous bodily harm from the violence with which the assault was originally made or with which the assailant pursues his purposes; and
(b) he believes, on reasonable grounds, that he cannot otherwise preserve himself from death or grievous bodily harm.

The US, Canada and NATO are attacking the Afghan people and their legal Taliban governing body on a daily basis since October 7, 2001. The Afghan people and the Taliban are acting in legal self-defense of themselves and the defense of their country and fellow countrymen. The Afghan people and the Taliban are forced every day to use deadly physical force in defense from the unlawful life threatening daily attacks by US, Canadian and NATO forces. According to US, Canadian and International Law the US, Canadian and NATO leadership are guilty of War Crimes, Crimes against Peace, Crimes against Humanity, Murder and Torture.

War crimes are “violations of the laws or customs of war”; including murder, the ill-treatment or deportation of civilian residents of an occupied territory, the murder or ill-treatment of prisoners of war, the killing of hostages, the wanton destruction of cities, towns and villages, and any devastation not justified by military, or civilian necessity.

The term crimes against humanity has come to mean anything atrocious committed on a large scale. The term originated in the 1907 Hague Convention preamble, which codified the customary law of armed conflict. This codification was based on existing State practices that derived from those values and principles deemed to constitute the “laws of humanity,” as reflected throughout history in different cultures.

After World War I, the Allies, in connection with the Treaty of Versailles, established in 1919 a commission to investigate war crimes that relied on the 1907 Hague Convention as the applicable law.

In 1945, the United States and other Allies developed the Agreement for the Prosecution and Punishment of the Major War Criminals of the European Axis and Charter of the International Military Tribunal (IMT), sitting at Nuremberg, which contained the following definition of crimes against humanity in Article 6(c):

“Crimes against humanity: murder, extermination, enslavement, deportation, and other inhumane acts committed against civilian populations, before or during the war; or persecutions on political, racial or religious grounds in execution of or in connection with any crime within the jurisdiction of the Tribunal, whether or not in violation of the domestic law of the country where perpetrated.”

The list of the specific crimes contained within the meaning of crimes against humanity has been expanded since Article 6(c) of the IMT to include, in the ICTY and the ICTR, rape and torture. The statute of the ICC also expands the list of specific acts. In particular, the ICC statute adds the crimes of enforced disappearance of persons and apartheid. Further, the ICC statute contains clarifying language with respect to the specific crimes of extermination, enslave- ment, deportation or forcible transfer of population, torture, and forced pregnancy.

To some extent, crimes against humanity overlap with genocide and war crimes. But crimes against humanity are distinguishable from genocide in that they do not require an intent to “destroy in whole or in part,” as cited in the 1948 Genocide Convention, but only target a given group and carry out a policy of “widespread or systematic” violations. Crimes against humanity are also distinguishable from war crimes in that they not only apply in the context of war—they apply in times of war and peace.

Crimes against humanity have existed in customary international law for over half a century and are also evidenced in prosecutions before some national courts.

All States can exercise their jurisdiction in prosecuting a war crimes perpetrator irrespective of where the crime was committed. It also means that all States have the duty to prosecute or extradite, that no person charged with that crime can claim the “political offense exception” to extradition, and that States have the duty to assist each other in securing evidence needed to prosecute. But of greater importance is the fact that no perpetrator can claim the “defense of obedience to superior orders” and that no statute of limitation contained in the laws of any State can apply. Lastly, no one is immune from prosecution for such crimes, even a head of State.

Guantanamo Bay - The US War Crimes Central

Guantanamo Bay is an illegal detainment facility located in Cuba. The facility is operated by Joint Task Force Guantánamo of the United States government since 2002 in Guantánamo Bay Naval Base, which is on the shore of Guantánamo Bay, Cuba. In 2001, President George W. Bush signed an executive order that stipulated (without legal authority) that the US military could indefinitely detain any non-citizen who was believed to be involved in international terrorism. After the US Justice Department ill-advised that the Guantanamo Bay Detention Camp could be considered outside US legal jurisdiction, prisoners of war captured in Afghanistan and civilians kidnapped by the US government (CIA rendition flights) were moved there beginning in early 2002. After the Bush administration unlawfully asserted that detainees were not entitled to any of the protections of the Geneva Conventions, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled in Hamdan v. Rumsfeld on June 29, 2006 that they were entitled to the protections listed under Common Article 3 of the Geneva Conventions. Following this, on July 7, 2006, the Department of Defense issued an internal memo stating that prisoners would in the future be entitled to protection under Common Article 3. No future date has ever been stated meaning the US government continues to violate the law in regards to handling prisoners of war - a war crime.

Guantanamo Bay is the symbol of the United States’ war crimes and crimes against humanity. It contains all the concrete evidence to successfully indict and convict top US government officials including George W bush, Dick Cheney, Donald Rumsfeld, Condoleezza Rice, Robert Gates, George Tenet, Joe Biden and Barack Obama for war crimes, crimes against humanity and crimes against peace. Guantanamo Bay is the United States’ War Crimes Central. It was created in violation of international laws and treaties. It was created by the US government under George W Bush in direct violation of international law. Everyone who has ever worked there or is now working there can be charged with war crimes because the facility contains civilians and prisoners of war who were captured in battle or kidnapped from their homes and illegally deported to the US detainment facility - Guantanamo Bay.

Individual or mass deportations of civilians and or POWs are war crimes and crimes against humanity as defined at the Nuremberg Tribunals following World War II, and war crimes under the 1949 Geneva Conventions. If there is enormous loss of life, deportation may constitute genocide, namely the intent to kill or injure, in whole or in part, a national, ethnic, racial, or religious group, according to legal scholar Alfred de Zayas of Rutgers University.

The Fourth Geneva Convention of 1949 explicitly forbids deportations in conditions of war. “Individual or mass forcible transfers, as well as deportations of protected persons from occupied territory to the territory of the Occupying Power or to that of any other country, occupied or not, are prohibited, regardless of their motive.” Also forbidden is the common practice of the occupying power deporting or transferring parts of its own civilian population into the territory it occupies. The convention allows the “total or partial evacuation” of any area where either “the security of the population or imperative military reasons” require, even outside the occupied territory, “when for material reasons it is impossible to avoid such displacement,” but the evacuated civilians must be returned to their homes “as soon as hostilities in the area have ceased.”

Guantanamo Bay has from the very beginning been created to usurp US law and International law. The US Justice Department knew that Guantanamo Bay was and is illegal and that is why the US government build it on Cuban soil, not on US soil. They asserted that since it wasn’t legally on US soil POWs and illegally kidnapped civilians would not be not entitled to any of the protections of the Geneva Conventions but most importantly the US government would not be accountable for and would not be indicted, nor punished, for the crimes they commit at Guantanamo Bay, in direct violation of both US and International Law. They are wrong. The US government is accountable for their crimes. US Law states:

Whoever, whether inside or outside the United States, commits a war crime, in any of the circumstances described in subsection (b), shall be fined under this title or imprisoned for life or any term of years, or both, and if death results to the victim, shall also be subject to the penalty of death. ~
US Code TITLE 18 > PART I > CHAPTER 118 > § 2441 War crimes

Apart from the gross violation of International Laws and Treaties (deportation of civilian of an occupied territory, torture, the killing of hostages and the murder or ill-treatment of prisoners of war) by the US government, the US law that the US government is guilty of in regards to Guantanamo Bay is kidnapping. In criminal law, kidnapping is the taking away or asportation of a person against the person’s will, usually to hold the person in false imprisonment, a confinement without legal authority.

The majority of prisoners held illegally in Guantanamo Bay are civilians. The majority of prisoners are not terrorists but civilians that the US government ordered the CIA to kidnap and deport to illegal detainment facilities including Guantanamo Bay. The majority of prisoners are civilians who were ordered kidnapped because the US government had no evidence to legally arrest them and the US government lacked the necessary evidence to legally extradite them. Extradition is the official process whereby one nation or state requests and obtains from another nation or state the surrender of a suspected or convicted criminal. Between nation states, extradition is regulated by treaties. Where extradition is compelled by laws kidnapping is a direct violation of the law. The consensus in international law is that a state does not have any obligation to surrender an alleged criminal to a foreign state as one principle of sovereignty is that every state has legal authority over the people within its borders. The United States attacked Afghanistan after the Afghan Taliban government exercised this legal sovereign right and legal authority over the people within Afghanistan’s border. The US violated both US and International laws when they attacked Afghanistan - meaning that according to the law the US attack on Afghanistan was and is to this day illegal. According to International Law the Taliban and the state of Afghanistan did not have any legal obligation to surrender an alleged criminal (bin Laden) to a foreign state (the United States).

Because of international law and treaties the George W bush ordered the CIA to commence the “Extraordinary rendition” of anyone opposed to the illegal US policies - mainly Afghanistan and Iraq or any alleged criminal(s) the US government wanted but could not extradite legally. “Extraordinary rendition” is an extrajudicial procedure and policy of the United States in which suspects, generally civilians the US government claim (without evidence) are terrorists or supporters of terrorist organizations, are deported illegally to countries for imprisonment and interrogation (tortured). The procedure differs from extradition as the purpose of the rendition is to illegally extract information from suspects using torture, while extradition is used to legally return fugitives so that they can stand trial or fulfill their sentence. The CIA Extraordinary rendition of suspects to other countries circumvents U.S. laws prescribing due process and prohibiting torture. Guantanamo Bay is a US government facility that is used to circumvent US laws. It is a US government facility where the US government has willingly and willfully committed war crimes. The following is what the United States considers to be “War Crimes”. The US government is unequivocally guilty of war crimes - according to the following US law.

US Code
TITLE 18 > PART I > CHAPTER 118 > § 2441 War crimes

Definition.— As used in this section the term “war crime” means any conduct—
(1) defined as a grave breach in any of the international conventions signed at Geneva 12 August 1949, or any protocol to such convention to which the United States is a party;
(2) prohibited by Article 23, 25, 27, or 28 of the Annex to the Hague Convention IV, Respecting the Laws and Customs of War on Land, signed 18 October 1907;
(3) which constitutes a grave breach of common Article 3 (as defined in subsection (d)) when committed in the context of and in association with an armed conflict not of an international character;…

(d) Common Article 3 Violations.—

(1) Prohibited conduct.— In subsection (c)(3), the term “grave breach of common Article 3” means any conduct (such conduct constituting a grave breach of common Article 3 of the international conventions done at Geneva August 12, 1949), as follows:

(A) Torture.— The act of a person who commits, or conspires or attempts to commit, an act specifically intended to inflict severe physical or mental pain or suffering (other than pain or suffering incidental to lawful sanctions) upon another person within his custody or physical control for the purpose of obtaining information or a confession, punishment, intimidation, coercion, or any reason based on discrimination of any kind.

(B) Cruel or inhuman treatment.— The act of a person who commits, or conspires or attempts to commit, an act intended to inflict severe or serious physical or mental pain or suffering (other than pain or suffering incidental to lawful sanctions), including serious physical abuse, upon another within his custody or control.

(D) Murder.— The act of a person who intentionally kills, or conspires or attempts to kill, or kills whether intentionally or unintentionally in the course of committing any other offense under this subsection, one or more persons taking no active part in the hostilities, including those placed out of combat by sickness, wounds, detention, or any other cause.

(F) Intentionally causing serious bodily injury.— The act of a person who intentionally causes, or conspires or attempts to cause, serious bodily injury to one or more persons, including lawful combatants, in violation of the law of war.

(G) Rape.— The act of a person who forcibly or with coercion or threat of force wrongfully invades, or conspires or attempts to invade, the body of a person by penetrating, however slightly, the anal or genital opening of the victim with any part of the body of the accused, or with any foreign object.

(H) Sexual assault or abuse.— The act of a person who forcibly or with coercion or threat of force engages, or conspires or attempts to engage, in sexual contact with one or more persons, or causes, or conspires or attempts to cause, one or more persons to engage in sexual contact.

(I) Taking hostages.— The act of a person who, having knowingly seized or detained one or more persons, threatens to kill, injure, or continue to detain such person or persons with the